Uso de antirreumáticos en covid-19 desde la hidroxicloroquina hasta la anakinra pasando por tocilizumab y baricitinib: Una revisión de la literatura / Use of antirheumatic drugs in covid-19 from hydroxychloroquine to anakinra through tocilizumab and baricitinib: A review of the literature

Actualmente nos encontramos en una pandemia mundial causada por el coronavirus 2019 o COVID­19, presentando diferentes desafíos para el sistema de salud debido a que no se cuenta aún con alguna vacuna ni con un tratamiento que haya demostrado su eficacia en totalidad, siendo el manejo actual preventivo y de soporte. Por lo que, en esta revisión se estudiará a los fármacos antirreumáticos más resaltantes que tengan un probable efecto farmacológico, como son la hidroxicloroquina, el tocilizumab, el anakinra y el baricitinib, frente al COVID­19. Se espera que brinde apoyo para futuros tratamientos e investigaciones sobre la enfermedad.

We are currently in a global pandemic caused by the coronavirus 2019 or COVID-19, presenting different challenges for the health system due to the fact that there is still no vaccine or a treatment that has proven its effectiveness in its entirety, being the management current preventive and supportive. Therefore, this review will study the most prominent antirheumatic drugs that have a probable pharmacological effect, such as hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, anakinra and baricitinib, against COVID-19. It is expected that they will provide support for future treatments. and research on the disease

Uso de antirreumáticos en covid-19 desde la hidroxicloroquina hasta la anakinra pasando por tocilizumab y baricitinib: Una revisión de la literatura / Use of antirheumatic drugs in covid-19 from hydroxychloroquine to anakinra through tocilizumab and baricitinib: A review of the literature

RESUMEN Actualmente nos encontramos en una pandemia mundial causada por el coronavirus 2019 o COVID-19, presentando diferentes desafíos para el sistema de salud debido a que no se cuenta aún con alguna vacuna ni con un tratamiento que haya demostrado su eficacia en totalidad, siendo el manejo actual preventivo y de soporte. Por lo que, en esta revisión se estudiará a los fármacos antirreumáticos más resaltantes que tengan un probable efecto farmacológico, como son la hidroxicloroquina, el tocilizumab, el anakinra y el baricitinib, frente al COVID-19. Se espera que brinde apoyo para futuros tratamientos e investigaciones sobre la enfermedad.

ABSTRACT We are currently in a global pandemic caused by the coronavirus 2019 or COVID- 19, presenting different challenges for the health system due to the fact that there is still no vaccine or a treatment that has proven its effectiveness in its entirety, being the management current preventive and supportive. Therefore, this review will study the most prominent antirheumatic drugs that have a probable pharmacological effect, such as hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, anakinra and baricitinib, against COVID-19. It is expected that they will provide support for future treatments. and research on the disease.

Caracterización de pacientes con artritis indiferenciada y evolución a otras enfermedades inflamatorias en una cohorte del noroccidente colombiano: Estudio observacional / Characterization of patients with undifferentiated arthritis and evolution to other inflammatory diseases in a Colombian northwestern cohort: An observational study

RESUMEN Objetivo: La artritis indiferenciada es una artropatía inflamatoria que no cumple con los criterios de enfermedades reumatológicas específicas y cuyos síntomas persisten durante un año. Estos individuos pueden remitir espontáneamente o evolucionar a otra artropatía definida, especialmente artritis reumatoide. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir las características clínicas y de laboratorio, tanto basales como de seguimiento, de pacientes con artritis indiferenciada en un centro de referencia. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo retrospectivo con pacientes con artritis indiferenciada por criterio de reumatólogo. Se analizaron variables sociodemográficas, clínicas y terapéuticas. Las variables cualitativas se expresaron como frecuencias absolutas y relativas, y las cuantitativas con mediana y rango intercuartílico. Resultados: Se incluyeron 66 pacientes; la mediana de edad fue 46,3 años (RIC: 37,5-51,8); diez (15,2 %) sujetos tenían antecedente familiar de artritis reumatoide. Cuarenta (60,6 %) individuos tuvieron compromiso articular en interfalángicas proximales; el principal síntoma fue la rigidez matinal en 29 pacientes (44 %). El compromiso extraarticular más frecuente fue el cutáneo (n=14; 21,2 %). Los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (n=18; 27,2 %) y los esteroides (n=15; 22,7 %) fueron los tratamientos más frecuentes. De 43 pacientes, 22 (51,2 %) permanecieron con diagnóstico de artritis indiferenciada, 18 (41,9 %) progresaron a otras enfermedades, siendo la más frecuente artritis reumatoide, y en tres (7 %) hubo remisión. Conclusiones: En una cohorte de pacientes con artritis indiferenciada del noroccidente colombiano, luego de 12 meses, la mayoría, persiste con este diagnóstico; fue llamativa la frecuencia importante de antecedente familiar de artritis reumatoide y de baja remisión espontánea.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Undifferentiated arthritis is an inflammatory arthropathy that does not meet the criteria of specific rheumatological diseases and whose symptoms persist for one year. These individuals may spontaneously remit or evolve to another defined arthropathy, especially rheumatoid arthritis. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and laboratory characteristics, both baseline and follow-up, of patients with undifferentiated arthritis in a reference center. Materials and methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted with patients with undifferentiated arthritis defined by rheumatologist criteria. Sociodemographic, clinical and therapeutic variables were analyzed. The qualitative variables were expressed as absolute and relative frequencies and the quantitative variables with median and interquartile range. Results: 66 patients were included; the median age was 46.3 years (IQR: 37.5-51.8); 10 subjects (15.2 %) had a family history of rheumatoid arthritis. Forty individuals (60.6 %) had involvement in proximal interphalangeal joints; the main symptom was morning stiffness in 29 patients (44 %). The most frequent extra-articular involvement was cutaneous (n = 14, 21.2 %). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n=18; 27.2%) and steroids (n=15; 22.7 %) were the most frequent treatments. Of 43 patients, 22 (51.2 %) remained with a diagnosis of undifferentiated arthritis, 18 (41.9 %) progressed to other diseases, the most frequent being rheumatoid arthritis, and in three (7 %) there was disease remission. Conclusions: In a cohort of patients with undifferentiated arthritis from northwestern Colombia, after 12 months, most of them persist with this diagnosis; it was striking the important frequency of a family history of rheumatoid arthritis and a low spontaneous remission.

Enfermedad de Still del Adulto, a propósito de un caso / Still's disease, a clinical case

La enfermedad de Still del Adulto es una variante sistémica del universo llamado "artritis idiopática juvenil", cuya diferencia es la edad de aparición, recibiendo este nombre cuando el cuadro se manifiesta en personas mayores de 15 años. Es una enfermedad autoinflamatoria caracterizada por fiebre intermitente, artritis, rash evanescente y linfadenopatías, asociado a manifestaciones de compromiso sistémico. Es una patología de baja prevalencia, pero es importante considerarla como uno de los principales diagnósticos etiológicos de la fiebre de origen desconocido.

Adult-onset Still's disease is a systemic variant of Still's disease distinguished from juvenile idiopathic arthritis by its onset age of over 15. It is an auto-inflammatory disease characterized by intermittent fever, arthritis, short-lived rash and lymphadenopathies. It has low prevalence but is important to consider as one of the principle etiological diagnoses of fever of unknown origin.

Infecciones en pacientes con artritis reumatoide: medicamentos moduladores de la respuesta biológica versus fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad. Seguimiento a un año / Infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients: biological therapy versus disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: one year follow-up

IntroducciónLos fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad y los medicamentos biológicos buscan controlar la inflamación y evitar la progresión del daño articular en artritis reumatoide. Aún es controvertido si éstos aumentan la incidencia de infecciones en esta entidad.MétodosEstudio de cohorte retrospectivo en una población de pacientes de consulta externa y hospitalización, de un hospital universitario de referencia de reumatología, de cuarto nivel de complejidad, del noroccidente colombiano. Se incluyeron 383 pacientes según los criterios del American College of Rheumatology de 1987: 83 en el grupo de terapia con biológicos y 300 en el grupo de fármacos modificadores, para establecer la incidencia y factores de riesgo para infecciones no serias y serias a los 12 meses de seguimiento.ResultadosLa mayoría de la población fue femenina (85%). El grupo de biológicos presentó un mayor riesgo para infecciones no serias [HR 1.73 (IC 95% 1.07–2.77; p=0.023)] y serias [HR 2.56 (IC 95% 1.09–6.01; p=0.030)]; este hallazgo se mantuvo al ajustar los resultados por otras variables asociadas a infección (número de fármacos modificadores recibidos, uso de metotrexate, esteroides y leflunomida, diabetes mellitus) HR para infección no seria [(1.67, IC 95% 1.05–2.70; p=0.030)] y HR para infección seria [(2.67, IC 95% 1.12–6.34; p= 0.026)]. La enfermedad pulmonar crónica [HR 5.11 (IC 95% 1.18–22.08; p=0.029)] fue factor de riesgo adicional para infecciones serias.ConclusionesLa terapia con biológicos aumenta el riesgo de infecciones serias y no serias a 12 meses, en comparación con fármacos modificadores, en un grupo de pacientes con artritis reumatoide. También se aumenta el riesgo de infecciones serias con la presencia de enfermedad pulmonar crónica.

Background: Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and biological disease modifying drugs are used to control inflammation and prevent progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis. It is still controversial whether these drugs increase the incidence of infection in this disease.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted on a population sample of 383 inpatients and outpatients from a university hospital and referral rheumatology tertiary hospital complex in northwestern Colombia. They were classified according to American College of Rheumatology 1987 classification criteria, with 83 in the biological therapy group, and 300 in the disease modifying antirheumatic drugs group, in order to establish the incidence and risk factors for serious and non-serious infections at 12 months follow-up. Results: The majority were females (85%). The biological therapy group presented a greater risk for non-serious [HR 1.73 (95% CI 1.07-2.77; P=.023)] and serious infections [HR 2.56 (95% CI 1.09-6.01; P=.030)]. This finding remained when adjusting for other variables associated with infection (number of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs received, methotrexate, leflunomide and steroids use, diabetes mellitus), with HR for non-serious infection [(1.67, 95% CI 1.05-2.70; P=.030)], and HR for serious infection [(2.67, 95% CI 1.12-6.34; P=.026)]. Chronic lung disease [HR 5.11 (95 % CI 1.18-22.08; P=.029)] was an additional risk factor for serious infections.Conclusions: Biological therapy increases the risk of serious and non-serious infections at 12 months, compared to disease modifying drugs, in a group of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The risk of serious infections also increases with the presence of chronic lung disease.

Registro brasileiro de biológicos: processo de implementação e resultados preliminares do BiobadaBrasil / Brazilian biologic registry: BiobadaBrasil implementation process and preliminary results

OBJETIVOS: O presente estudo teve por objetivo descrever o processo de implementação de um registro nacional em um país em desenvolvimento (Brasil) e relatar os principais resultados preliminares do registro BiobadaBrasil. MATERAL E MÉTODOS: Através de um acordo com a PANLAR, o protocolo Biobadaser foi utilizado como modelo para a implementação de um novo registro no nosso país. Durante os dois primeiros anos desse esforço, o protocolo original foi adaptado, traduzido e apresentado a todos os reumatologistas brasileiros. Durante dez meses, dados de 1.037 pacientes (750 tratados com biológicos e 287 controles) de 15 centros foram coletados. RESULTADOS: A maioria dos pacientes tinha artrite reumatoide (AR) (n = 723). Infliximabe foi o agente anti-TNF mais usado, e a exposição total a biológicos foi 2.101 pacientes-ano. A razão mais comum para suspensão da droga foi ineficiência ou perda de efetividade (50 por cento), e 30 por cento dos pacientes interromperam o tratamento devido a eventos adversos. Três casos de tuberculose foram observados no grupo biológico, representando maior incidência do que aquela da população brasileira geral. Infecções foram observadas em 23 por cento dos pacientes do grupo biológico, sendo o trato respiratório superior o local mais comumente afetado. Apenas um caso de hanseníase tuberculoide foi observado. Nenhuma morte nem malignidade atribuível ao efeito dos medicamentos foi observada até fevereiro de 2010. CONCLUSÕES: A implementação do registro foi bem sucedida. Embora recente, o registro BiobadaBrasil já forneceu importantes dados.

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed at describing the implementation process of a national registry in a developing country (Brazil) and at reporting the main preliminary results of the BiobadaBrasil registry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Through a PANLAR agreement, the Biobadaser protocol was used as a model for implementing the new registry in our country. During the first two years of this effort, the original protocol was adapted, translated, and presented to all Brazilian rheumatologists. For ten months, data of 1,037 patients (750 subjects treated with biological drugs and 287 control subjects) from 15 centers were collected. RESULTS: Most patients had rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 723). Infliximab was the most frequently used anti-TNF agent, and the total exposure to biologic drugs was 2,101 patient-years. The most common reason for interrupting drug use was lack or loss of efficacy (50 percent), while 30 percent withdrew from the treatment arm due to adverse events. Three cases of tuberculosis were observed in the biologic group, with an incidence higher than that of the general Brazilian population. Infections were observed in 23 percent of the biologic group, and the upper respiratory tract was the most commonly affected site. Only one case of tuberculoid leprosy was observed. No deaths or malignancies attributed to drug effects were observed as of February 2010. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the BiobadaBrasil registry was successful, and, although recent, the registry has provided important data.