Biomechanical Study on Contiguous Three-Level Cervical Hybrid Surgery and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion / 医用生物力学

Objective To compare the biomechanical effects of contiguous three-level cervical Hybrid surgery[anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) + cervical disc arthroplasty ( CDA)] and three-level ACDF. Methods The finite element model of C1-T1 cervical-thoracic spine was developed based on CT data. Three models were simulated by the implantation of Prestige LP and Zero-P prostheses, including two Hybrid models (AFA, Prestige LP implanted at C3-4 and C5-6 segments and Zero-P implanted at C4-5 segment; FAF, Zero-P implanted at C3-4 and C5-6 segments and Prestige LP implanted at C4-5 segment) and three-level ACDF model(FFF). The changes in range of motion (ROM) of adjacent levels during flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation, the overall ROM, as well as the intradiscal pressure ( IDP) and facet contact force ( FCF) of adjacent levels were compared. Results The ROM in adjacent levels and the overall ROM of the AFA modelwere closer to the intact model, and the maximum increases in the ROM of the adjacent levels for the FAF and FFF models were 15. 0% and 23. 4% , respectively. For AFA, FAF and FFF models, the maximum increases in the maximum IDP of adjacent levels were 19. 0% , 66. 7% , 147. 6% , and the maximum increases in FCF were 17. 4% , 55. 7% , 80. 1% , respectively. Conclusions This study provides biomechanical basis for three-level cervical Hybrid surgery in treating patients with the contiguous three-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Study of clinical outcome following cervical spine surgery: prognostic indicators

Background: Cervical spine surgeries done through anterior approach and posterior approach. Anterior approach is preferred in degenerative conditions and cervical spine injury. Posterior approach preferred in pathological conditions like intra dural extra tumor. Our study is to analyse the functional outcome and recovery of patients who undergone cervical spine surgeries by anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by bone graft with or without instrumentation, anterior cervical decompression by corpectomy and fusion and posterior cervical decompression by laminectomy.Methods: This cross-sectional study contains patients admitted in Surgery Department, Gandhi Medical College and Hamidia Hospital, Bhopal between July 2017 to April 2019 with degenerative disease/trauma/pathological (tumor) having neurological deficit or not, to know the clinical outcome after cervical spine surgeries anterior approach and posterior approach after approval from ethical committee.Results: In 70 cases of study 09 patients had mild preoperative neurology score (15-17) in which 3 patients had no improvement after 6 months and 06 patients improved (normal function). 39 patients had moderate preoperative neurology score (12-14) in which 28 patients improved with moderate to mild score and 03 patients remain same (no improvement). 03 patients improved after 1 year with mild score. 22 patients had severe preoperative neurology score (0-11) in which 05 cases improved with severe to moderate score and 05 cases improved with severe to mild score. These 05 cases improved with mild score after 1 year.Conclusions: Anterior approach is better than posterior approach in our study which is comparable with existing studies in terms of hospital stay, neurological recovery and final outcome.

Evaluation of clinical profile, radiological and functional outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical compressive myelopathy

Background: Symptomatic cervical disc prolapse is best managed with anterior cervical discectomy with or without fusion. We studied the clinical, radiological and surgical profile with postoperative outcome of the patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical compressive myelopathy at one level.Methods: In this retrospective study, data was collected from patients who underwent ACDF for cervical compressive myelopathy in our hospital between 2016 and 2019. Clinical, radiological profile with surgical outcome were studied.Results: A total of 283 patients were recruited. They could be followed up for a period of at least 6 months and so were recruited for the study. Out of these 283 patients (201 males; 82 females; mean age, 48.4 years, range, 22 years to 83 years), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cervical spine without contrast and x-ray cervical spine was available for all the patients. Nape of neck pain was the most common presenting symptom followed by tingling sensation in all four limbs and trunk. Average time taken for surgery was 2 hours 10 minutes with an average blood loss of 50 ml. Mean follow up duration was 2.7 years (range 6 months to 4 years).Conclusions: ACDF is the treatment of choice for the patients with clinical and radiological evidence of cervical cord compression. The techniques is associated with minimal blood loss and exceptionally good surgical outcome. Following discectomy, putting an autologous graft or titanium cage improves the spine stability and maintains the cervical lordosis.

Functional Outcome Of Anterior Cervical Decompression And Fusion Surgery In Cervical Compressive Diseases:A 6 Months Follow Up

Background: Neck pain with radiculopathy and neurodeficit is a common problem in working population. Methods: 50 patients underwent ACDF with C5-C6 the commonest level to be affected. The cases were analyzed preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months using NDI and VAS. Decrease in pre operative and 1 year post operative VAS score, Preoperative and postoperative NDI was statistically significant.Conclusion: Symptoms of neck pain, tingling, and weakness reduced after 1 year follow up. Discussion: From our study, it is evident that there is significant decrease in parameters like neck pain, tingling and radiculopathy postoperatively also there was significant decrease in NDI at 6 months follow-up.

Polyetheretherketone Cage with Demineralized Bone Matrix Can Replace Iliac Crest Autografts for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Subaxial Cervical Spine Injuries

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients with subaxial cervical injury who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with autologous iliac bone graft or polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages using demineralized bone matrix (DBM). METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2010, 70 patients who underwent one-level ACDF with plate fixation for post-traumatic subaxial cervical spinal injury in a single institution were retrospectively investigated. Autologous iliac crest grafts were used in 33 patients (Group I), whereas 37 patients underwent ACDF using a PEEK cage filled with DBM (Group II). Plain radiographs were used to assess bone fusion, interbody height (IBH), segmental angle (SA), overall cervical sagittal alignment (CSA, C2–7 angle), and development of adjacent segmental degeneration (ASD). Clinical outcome was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and Frankel grade. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration for patients in Group I and Group II was 28.9 and 25.4 months, respectively. All patients from both groups achieved solid fusion during the follow-up period. The IBH and SA of the fused segment and CSA in Group II were better maintained during the follow-up period. Nine patients in Group I and two patients in Group II developed radiologic ASD. There were no statistically significant differences in the VAS score and Frankel grade between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed that PEEK cage filled with DBM, and plate fixation is at least as safe and effective as ACDF using autograft, with good maintenance of cervical alignment. With advantages such as no donor site morbidity and no graft-related complications, PEEK cage filled with DBM, and plate fixation provide a promising surgical option for treating traumatic subaxial cervical spine injuries.

The causes and prevention of C₅ nerve root palsy after anterior cervical decompression and fusion / 中国骨伤

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To analyze the causes of muscular paralysis due to C₅ nerve root injury after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and explore its prevention way.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From January 2005 to December 2015, 310 patients underwent ACDF in our hospital. Of them, 9 cases occurred muscular paralysis due to C₅ nerve root injury after operation. The clinical data of 9 patients were retrospectively analyzed. There were 8 males and 1 female, aged from 51 to 84 years with an average of 64 years. Two cases underwent internal fixation and intervertebral fusion with one segment, 6 cases with two segments, 1 case with three segments. Simple deltoid muscle weakness, pain, numbness happened in 7 cases, simultaneously biceps brachii muscle weakness, pain, numbness in 2 cases. Muscle strength was 0 grade in 1 case, 1 grade in 3 cases, 2 grades in 4 cases, 3 grades in 1 case.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The follow up time of 9 patients was more than 12 months and the longest was 24 months with an average of 14 months. Muscle strength of 7 patients recovered to 4-5 grades. Recovering time after operation was directly proportional to the degree of injury, those patients with muscle strength level more than 2, usually could have significant improvement within 3 weeks. The JOA score improved from 10.89±1.89 preoperatively to 8.92±1.91 postoperative C₅ nerve root palsy to 14.48±2.10 at final follow up, with significant difference(<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>More complicated factors result in C₅ nerve root injury after ACDF. Except those suffered severe grinding contusion and amputation, most of the patients can get satisfactory prognosis. Strict control of the operation indication, selection of the right surgical segment with accurate manipulation, control of the distraction of intervertebral space and the width of the multilevel anterior cervical corpectomy, are main methods to prevent the complication.</p>

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Alters Whole-Spine Sagittal Alignment

PURPOSE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has become a common spine procedure, however, there have been no previous studies on whole spine alignment changes after cervical fusion. Our purpose in this study was to determine whole spine sagittal alignment and pelvic alignment changes after ACDF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients who had undergone ACDF from January 2011 to December 2012 were enrolled in this study. Cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and pelvic parameters were measured preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and Neck Disability Index (NDI) values. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were grouped according to operative method (cage only, cage & plate), operative level (upper level: C3/4 & C4/5; lower level: C5/6 & C6/7), and cervical lordosis (high lordosis, low lordosis). All patients experienced significant improvements in VAS scores and NDI values after surgery. Among the radiologic parameters, pelvic tilt increased and sacral slope decreased at 12 months postoperatively. Only the high cervical lordosis group showed significantly-decreased cervical lordosis and a shortened SVA postoperatively. Correlation tests revealed that cervical lordosis was significantly correlated with SVA and that SVA was significantly correlated with pelvic tilt and sacral slope. CONCLUSION: ACDF affects whole spine sagittal alignment, especially in patients with high cervical lordosis. In these patients, alteration of cervical lordosis to a normal angle shortened the SVA and resulted in reciprocal changes in pelvic tilt and sacral slope.

The Relationship between Increased Intervertebral Disc Height and Development of Postoperative Axial Neck Pain after Anterior Cervical Fusion

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between postoperative increase in intervertebral disc space height (IVH) and posterior axial neck in cases of degenerative cervical disease treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: A total of 155 patients who underwent ACDF with more than 1 year follow up were included. Radiologically, IVH and interfacet distance (IFD) of the operated segment were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. We clinically evaluated neck and arm pains according to visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and assessed neck disability index (NDI) scores preoperatively, postoperatively, at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. The relationship between radiological parameters, and clinical scores were analyzed using a regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean increase in IVH was 2.62 mm, and the mean increase in IFD was 0.67 mm. The VAS scores for neck pain preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year postoperatively were 4.46, 2.11, 2.07, 1.95, and 1.29; those for arm pain were 5.89, 3.24, 3.20, 3.03, and 2.18. The NDI scores were improved from 18.52 to 7.47. No significant relationship was observed between the radiological evaluation results regarding the increase in intervertebral height or interfacet distance and clinical changes in VAS or NDI scores. CONCLUSION: The increase in intervertebral space or interfacet distance by the insertion of a large graft material while performing ACDF for the treatment of degenerative cervical disease was not related with the change in VAS scores for neck and arm pains and NDI scores postoperatively and during the follow-up period.

A Surgical Method for Determining Proper Screw Length in ACDF

OBJECTIVE: We describe a surgical tool that uses the distractor pin as a reference for determining proper screw length in ACDF. It is critical that screw purchase depth be as deep as possible without violating or penetrating the posterior cortical wall, which ensures strong pull out strength. METHODS: We enrolled 81 adult patients who underwent ACDF using an anterior cervical plate from 2010 to 2012. Patients were categorized into Groups A (42 patients: retractor pin used as a reference for screw length) and B (39 patients: control group). Intraoperative lateral x-rays were taken after screwing the retractor pin to confirm the approaching vertebral level. The ratio of retractor pin length to body anteroposterior (A-P) diameter was measured as a reference. Proper screw length was determined by comparison to the reference. RESULTS: The average distance from screw tip to posterior wall was 3.0+/-1.4mm in Group A and 4.1+/-2.3mm in Group B. The ratio of screw length to body sagittal diameter was 86.2+/-5.7% in Group A and 80.8+/-9.0% in Group B. Screw length to body sagittal diameter ratios higher than 4/5 occurred in 33 patients (90%) in Group A and 23 patients (59%) in Group B. No cases violated the posterior cortical wall. CONCLUSION: We introduce a useful surgical method for determining proper screw length in ACDF using the ratio of retractor pin length to body A-P diameter as a reference. This method allows for deeper screw purchase depth without violation of the posterior cortical wall.

Comparison between Two Different Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages in One Level Stand-alone ACDF: Carbon Fiber Composite Frame Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage

OBJECTIVE: The authors conducted a retrospective study to compare the implantation of carbon fiber composite frame cages (CFCFCs) to the implantation of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages after anterior cervical discectomy for cervical degenerative disc disease. In addition, the predictive factors that influenced fusion or subsidence were investigated. METHODS: A total of 58 patients with single-level degenerative disc disease were treated with anterior cervical discectomy and implantation of stand-alone cages; CFCFCs were used in 35 patients, and PEEK cages were used in 23 patients. Preoperative and postoperative radiological and clinical assessments were performed. RESULTS: During the mean follow-up period of 41 months, fusion occurred in 43 patients (74.1%), and subsidence developed in 18 patients (31.0%). Pain decreased in all patients, and the patients' satisfaction rate was 75.9%. Neither fusion nor subsidence was related to the clinical outcome. There were no significant differences in the clinical and radiological outcomes between the CFCFC and the PEEK cage groups. Smoking history (p=0.023) was significantly associated with pseudarthrosis, and cage height (> or =7mm) (p=0.037) were significantly associated with subsidence. CONCLUSION: The clinical and radiological results were similar between the CFCFC and the PEEK cage groups. Fusion or subsidence did not affect the clinical outcomes. Smoking history and cage height (> or =7mm) were predictive factors for pseudarthrosis or subsidence in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone cages.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a Double Cylindrical Cage versus an Anterior Cervical Plating System with Iliac Crest Autografts for the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is often complicated by subsidence, pseudoarthrosis, kyphosis, and graft donor site morbidities. To decrease the occurrence of these complications, various types of cages have been developed. We designed this retrospective study to analyze and compare the efficacy and outcomes of ACDF using double cylindrical cages (DCC) (BK Medical, Seoul, Korea) versus an anterior cervical plating system with autogenous iliac crest grafts. METHODS: Forty-eight patients were treated with autograft and plating (plate group), and 48 with DCC group from October 2007 to October 2011. We analyzed construct length, cervical lordotic curvarture, the thickness of the prevertebral soft tissue, segmental instability, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the decrease in construct length or cervical lodortic curvature at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. The prevertebral soft tissue was thinner in the DCC group than the plate group immediately after surgery and at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. The difference in interspinous distance on flexion-extension was shorter in the plate group than the DCC group at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. However, there was no significant difference in this distance between the two groups at the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: A double cylindrical cage is a good alternative for fusion in patients with cervical degenerative diseases; the surgical method is relatively simple, allows good synostosis, has less associated prevertebral soft tissue swelling, and complications associated with autografting can be avoided.

Comparative Study of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of a Zero-Profile Device Concerning Reduced Postoperative Dysphagia after Single Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed clinical and radiological outcomes of a zero-profile anchored spacer (Zero-P) and conventional cage-plate (CCP) for single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to compare the incidence and difference of postoperative dysphagia with both devices. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our experiences of single level ACDF with the CCP and Zero-P. From January 2011 to December 2013, 48 patients who had single level herniated intervertebral disc were operated on using ACDF, with CCP in 27 patients and Zero-P in 21 patients. Patients who received more than double-level ACDF or combined circumferential fusion were excluded. Age, operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), pre-operative modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores, post-operative mJOA scores, achieved mJOA scores and recovery rate of mJOA scores were assessed. Prevertebral soft tissue thickness and postoperative dysphagia were analyzed on the day of surgery, and 2 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The Zero-P group showed same or favorable clinical and radiological outcomes compared with the CCP group. Postoperative dysphagia was significantly low in the Zero-P group. CONCLUSIONS: Application of Zero-P may achieve favorable outcomes and reduce postoperative dysphagia in single level ACDF.

In vitro study on biomechanical comparison between cervical arthroplasty and fusion / 医用生物力学

Objective To analyze biomechanical properties of cervical spine after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and total disc replacement (TDR) surgery. Methods Twelve cadaveric cervical spines (C2-T1) were adopted, and the motion and load distributions of the cervical segments under intact state and after ACDF and TDR surgery were tested using a three-dimensional (3D) optoelectronics measurement system. All the tests were carried out with displacement control in directions of flexion (Flex), extension (Ext), left bending (LB), right bending (RB), left rotation (LR) and right rotation (RR). Motion characteristics of the normal cervical spine and the implant were also discussed. Results In TDR-treated specimens, range of motion (ROM) was well preserved and could restore to the normal ROM distributions, especially in Flex/Ext and LR/RR direction. While in ACDF-treated specimens, ROM presented a large decrease as much as to 73.41% under the same condition compared with TDR, and ROM distributions were also changed obviously in other motions for the segments. Significant changes of ROM in LB/RB direction occurred in both TDR and ACDF group, which were up to 45.92% and 108.06%, respectively. The experimental data indicated that the normal motion of cervical spines was a 3D coupled motion, especially in LB/RB direction, where a 35% rotation around X-axis existed. The cervical spine could recover close to normal coupled motion after TDR surgery. Conclusions TDR surgery can restore the physiological motion of cervical spines more close to the normal state, especially in Flex/Ext and LR/RR direction. The study provides a theoretical basis and quantitative reference for TDR and ACDF surgery in clinic.

Immediate Revision Surgery due to Post-Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Spinal Epidural Hematoma

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion(ACDF) is a surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. Though this is a common surgery, spinal epidural hematomas occur rarely and an immediate treatment decision and surgical decompression are required in this situation. In this report, we discuss the proper treatment of spinal epidural hematoma after ACDF.

Immediate Revision Surgery due to Post-Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Spinal Epidural Hematoma

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion(ACDF) is a surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. Though this is a common surgery, spinal epidural hematomas occur rarely and an immediate treatment decision and surgical decompression are required in this situation. In this report, we discuss the proper treatment of spinal epidural hematoma after ACDF.

Artrodese na coluna cervical utilizando SICAP como substituto de enxerto ósseo / Artrodesis en la columna cervical utilizando SICAP como sustituto de injerto óseo / Cervical spine fusion utilizing silicated calcium phosphate bone graft substitute SICAP

OBJETIVO: Substitutos de enxerto ósseo autólogo foram desenvolvidos para evitar as complicações da retirada de enxerto ósseo autólogo. SiCaP (Actifuse, ApaTech EUA, Reino Unido) é um enxerto ósseo composto de cálcio-fosfato com um substituição de silicato na estrutura química, com uma estrutura tridimensional que parece osso natural. MÉTODOS: 19 pacientes foram submetidos à fusão óssea cervical e analisados retrospectivamente. A avaliação radiográfica e avaliação clínica foram realizadas utilizando o questionário Neck Disability Index e a escala análoga da dor (VAS) pré- e pós-operação. RESULTADOS: O período médio de acompanhamento pós-operatório foi de 14 meses ± 5 meses (7-30 meses). 11 pacientes foram submetidos à fusão via anterior; 5 pacientes via posterior e 3 pacientes via anterior e posterior. A revisão radiográfica mostrou 19/19 (100 por cento) de fusão óssea, nenhum caso apresentou subsidência, quebra ou soltura de material de implante ou movimento nos níveis fusionados. Nenhum exemplo de ossificação heterotópica ou de crescimento ósseo intracanal foi observado. Clinicamente, os escores médios do Neck Disability decresceram 13,3 pontos (media pré-op. de 34,5, pós-op. de 21,2, melhora de 39 por cento), a média da VAS para dor cervical decresceu 2 pontos (2,7 pré-op para 0,7 pós-op.; melhora de 74,1 por cento). Não foram observadas complicações como infecção, osteólise ou edema excessivo das partes moles. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados preliminares obtidos nesta série foram encorajadores com o uso do SICaP como enxerto ósseo, com sólida fusão óssea obtida em todos os casos e sem formação de ossificação heterotópica ou crescimento de osso intracanal. SIcaP demonstra ser um substituto confiável para o enxerto ósseo autólogo na coluna cervical.

OBJECTIVE: Bone graft substitutes have been developed to obviate the need for autograft from the iliac crest and its resultant complications. SiCaP (Actifuse, ApaTech US, UK) is a calcium phosphate bone graft substitute with selective controlled silicate substitution in a patented 3-dimensional structure resembling natural bone. METHODS: 19 patients who underwent cervical spine fusion were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic evaluation and clinical evaluation were performed using Neck Disability Index questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pre- and post-operatively. RESULTS: The mean post-operative follow-up was 14 ± 5 months, range 7-30 months. Eleven patients had an anterior approach, five patients had a posterior approach, and 3 had combined anterior-posterior approaches. Radiographic review showed 19/19 (100 percent) patients were considered fused, with no subsidence, hardware breakage, or hardware loosening. No instances of heterotopic bone formation or intracanal boney ingrowths were observed. Clinically, average Neck Disability scores decreased 13.3 points (pre-op 34.5, post-op 21.2, a 39 percent improvement); average VAS neck pain scores decreased 2.2 points (4.9 pre-op to 1.9 post-op; a 44.9 percent improvement; average VAS arm pain decreased 2.0 points (2.7 pre-op to 0.7 post-op, a 74.1 percent improvement). There were no complications such as infection, osteolysis, or abnormal swelling of soft tissues. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results from this series with the use of SiCaP bone graft substitute were encouraging, with solid fusion occurring in all subjects, and no heterotopic bone formation or intracanal bone ingrowths. SiCaP seems to be a reliable alternative to autograft on cervical spine fusion achieving solid fusion with no complications.

OBJETIVO: Sustitutos de injerto óseo autólogo fueron desarrollados para evitar las complicaciones de la recogida de injerto óseo autólogo. SiCaP (Actifuse, ApaTech EE.UU, Reino Unido) es un injerto óseo compuesto de calcio-fosfato con una sustitución de silicato en la estructura química, con una estructura tridimensional que parece hueso natural. MÉTODOS: 19 pacientes fueron sometidos a fusión ósea cervical y analizados retrospectivamente. La evaluación radiográfica y la evaluación clínica fueron realizadas utilizandose el cuestionario Neck Disability Index y la escala análoga del dolor (VAS) pre y postoperación. RESULTADOS: El período promedio de seguimiento postoperatorio fue de 14 meses ± 5 meses (7-30 meses). Once pacientes fueron sometidos a fusión vía anterior; 5 pacientes vía posterior y 3 pacientes vía anterior y posterior. La revisión radiográfica mostró 19/19 (100 por ciento) de fusión ósea, ningún caso presentó subsidencia, rotura o soltura de material de implante o movimiento en los niveles fusionados. Ningún ejemplo de osificación heterotópica o de crecimiento óseo intracanal fue observado. Clínicamente, el promedio de las puntuaciones del Neck Disability disminuyeron 13,3 puntos (promedio preop. de 34,5, postop. de 21,2, mejora de 39 por ciento), el promedio de VAS para dolor cervical disminuyó 2 puntos (2,7 preop. para 0,7 postop.; mejora de 74,1 por ciento). No fueron observadas complicaciones como infección, osteólisis o edema excesivo de las partes blandas. CONCLUSIÓN: Los resultados preliminares obtenidos en esta serie feuron estimulantes con el uso de SICaP como injerto óseo, con sólida fusión ósea obtenida en todos los casos y sin formación de osificación heterotópica o crecimiento de hueso intracanal. SIcaP demuestra ser un sustituto confiable para el injerto óseo autólogo en la columna cervical.

Comparison of Fusion with Cage Alone and Plate Instrumentation in Two-Level Cervical Degenerative Disease

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with cage alone compared with ACDF with plate instrumentation for radiologic and clinical outcomes in two-level cervical degenerative disease. METHODS: Patients with cervical degenerative disc disease from September 2004 to December 2009 were assessed retrospectively. A total of 42 patients received all ACDF at two-level cervical lesion. Twenty-two patients who underwent ACDF with cage alone were compared with 20 patients who underwent ACDF with plate fixation in consideration of radiologic and clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Robinson's criteria and posterior neck pain, arm pain described by a 10 point-visual analog scale. Fusion rate, subsidence, kyphotic angle, instrument failure and the degenerative changes in adjacent segments were examined during each follow-up examination. RESULTS: VAS was checked during each follow-up and Robinson's criteria were compared in both groups. Both groups showed no significant difference. Fusion rates were 90.9% (20/22) in ACDF with the cage alone group, 95% (19/20) in ACDF with the plate fixation group (p = 0.966). Subsidence rates of ACDF with cage alone were 31.81% (7/22) and ACDF with plate fixation were 30% (6/20) (p = 0.928). Local and regional kyphotic angle difference showed no significant difference. At the final follow-up, adjacent level disease developed in 4.54% (1/22) of ACDF with cage alone and 10% (2/20) of ACDF with plate fixation (p = 0.654). CONCLUSION: In two-level ACDF, ACDF with cage alone would be comparable with ACDF with plate fixation with regard to clinical outcome and radiologic result with no significant difference. We suggest that the routine use of plate and screw in 2-level surgery may not be beneficial.

Prevertebral Soft Tissue Swelling after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Comparison between Plate Fixation and Cage Insertion / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: We wanted to identify the natural course of prevertebral soft tissue swelling after performing one-level or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and we compared the prevertebral soft tissue swelling between the plate and cage groups, and we wanted to help preventing potentially lethal airway complications after ACDF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred thirteen patients who underwent one-level or two-level ACDF with plate and screws or cages were studied. Eighty-seven patients underwent ACDF using plates and twenty-six underwent ACDF using cages. Cervical spine lateral radiography was taken preoperatively, on the immediate postoperative day and on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th days after surgery. The prevertebral soft tissue was measured from C2 to C6 on the cervical spine lateral radiography. RESULTS: Prevertebral soft tissue swelling occurred postoperatively and the peak level was found on the second and third days after surgery. The prevertebral soft tissue swelling was gradually decreased from the fourth day after surgery. Prominent swelling of the prevertebral soft tissue was found at the 2nd, 3rd and 4th cervical spines. There were no significant differences of the prevertebral soft tissue swelling between the one-level and two-level ACDF groups. The cage insertion group showed less swelling than did the plate fixation group. CONCLUSION: The peak prevertebral soft tissue swelling was found on the second and third days after surgery. The cage insertion group showed less swelling than did the plate fixation group.

Outcome Analysis of Single Level Anterior Cervical Fusion using Interbody PEEK Cage with Autologous Iliac Bone Graft / 대한정형외과학회잡지

PURPOSE: Anterior cervical fusion with a tricortical iliac bone graft is a well established procedure for treating degenerative cervical spine disease. An interbody cage has been used to prevent donor site morbidity but there are few reports on the clinical and radiological outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty eight patients, who underwent single level ACDF with PEEK interbody Solis(R)cage (Stryker spine, South Allendale, NJ, USA), were enrolled in this study. This study evaluated Odom's criteria and visual analogue scale (VAS) for the neck, arm and donor site pain, and the radiological findings, including the disk height, cage subsidence, and sagittal alignment of cervical spine. RESULTS: The mean disk height loss was 1.1 mm during the follow up period. Case subsidence >2 mm developed in 17 cases (44.7%). The mean subsidence of this group was 3.09 mm. The bone union rate was 95% at 12 weeks. There was no significant change in the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine. The VAS for neck, arm, and donor site pain improved all cases. Only 9 patients complained of mild discomfort at the donor site CONCLUSION: Single-level ACDF using PEEK interbody cage has a lack of donor site morbidity, excellent clinical outcomes and bone union. However, more study of the factors related to postoperative cage subsidence will be needed.

Comparative Analysis of Cervical Arthroplasty Using Mobi-C(R) and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Husion Using the Solis(R) -Cage

OBJECTIVE: Although anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the standard treatment for degenerative cervical disc disease, concerns regarding adjacent level degeneration and loss of motion have suggested that arthroplasty may be a better alternative. We have compared clinical and radiological results in patients with cervical disc herniations treated with arthroplasty and ACDF. METHODS: We evaluated 53 patients treated for cervical disc herniations with radiculopathy, 21 of whom underwent arthroplasty and 32 of whom underwent ACDF. Clinical results included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for upper extremity radiculopathy, neck disability index (NDI), duration of hospital stay and convalescence time. All patients were assessed radiologically by measuring cervical lordosis, segmental lordosis and segmental range-of-movement (ROM) of operated and adjacent disc levels. RESULTS: Mean hospital stay (5.62 vs. 6.26 days, p<0.05) and interval between surgery and return to work (1.10 vs. 2.92 weeks, p<0.05) were significantly shorter in the arthroplasty than in the fusion group. Mean NDI and extremity VAS score improved after 12 months in both groups. Although it was not significant, segmental ROM of adjacent levels was higher in the fusion group than in the arthroplasty group. And, segmental motion of operated levels in arthroplasty group maintained more than preoperative value at last follow up. CONCLUSION: Although clinical results were similar in the two groups, postoperative recovery was significantly shorter in the arthroplasty group. Although it was not significant, ROM of adjacent segments was less in the arthroplasty group. Motion of operated levels in arthroplasty group was preserved at last follow up.