ABSTRACT
RESUMEN La quimioterapia metronómica es un tipo de quimioterapia cuya toxicidad es mínima. Consiste en administrar agentes antineoplásicos habituales a intervalos muy próximos uno del otro y a dosis relativamente bajas durante un tiempo prolongado y sin periodos de descanso farmacológico. Esta terapia reduce la toxicidad y elimina la necesidad de tratamientos de soporte, por lo tanto, el empleo de esta modalidad de tratamiento en pacientes con enfermedad metastásica resulta de gran interés. Muchas investigaciones han evaluado la administración de medicamentos antineoplásicos en esquemas metronómicos, tanto en monoterapia como en combinación. Los fármacos mayormente estudiados son la ciclofosfamida, vinorelbina y capecitabina. Diversos estudios han mostrado la eficacia y tolerancia de esta terapia combinada con la hormonoterapia e inmunoterapia. Es necesaria mayor evidencia científica para definir cuestiones como: pacientes que más beneficio puedan obtener y las combinaciones terapéuticas a emplear de acuerdo al tipo de paciente.
ABSTRACT Metronomic chemotherapy is a type of chemotherapy whose toxicity is minimal. It consists of administering usual antineoplastic agents at intervals very close to each other and at relatively low doses for a prolonged time without periods of pharmacological rest. This therapy reduce toxicity and eliminates the need for supportive treatments, therefore, the use of this treatment modality in patients with metastatic disease is of great interest. Many investigations have evaluated the administration of antineoplastic drugs in metronomic schemes, both in monotherapy and in combination. The most studied drugs are cyclophosphamide, vinorelbine and capecitabine. Several studies have shown the efficacy and tolerance of this therapy combined with hormone therapy and immunotherapy. More scientific evidence is needed to define issues such as: patients who can obtain more benefit and the therapeutic combinations to be used according to the type of patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been reported as an effective treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of this study is to compare the effect and safety between a high-dose regimen (750 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil [FU] and 25 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1–4) and a low-dose regimen (500 mg/m2 5-FU on day 1–3 with 60 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 2). METHODS: A total of 48 patients undergoing HAIC were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-two patients were treated with the high-dose and 16 patients with the low-dose regimen. RESULTS: Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease were noted in one (3.1%), 15 (46.9%), three (9.4%), and 13 patients (40.6%) in the highdose group, and 0 (0%), one (6.3%), eight (50%), and seven patients (43.8%) in the low-dose group (P=0.002). The disease control rate (CR, PR, and SD) did not differ between groups (59.4% vs. 56.3%, P=1.000), but the objective response rate (CR and PR) was significantly higher in the high-dose group (50.0% vs. 6.3%, P=0.003). The median progression free survival did not differ between groups (4.0 vs. 6.0, P=0.734), but overall survival was significantly longer in the high-dose group (not reached vs. 16.0, P=0.028). Fourteen (43.8%) patients in the high-dose group and two patients (12.5%) in the low-dose group experienced grade 3–4 toxicities (P=0.050). CONCLUSIONS: High dose HAIC may achieve better tumor response and may improve overall survival compared to a low-dose regimen. However, the high-dose regimen should be administered cautiously because of the higher incidence of adverse events.
Subject(s)
Humans , Administration, Metronomic , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion , Cisplatin , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Therapy , Fluorouracil , Incidence , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
No abstract available.
Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Administration, Metronomic , Capecitabine , Colorectal Neoplasms , Drug TherapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Metronomic chemotherapy (MET) is frequently administered in comparatively low doses as a continuous chemotherapeutic agent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and overall survival (OS) of MET compared to sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). METHODS: A total of 54 patients with advanced HCC and PVTT who had undergone MET were analyzed between 2005 and 2013. A total of 53 patients who had undergone sorafenib therapy were analyzed as the control group. The primary endpoint of this study was OS. RESULTS: The median number of MET cycles was two (1-15). The OS values for the MET group and sorafenib group were 158 days (132-184) and 117 days (92-142), respectively (P=0.029). The Cox proportional-hazard model showed that a higher risk of death was correlated with higher serum alpha fetoprotein level (≥400 mg/dL, hazard ratio [HR]=1.680, P=0.014) and Child-Pugh class B (HR=1.856, P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: MET was associated with more favorable outcomes in terms of overall survival than was sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC with PVTT, especially in patients with poor liver function. Therefore, MET can be considered as a treatment option in patients with advanced HCC with PVTT and poor liver function.