Mortality of Elderly Patients Supported by Mechanical Ventilation at a General Critical Care Unit in a Tertiary Care Centre

Background : There has been a steady rise in the geriatric population in India and increasing number of elderly patients are being admitted in Critical Care Unit (CCU). They need mechanical ventilation during their hospital stay. Hence, there is continued need for evaluation and research to develop a validating scoring systems used to predict the outcome of CCU patients supported by mechanical ventilation. Objective : Analysis to predict the outcome (survival or mortality) of mechanically ventilated elderly patients in different age groups at the CCU. Material and Method : A Prospective observational study was done in CCU for a period of one year. A group of 40 elderly ventilated patients greater than 60 years of age (Group 1-elderly case group) and another group of 40 ventilated patients less than 60 years of age (Group-2- control group) were included in the study. A clinical database was collected which included age, sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score and an Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were calculated in the first 24 hours of ventilation,indication of mechanical ventilation, co-morbidity, according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), functional capacity according to the Barthel Index (BI). Patients outcome (survival or mortality) were analyzed. All the patients in two groups were on ventilation support. Result : In case group (n=40), mortality was 55%. In control group (n=40), mortality was 52.5%. On comparison of outcome between two groups (case with control group) the difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.8225). In case group, association of outcome to different age groups (60-65 years, 66-75years, more than75years) (p=0.3357) andto gender (p=0.3854) was not statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the study variables showed APACHE II score to be statistically significant for outcome (p=0.0229). Conclusion : Mortality of elderly patients supported by mechanical ventilation at CCU were slightly higher(55%) than in mechanically ventilated younger populations (52.5%) though the difference was not statistically significant between two groups (p=0.82). APACHE II, score measured within 24 hours of ventilation was a significant predictor of mortality in the patients on mechanical ventilation.

Valor pronóstico del sistema de calificación APACHE II en el postoperatorio de cirugía cardíaca / Prognostic value of APACHE II score in postoperative of cardiac surgery

Resumen Antecedentes y objetivos: El sistema de calificación APACHE II permite predecir la mortalidad intrahospitalaria en terapia intensiva. Sin embargo, no está validado para cirugía cardíaca, ya que no posee buena capacidad diferenciadora. El objetivo es determinar el valor pronóstico de APACHE II en el postoperatorio de procedimientos cardíacos. Materiales y métodos: Se analizó en forma retrospectiva la base de cirugía cardíaca. Se incluyó a pacientes intervenidos entre 2017 y 2018, de los cuales se calculó la puntuación APACHE II. Se utilizó curva ROC para determinar el mejor valor de corte. El punto final primario fue mortalidad intrahospitalaria. Como puntos finales secundarios se evaluó la incidencia de bajo gasto cardíaco (BGC), accidente cerebrovascular (ACV), sangrado quirúrgico y necesidad de diálisis. Se realizó un modelo de regresión logístico multivariado para ajustar a las variables de interés. Resultados: Se analizó a 559 pacientes. La media del sistema de calificación APACHE II fue de 9.9 (DE 4). La prevalencia de mortalidad intrahospitalaria global fue de 6.1%. El mejor valor de corte de la calificación para predecir mortalidad fue de 12, con un área bajo la curva ROC de 0.92. Los pacientes con APACHE II ≥ 12 tuvieron significativamente mayor mortalidad, incidencia de BGC, ACV, sangrado quirúrgico y necesidad de diálisis. En un modelo multivariado, el sistema APACHE II se relacionó de modo independiente con mayor tasa de mortalidad intrahospitalaria (OR, 1.14; IC95%, 1.08-1.21; p < 0.0001). Conclusiones: El sistema de clasificación APACHE II demostró ser un predictor independiente de mortalidad intrahospitalaria en pacientes que cursan el postoperatorio de cirugía cardíaca.

Abstract Background and objectives: The APACHE II score allows predicting in-hospital mortality in patients admitted to intensive care units. However, it is not validated for patients undergoing cardiac surgery, since it does not have a good discriminatory capacity in this clinical scenario. The aim of this study is to determine prognostic value of APACHE II score in postoperative of cardiac surgery. Materials and methods: The study was performed using the cardiac surgery database. Patients undergoing surgery between 2017 and 2018, with APACHE II score calculated at the admission, were included. The ROC curve was used to determine a cut-off value The primary endpoint was in-hospital death. Secondary endpoints included low cardiac output (LCO), stroke, surgical bleeding, and dialysis requirement. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to adjust to various variables of interest. Results: The study evaluated 559 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The mean of APACHE II Score was 9.9 (SD 4). The prevalence of in-hospital death was 6.1%. The best prognostic cut-off value for the primary endpoint was 12, with a ROC curve of 0.92. Patients with an APACHE II score greater than or equal to 12 had significantly higher mortality, higher incidence of LCO, stroke, surgical bleeding and dialysis requirement. In a multivariate logistic regression model, the APACHE II score was independently associated with higher in-hospital death (OR, 1.14; 95CI%, 1.08-1.21; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The APACHE II Score proved to be an independent predictor of in-hospital death in patients undergoing postoperative cardiac surgery, with a high capacity for discrimination.

Mannheim’s peritonitis index a more simpler prognostic index than APACHE II score

Background: The study was done with the aim to determine the clinical profile of patients with hollow viscous perforation and to compare MPI and APACHE II scoreMethods: This study was a prospective and retrospective observational study conducted in the department of General Surgery, Gandhi Medical College and associated Hamidia Hospital from the June 2017 to August 2019The possible score ranges from 0-47. All necessary preoperative data was recorded. Blood sample was taken and relevant blood investigations were done. Patients were resuscitated with iv fluids. Nasogastric tube and urinary cather insertion were done. The parameters of modified APACHE II score and Manheim’s peritonitis index were recorded at the time of admission. Patients underwent emergency laprotomy and correction of pathology was done.Results: Out of total 100 patients 79% were males, 21% were females, majority 45% belonged to the age group 26-35 years.  To calculate the cut off point for mortality ROC curve was constructed. ROC curve analysis predicted that Manheim’s score of 22 or more would predict mortality. Out of total 16 deaths, 14 cases had Manheim’s score of 22 or more thus, giving the score a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 77.38% and overall accuracy of 79% in our study. ROC also predicted that APACHE II score of 15 or more would predict mortality. Thus, giving APACHE II score a sensitivity of 93.75%, specificity of 100% and accuracy of 99%.Conclusions: We consider MPI to be a more simpler prognostic indicator than APACHE II score.

Role of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scoring system in risk stratification and management of small bowel perforations

Background: Despite the surgical treatment, sophisticated intensive care units, latest generation antibiotics and a better understanding of pathophysiology, the morbidity and mortality rate of perforation peritonitis are still high. Patients are usually managed by subjective decision of surgeon based on which mortality is very high.Methods: This was a double-blind observational study conducted over a period of 18 months on 50 patients with small bowel perforations. Based on the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score at presentation, patients were triaged into 3 groups: group 1 (score ≤10), group 2 (score 11 to 20) and group 3 (score >20). Study population was managed by the subjective decision of the operating surgeon who was blinded off the APACHE II score of patients. Hence removing the possibility of bias and observing a correlation between surgical outcome and APACHE II score of the patient.Results: Patients with higher APACHE II score (>10) were more likely to undergo exteriorization of bowel. Length of hospital stay was also found to be increased with an increase in score. APACHE II score of 10 was found to predict mortality with significant difference between 2 groups. Below this score the mortality was 0% and above this score the mortality rate rose to 31.25%.Conclusions: APACHE II can be used as a reliable and uniform scoring system as its assessment at presentation in patients of small bowel perforations provides an insight to their surgical management as well as predicting overall outcome.

A comparative analysis between Mannheim peritonitis score and acute physiological and chronic health evaluation II score in predicting prognosis of patients of perforation peritonitis

Background: The early assessment and recognition of peritonitis patient is required in surgical emergency. Various scoring system have been designed successfully to assess the prognosis and outcome of peritonitis. The present study was carried out with an aim to evaluate the usefulness and severity of Mannheim peritonitis (MPI) score in comparison to acute physiological and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring system for prediction of the outcome in patients with perforation peritonitis and thus decision making in perforation peritonitis.Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out at Department of Surgery, King George’s Medical University (KGMU), Lucknow for a period of one year from July 2018 to June 2019. A total of 100 patients were enrolled in the study.Results: Majority of patients were males compared to females. Maximum number of patients (40%) was aged 51-60 years. Maximum number of patients (42%) had duodenal perforation. A significant association between higher MPI scores and mortality was seen (p<0.001). Statistically, the association between APACHE II scores and mortality was significant (p<0.001).Conclusions: APACHE II had a slightly higher sensitivity as well as specificity as compared to MPI. MPI is easy to calculate but accuracy of APACHE II is more, compared to MPI.

Utilisation of antimicrobial agents in intensive care unit at a tertiary care teaching hospital in eastern India

Background: Antimicrobial agents (AMAs) are the most frequently used drugs in the intensive care units (ICU) and regular auditing can prevent the development of resistance to AMAs, reduce the cost and incidence of adverse drug reactions. The present study was conducted to assess the drug utilisation pattern by measuring the defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 bed days for the AMAs used and their correlation with the APACHE score II.Methods: This was a prospective observational study, conducted in the Central ICU of SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha for 4 months. Data regarding demographic profile, diagnosis, APACHE II score, microbiologic investigation, length of stay, outcome and utilisation pattern of AMAs assessing anatomic therapeutic chemical (ATC) classification and measuring the antimicrobial consumption index (ACI) equal to DDD per 100 bed days were collected and subjected to descriptive analysis. Multinomial logistic regression model was used to predict probabilities of different possible outcomes of categorically distributed variables and independent variables.Results: Mean age of study population was 44.70±14.814 with male and female ratio of 1.63:1. Septicaemia was the most common cause of admission. AMAs were prescribed to 92.66% of patients during their stay which constitutes 37.32% of the total drugs used. The DDD per 100 bed days for the AMAs were 118.59 and ceftriaxone was found to be most frequently used. Patients having higher APACHE II score received more no of AMAs (4.20±1.30). Patients having low APACHE II Scores received less number of antibiotics as compared to patients having higher score.Conclusions: AMAs were prescribed to 92.66% patients in the central ICU and there is significant relation between the APACHE II score and number of AMAs prescribed.

Value of APACHE.II score and DIC score in predicting the death of patients with heat stroke / 中华劳动卫生职业病杂志

Objective@#To investigate the predictive values of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE.II) score and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) score on death in patients with heat stroke.@*Methods@#A total of 76 patients with heat stroke who were treated in Emergency Department of Harrison International Peace Hospital from June 2013 to September 2017 were studied. According to the outcome of patients, we distributed the patients to death group and survival group. APACHE.II score and DIC score were calculated according to the clinical data and the test results at admission. Evaluate the correlation between the two indicators associated with death.@*Results@#There were 76 patients, with 23 deaths (30.3%) and 53 survivors (69.7%) . The APACHE-II score and DIC score were 26.26±6.48 and 4.00±1.38 in the death group.significantly higher than 20.74±4.17 and 2.28±1.21 in the survival group, and there were significant difference (P< 0.01) . The APACHE. II score was positively correlated with the DIC score, and the higher the score, the higher the mortality rate.Both indicators are significant for the Logitic regression analysis of death (P<0.01) .The sensitivity and specificity of the APACHE.II score were 65.2% and 81.1% in prediction of mortality, The sensitivity and specificity of DIC score were 65.2% and 84.9% in prediction of mortality. The specificity of the APACHE II score plus DIC score were higher than that of single APACHE. II score or DIC score in prediction of mortality (P<0.05) .@*Conclusion@#The APACHE.II score and DIC score are significantly increased in the early stage of the patients with heat stroke, and the APACHE. II score combined with DIC score may improve the value in prediction of mortality with heat stroke.

An observational study on effects of hypomagnesemia among critically ill patients at a tertiary care hospital

Background: Magnesium is the fourth abundant cation in the human body and second most abundant intracellular cation after potassium and also serving as cofactor in more than 300 enzymatic reactions. Magnesium deficiency is the most commonly overlooked condition in critically ill patients and associated with other coexisting electrolyte abnormalities. The aim of the present study was to evaluate serum magnesium levels in critically ill patients and to correlate with patient outcome and other parameters like length of stay in ICU, ventilator support, APACHE-II score and duration and mortality.Methods: A two years observational study after ethical committee approval was conducted at a tertiary care hospital among critically ill patients admitted in ICU. Serum magnesium levels and other relevant investigations were performed within 24 hours of admission. Patients management and progress were followed till the outcome. The data was analysed by using SPSS software version 16.0 for windows.Results: Total of 150 patients with 102 males and 48 females were enrolled. 97 cases (64.7%) of hypomagnesemia were observed and 11 cases of hypermagnesemia and 42 cases with normal serum magnesium levels were observed. Hypomagnesemia cases were compared with normal cases and found that: Hypomagnesemia cases had higher mortality rate, higher APACHE II score, more length of hospital stay and ventilator duration. Significant association was identified with diabetes and chronic alcoholism (p valve <0.05).Conclusions: Monitoring of magnesium levels in critically ill patients has several prognostic and therapeutic implications and should be recommended as a regular parameter as it is commonly out looked condition. Statistically significant association of hypomagnesaemia was found with hypocalcaemia, hypoalbuminaemia, septicaemia, diabetes and chronic alcoholism. Higher APACHE II score is associated with higher mortality and more length of stay in ICU among the cases of hypomagnesaemia.

Measurement of serum lipopolysaccharide binding protein for diagnosis and prognosis prediction in septic patients / 中国病理生理杂志

AIM:To investigate the role of lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) for diagnosis and prog-nosis prediction in the septic patients.METHODS:A total number of 80 ICU patients were enrolled.The patients were divided into systemic inflammatory response syndrome ( SIRS) group and sepsis group, the patients in sepsis group were di-vided into non-survivor sub-group and survivor sub-group.We collected the serum samples and analyzed acute physiology and chronic health evaluation ( APACHE) II score on the first day of the patients hospitalized in ICU.In addition, we also selected 10 healthy volunteers and collected their serum samples.The serum concentrations of LBP, C-reactive protein ( CRP) and procalcitonin ( PCT) were measured by ELISA.ROC analysis of LBP, CRP, PCT and APACHE II score was conducted to discriminate among critically ill patients with sepsis and predict the prognosis of the patients with sepsis.RE-SULTS:The levels of the 4 indicators in the septic patients were higher than those in the patients of SIRS (P<0.05).In addition, serum LBP and APACHE II score in the non-survivor sub-group were higher than those in the survivor sub-group (P<0.05), whereas no difference of the PCT and CRP levels between survivors and non-survivors with sepsis was ob-served.LBP levels greater than 26.84 mg/L had 97.1% sensitivity and 95.9% specificity to discriminate between SIRS and sepsis.LBP levels greater than 54.16 mg/L had 85.2%sensitivity and 80.0%specificity for prognosis of unfavorable outcome.CONCLUSION:LBP level was more accurately correlated with diagnosis or prognosis prediction than CRP or PCT in patients with sepsis.

Association between early arterial blood lactate clearance rate and central venous oxygen saturation monitoring and prognosis in patients with severe pneumonia / 中国感染与化疗杂志

Objective To explore the value of early arterial blood lactate clearance rate and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2 ) monitoring in patients with severe pneumonia .Methods A total of 56 patients with severe pneumonia treated during the period from January 2012 to December 2013 were reviewed retrospectively .The arterial blood lactate concentration and ScvO2 were determined immediately after admission to hospital and 6 hours after admission to calculate the 6‐hour lactate clearance rate .APACHE II score was evaluated at the same time .The patients were divided into three groups according to APACHE II score:10 to ＜20 (group A) ,20 to ＜30 (group B) ,≥30 (group C) .The three groups were compared in terms of early arterial blood lactate clearance rate and ScvO2 and estimate their association with the prognosis of patients .Results The initial arterial blood lactate concentration did not show significant difference between the three groups (P>0 .05) .The early lactate clearance rate and ScvO2 at 6 hours in group C were significantly lower than in group B .The values in group B were significantly lower than in group A (P＜0 .05) .The mortality rate in group C was significantly higher than in group B ,and the mortality rate in group B was significantly higher than in group A (P＜0 .05) .The APACHE II score of the dead patients was higher than that of the suevivors ,but early lactate clearance rate and ScvO2 level were lower than those of the survivors (P＜0 .05) .APACHE II score was negatively correlated to early lactate clearance rate (r=0 .661 ,P＜0 .01) and early ScvO2 level (r=0 .579 , P＜ 0 .01) .Conclusions Early lactate clearance rate and ScvO2 level are good indicators to reflect the severity of disease and predict the outcome in the patients with severe pneumonia .

Application of plasma procalcitonin and D-dimer measurements in estima-ting the prognosis of patients with sepsis / 中国感染控制杂志

Objective To evaluate the clinical value of plasma procalcitonin and D-dimer measurements in estima-ting the prognosis of patients with sepsis.Methods According to prognosis,68 patients with sepsis were divided in-to survival group and death group,levels of procalcitonin and D-dimer,and acute physiology and chronic health eval-uation II (APACHE II)of two groups of patients were compared,predictive value of above markers in estimating the prognosis of patients with sepsis were evaluated.Results Of 68 patients with sepsis,28 survived and 40 died, mortality was 58.82%.There were significant differences in levels of procalcitonin and D-dimer,as well as APACHE II between two groups(both P<0.05),death group were all higher than survival group.Procalcitonin and D-dimer level were positively correlated with APACHE II score(P<0.05).Conclusion Procalcitonin,D-dimer level and APACHE II score can be used to evaluate condition of patients with sepsis as well as the prognosis of dis-ease.

APACHE II Score, Rather Than Cardiac Function, May Predict Poor Prognosis in Patients With Stress-Induced Cardiomyopathy

While the disease course of stress-induced cardiomyopathy (SIC) is usually benign, it can be fatal. The prognostic factors to predict poorer outcome are not well established, however. We analyzed the Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score to assess its value for predicting poor prognosis in patients with SIC. Thirty-seven consecutive patients with SIC were followed prospectively during their hospitalization. Clinical factors, including APACHE II score, coronary angiogram, echocardiography and cardiac enzymes at presentation were analyzed. Of the 37 patients, 27 patients (73%) were women. The mean age was 66.1 +/- 15.6 yr, and the most common presentation was chest pain (38%). Initial echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was 42.5% +/- 9.3%, and the wall motion score index (WMSI) was 1.9 +/- 0.3. Six patients (16%) expired during the follow-up period of hospitalization. Based on the analysis of characteristics and clinical factors, the only predictable variable in prognosis was APACHE II score. The patients with APACHE II score greater than 20 had tendency to expire than the others (P = 0.001). Based on present study, APACHE II score more than 20, rather than cardiac function, is associated with mortality in patients with SIC.

Effects of APACHE II Score and Initial Nutritional Status on Prognosis of the Critically Ill Patients / 대한구급학회지

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition is common in hospitalized patients, especially in critically ill patients and affects their mortality and morbidity. However, the correlation between malnutrition and poor outcome is not fully understood. Our hypothesis is that the nutritional effect on the patient's prognosis would differ depending on the severity of the disease. METHODS: 3,758 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were observed retrospectively. Patients were divided into well, moderate and severe groups, according to their nutritional status as assessed by their serum albumin level and total lymphocyte count (TLC). The severity of the disease was assessed by the Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II score). All patients were followed clinically until discharge or death and ICU days, hospital days, ventilator days, and mortality rates were recorded. RESULTS: Depending on the definition used, the prevalence of hospital malnutrition is reported to be 68.3%. Hospital days, ICU days, as well as ventilator days of moderate and severe groups were longer than the well group. In patients exhibiting mild severity of disease, moderate and severe malnutrition groups have 3-5 times the mortality rate than the well group. CONCLUSIONS: Malnutrition affects the prognosis of patients who have an APACHE II score ranging from 4-29 points. Active nutritional support may be more effective for patients with a disease of mild severity.

Validation of APACHE II Score and Comparison of the Performance of APACHE II and Adjusted APACHE II Models in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit / 대한구급학회지

BACKGROUND: The ability to accurately adjust for the severity of illness in outcome studies of critically ill patients is essential for clinical audits and trials. Several studies have been carried out to validate the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score in Korean ICUs. However, few reports have been presented that compare the performance of the APACHE II score and diagnostic category weighted APACHE II models in the surgical ICU population of Korea. The aim of this study was to validate APACHE II and compare the performance of the APACHE II and adjusted APACHE II models for emergency admission in a surgical intensive care unit (SICU) population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the prospective ICU registry was conducted in the SICU between October 2007 and February 2011. Calibration and discrimination were determined by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve from patients. RESULTS: This study included 854 patients. SICU mortality was 9.4%. For APACHE II and adjusted APACHE II, AUCs were 0.791 and 0.757, respectively. Hosmer and Lemeshow C statistics showed good calibration for APAHCE II and for adjusted APACHE II (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The ability of the APACHE II system in predicting group outcome is validated in a surgical ICU population by a receiver operating characteristic curve and logistic regression analysis. Mortality rates predicted using APACHE II exhibited good calibration and moderate discrimination. Diagnostic category weighted adjusted APACHE II did not improve the mortality prediction.

Clinical Aspects and Prognostic Factors Of Small Bowel Perforation After Blunt Abdominal Trauma

PURPOSE: The incidence of abdominal trauma with intra-abdominal organ injury or bowel rupture is increasing. Articles on the diagnosis, symptoms and treatment of small bowel perforation due to blunt trauma have been reported, but reports on the relationship of mortality and morbidity to clinical factors for prognosis are minimal. The purposes of this study are to evaluate the morbidity and mortality of patients with small bowel perforation after blunt abdominal trauma on the basis of clinical examinationand to analyze factors associated with the prognosisfor blunt abdominal trauma with small bowel perforation. METHODS: The clinical data on patients with small bowel perforation due to blunt trauma who underwent emergency surgery from January 1994 to December 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation of each prognostic factor to morbidity and mortality, and the relationship among prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients met the inclusion criteria: The malewas 81.9% .The mean age was 45.6 years.The mean APACHE II score was 5.75.The mean time interval between injury and surgery was 395.9 minutes.The mean surgery time was 111.1 minutes. Forty seven patients had surgery for ileal perforations, and primary closure was done for 51patients. The mean admission period was 15.3 days, and the mean fasting time was 4.5 days. There were 6 deaths (7.2%), and 25 patientssuffered from complications. CONCLUSION: The patient's age and the APACHE II score on admission were important prognostic factors that effecteda patient's progress. Especially, this study shows that the APACHE II score had effect on the operation time, admission period, the treatment period, the fasting time, the mortality rate, and the complication rate.

The Factors that Predict Using Mechanical Ventilation for Patients with Organophosphate Intoxication

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors that predict using mechanical ventilation for patients with organophosphate intoxication. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 111 patients with acute organophosphate intoxication and who were treated in our emergency center from January 2000 to December 2008. We compared the toxicologic characteristics, the laboratory findings and the APACHE II scores between the Mechanical Ventilation group (MV group) and the non-Mechanical Ventilation group (the non MV group). RESULTS: Sixty three patients were in the MV group and 48 patients were in the non MV group. In the MV group, the patients had an older age (p<0.001), a larger amount of ingestion (p<0.001), a lower initial serum cholinesterase level (p=0.003), a higher APACHE II score (p<0.001) and they ingested a more toxic agent (p=0.001). There were no significant differences in gender, the type of visit and the arrival time between the MV group and the non MV group. CONCLUSION: We suggest that the patient's age, the amount of organophosphate ingestion, the toxicity of the agent, the initial serum cholinesterase level and the APACHE II score are important factors to determine if mechanical ventilation will be applied for patients with organophosphate intoxication.

Evaluating the Relationship between the Scoring Systems of Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation after Liver Transplantation / 대한구급학회지

BACKGROUND: Postoperative mechanical ventilation in liver transplant patient has an important role for reducing respiratory complications and multi-organ failure in intensive care unit (ICU). Yet there are no specific indications for predicting the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation. Thus, we evaluated the correlation between the duration of mechanical ventilation and scoring systems such as the Acute Physiology and Chronic health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and the risk index. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 183 patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation and we divided them into three groups based on the duration of mechanical ventilation: Group 1: 12 hr. We analyzed the correlation coefficients among the duration of mechanical ventilation, the risk index, and the SOFA, APACHE II and MELD scores. RESULTS: The MELD and preoperative SOFA scores were significantly higher in group 3 (p = 0.003, p = 0.027). The MELD and SOFA scores were correlated with the duration of mechanical ventilation for all the patients (correlation coefficient = 0.22, 0.20, p = 0.003, 0.007, respectively). Yet the APACHE II score shows no correlation. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the MELD and SOFA scores were correlated with the duration of mechanical ventilation in liver transplant patients. Thus, these scoring systems may be useful to determine the duration of mechanical ventilation.

Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Lung Cancer Patients Admitted to the Medical Intensive Care Unit at a University Hospital / 결핵및호흡기질환

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with lung cancer has improved recently, and many of them will require admission to the medical intensive care unit (MICU). The aim of this study was to examine the clinical characteristics and to identify risk factors for mortality in patients with lung cancer admitted to the MICU. METHODS: We conducted retrospective analysis on 88 patients with lung cancer admitted to the MICU between April 2004 and March 2008. RESULTS: Of the 88 patients (mean age, 66 years), 71 patients (80.7%) had non-small cell lung cancer and 17 patients (19.3%) had small cell lung cancer. Distant metastasis were present in 79 patients (89.8%). The main reasons for MICU admission were acute respiratory failure (77.3%), sepsis (11.4%), and central nervous system dysfunction (4.5%). Mechanical ventilation was used in 54 patients (61.4%). Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, length of MICU stay, need for mechanical ventilation, source of MICU admission were correlated with MICU mortality. The type of lung cancer and metastasis were not predictive factors of death in MICU. CONCLUSION: Most common reason for ICU admission was acute respiratory failure. Mortality rate of lung cancer patients admitted to the MICU was 65.9%. APACHE II score, length of ICU stay, need for mechanical ventilation, source of MICU admission were predicted factors of death in the MICU.

Comparing the Usefulness of the Initial Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II Score in the Emergency Department (ED) and the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) Score for Predicting the Prognosis of Septic Patients Admitt / 대한구급학회지

BACKGROUND: To determine the prognostic value of the initial APACHE II score in the ED compared with the classic APACHE II score in the ICU and to check the usefulness of the MEDS score together for more rapid risk stratification of septic patients admitted to the ICU via the ED. METHODS: We prospectively checked the initial APACHE II and MEDS scores of all the patients who had systemic inflammatory response syndrome in the ED and the classic APACHE II scores after admission to the ICU, as well 6 months later. We enrolled the only sepsis cases in the final diagnosis after reviewing the medical records. We evaluated the predictive abilities of the initial APACHE II and MEDS scores compared with the classic APACHE II score. RESULTS: During 6 months, 58 patients diagnosed with sepsis were enrolled. Twenty-four (41.4%) patients died within 28 days of admission and 34 patients survived. The mortality group had a significantly higher mean classic APACHE II score (19 +/- 6.7 vs. 15 +/- 5.0, p < 0.01) and a higher mean MEDS score (16.67 +/- 2.70 vs. 8.91 +/- 3.11, p < 0.01) than the survivor group. The initial APACHE II score at the ED was not significantly different between the two groups. ROC analysis showed the discriminative power of the MEDS score in predicting mortality was much better than the APACHE II score (areas under the curves of the APACHE II score in the ED and ICU, and the MEDS scores were 0.668, 0.807, and 0.967, respectively; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The initial APACHE II score in the ED did not predict mortality better than the classic APACHE II score. However, the MEDS score predicted the poor prognosis of septic patients more rapidly and accurately in the ED than the APACHE II model.

Prognosis of Patients Admitted to ICU after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Emergency Room / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is poor. Although the number of these patients is increasing as a consequence of emergency medical service improvements, we had no information conceiving the survival rates of patients admitted to ICU after CPR in Korea. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all patients admitted to an ICU after CPR at an emergency room of a teaching hospital during the 24 month period from July, 2002 to July, 2004. The demographic and clinical information of each patient were recorded. These included primary diagnosis, total resuscitation time, APACHE II score (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score) at admission to ICU, ICU days, and hospital days. We analyzed all variables in the database and compared the data of patients who died in hospital with that of those who were discharged. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were admitted to the ICU after CPR in the emergency room, and 14 were discharged alive. APACHE II scores were significantly lower and Glasgow coma scales were significantly higher in survivors. CONCLUSIONS: 38% of patients who admitted to ICU after CPR in the emergency room were discharged from hospital alive. We evaluated that the severity scores of patients who receive CPR before ICU admission are important predictors of survival.