ABSTRACT
Objective:To retrospectively identify the risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)in the obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG).Methods:The medical records from the obese patients who underwent elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy from January 2018 to July 2022 were retrospectively collected. PONV was defined according to the use of remedial antiemetics in the nursing record sheet, and the patients were divided into PONV group and non-PONV group according to the occurrence of PONV that required treatment. The logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for PONV after LSG.Results:A total of 1 264 obese patients were included in this study, and there were 263 patients in PONV group, and the incidence of PONV was 20.81%. According to the results of multifactorial logistic regression analysis, female( OR=1.533, 95% CI 1.007-2.334, P=0.046), higher level of serum alanine aminotransferase concentrations ( OR=1.006, 95% CI 1.002-1.009, P=0.001), higher level of C-reactive protein ( OR=1.013, 95% CI 1.005-1.022, P=0.001), general anesthesia combined with nerve block (general anesthesia combined with TAPB: OR=2.737, 95% CI 1.817-4.121, P<0.001; general anesthesia combined with other nerve block: OR=1.899, 95% CI 1.249-2.889, P=0.003) and intraoperative use of sufentanil ( OR=2.114, 95% CI 1.308-3.415, P=0.002) were independent risk factors for PONV( P<0.05). However, the higher level of serum follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations ( OR=0.941, 95% CI 0.895-0.988, P=0.015), intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine ( OR=0.640, 95% CI 0.417-0.982, P=0.041), and administration of prophylactic antiemetic medication (antiemetic drugs during operation OR=0.669, 95% CI 0.469-0.955, P=0.027; antiemetic drugs after operation OR=0.303, 95% CI 0.182-0.503, P<0.001; antiemetic drugs during and after operation OR=0.215, 95% CI 0.107-0.434, P<0.001) were protective factors for PONV. Conclusions:Female, higher levels of serum alanine aminotransferase and C-reactive protein, general anesthesia combined with nerve block and intraoperative use of sufentanil are independent risk factors for PONV, while higher levels of follicle-stimulating hormone, intraoperative use of dexmedetomidine and administration of prophylactic antiemetic medication are protective factors for PONV among obese patients undergoing LSG.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To compare the setup accuracy between Catalyst HD and skin markers in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung cancer.@*Methods@#A total of 24 cases treated with SBRT were selected and all patients were fixed with vacuum pad in the supine position. Patients in group A were positioned by Catalyst HD and those in group B were positioned by shin markers. All patients were matched with the CT images after CBCT scan by rigid registration and the setup errors in six directions (x-, y-, z-axis, Rtn, Pitch and Roll) were obtained.@*Results@#The mean±SD in group A and B in the six directions were as follows: (0.13±0.12) cm, (0.25± 0.19) cm; (0.26±0.15) cm, (0.13±0.11) cm; (0.23±0.19) cm, (0.35±0.29) cm; (0.43°±0.40°), (0.80°±0.69°); (0.48°±0.47°), (0.79°±0.64°); (0.62°±0.60°) and (0.88°±0.70°), respectively. Except the x-axis data in group B, all the data in the six directions were not normally distributed. The obtained data significantly differed between two groups (all P<0.05). The out-of-tolerance errors (>0.5 cm/2°) also significantly differed between two groups (P<0.05).@*Conclusions@#The setup errors of Catalyst HD are less than those of the skin markers (except the y-axis). The setup accuracy of Catalyst HD is superior to that of traditional skin markers, which is worthy of application in clinical practice.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the setup accuracy between Catalyst HD and skin markers in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung cancer.Methods A total of 24 cases treated with SBRT were selected and all patients were fixed with vacuum pad in the supine position.Patients in group A were positioned by Catalyst HD and those in group B were positioned by shin markers.All patients were matched with the CT images after CBCT scan by rigid registration and the setup errors in six directions (x-,y-,z-axis,Rtn,Pitch and Roll) were obtained.Results The mean ±SD in group A and B in the six directions were as follows:(0.13±0.12) cm,(0.25± 0.19) cm;(0.26±0.15) cm,(0.13±0.11) cm;(0.23±0.19) cm,(0.35±0.29) cm;(0.43°±0.40°),(0.80°±0.69°);(0.48°±0.47°),(0.79°±0.64°);(0.62°±0.60°) and (0.88°±0.70°),respectively.Except the x-axis data in group B,all the data in the six directions were not normally distributed.The obtained data significantly differed between two groups (all P＜0.05).The out-of-tolerance errors (＞0.5 cm/2°) also significantly differed between two groups (P＜0.05).Conclusions The setup errors of Catalyst HD are less than those of the skin markers (except the y-axis).The setup accuracy of Catalyst HD is superior to that of traditional skin markers,which is worthy of application in clinical practice.