ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Identificar as evidências científicas da literatura sobre a inserção de máscara laríngea por enfermeiros. Método: Revisão integrativa de literatura, realizada em novembro de 2020, cuja busca ocorreu nas bases de dados Cumulattive Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, Excerpta Médica Database, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, US National Library of Medicine National Institutes Database Search of Healthe Web of Sciencepor meio do programa Rayyan para seleção dos estudos. Resultados: Identificaram-se 1.156 estudos, do quais oito atenderam aos critérios de inclusão. Os estudos foram categorizados em dispositivos de primeira e segunda geração. Conclusão: Conclui-se que o uso de máscara laríngea de primeira e segunda geração por enfermeiros é uma alternativa recomendada por sua rapidez, sucesso e eficácia em garantir a via aérea avançada, em especial, em situações de parada cardiorrespiratória em adultos, porém, recomenda-se verificar os efeitos adversos de seu uso.
Objective: To identify evidence-based literature on the laryngeal mask airway insertion by nurses. Method: Integrative literature review conducted in November 2020, searched in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane, Excerpta Medica Database, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, US National Library of Medicine National Institutes Database Search of Health and Web of Science through the Rayyan Study Selection Program. Results: Eight out of the 1,156 studies identified met the inclusion criteria. Studies were categorized into first and second-generation devices. Conclusion: The use of a first and second-generation laryngeal mask airway by nurses is a recommended alternative for its speed, success and effectiveness in ensuring the advanced airway, especially in situations of cardiopulmonary arrest in adults. However, adverse effects of its use should be evaluated.
Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal , Airway Management , Primary Care NursingABSTRACT
GOALS: Determine the success rate of guided intubation with a flexible bronchofibroscope (BFC) through supraglottic devices: I-gel or Fastrach, establish the degree of fibroscopic visualization and determine the insertion time of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and endotracheal intubation. METHODS: Experimental, prospective, comparative and randomized study of 60 ASA I-II-III patients, older than 18 years, undergoing elective surgeries that required general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. After anesthetic induction, the assigned LMA was placed and intubation with BFC was performed through it. Both the success of laryngeal mask insertion and intubation were recorded, as well as the time (in seconds) equired for these procedures. The vision of the laryngeal structures was classified according to the Brimacombe Scale. RESULTS: The groups analyzed presented similar general characteristics. Insertion time of he LMA was significantly lower with I-gel than Fastrach (median 12 s vs 16 s. Respectively, p = 0.001). Also, in the intubation time BFC guided through the laryngeal mask, differences in favor of I-gel were found, with a median of 72 s. vs 89 s. (p = 0.001). Regarding the degree of glottic visualization with BFC, no statistically significant differences were found between both groups.CONCLUSIONS: Although both devices had the highest success rate (both in their placement and in intubation through them), with I-gel the intubation was performed quicker.
OBJETIVOS: Determinar la tasa de éxito de intubación guiada con broncofibroscopio flexible (BFC) a través de los dispositivos supraglóticos: I-gel o Fastrach, establecer el grado de visualización fibroscópica y determinar el tiempo de inserción de la máscara laríngea y de intubación endotraqueal. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio experimental, prospectivo, comparativo y aleatorizado de 60 pacientes ASA I- II III, mayores de 18 años, sometidos a cirugías electivas que requerían anestesia general e intubación endotraqueal. Luego de la inducción anestésica, se procedió a colocar la máscara laríngea asignada y se realizó la intubación con BFC a través de la misma. Tanto el éxito de inserción de máscara laríngea como de intubación fueron registrados, así como el tiempo (en segundos) requerido para dichos procedimientos. La visión de las estructuras laríngeas fue clasificada de acuerdo a Escala de Brimacombe. RESULTADOS: Los grupos analizados presentaron características generales similares. El tiempo de inserción de la ML fue significativamente menor con I-gel que con Fastrach (medianas: 12 s. vs 16 s. respectivamente, p = 0,001). También en el tiempo de intubación guiada con BFC a través de la máscara laríngea, se encontraron diferencias en favor de I-gel, con una mediana de 72 s. vs 89 s. (p = 0,001). Respecto al grado de visualización glótica con BFC, no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ambos grupos. CONCLUSIONES: Aunque ambos dispositivos tuvieron la máxima tasa de éxito (tanto en su colocación como en la intubación a través de ellos), con I-gel se realizó la intubación de manera más rápida.
Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Bronchoscopy/methods , Laryngeal Masks , Time Factors , Body Weight , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Fiber Optic Technology , Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Intubation, Intratracheal/methodsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Treacher Collins syndrome is a rare disorder of the craniofacial development that constitutes a challenge for anesthesiologists, since it represents a difficult airway in the majority of cases. The main objective of this article is to provide a bibliographic review about how the airway management of patients with Treacher Collins syndrome has been managed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was carried out in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE and ScienceDirect. DISCUSSION: The factors that increase the risk of difficult airway in these patients are presented as well as the strategies to handle it. CONCLUSION: The Treacher Collins syndrome presents a high risk of difficult airway, therefore careful planning of airway management is mandatory and there are different strategies to handle it.
INTRODUCCIÓN: El síndrome de Treacher Collins (STC) es un trastorno inusual del desarrollo craneofacial que constituye un reto para el anestesiólogo, ya que éste condiciona la condición de vía aérea difícil en la mayoría de los casos. El objetivo principal de este artículo es realizar una revisión bibliográfica de cómo se han manejado casos de vía aérea difícil ligados al síndrome de Treacher Collins. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó una revisión de la literatura disponible en las siguientes bases de datos: PubMed, EMBASE y ScienceDirect. DISCUSIÓN: Se presentan los factores que aumentan el riesgo de vía aérea difícil en estos pacientes, así como las estrategias para manejarla. CONCLUSIÓN: El síndrome de Treacher Collins presenta un alto riesgo de vía aérea difícil, por lo tanto, es obligatoria la planificación cuidadosa de la misma, contando con diferentes estrategias para manejarla.