The Abdominal Approach for Epiphrenic Esophageal Diverticulum as an Alternative to the Thoracic Approach / 대한흉부외과학회지

BACKGROUND: There is no established surgical procedure for the treatment of epiphrenic esophageal diverticulum. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of esophageal diverticulectomy using abdominal and thoracic approaches. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients who underwent esophageal diverticulectomy through the thoracic or abdominal approach for an epiphrenic diverticulum at a single center between 1996 and 2018. We compared clinical outcomes, including the postoperative length of stay, time from the operation to oral feeding, leakage rate, and reoperation rate between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The median age was 56 years. Of the 30 patients, 18 (60%) underwent diverticulectomy via the thoracic approach and 12 (40%) underwent the abdominal approach. The median hospital stay was 10 days (range, 5–211 days) in the thoracic approach group and 9.5 days (range, 5–18 days) in the abdominal approach group. The median time from the operation until oral feeding was 6.5 days (range, 3–299 days) when the thoracic approach was used and 5 days (range, 1–11 days) when the abdominal approach was used. In the thoracic approach group, the leakage rate was 16.67% and the reoperation rate was 27.78%. However, there were no cases of leakage or reoperation in the abdominal approach group. CONCLUSION: The abdominal approach for esophageal diverticulectomy is a feasible and appropriate alternative to the thoracic approach.

The choice of surgical approach and method for rectal prolapse / 中华消化外科杂志

There are many surgical methods for rectal prolapse,and the choice of transanal or abdominal approach is controversial.There are many factors influencing the choice of surgical approach for rectal prolapse,including the subjective factors such as regional habits,Specialist's experience and difficulty degree of surgery,as well as the objective conditions such as the degree of rectal prolapse,gender,age,basic conditions,anal function evaluation and patient acceptance.Transanal surgery is well tolerated but is usually associated with higher recurrence rates.The recurrence rate of transabdominal approach is relatively low,but the risk and operation duration have some requirements on the basic conditions of patients.Laparoscopic rectal prolapse repair can reduce hospitalization time,postoperative pain and incisional complications.Currently,minimally invasive and individualized treatment are advocated,in which doctors select the surgical approach and procedures that meet the needs of patients and doctors are good at based on the basic conditions and surgical indications of patients.Individualized treatment plan for patients is the development direction of clinical strategy for rectal prolapse.

Feasibility study of one-stage surgery of intracardiac leiomyomatosis through an abdominal approach / 中国实用外科杂志

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of abdominal surgical resection of intracardiac leiomyomatosis.METHODS: The clinical data of 4 cases of intracardiac leiomyomatosis performed in zhongshan Hospital,Fudan University from December 2015 to August 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Four patients underwent onestage surgery through an abdominal approach,without death. The operative time was 185-420(315.3 ± 86.4) min.Extracorporeal circulation time was 22-175(71.8±60.4)min and blood loss was 600-3000(1475.0±941.7)mL. Acute renal failure occurred in one of the patients after operation,the rest had no surgical complications. After 8-26 months of follow-up,there was no sign of recurrence and metastasis. CONCLUSION: One-stage surgery of intracardiac leiomyomatosis through an abdominal approach is feasible. But,how to determine the indications of surgery remains to be further explored and studied.

Management of hepatic hydatidosis by open versus laparoscopic surgery.

Background: Aim of current study was to compare between laparoscopic versus open management of the hydatid cyst of liver regarding complication rate, post-operative recovery course with different modality of treatment and hospital stay. This study shows our results of surgical treatment of liver hydatid cysts during a 2.5 years period. Methods: A prospective study of 30 patients operated on in a 2.5 year period (April 2011 to October 2013) in department of general surgery of J.N. medical college, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, with hepatic hydatid cyst. All patients were preoperatively treated with albendazole. 15 patients were tackled by laparoscopic technique (using Palanivelu hydatid system) and rest 15 underwent Open procedure as surgical approach. Results: Patients operated by laparoscopic surgery shown a better post-operative recovery course, required less analgesia, mobilized and started on oral feed early, intra-abdominal drain was removed at a much earlier period as compared to open group patient, this not only reduced morbidity but also because of this patient could be discharged earlier. Conclusion: Minimal invasive management, using Palanivelu hydatid system for aspiration and laparoscopic intervention, is an alternative to open surgery because of its ability to prevent spillage and thus minimize recurrences. It is better and safe to use laparoscopy in treatment of hydatid liver with less morbidity, mortality and recurrence rate in comparison with open technique.