ABSTRACT
La biopsia hepática de los aloinjertos sigue siendo considerada el estándar de oro y juega un papel importante e integral en la interpretación y explicación de los cambios que puedan ocurrir en respuesta a alteraciones en las pruebas de la función o bioquímica hepática, anomalías funcionales o alteración en las imágenes diagnósticas, las cuales pueden, o no, ir acompañadas de síntomas. También es útil en el seguimiento o biopsias por protocolo (1-3). La evaluación de biopsias, después del trasplante, puede ser difícil debido a que es muy amplio el espectro de las complicaciones que pueden presentarse en el período postrasplante; más aún, cuando muchas de ellas necesitan un diagnóstico y tratamiento inmediato. La patología más frecuente es el rechazo agudo. Sin embargo, también pueden observarse cambios de perfusión/reperfusión, alteraciones funcionales, recidiva de enfermedad de base, lesión de la vía biliar, lesiones vasculares, infecciones oportunistas, patologías de novo, como la hepatitis autoinmune, hepatitis crónica idiopática postrasplante, toxicidad farmacológica o tumores, entre otras patologías (4). En este artículo relacionado con la patología del trasplante hepático se tratarán las patologías más frecuentes, no quirúrgicas, en el período postrasplante temprano, con un enfoque histopatológico dirigido a las dificultades y controversias para una adecuada correlación clínico-patológica.
Biopsies of liver allografts are still considered to be the gold standard. They play an important and integral role in the interpretation and explanation of changes that may occur in response to alterations in function tests, in the interpretation and explanation of liver biochemistry, in the interpretation and explanation of functional abnormalities, and in the interpretation and explanation of diagnostic images (whether or not accompanied by symptoms). Biopsies are also useful for monitoring and are often part of the protocol (1-3). The evaluation of biopsy samples after transplantation can be difficult especially because of the very broad spectrum of complications that may arise in the post-transplant period. Many of them require immediate diagnosis and treatment despite this difficulty. Although the most common condition is acute rejection, many other conditions and disorders can be observed. They include perfusion/reperfusion alterations, functional impairment, recurrence of underlying diseases, injury to the bile duct, vascular lesions, opportunistic infections, de novo pathologies such as autoimmune hepatitis, post-transplant idiopathic chronic hepatitis, drug toxicity, and tumors (4). This is the second article about the pathology of liver transplantation. It discusses the most common pathologies in the early post-transplant period and provides a histopathological approach towards difficulties and controversies for adequate clinicopathological correlation.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Biopsy , Endothelium , Graft Rejection , Liver Transplantation , Primary Graft Dysfunction , Reperfusion InjuryABSTRACT
Context: In the current scenario of renal transplantation, the role of immunological methods in the detection of C4d has emerged as a useful adjunct in the recognition of acute humoral rejection (AHR). Few reports of this nature are available from the Indian context although there are several from the Western literature. Aims: To study the humoral component of renal allograft rejection in patients presenting clinically with graft dysfunction by histopathological detection of polymorphs in the peritubular capillaries and the expression of C4d using immunological techniques, as well as the response of patients to appropriate antirejection therapy. Settings and Design: This study from a tertiary care center reemphasizes the importance of recognition of AHR as a cause of renal allograft dysfunction. Materials and Methods: Percutaneous renal biopsies were obtained from 40 postrenal transplant patients and evaluated for C4d using immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical methods. Statistical a0 nalysis used: SPSS software. Results: Positive expression of C4d was seen in a total of 19/40 cases (44.4%) indicating immunological evidence of AHR. Diffusely positive cases were treated with IV immunoglobulin therapy, plasmapheresis and Rituximab following which graft function was restored. Patients with minimal to focal positive expression of C4d responded well to pulse steroids and change in immunosuppressive therapy. Conclusions: C4d staining is a useful adjunct to routine histopathological methods in evaluating the humoral component of acute renal allograft dysfunction and helps in planning appropriate antirejection therapy with the goal of achieving long-term graft survival.
ABSTRACT
Acute humoral rejection after renal transplantation is associated with a higher frequency of allograft dysfunction and graft loss. We report a case of acute humoral rejection which was treated successfully with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin. A 31- year-old man developed azotemia after kidney transplantation. Kidney biopsy finding was compatible with antibody-mediated rejection, demonstrated by the infiltration of monocytes and neutrophils and the deposition of C4d on glomerulus and peritubular capillaries. We performed five plasmapheresis with concomitant treatment of intravenous immunoglobulin after each session. With aggressive treatment, there was improvement of oliguric acute renal failure, accompanied by decrease in the percentage of PRA and the titer of donor specific antibodies. Repeated kidney biopsy revealed persistent C4d staining on peritubular capillaries despite disappearance of donor specific antibodies. In conclusion, plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin are effective in treating acute humoral rejection.
Subject(s)
Male , Humans , BiopsyABSTRACT
Although acute humoral rejection is a major cause of renal allograft loss, the diagnosis and treatment of acute humoral rejection have been very difficult because of lack of proper diagnostic tools and effective therapeutic modalities. Recently C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries of renal allografts has been demonstrated to be a sensitive and diagnostic in-situ marker of humoral rejection that correlates strongly with the presence of circulating donor-specific antibodies. Whereas conventional immunosuppressive agents are effective for the treatment of cellular rejection, specific therapeutic strategies targeting the humoral limb of immunosuppression should be necessary for the treatment of humoral rejection. Here we report a case of acute humoral rejection diagnosed with C4d immunostaining from transplant kidney biopsy and treated successfully with combination of plasma exchange, polyclonal rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, and rituximab.
Subject(s)
Allografts , Antibodies , Antilymphocyte Serum , Biopsy , Capillaries , Diagnosis , Extremities , Immunosuppression Therapy , Immunosuppressive Agents , Kidney , Plasma Exchange , Plasma , RituximabABSTRACT
Objective:To study the correlation between deposition of C4d along peritubular capillaries (PTC) and interstitial eosinophilic infiltration in renal allografts.Methods:Deposition of C4d in kidneys was assayed by indirect immunoflourescence of the renal allograft biopsies.Twenty-six patients were demonstrated strongly diffuse staining of PTC,who were defined as C4d+ group,while the biopsies of thirty patients with acute rejection exhibited negative for PTC C4d staining served as the controls,who were defined as C4d-group.Eosinophils were counted under microscope.Results:The C4d+group was demonstrated significantly greater interstitial eosinophilic infiltration than did the C4d-group(P