Effects of alfentanil on myocardial fibrosis in rats with acute myocardial infarction by regulating the SphK1/S1P signaling pathway / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To explore the effects of alfentanil （ALF） on myocardial fibrosis in rats with acute myocardial infarction （AMI） by regulating sphingosine kinase 1 （SphK1）/sphingosine 1-phosphate （S1P） signaling pathway. METHODS Male SD rats were collected to construct AMI model by the ligation of anterior descending branch of left coronary artery. The successfully modeled rats were randomly divided into AMI model group （Model group）， ALF low-dose group （ALF-L group， 0.25 mg/kg ALF）， ALF high-dose group （ALF-H group， 0.5 mg/kg ALF）， high dose of ALF+SphK1 activator group （ALF-H+K6PC-5 group， 0.5 mg/kg ALF+1 μg/g K6PC-5）. At the same time， a sham operation group （Sham group） was set up to perform only chest opening/closing operations without ligating the anterior descending branch of left coronary artery， with 15 rats in each group. Rats in each drug group were intraperitoneally injected with the corresponding drug solution， once a day， for 4 consecutive weeks. Twelve hours after the last medication， cardiac function indicators [left ventricular systolic pressure （LVSP）， left ventricular ejection fraction （LVEF）， left ventricular systolic diameter （LVSD）， left ventricular fractional shortening （LVFS）] of rats were detected in each group； the condition of myocardial infarction， pathological changes in myocardial tissue， and degree of fibrosis were observed； serum levels of brain natriuretic peptide （BNP） and cardiac troponin Ⅰ （cTnⅠ） in rats were detected. The protein expressions of collagen Ⅰ ， collagen Ⅲ ， matrix metalloproteinase-2 （MMP-2）， SphK1 and S1P were alsodetected in the myocardial tissue of rats. RESULTS Compared with the Sham group， the arrangement of myocardial cells in the Model group was disordered， with a large number of inflammatory cells infiltrating. The levels of LVSP， LVFS and LVEF in the Model group were significantly reduced （P＜0.05）； LVSD level， myocardial infarction area， collagen volume fraction， serum levels of BNP and cTnⅠ， the protein expressions of collagen Ⅰ， collagen Ⅲ， MMP-2， SphK1 and S1P in myocardial tissue were significantly increased or enlarged （P＜0.05）. Compared with the Model group， the pathological changes and degree of fibrosis in the myocardial tissue of rats in each dose group of ALF were improved or relieved， while the quantitative indicators of rats in the ALF-H group were significantly improved and significantly better than those in ALF-L group （P＜0.05）. K6PC-5 could significantly reverse the improvement effect of high-dose ALF on the above quantitative indicators in rats （P＜0.05）. CONCLUSIONS ALF can reduce myocardial fibrosis and improve cardiac function in AMI rats， and the effect may be related to the inhibition of the SphK1/S1P signaling pathway.

Median effective dose of alfentanil combined with propofol inhibiting responses to laryngeal mask airway insertion in children / 中华麻醉学杂志

Objective:To determine the median effective dose(ED 50) of alfentanil combined with propofol inhibiting responses to the laryngeal mask airway(LMA) insertion in children. Methods:American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification Ⅰ children, aged 6-10 yr, with body mass index of 18-24 kg/m 2, undergoing facial skin pigmented nevus resection, were selected. Propofol(target plasma concentration 3 μg/ml) was given by the target-controlled infusion, alfentanil was intravenously injected, 2 min later LMA was inserted, and anesthesia was maintained with 2%-3% sevoflurane until the end of surgery. The dose of alfentanil was determined by the up-and-down sequential method, the initial dose of alfentanil was 15 μg/kg, when the response to LMA insertion was positive/negative, the dose of alfentanil increased/decreased by 1 μg/kg in the next case. The LMA insertion response was defined as swallowing, bucking, body movement occurred during insertion of the LMA, and this process was repeated until 7th turning points appeared. The ED 50 and 95% confidence interval of alfentanil combined with propofol inhibiting responses to LMA insertion in children were calculated using probit method. Results:The ED 50 of alfentanil combined with propofol inhibiting responses to LMA insertion was 13.18(95% confidence interval 12.43-13.79) μg/kg in children. Conclusions:The ED 50 of alfentanil combined with propofol inhibiting responses to LMA insertion is 13.18 μg/kg in children.

Effect of gender factor on efficacy of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy / 中华麻醉学杂志

Objective:To evaluate the effect of gender factor on efficacy of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in the patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.Methods:Two hundred patients, aged 18-64 yr, with body mass index of 18-30 kg/m 2, of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classificationⅠor Ⅱ, scheduled for elective gastrointestinal endoscopy, were divided into 2 groups ( n=100 each) according to gender: male group (group M) and female group (group F). Remimazolam 0.2-0.3 mg/kg and alfentanil 5-7 μg/kg were intravenously injected, remimazolam 0.5-0.7 mg·kg -1·h -1 was continuously infused during operation to maintain the modified observer′s assessment of alert/sedation score<3 points, and alfentanil 2 μg/kg was administered when necessary. The consumption of remimazolam and alfentanil, examination time, recovery time and time of post-anesthesia care unit stay were recorded. The satisfaction scores of examination physicians and patients were recorded. The occurrence of adverse reactions such as injection pain, intraoperative body movement, respiratory depression, hypotension, bradycardia and hiccups and postoperative dizziness, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, abdominal pain and abdominal distension were recorded. Results:There was no significant difference in the consumption of remimazolam and alfentanil, examination time, recovery time, satisfaction scores of examination physicians and patients between the two groups ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of respiratory depression, hypotension, bradycardia, injection pain, body movement, hiccups, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and fatigue between the two groups ( P>0.05). Compared with group M, the time of post-anesthesia care unit stay was significantly prolonged, and the incidence of postoperative dizziness, nausea and vomiting was increased in group F ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Remimazolam combined with alfentanil provides better efficacy in male patients than in female patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Safety and efficacy of alfentanil combined with remimazolam for fiberoptic bronchoscopy / 中国医师杂志

Objective:To investigate the safety and efficacy of remimazolam combined with afentanyl for fiberoptic bronchoscopy.Methods:Sixty patients admitted to Chifeng Hospital for fiberbronchoscopy from January to April 2022 were selected and divided into two groups by random number table method: remimazolam group (group R) and propofol group (group P), 30cases in each group. After intravenous injection of alfentanil for anesthesia induction, group R was sedated by intravenous injection of remidazolam besylate, and group P was sedated by intravenous injection of propofol emulsion. When sufficient sedation was achieved, fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed. The patients were scored with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) before examination and before leaving the room. The recovery rate of sedation and the recovery rate of drugs during operation were compared. Blood pressure, heart rate (HR), bispectral index (BIS), SpO 2 value and Modified Observer′s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score were compared before induction (T 0), at the beginning of examination (T 1), immediately when fiber bronchoscope reached juga (T 2), at the end of surgery (T 3), immediately, when patients regained consciousness (T 4). Drug onset and recovery time (time out of hospital) as well as the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative adverse reactions were recorded in both groups. Results:There was no statistically significant difference in general condition, MMSE score and examination time between the two groups (all P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the success rate of sedation and the number of sedative remedy times (all P>0.05). The number of additional drugs in group R was significantly higher than that in group P ( P<0.05). The systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and BIS values of patients in group P at T 1 and T 2 were significantly lower than those in group R (all P<0.05). After administration, the MOAA/S score of the two groups began to decrease, and the decrease of the P group was significantly greater than that of the R group, and the MOAA/S value of the patients was the lowest at the 3rd and 4th minutes after administration, respectively. The time from the beginning of administration to the MOAA/S score ≤3 in group P was significantly shorter than that in group R (all P<0.05). The incidence of pain and respiratory depression after injection in group P was significantly higher than that in group R ( P<0.05). Conclusions:The application of afentanil combined with remimazolam in the patients undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy has good sedative effect and high anesthesia quality, and has no obvious effect on cognitive function and few adverse reactions, so it is safe and effective.

Efficacy and safety of ropivacaine combined with alfentanil for analgesia after knee arthroscopic surgery / 中国药房

OBJECTIVE To explore the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of ropivacaine combined with alfentanil for postoperative analgesia in patients who underwent knee arthroscopic surgery. METHODS A total of 60 patients who underwent knee arthroscopic surgery were collected from the Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture from March to September in 2022， and then divided into trial group and control group with random number table method， with 30 cases in each group. The control group received intra-articular injection of 0.25% ropivacaine 50 mg， and the trial group received intra-articular injection of 0.25% ropivacaine 50 mg+alfentanil 0.15 μg/kg.The first postoperative remedial analgesia time， the total amount of postoperative remedial drugs， numerical rating scale at rest （NRS-R） scores， numerical rating scale at movement （NRS-M） scores， heart rate， mean arterial blood pressure， and pulse oxygen saturation during exercise at different monitoring time points after surgery， the incidence of adverse drug reactions such as hypotension， respiratory depression， nausea， and vomiting after surgery were compared between 2 groups. RESULTS Compared with the control group， the first postoperative remedial analgesia time was significantly longer in the trial group， and the total amount of postoperative remedial drugs was significantly reduced （P＜0.001）. The trial group had lower NRS-R and NRS-M scores at each monitoring time point， with statistically significant differences （P＜0.001）， and there was an interactive effect between time and groups （P＜0.001）. The changes in heart rate， mean arterial blood pressure， and pulse oxygen saturation of patients in the trial group were relatively small， with no statistically significant differences （P＞0.05）， and there was no interactive effect between time and groups （P＞0.05）. There was no statistical significance in the incidence of adverse drug reactions between 2 groups， such as postoperative hypotension， respiratory depression， nausea， vomiting （P＞0.05）. CONCLUSIONS The intra- articular injection of ropivacaine combined with alfentanil shows good efficacy and safety for post-knee arthroscopic analgesia， and significantly prolongs the analgesic duration of ropivacaine.

Dose-effect relationship of alfentanil inhibiting cardiovascular responses to endotracheal intubation when combined with midazolam and etomidate / 中华麻醉学杂志

Objective:To investigate the dose-effect relationship of alfentanil inhibiting cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation when combined with midazolam and etomidate.Methods:American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients of either sex, aged 18-64 yr, with body mass index<32 kg/m 2, undergoing elective operation under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, were enrolled in this study.Midazolam 0.025 mg/kg was intravenously injected for adequate sedation, and 5 min later mean arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded for 3 consecutive times at an interval of 3 min, and the mean value was calculated and served as the baseline value.Etomidate 0.3 mg/kg was intravenously injected, and alfentanil and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg were intravenously injected when bispectral index value < 60, and then 1.4 min later tracheal intubation was performed.The dose of alfentanil was determined by the Dixon′s up-and-down method.The initial dose of alfentanil was set at 20 μg/kg.The dose of alfentanil in the next patient was determined according to the development of cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation, and the ratio between the two successive doses was 1.0∶1.1.The cardiovascular response was defined as as positive when the maximum value of mean arterial pressure or heart rate increased by ≥20% of the baseline value within 2 min after endotracheal intubation.Probit method was used to determine the ED 50, ED 95 and 95% confidence interval of alfentanil inhibiting cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation. Results:When combined with midazolam and etomidate, the ED 50 (95% confidence interval) of alfentanil inhibiting cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation was 21.343 (19.105-24.516) μg/kg, and the ED 95 (95% confidence interval) was 25.043 (22.983-48.983) μg/kg. Conclusions:When combined with midazolam and etomidate, the ED 50 and ED 95 of alfentanil inhibiting cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubation are 21.343 and 25.043 μg/kg, respectively.

Dose-response relationship of alfentanil in combination with midazolam-etomidate inhibiting cardiovascular responses to laryngeal mask airway implantation in elderly patients / 中华麻醉学杂志

Objective:To evaluate the dose-response relationship of alfentanil in combination with midazolam-etomidate inhibiting cardiovascular responses to laryngeal mask airway implantation in elderly patients.Methods:American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients of either sex, aged 65-85 yr, with body mass index of 20-30 kg/m 2, undergoing elective operation under general anesthesia, were enrolled in this study.Midazolam 0.025 mg/kg was intravenously injected for adequate sedation, 5 min later mean arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded for 3 consecutive times at 3-min interval, the mean value was collected and considered as the baseline value.Etomidate 0.2 mg/kg was intravenously injected, and alfentanil and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg were intravenously injected when bispectral index value < 60.A laryngeal mask airway was inserted at 1.4 min after intravenous injection of alfentanil, and mechanical ventilation was performed.The dose of alfentanil was determined by the Dixon′s up-and-down method.The initial dose of alfentanil was set at 6.83 μg/kg.The dose of alfentanil in the next patient was determined according to the development of cardiovascular response to laryngeal mask airway placement.If the cardiovascular response to laryngeal mask airway placement occurred, the dose was increased for the next patient, and if cardiovascular response to laryngeal mask airway placement did not occur, the dose was decreased, and the ratio between the two successive doses was 1.0∶1.1.The cardiovascular response to laryngeal mask airway placement was defined as increase in maximum mean arterial pressure or maximum heart rate by≥20% of baseline values within 2 min after laryngeal mask airway placement.The median effective dose (ED 50), 95% effective dose (ED 95) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of alfentanil inhibiting cardiovascular responses to laryngeal mask airway placement in elderly patients were calculated by the Probit method. Results:When combined with midazolam and etomidate, the ED 50 (95% CI) of alfentanil inhibiting the cardiovascular responses to laryngeal mask airway placement in elderly patients were 5.605 (5.036-6.082) μg/kg, and the ED 95 (95% CI) were 6.625 (6.125-9.763) μg/kg. Conclusions:When combined with midazolam and etomidate, the ED 50 and ED 95 of alfentanil inhibiting the cardiovascular responses to laryngeal mask airway placement are 5.605 and 6.625 μg/kg, respectively, in elderly patients.

Effect of obesity on dose-effect relationship of remimazolam when combined with alfentanil in painless gastroscopy / 中华麻醉学杂志

Objective:To evaluate the effect of obesity on the dose-effect relationship of remimazolam when combined with alfentanil in painless gastroscopy.Methods:American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰor Ⅱ patients of both sexes, scheduled for elective painless gastroscopy, aged 18-64 yr, were divided into 2 groups according to the body mass index (BMI): normal (BMI 19-24 kg/m 2) group and obese (BMI≥28 kg/m 2) group.Alfentanil 5 μg/kg combined with remimazolam was given intravenously in all the patients, and the dose of remimazolam was determined by the modified Dixon′s up-and-down method.The initial dose of remimazolam was 0.25 mg/kg, and each time the dose was increased or decreased by 0.05 mg/kg based on the sedative effect.The response was defined as positive when the responses that affected the operation of examination developed during insertion of the gastroscope and within the first 2 min of examination such as swallowing, bucking or body movement.This process was repeated until the seventh intersection occurred.The 50% effective dose (ED 50), 95% effective dose (ED 95), and 95% confidence interval ( CI) of remimazolam were calculated by probit method. Results:There were 26 patients in normal group and 18 patients in obese group.The ED 50 (95% CI) of remimazolam was 0.196 (0.087-0.274) mg/kg, and the ED 95 (95% CI) was 0.322 (0.256-1.397) mg/kg in normal group.The ED 50 (95% CI) of remimazolam was 0.125 (0.102-0.148) mg/kg, and the ED 95 (95% CI) was 0.161 (0.141-0.242) mg/kg in obese group.The ED 50 and ED 95 were significantly lower in obese group than in normal group ( P<0.001). Conclusions:Obesity increases the potency of remimazolam when combined with alfentanil 5 μg/kg in the patients undergoing painless gastroscopy.

Efficacy of remimazolam combined with alfentanil for gastroscopy in frail elderly patients / 中华麻醉学杂志

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of remimazolam combined with alfentanil for gastroscopy in frail elderly patients.Methods:Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅱ or Ⅲ elderly patients, aged 65-85 yr, with body mass index of 18-30 kg/m 2, of Clinical Frailty Scale score≥5, scheduled for elective painless gastroscopy, were divided into 2 groups ( n=30 each) using a random number table method: remimazolam combined with alfentanil group (group R) and propofol combined with remifentanil group (group P). A combination of alfentanil 10 μg/kg and remimazolam 0.2 mg/kg was intravenously injected until loss of consciousness in group R. Remifentanil 0.5 μg/kg combined with propofol 1.0-2.0 mg/kg was intravenously injected until loss of consciousness in group P. According to the intraoperative conditions, 1/4 of the initial dose of remimazolam was intravenously injected in group R, and 1/4 of the initial dose of propofol was intravenously injected in group P. The time for gastroscopy, requirement for additional remimazolam or propofol, onset time of anesthesia, emergence time and time of post-anesthesia care unit stay were recorded.Physician′s satisfaction scores, patient′s satisfaction scores and Verbal Pain Scale scores were recorded.The occurrence of injection pain, respiratory depression, bradycardia, hypotension and nausea and vomit was recorded. Results:There was no significant difference in the requirement for additional remimazolam or propofol, onset time of anesthesia, time for gastroscopy, physician′s satisfaction scores, and patient′s satisfaction scores, Verbal Pain Scale scores and incidence of nausea and vomit between two groups ( P>0.05). Compared with P group, the emergence time and time of post-anesthesia care unit stay were significantly shortened, and the incidence of injection pain (0 vs.33%), respiratory depression (0 vs.20%), hypotension (3% vs.23%) and bradycardia (3% vs.23%) was decreased in R group ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Remimazolam combined with alfentanil is safe and effective, with rapid recovery from anesthesia, and provides better efficacy than the combination of propofol and remifentanil when used for gastroscopy in frail elderly patients.

Effects of alfentanil on tracheal intubation during tonsillectomy in children: A randomized double-blind study / 中国临床药理学与治疗学

AIM: To compare the effects of different doses of alfentanil on tracheal intubation conditions, hemodynamic parameters and recovery quality in children undergoing tonsillectomy. METHODS: Ninety children undergoing tonsillectomy were randomly divided into 3 groups, and received alfentanil 20 μg/kg (A20 group), 40 μg/kg (A40 group) and 60 μg/kg (A60 group) for anesthesiainduction respectively, 30 cases in each group. The remaining anesthesia induction and maintenance protocols were the same. The Helbo-Hansen scores of the three groups were evaluated, and the MAP and HR before anesthesia induction (T0), before tracheal intubation (T1), immediately after tracheal intubation (T2), and 1 min after intubation (T3) as well as the recovery time of spontaneous breathing, eye opening time, extubated time, agitation score in PACU, and adverse drug reactions were recorded. RESULTS: Compared with A20 group, the total values of Helbo-Hansen score and cough scores in group A40 and A60 were lower (P<0.05). Compared with T0, the MAP at T1-T3 were decreased in group A40 and A60, and HR increased at T2 and T3 in group A20 while HR slowed down at T1 in group A40, and at T1-T3 in group A60 (P<0.05). Compared with A20 group, children in group A40 had lower MAP and slower HR at T1-T3, while those in group A60 had lower MAP and slower HR at T1-T3 (P<0.05). The recovery time of spontaneous breathe and extubated time were prolonged in group A60 (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: During the anesthesia induction period of tonsillectomy in children, both afentanil 40 μg/kg or 60 μg/kg combined with propofol 3 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.3 mg/kg can provide satisfactory intubation condition, while the vital signs are more stable during anesthesia induction in afentanil 40 μg/kg group and rapid extubation after operation can be achieved.

Efficacy and safety of alfentanil hydrochloride injection in general anesthesia: A multicenter, double-blind, controlled study / 中国药理学通报

Aim To investigate the effectiveness and safety of alfentanil in general anesthesia.Methods In this study, a multicenter randomized double-blind con¬trolled study was conducted.A total of 352 subjects were selected and randomly assigned to fentanyl group (group A, n =176) and alfentanil group (group 15, n = 176).Anesthesia induction: intravenous midazolam 0.03 mg • kg-1 + fentanyl 25 p.g • kg"'(group A) or alfentanil 4 p,g • kg-1 ( group 15) + propofol 2 mg • kg"1 + rocuronium 0.8 mg • kg"1.Sevoflurane + fent¬anyl ( group A ) or alfentanil ( group B ) + rocuronium were used for anesthesia.The vital signs of patients re¬covery time and extuhation time, anesthesia-related complications and the use of related remedial drugs during anesthesia induction and maintenance were compared between the two groups.Results During the induction and maintenance period of anesthesia, alfentanil and fentanyl could equally effectively inhibit the stress response induced by endotracheal intubation and surgical stimulation.Alfentanil also showed more effective inhibition on stress response induced by endo¬tracheal intubation and surgical stimulation than that of fentanyl ( P < 0.05 ) .However, there was no signifi¬cant difference in the incidence of intraoperative hypo¬tension and hypertension and the time of anesthesia re¬covery and extubation between the two groups.Conclu¬sions Both alfentanil and fentanyl can effectively in¬hibit the stress response induced by surgical stimulation and could be safely used in general anesthesia in sur¬gery.Alfentanil has more advantages in maintaining the stability of blood pressure and heart rate during an¬esthesia induction and maintenance.

Efficacy of remimazolam-alfentanil-mivacurium for fiberoptic bronchoscopy / 中华麻醉学杂志

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of remimazolam-alfentanil-mivacurium for fiberoptic bronchoscopy.Methods:A total of 100 patients of both sexes, aged 18-64 yr, with body mass index of 18.5-28.0 kg/m 2, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ-Ⅲ, scheduled for elective fiberoptic bronchoscopy, were divided into 2 groups ( n=50 each) using a random number table method: remimazolam-alfentanil-mivacurium group (group R) and propofol-alfentanil-mivacurium group (group P). Oxygen was inhaled by mask, and alfentanil 10 μg/kg was slowly injected intravenously in advance.One minute later, remimazolam 0.2 mg/kg was injected intravenously in group R, propofol 1.5-2.0 mg/kg was injected in group P until loss of consciousness, and mivacurium 0.14 mg/kg was then injected intravenously in 2 groups.When the bispectral index value was 40-60, mechanical ventilation was performed after laryngeal mask was placed by the same anesthesiologist.During the maintenance of anesthesia, remimazolam 1 mg·kg -1·h -1 was infused intravenously in group R, propofol 4-6 mg ·kg -1·h -1 was infused intravenously in group P, and mivacurium was intermittently injected in both groups to maintain muscle relaxation.Before induction (T 0), when the laryngeal mask was placed (T 1), immediately when fiber bronchoscope reached juga (T 2), at 10 min after the surgery (T 3), at the end of the surgery (T 4) and when patients regained consciousness (T 5), blood pressure (BP), (HR), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO 2), breathing at the end of the CO 2 partial pressure (P ETCO 2), BIS values and Modified Observer's Assessment/Alertness and Sedation (MOAA/S) score were recorded.The time from beginning of anesthesia to beginning of examination, total examination time, the time from the end of administration to laryngal mask airway removal, the time to recovery of spontaneous breathing and the time from emergence to discharge from postanesthesia care unit (PACU) were recorded.The occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative adverse reactions was recorded. Results:There was no significant difference in SpO 2, P ETCO 2, BIS values and MOAA/S score at each time pint and the time from beginning of anesthesia to beginning of examination, the time to recovery of spontaneous breathing and the time from emergence time to discharge from PACU between the 2 groups ( P>0.05). Compared with group P, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were significantly increased at T 1, T 3 and T 4, the time from the end of administration to laryngal mask airway removal was prolonged, the incidence of intraoperative hypotension, postoperative cough and total adverse reactions were decreased in group R ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Remimazolam-alfentanil-mivacurium produces better efficacy than propofol-alfentanil-mivacurium for fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Dose-response relationship of alfentanil inhibiting gag reflex when combined with propofol in elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy / 中华麻醉学杂志

Objective:To evaluate the dose-response relationship of alfentanil inhibiting gag reflex when combined with propofol in elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy.Methods:Patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical statusⅠor Ⅱ, aged ≥60 yr, scheduled for elective painless gastroscopy, were selected. Propofol 1.5 mg/kg combined with alfentanil was given intravenously in all the patients. The dose of alfentanil was determined by the Dixon up-and-down method. The initial dose of alfentanil was set at 5 μg/kg. The dose of alfentanil in the next patient was determined according to the development of gag reflex, and the ratio between the two successive doses was 1.1. The median effective dose (ED 50) and 95% confidence interval of alfentanil-induced inhibition of gag reflex when combined with propofol in elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy were calculated using the by up-and-down sequential allocation. Results:The ED 50 (95% confidence interval) of alfentanil-induced inhibition of gag reflex when combined with propofol 1.5 mg/kg was 2.8 (2.4-3.2) μg/kg in elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy. Conclusion:When combined with propofol 1.5 mg/kg, the ED 50 of alfentanil inhibiting gag reflex is 2.8 μg/kg in elderly patients undergoing painless gastroscopy.

Premedication effect of dexmedetomidine and alfentanil on seizure time, recovery duration, and hemodynamic responses in electroconvulsive therapy.

Introduction: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for many mental disorders, especially severe and persistent depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and alfentanil on agitation, satisfaction, seizure duration, and patients hemodynamic after ECT. Materials and Methods: In a three phase crossover randomized clinical trial, 75 patients aged between 18 and 50 years and candidate for ECT were enrolled and assigned into three groups (25 patients in each group). All patients, respectively, took premedication of dexmedetomidine, alfentanil, or saline in three consecutive phases. Patients received 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine, 10 μg/kg alfentanil or normal saline intravenously, 10 min before induction. Finally, seizure and recovery duration, satisfaction and agitation score, and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated. Results: There was no significant difference about seizure duration, agitation score, and hemodynamic parameters between groups but recovery duration was significantly lower in the control group than dexmedetomidine (P = 0.016) and alfentanil group (P = 0.0001). Patients’ satisfaction was significantly higher in intervention groups (alfentanil and dexmedetomidine groups) (P = 0.0001). Conclusion: Given the equal effects of alfentanil and dexmedetomidine, it seems that choosing one of these two drugs for premedication of patients undergoing ECT is appropriate. Drug choice is influenced by numerous factors such as accessibility of each drug and the dominance of anesthesiologist and psychiatrist.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenously infused domestic alfentanil in patients undergoing general anesthesia / 中华麻醉学杂志

Objective To investigate the pharmacokinetics of intravenously infused domestic alfentanil in the patients undergoing general anesthesia.Methods Twelve American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients of both sexes,aged 18-47 yr,weighing 49-86 kg,scheduled for elective subtotal thyroidectomy under general anesthesia,were enrolled in the study.Anesthesia was induced with iv midazolam 0.02 mg/kg,alfentanil 25 μg/kg,propofol 1.5 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.8 mg/kg.The patients were endotracheally intubated and mechanically ventilated.Anesthesia was maintained with inhalation of 0.8％-2.0％ sevoflurane,iv infusion of alfentanil 1 μg · kg-1 · min-1,and intermittent iv boluses of rocuronium 10-20 mg,bispectral index value was maintained at 40-60,and infusion was stopped at 10 min before the end of surgery.Before induction of anesthesia,at 1,3,5,8,10,14,20,35,65,95 and 125 min ofalfentanil infusion,and at 5,15,30,60,120,180,240,300 and 360 min after termination of alfentanil infusion,venous blood samples were collected for determination of the plasma concentration of alfentanil (by high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry).DAS 3.0 software was used to analyze the pharmacokinetic parameters of alfentanil.Results The pharmacokinetics of domestic alfentanil was best described by a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model.The distribution half-life was (1.8 ± 0.8) min,and the elimination half-life was (91±22) min.The volume of distribution at steady state was (0.38±0.12) L/kg,and the clearance was (4.3± 1.6) ml · kg-1 · min-1.The elimination of domestic alfentanil followed the first-order kinetics.Conclusion The distribution of intravenously infused domestic alfentanil is fitted to a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with elimination following the first-order kinetics in the patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Sedação e analgesia em colonoscopia eletiva: propofol-fentanil versus propofol-alfentanil / Sedation-analgesia in elective colonoscopy: propofol-fentanyl versus propofol-alfentanil / Sedación y analgesia en colonoscopia electiva: propofol-fentanilo versus propofol-alfentanilo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVO: Sedação e analgesia são recomendadas em colonoscopia para propiciar conforto, pois são procedimentos invasivos e podem ser dolorosos. Este estudo teve como objetivo comparar as combinações de propofol-alfentanil e propofol-fentanil para sedação e analgesia em pacientes submetidos à colonoscopia eletiva. MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo e randomizado. Participaram do estudo 80 pacientes, ASA I-II, entre 18 e 65 anos. A indução de sedação e a analgesia foram feitas com propofol (1 mg.kg-1) e fentanil (1 µg.kg-1) no grupo propofol-fentanil (PF) e com propofol (1 mg.kg-1) e alfentanil (10 µg.kg-1) no grupo propofol-alfentanil (PA). Para manutenção, doses adicionais de propofol foram administradas em bolus de 0,5 mg.kg-1 para obter escores de 3-4 na Escala de Sedação de Ramsey (ESR). Registrados os dados demográficos, a frequência cardíaca, a pressão arterial média (PAM), a saturação de oxigênio da hemoglobina (SpO2), os valores da ESR, o tempo de colonoscopia, a dose total de propofol, as complicações, o tempo de recuperação e o tempo para alta, bem como os escores de satisfação do colonoscopista e do paciente. RESULTADOS: A PAM aos 15 minutos no Grupo PA foi significativamente maior do que no Grupo PF (p = 0,037). A frequência cardíaca média do grupo PA foi maior no início do que nas mensurações subsequentes (p = 0,012, p = 0,002). A média da dose total de propofol do Grupo PA foi significativamente maior do que a do Grupo PF (p = 0,028). O tempo médio de recuperação do grupo PA foi significativamente maior do que o do grupo PF (p = 0,032). CONCLUSÃO: Fentanil proporciona melhores condições de operação e reduz a necessidade de doses adicionais de propofol. Essas vantagens diminuem o tempo de recuperação. Portanto, propofol-fentanil é superior ao propofol-alfentanil para sedação e analgesia em colonoscopia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sedation-analgesia is recommended for comfortable colonoscopy procedures, which are invasive and can be painful. This study aimed to compare the combinations of propofol-alfentanil and propofol-fentanyl for sedation-analgesia in elective colonoscopy patients. METHODS: This prospective and randomized study was planned in ASA I-II groups and included 80 patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years. Sedation-analgesia induction was performed as 1 µg.kg-1 fentanyl, 1 mg.kg-1 propofol in the propofol-fentanyl group (Group PF) and 10 µg.kg-1 alfentanil, 1 mg.kg-1 propofol in the propofol-alfentanil group (Group PA). Patients' scores were limited to 3-4 values on the Ramsey Sedation Scale (RSS) by 0.5 mg.kg-1 bolus additional doses of propofol in sedation-analgesia maintenance. We recorded demographical data, heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), oxygen saturation of hemoglobin (SpO2), RSS value, colonoscopy time, total dose of propofol, complications, recovery time, and discharge time, as well as colonoscopist and patient satisfaction scores. RESULTS: MAP at the 15th minute in Group PA was significantly higher than in Group PF (p = 0.037). Group PA's beginning mean heart rate was higher than the mean heart rate at subsequent readings (p = 0.012, p = 0.002). The mean total propofol dose of Group PA was significantly higher than the total dose of Group PF (p = 0.028). The mean recovery time of Group PA was significantly longer than that of Group PF (p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Fentanyl provides better operative conditions and reduces the need for additional propofol doses. These advantages cause a shorter recovery time. Therefore, propofol-fentanyl is superior to the propofol-alfentanil for sedation-analgesia in colonoscopy.

JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVO: La sedación y la analgesia están recomendadas en la colonoscopia para propiciar la comodidad, porque son procedimientos invasivos y pueden ser dolorosos. Este estudio tuvo el objetivo de comparar las combinaciones de propofol-alfentanilo y propofol-fentanilo para la sedación y la analgesia en pacientes sometidos a la colonoscopia electiva. MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo y aleatorio. Participaron en el estudio 80 pacientes, ASA I-II, entre 18 y 65 años. La inducción de sedación y la analgesia fue hecha con propofol (1 mg.kg-1) y fentanilo (1 µg.kg-1) en el grupo propofol-fentanilo (PF) y con propofol (1 mg.kg-1) y alfentanilo (10 µg.kg-1) en el grupo propofol-alfentanilo (PA). Para el mantenimiento, dosis adicionales de propofol se administraron en bolos de 0,5 mg.kg-1 para obtener las puntuaciones de 3-4 en la Escala de Sedación de Ramsey (ESR). Se registraron los datos demográficos, la frecuencia cardíaca, la presión arterial promedio (PAP), la saturación de oxígeno de la hemoglobina (SpO2), los valores de la ESR, el tiempo de colonoscopia, la dosis total de propofol, las complicaciones, el tiempo de recuperación y el tiempo para el alta, como también las puntuaciones de satisfacción del colonoscopista y del paciente. RESULTADOS: La PAP a los 15 minutos en el Grupo PA fue significativamente mayor que en el Grupo PF (p = 0,037). La frecuencia cardíaca promedio del grupo PA fue mayor al inicio que en las mensuraciones posteriores (p = 0,012, p = 0,002). El promedio de la dosis total de propofol del Grupo PA fue significativamente mayor que la del Grupo PF (p = 0,028). El tiempo promedio de recuperación del grupo PA fue significativamente mayor que el del grupo PF (p = 0,032). CONCLUSIONES: El Fentanilo proporciona mejores condiciones de operación y reduce la necesidad de dosis adicionales de propofol. Esas ventajas reducen el tiempo de recuperación. Por tanto, el propofol-fentanilo es superior al propofol-alfentanilo para la sedación y la analgesia en la colonoscopia.

The clinical effective dose of alfentanil for suppressing cough during emergence from desflurane anesthesia / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: The administration of short-acting opioids before emergence is useful for preventing emergence cough induced by an endotracheal tube. This study examined the clinically effective dose of alfentanil for suppressing cough during emergence from desflurane anesthesia. METHODS: Twenty-nine adult patients undergoing elective oral surgery were enrolled in this study. During emergence from anesthesia, the patients received alfentanil diluted in 10 ml normal saline when the end-tidal vol% of desflurane decreased to 3%. The initial alfentanil dose was 16 microg/kg. The alfentanil dose for consecutive patients, determined by Dixon's up-and-down method, increased or decreased by 2 microg/kg according to a previous patient's result. RESULTS: The 50% effective dose (ED50) of alfentanil for suppressing cough during emergence from desflurane anaesthesia was 9.3 +/- 1.5 microg/kg according to Dixon's up-and-down method. Isotonic regression revealed an ED50 and ED95 (95% confidence interval) of alfentanil 10.0 microg/kg (6.8-13.2 microg/kg) and 14.0 microg/kg (7.7-19.4 microg/kg), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ED95 of alfentanil for suppressing emergence cough was 14.0 microg/kg. A single bolus administration of alfentanil during emergence from anesthesia was useful for suppressing emergence cough.

The optimal clinical dose of alfentanil for tracheal intubation during inhalation induction with sevoflurane after sedation with ketamine in children

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical effective dose of alfentanil required for successful tracheal intubation during inhalation induction using 5% sevoflurane without neuromuscular blockade in children sedated with ketamine. METHODS: Twenty-one children, aged 3-10 years, undergoing surgeries under general anesthesia were enrolled into the study. All patients were premedicated with 0.004 mg/kg glycopyrrolate intramuscularly 30 min before anesthesia.To facilitate separation of the child from the parents, intravenous 1 mg/kg ketamine was given prior to transfer into the operating room.After inhalation induction with 5% sevoflurane and 100% oxygen, pre-determined dose of alfentanil was injected over 20 sec. The dose of alfentanil was determined by modified Dixon's up-and-down method (2microgramkg as a step size starting from 12microgramkg).The study ended when six independent pairs of patients, who manifested cross over from 'failure' to 'success' for tracheal intubation, were recruited. RESULTS: In 50% of children, the effective bolus dose (ED50) (95% confidence intervals) of alfentanil for successful tracheal intubation was 7.2microgram/kg (6.3-8.1microgram/kg) during sevoflurane inhalation induction.From isotonic regression, 95% effective dose (ED95) (95% confidence intervals) of alfentanil was 9.9microgram/kg (2.2-16.0microgram/kg). CONCLUSIONS: During inhalation induction using 5% sevoflurane without neuromuscular blockade after ketamine sedation, the ED50 and ED95 of alfentanil for successful tracheal intubation were 7.2 microgram/kg and 9.9microgram/kg in children, respectively.

The dose-dependent effect of alfentanil on the rocuronium induced withdrawal in children

BACKGROUND: The injection of rocuronium causes pain and withdrawal responses.This study was designed to determine an optimal dose of alfentanil to prevent the withdrawal responses associated with injection of rocuronium in children. METHODS: One hundred and ten ASA physical status I and II pediatric patients were randomly allocated into four groups; Group C (control; normal saline 3 ml, n = 28), Group A5 (alfentanil 5microgram/kg, n = 28), Group A10 (alfentanil 10microgram/kg, n = 27) and Group A15 (alfentanil 15microgram/kg, n = 27). After the induction of anesthesia with 5 mg/kg of thiopental sodium, the test drug was injected over 20 seconds, respectively. After one minute, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was injected over 5 seconds. The patient's response after injection was graded using a four-point scale. Additionally, the mean arterial pressure and heart rate were recorded upon arrival in the operating room, as well as 1 min before and 1 min after tracheal intubation. RESULTS: The incidence of withdrawal responses was 96%, 61%, 19% and 19% in groups C, A5, A10 and A15, respectively. The incidence and severity of withdrawal responses in group A10 and A15 were lower than group C and A5. CONCLUSIONS: After thiopental injection, alfentanil 10microgram/kg prevent the withdrawal responses on injecting rocuronium in pediatric patients.

Comparison of alfentanil and remifentanil for the use of patient controlled sedation under local anesthesia during ear, nose and throat surgery / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare the effects of alfentanil and remifentanil on patient controlled sedation (PCS). METHODS: 60 patients scheduled for ear, nose and throat surgery under local anesthesia were randomly allocated to Group P (n = 20, propofol 10 mg/ml), Group A (n = 20, propofol 10 mg/ml with alfentanil 500 microg/ml) and Group R (n = 20, propofol 10 mg/ml with remifentanil 10 microg/ml). Without a basal rate, bolus was set to 2 ml with one minute of lockout time. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients were included in this study. Group A was found to have a lower blood pressure and pulse rate than group R. Group R showed a lower PCS dose upto an OAA/S (Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale) value of 4 and a higher OAA/S prior to surgery than group P. Group P was found to have a higher blood pressure and respiration rate than Group A. During PCS, patient anxiety was significantly decreased in all groups. In addition, there was no differences among groups in the level of pain during the perioperative period, delivery/attempt ratio, satisfaction of the patient and surgeon, and number of patients required to undergo the same PCS technique again. The frequency of side effects of PCS, which included pain on injection, transient hypertension, hypotension, desaturation and oversedation, were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of patients who underwent ear, nose and throat surgery under local anesthesia using PCS with propofol alone or alfentanil or remifentanil revealed no differences in safety, effectiveness, complications or satisfaction of the patients and surgeons.