ABSTRACT
Objective Compare the complications between laparoscopic and abdominal cervical cancer surgery, and investigate the safety of laparoscopic cervical cancer surgery and complications classified by Clavien-Dindo classification, then analyze the risk factors. Method Clinical data of 215 cases of cervical cancer received surgery from March 2011 to October 2014 was collected, which include intraoperative, postoperative and postoperative fol﹣low-up data. All the cases were divided into two groups: LRH group (n= 116) and ARH group (n= 88), then ana﹣lyze and compare the difference of intraoperative, postoperative complications and postoperative follow-up data be﹣tween the two groups, assess the safety of the two groups, and statistically concluded related independent risk factors. Results The complications of 204 patients were classified into 4 grades. The criticality and morbidity of intraopera﹣tive and postoperative complications have no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05). Logistic re﹣gression analysis show that over criticality grade Ⅱ of LRH intraoperative complication related to operating time, over criticality grade Ⅱ of ARH intraoperative complication related to aged over 50 yr, over criticality grade Ⅱ of ARH intraoperative complication related to BMI> 25. Conclusions Through the analysis of laparoscopic operation and the criticality of complications, the safety of the two groups were no difference. The patients with high risk fac﹣tors should be evaluated comprehensively. And strictly grasp the contraindication and indication.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative outcome of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer and endometrial cancer and to evaluate the feasibility of robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy. METHODS: We reviewed medical record of 37 patients who had radical hysterectomy at Hallym university for cervical cancer stage Ia1 to IIa and endometrial cancer stage Ia to Ib. Abdominal radical hysterectomy was carried out in 27 (Abdominal group) patients and robot-assisted radical hysterectomy carried out in 10 patients (Robotic group). We compared patient's characteristics between two groups. Perioperative characteristics compared included cancer stage, operative time, number of nodes, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay and complications. RESULTS: There were no differences in age, parity, history of medical disease, body mass index between two groups (p>0.05). Robotic operative times were significantly longer than for abdominal (480.0+/-117.8 vs. 286.9+/-65.6 min, p<0.0001). Blood loss (660.0+/-245.9 vs. 1,137.0+/-608.4 mL. p<0.0001) and length of hospital stay (7.2 versus 17.1 days, p<0.0001) were significantly lower for the robotic group. Lymph node yield in the robotic group was equivalent to that for the abdominal group (30.1+/-8.7 vs. 35.4+/-16.9, p=0.356). No major operative complications occurred with both groups. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted radical hysterectomy appears safe and feasible in early-stage cervical and endometrial cancer.