ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effect of Anerdian type III solution on the treatment of acute gouty monoarthritis. Methods Total 108 cases of acute gouty monoarthritis were divided into two groups according to the method of random number table, including 56 cases in the Anerdian group and 53 cases in the Votalin group, respectively. The Anerdian group was applied Anerdian type III solution to compress the swelling joint wet for 30 minutes, while the Votalin group was given Votalin Emulgel for external application in the swollen joint. Then the scores of pain and redness were calculated, and the effects of local treatment were compared directly before and after the treatment, and these variables were also compared after 7 days. Results 24 hours and 72 hours after the treatment, the pain score in the Anerdian group was 3.44 ± 0.89 and 2.43 ± 0.73 (t=2.375, 3.393, P<0.01), while the pain score in the Votalin group was 3.85 ± 0.74 and 3.14 ± 0.68 (t=2.208, 3.120, P<0.01), respectively, which referred to improvement in both groups.And the score of redness in the Anerdian group was 1.57 ± 0.70 and 1.13 ± 0.35 (t=0.589, 0.964, P<0.01), while the score of redness in the Votalin group was 1.95 ± 0.73 and 1.61 ± 0.49 (t=0.151, 0.623, P=0.091, P<0.01) respectively. 24 hours and 72 hours after the treatment, the score of redness in the Anerdian group was smaller than that in the Votalin Group (t=3.379, 4.290, P<0.01). In Anerdian group, local treatment showed fully cured in 28 cases, marked effective in 15 cases, effective in 11 cases, not effective in 2 case, and total effective rate was 96.4% (54/56) after 7 days′treatment, while in Votalin group, local treatment revealed fully cured in 24 cases, marked effective in 11 cases, effective in 8 cases, not effective in 9 case, and total effective rate was 83.0% (44/53). There was statistically significant difference between the two groups in local treatment ( χ2=4.019, P<0.05). Conclusion Anerdian type III solution can alleviate the symptoms of acute gouty unilateral arthritis quickly. It hasbetter curative effect on local treatment of acute gouty monoarthritis than Votalin.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the relationship between nasal colonization of Staphylococcus aureus(SA) and nosocomial infection in intensive care unit(ICU), and observe the therapeutic effect of Anerdian III in nasal decolonizaion. Methods Bacterial cultures were made by means of nasal swabs among inpatients whom the occurrence of nosocomial infection were observed.Patients with SA colonization were randomly divided into two groups:control and treatment.Control group were given regular treatment, and treatment group were administered Anerdian III in addition to regular treatment.Then the clearance rate of SA and the occurrence of nosocomial infection of two groups were observed. Results A total of 751 patients were enrolled, of whom 108(14.4%) were with nosocomial infection and 85(11.3%) with SA nasal colonization. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus ( MRSA ) was detected in 33 patients (4.4%).The nosocomial infection rate of patients with MRSA colonization was 51.5%, which was significantly higher than those in patients with other bacterial colonization(P<0.05).The SA clearance rate in treatment group was significantly higher than that in control group(81.4% vs.42.8%,P<0.05).The nosocomial infection rate in treatment group was significantly lower than that in control group ( 16 .3% vs. 40.5%,P <0.05).After decolonization treatment,the nosocomial infection rate of patients with MRSA colonization was significantly lower than that in control group(25.0% vs.76.5%,P <0.05). Conclusion The incidence rate of nosocomial infection in patients with MRSA nasal colonization is markedly increased in ICU, and the decolonization treatment by Anerdian III increases the clearance rate of nasal SA and decreases the incidence rate of nosocomial infection.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore disinfection efficacy of anerdian using swab and spray disinfection methods.Methods Hands of 30 subjects were randomly divided into the swab group and the spray group.The samples of before and after disinfection in each group were collected separately and observed their disinfection effect.Results The number of bacteria showed no significant difference between the two groups.The passing rate of disinfection reached 100％.The time of disinfection in the spray group was (2.58±0.32)s,significantly less than that in the swab group,(12.26±1.48)s,however,the drying time in the spray group was (42.37±1.79)s,significant longer than that in the swab group,(26.24±1.46)s.A subject hand disinfection used 0.5ml 0.2％ anerdian in the spray group,and 0.75ml 0.2％ anerdian and two cotton buds was used in the swab group.Conclusions There is identical disinfection efficacy between spray and swab methods.Spray disinfection method has short operating time,less use of disinfectant without using cotton buds,it is able to replace swab disinfection and will play an important role to reduce medical waste and health care costs.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To observe the clinical efficacy of two kinds of compound skin disinfectants(compound iodine and Anerdian).METHODS One hundred and twenty recruited patients were divided into three groups randomly,group A(compound iodine group),group B(Anerdian group) and control group(iodine tincture group),40 patients per group.The groups A and B were carried on with one-step skin greasing disinfection.The control group was carried on with routine two-steps skin greasing disinfection.The sampling and detection were carried on by The Technological Specification of Hospital Disinfection published by the Ministry of Health.RESULTS The kill ratio of three groups was(95.44?9.45)%,(95.29?7.21)% and(96.24?11.12)%,respectively.Their disinfection qualification ratio was 97.50%,95.00% and 97.50%,respectively.Comparing the kill ratio and disinfection qualification ratio,there was no significant difference among three groups.CONCLUSIONS The disinfection efficacy of two kinds of the compound skin disinfectants are definite,there is no difference comparing with the traditional iodine tincture and ethanol disinfectants,but they are easy to carry on,safe and practical and the time is shorter,saving the time and the labor.It is helpful to increase the work efficiency of the nurse and deserve to be extended in the clinical application.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of Anerdian(AnEr Iodine) combined with moist dressing on wound infection.METHODS Totally 124 patients with wound infection were divided into two groups,in the study group,the wounds treated by Anerdian combined with moist dressing.In the control group,the wounds were treated by traditional method.Their healing time was compared in the two groups.RESULTS The effects of wound healing in study group were much better than the control group(96.1% vs 44.7%,P
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To observe the effect of Anerdian on operation field disinfection instead of iodine tincture.METHODS Totally 40 354 surgical patients used Anerdian during from Jan 2005 to May 2007 were studied in comparison with 15 840 cases used iodine tincture during 2004.RESULTS There was no significant difference in disinfection effect between Anerdian and iodine tincture.CONCLUSIONS Anerdian is an effective,convenient and available disinfectant for operation field disinfection.
ABSTRACT
0.05),but drying time was significantly various(P
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To study the possibility of applying Anerdian skin disinfectant for blood donor skin disinfection. METHODS Put Anerdian at 21℃,35℃ and 42℃ to exposure in air for 24h,48h and 72 h,detect the volatilization volume,effective iodine and appearance of disinfectant,and evaluate its effect on blood donor elbow by culture method. RESULTS At 21℃ exposure for 24 h the volatilization rate for Anerdian was 5%,effective iodine was 0.215%.At 35℃ and 42℃ exposure for 24 h its volatilization rate was more than 5%,and effective iodine was within the range of 0.18-0.22%.The average killing logarithm value of elbow skin natural bacteria in 30 donors was over 1. CONCLUSIONS Anerdian disinfectant is suitable for blood donor predonation skin treatment.