In vitro shear bond strength between fluorinated zirconia ceramic and resin cements

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of a gas-phase fluorination method under different fluorination periods through using two resin cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 84 zirconia specimens in dimensions of 5 mm × 5 mm × 2 mm were prepared and surface treated with 50 µm aluminum oxide particles or gas phase fluorination for 2 min, 5 min, or 10 min. One specimen in each group was surface analyzed under scanning electron microscope. The remaining specimens were bonded to composite cylinders in dimensions of 2 mm diameter and 3 mm high with Panavia SA Plus or Variolink N. Then, the specimens were stored in 37℃ distilled water for 24 hours and shear bond strength test was applied at a speed of 1 mm/min. RESULTS: The highest shear bond strength values were observed in the samples fluorinated for 5 minutes and cemented with Panavia SA Plus. Variolink N did not elicit any statistical differences between surface treatments. Panavia SA Plus resin cement and Variolink N resin cements featured statistically significant difference in shear bond strength values only in the case of 5 minutes of fluorination treatment. CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, application of 5 minutes of fluorination with 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate monomer (MDP) containing Panavia SA Plus resin cement increased the resin bond strength of zirconia. Fluorination of the zirconia surface using conventional resin cement, Variolink N, did not lead to an increase in bond strength.

Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on flexural strength of fiber-reinforced composite post

PURPOSE: Many studies have shown that airborne-particle abrasion of fiber post can improve the bonding strength to resin cement. But, airborne-particle abrasion may influence the property of fiber post. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of airborne-particle abrasion on flexural strength of fiber post. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two fiber-reinforced posts; DT Light Post Size 2 (1.8 mm diameter, Bisco Inc) and RelyX Fiber Post Size 3 (1.9 mm diameter, 3M ESPE); were used in this study. Each group was divided into 3 subgroups according to different surface treatments; without pretreatment: 50 µm aluminum oxide (Cobra®, Renfert): and 30 µm aluminum oxide modified with silica (Rocatec Soft®, 3M ESPE). After airborne-particle abrasion procedure, three-point bending test was done to determine the flexural strength and flexural modulus. The diameter of each posts was measured to an accuracy of 0.01 mm using a digital micrometer. There was no diameter change before and after airborneparticle abrasion. The mean flexural moduli and flexural strengths calculated using the appropriate equations. The results were statistically analyzed using One-way ANOVA and Scheffe's post-hoc test at 95% confidencial level. RESULTS: There was no significant difference on flexural strength between groups. CONCLUSION: In the limitation of this study, flexural strength and flexural modulus of fiber post are not affected by airborne-particle abrasion.

Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of a resin cement to commercially pure titanium

Investigation of the effectiveness of surface treatments that promote a strong bond strength of resin cements to metals can contribute significantly to the longevity of metal-ceramic restorations. This study evaluated the effect of surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin cement to commercially pure titanium (CP Ti). Ninety cast CP Ti discs were divided into 3 groups (n=30), which received one of the following airborne-particle abrasion conditions: (1) 50 ?m Al2O3 particles; (2) 30 ?m silica-modified Al2O3 particles (Cojet Sand); (3) 110 ?m silica-modified Al2O3 particles (Rocatec). For each airborne-particle abrasion condition, the following post-airborne-particle abrasion treatments were used (n=10): (1) none; (2) adhesive Adper Single Bond 2; (3) silane RelyX Ceramic Primer. RelyX ARC resin cement was bonded to CP Ti surfaces. All specimens were thermally cycled before being tested in shear mode. Failure mode was determined. The best association was Rocatec plus silane. All groups showed 100 percent adhesive failure. There were combinations that promote higher SBS than the protocol recommended by the manufacturer of RelyX ARC.

A investigação da eficácia de tratamentos de superfície que promovem uma forte resistência de união de cimentos resinosos aos metais pode contribuir significantemente para a longevidade das restaurações metalocerâmicas. Este estudo avaliou o efeito de tratamentos de superfície na resistência ao cisalhamento da união de um cimento resinoso ao titânio comercialmente puro (Ti cp). Noventa discos foram fundidos em Ti cp e divididos em 3 grupos (n=30), os quais receberam uma das seguintes condições de jateamento: (1) partículas de Al2O3 de 50 ?m; (2) partículas de Al2O3 modificadas por sílica de 30 ?m (Cojet Sand); (3) partículas de Al2O3 modificadas por sílica de 110 ?m (Rocatec). Para cada condição de jateamento, os seguintes tratamentos pós-jateamento foram utilizados (n=10): (1) nenhum; (2) adesivo Adper Single Bond 2; (3) silano RelyX Ceramic Primer. O cimento resinoso RelyX ARC foi aplicado à superfície do Ti cp. Todos os espécimes foram termociclados antes do ensaio de cisalhamento. O modo de fratura também foi determinado. A melhor associação foi o Rocatec mais silano. Todos os grupos apresentaram 100 por cento de falha adesiva. Houve combinações que promoveram maior resistência ao cisalhamento da união que aquela recomendada pelo fabricante do RelyX ARC.

Estudo dos procedimentos utilizados para obtenção de microrretenções na superfície interna da porcelana: avaliação por meio de testes de rugosimetria e microscopia eletrônica de varredura / Procedures for obtaining microretentions on the inner surface of the porcelain by surface roughness tests and SEM

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a superfície interna de dois sistemas cerâmicos, após diferentes tratamentos de superfície, avaliação essa feita por meio de rugosimetria e microscopia eletrônica de varredura. Foram utilizadas as seguintes cerâmicas: IPS Empress II (Ivoclar-Vivadent Alemanha) e InCeram Alumina (Vita Zahnfabrick - Alemanha). Foram confeccionadas 50 amostras em forma de pastilha para cada sistema cerâmico de acordo com as especificações dos fabricantes, armazenadas à temperatura ambiente para então serem submetidas ao tratamento superficial, a saber (n=10): sem tratamento (T0) (controle); Ácido fluorídrico (T1); Ácido fluorídrico associado ao jato de óxido de alumínio (T2); Sistema Cojet (T3); Laser Nd:YAG (T4). Para os resultados de rugosidade, padronizaram-se as medidas em Ra, sendo posteriormente realizada a análise estatística por meio de ANOVA e teste de Tukey (p<.001). Para ambos os grupos controle (T0) das cerâmicas testadas, as análises evidenciaram os valores de rugosidade mais inferiores; para o Sistema InCeram Alumina, os tratamentos, ácido fluorídrico (T1), Sistem Cojet (T3)e Laser Nd:YAG (T4), não tiveram diferença estatisticamente significante; já para o Sistema IPS Empress II, todos os tratamentos foram estatisticamente diferentes. As fotomicrografias em microscopia eletrônica de varredura mostraram características diferentes para os tratamentos peculiares para cada sistema cerâmico. Baseado nos dados obtidos pode-se concluir que, quanto ao IPS Empress II, o tratamento com ácido fluorídrico é suficiente, assim como o Sistema CoJet é para o InCeram Alumina. Outros estudos devem ser realizados para que se tenham parâmetros ideais para o tratamento a laser.

The present study aimed at evaluating the inner surface of two ceramic systems, after different surface treatments, performed by surface roughness tests and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). IPS Empress II (Ivoclar-Vivadent – Germany) and InCeram Alumina (Vita Zahnfabrick – Germany) were used. Fifty lozenge-shaped samples were made for each ceramic system according to the manufacturers’ specifications, and stored at room temperature prior to surface treatment; namely (n=10): non-treated (T0) (control); hydrofluoric acid (T1); hydrofluoric acid associated to airborne particle abrasion (T2); CoJet System (T3); Laser Nd: YAG (T4). Roughness measurement results were standardized in Ra. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test (p<.001) were used to perform the stastistics analysis. For both control groups of the tested ceramics, analyses revealed the lowest roughness values; for the InCeram Alumina System, treatments such as hydrofluoric acid (T1), CoJet System (T3) and Laser Nd:YAG (T4) did not present any statistically significant difference, while for the IPS Empress II System, all treatments were statistically different. Photomicrographs by SEM showed different characteristics for each ceramic system treatment. Based on the resulting data, it can be concluded that the hydrofluoric acid treatment suits the IPS Empress II System, as well as the CoJet System suits the InCeram Alumina System. Further research might be done in order to get ideal parameters for the laser treatment.