ABSTRACT
AIM: To valuate the efficacy of 0.01% atropine for controlling myopia in children of different ages.METHOD: A randomized, double-blind, placebo control and single-center study was conducted. A total of 295 myopic children, aged 6～13 years, with myopia of -0.5D～-6.00D and astigmatism ≤2.0D, who admitted to our hospital from May 2019 to May 2020 were randomly assigned to experimental group(197 cases)and control group(98 cases)in a 2:1 ratio. Two groups were further divided into three subgroups according to age, 6～8 years old group(40/26 cases), 9～10 years group(84/34 cases), and 11～13 years group(73/38 cases). 0.01% atropine was administrated in the experimental group and placebo was administrated in the control group once before sleep. The changes of parameters were compared before and at 2wk, 3, 6, 9 and 12mo after treatment. Intraocular pressure, accommodation amplitude, best corrected distance and near visual acuity, pupil diameter and tear film were tested at 2wk. Cycloplegic refraction was assessed before treatment, and at 6 and 12mo after treatment.RESULTS: The spherical equivalent and axial length progression at 12mo after administration was -0.37±0.69D and 0.29±0.24mm in the experimental group, and -0.59±0.65D and 0.37±0.23mm in the control group(P=0.008, 0.006). In 6～8 years group, spherical equivalent and axial length progression between experimental and control group were not statistically significant(t=0.054, P=0.957; t=-0.623, P=0.536). In 9～10 years group, spherical equivalent and axial length progression between groups were statistically significant(t=2.056, P=0.042; t=-2.057 P=0.042). In 11～13 years group, spherical equivalent and axial length progression between groups were statistically significant(t=2.33, P=0.022; t=-2.424, P=0.017). The pupil was slightly dilated and the accommodation amplitude was decreased in experimental group, and the mean pupil diameter of the two groups was 3.94±0.79 and 3.16±0.48 mm respectively at 12mo after treatment(P<0.001). Other parameters and adverse event noted between groups were not statistically significant.CONCLUSIONS: 0.01% atropine is helpful to control the progression of myopia in children, which is well tolerated by adolescents. However, the effect of 0.01% atropine on the control of myopia for children aged 6～8 years is not enough. The findings suggest that increased concentration of atropine can be tried for 6～8 years old.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effects of 0.0％ and 0.02％ atropine on pupil diameter (PD) and accommodation amplitude (AMP) in myopic children and analyze its relation factors.Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial design was adopted.One hundred and ninety-three myopia children were included from June to October,2016 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University,all the children completed one-year follow-up.All the children were divided into three groups randomly,with 72,74 and 80 myopic children in 0.01％ atropine group,0.02％ atropine group and control group,respectively.The myopic children in 0.01％ atropine group and 0.02％ atropine group wore single-vision spectacle lenses and were treated with 0.01％ and 0.02％ atropine eye drops nightly,respectively.The myopic children in the control group wore spectacle lenses only.The PD and AMP were measured at baseline,and 4,8 and 12 months after treatment.Results There were no significant difference of baselinePD and AMP among the three groups (F=9.321,P=0.820;F=13.209,P=0.220).Compared with basline,after 12 months,the PD increased by 0.75,0.84 and 0.02 mm in 0.01％ atropine group,0.02％ atropine group and control group,respectively.There were statistically significant differences of PD among three groups at different time points (Fgroup =2.168,P=0.013;Ftime =2.139,P=0.015;Finteraction =2.148,P=0.001).Compared with baseline,the PD of 0.01％ atropine group and 0.02％ atropine group were increased 4,8 and 12 months after treatment,and the difference was statistically significant (all at P＜0.001).The PD was stable in control group.After 12 months,the AMP were reduced by 1.25,1.12 and 0.28 D in 0.01％ atropine group,0.02％ atropine group and control group,respectively.There were statistically significant differences of AMP among the three groups at the different time points (Fgroup =18.346,P =0.034;Ftime =1.823,P =0.002;Fintercation =3.239,P =0.023).Compared with baseline,the AMP of 0.01％ atropine group and 0.02％ atropine group were increased 4,8 and 12 months after treatment,and the differences were statistically significant (all at P＜0.05).The AMP remained stable in control group.The change of PD in 0.01％ atropine group and 0.02％ atropine group was correlated with age,baseline PD and baseline eye axis length,respectively (β =0.060,P =0.019;β =-0.440,P＜0.001;β =-0.37,P =0.045).The change in AMP of the atropine group was significantly correlated with the baseline adjustment range (β =-0.71,P＜0.001).Conclusions 0.01％ and 0.02％ atropine show similar effects on pupil diameter and accommodation amplitude after 12 months of treatment in myopic children.
ABSTRACT
Many patients complain of near vision difficulty after PRK surgery. In the prospective study, we report the effect of PRK surgery for myopia on accommodation and binocular vision. 45 myopic eyes (39 patients, 9 males, 30 females) underwent PRK for myopia. Mean preoperative amplitude of accommodation in moderate degree myopia (group 1 -6.00D in spherical equivalent : range -6.10 ~ -10.75D) was 6.85+/-1.41D. Mean postoperative amplitude of accommodation of group 1 was 8.13+/-1.38D, mean postoperative amplitude of accommodation of group 2 was 7.80+/-1.33D, the difference of both groups were statistically significant(p>0.05). Mean preoperative amplitude of accommodation of all patients was 6.91+/-1.35D, mean postoperative amplitude of accommodation was 7.93+/-1.36D, the difference are statistically significant (p>0.01). 12 of 39 patients complained of near vision difficulty while reading after PRK surgery on their one eye, but 3 of them who underwent PRK surgery on their the other eye noticed the disappearance of near vision difficulty. Stereopsis was tested and 15 of 36 patient lost more than 50 sec/arc of streoacuity. Near vision difficulty was not related to the amount of myopia corrected, not related to the stereoacuity change but seemed to related to their adaptability or their reaction time of accommodation with their operated eyes.