Adhesion formation after applying adhesion barrier in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: Experience of 7 patients / 대한산부인과내시경학회지

OBJECTIVE: Adhesion barrier has been commonly used in gynecologic surgery. The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcome of applying adhesion barrier in preventing adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: Between March 2000 and March 2010, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who performed laparoscopic surgery twice at Samsung Medical Center. The patients to whom adhesion barrier was applied at the end of the first laparoscopic surgery and had imaging files of pelvic cavity at second laparoscopic surgery were included. The patients with recurrent endometriosis and pelvic inflammatory disease which can make postoperative adhesion by itself due to the nature of the disease were excluded. RESULTS: Ten patients were eligible to be analyzed. Only 3 among 10 showed adhesion free and we could find de novo adhesion formation in 7 patients at second laparoscopic surgery. Eight patients used Intercede(R) (oxidized regenerated cellulose mesh; Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA) and two patients used Guardix(R) (sodium hyaluronic acid solution and carboxymethylcellulose: Hanmi, Seoul, Korea). In six patients, adhesion formation was found at the operation site and one patient showed postoperative adhesion distant from operation site between omentum and anterior peritoneum of pelvic wall. CONCLUSION: We observed adhesion formation despite of prior use of adhesion barrier after laparoscopic gynecological surgery. These results suggest that the use of adhesion barrier alone after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery may not guarantee adhesion prevention.

Preventive Effect of Anti-adhesion Barrier Gel for Peridural Fibrosis in Rat Laminectomy Model

OBJECTIVE: The authors compare peridural scar formation and adhesion with and without the use of Antiadhesion Barrier Gel(Adba) in an animal model of laminectomy. METHODS: Forty-five Sprague-Dawley rats underwent a two level lumbar laminectomy. The Adba was applied to randomly assigned 30 rats around the dura. Remaining 15 rats underwent same operation without the use of Adba. The rats were sacrificed 2, 4, 8 weeks after surgery by 15 numbers. A gross anatomic assessment of scar formation was done using microdissection by an observer blinded to treatment. Amount of scar formation and tenacity were compared between experimental and control group by a numerical rating system. The histological comparing was also performed. RESULTS: The amount of scar tissue and tenacity were reduced grossly and histologically at postoperative 2, 4, 8 weeks in animal model using Adba. Adba material was absorbed around 4 weeks of postoperative period in model. No special inflammatory reaction was observed, and the healing of wound was not affected by Adba. CONCLUSION: Adba significantly reduces the amount of scar formation and tenacity in rat laminectomy model without impacting the healing of operation wound and other complications.