ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the values of 3D-SPACE sequence and 2D-TSE sequence for displaying the anatomical details of the sinus tarsi ligament of the ankle.Methods 1.5T Siemens Auanto MRI scanner and 8-channel skull phased array coil were used for the examination of 26 healthy volunteers with 3D-SPACE three-dimensional isotropic sectional scanning as well as 2D-T1WI-TSE transverse and 2D-T2WI-TSE coronal sagittal two-dimensional fast spin echo scan.Two senior MRI radiologists evaluated the display rates of the two sequences for the cervical ligament of sinus tarsi and talus ligament so as to determine the values of the two sequences for displaying the cervical ligament of sinus tarsi.Results 3D-SPACE sequence behaved significantly better than 2D sequence when used to display the sinus tarsi ligament (P＜0.05),and the display rates were statistically different at different positions (P＜0.05).3D-SPACE sequence gained obvious advantages over 2D conventional TSE sequence when used to display the cervical ligament of sinus tarsi and talus ligament,and the highest display rate occurred in case of the cervical ligament of sinus tarsi scanned with 3D-SPACE coronal view and in case of the talus ligament scanned at coronal and sagittal positions.Conclusion 3D-SPACE sequence can display clearly the anatomical details of the sinus tarsi ligament with multiplanar reconstruction,curved planar reformation and etc,and thus is worthy promoting clinically.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the imaging quality of articular cartilage of the knee with 3D-sampling perfection with applica-tion optimized contrast using different flip angle evolutions (3D-SPACE),3D-true fast imaging with steady-state precession (3D-True FISP)and 2D-fast-spin-echo-proto-density(2D-FSE-PD)sequences.Methods 40 healthy volunteers and 20 patients of knee joints were examined with 3D-SPACE,3D-True FISP and 2D-FSE-PD sequences at 1.5T MRI.Signal-noise ratio (SNR),contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)and lesion visualization of articular cartilage were compared.Results 3D-SPACE showed the highest SNR of cartilage and CNR of fluid/cartilage among the three sequences (P <0.05).3D-SPACE had the better capability for showing the lev-el I 、level Ⅱcartilage injury comparing with 3D-True FISP,but no significant difference between the cartilage injury at level Ⅲ and level Ⅳ.For all levels of cartilage injury,3D sequence was better than the 2D sequence.Conclusion Compared with the 3D-True FISP sequence and 2D-FSE-PD sequence,3D-SPACE sequence can show the structure of knee and knee cartilage injury better.