ABSTRACT
Background: Development in early childhood is an important determinant of health status in future life and any damage to brain in that period may affect quality of life. Reliable data regarding prevalence and predictors of developmental delay among under-5 children are required for combating this problem. Aim and Objective: Our study aimed at estimating proportion and determining predictors of developmental delay among 0–6-year-old children. Materials and Methods: An observational analytic study was conducted among 173 children (<6 years) attended in immunization clinic, medical college, Kolkata. Developmental status of children was assessed by Trivandrum Development Screening Chart. Sociodemographic parameters of children and their families were studied. Maternal morbidity and care during antenatal period as well as child morbidity and care during neonatal period were also assessed. Results: Proportion developmental delay among <6-year-old children was 26%. Maternal morbidity during antenatal period was revealed as significant predictor [AOR = 9.835 with 95% CI: 3.089–31.314]. Childhood morbidity and hospitalization during neonatal period were also found to be significant determinants of developmental delay [AOR = 28.041 with 95% CI: 8.826–89.089 and AOR = 28.286 with 95% CI: 8.790–91.023, respectively]. Conclusion: Improvement of neonatal care resulted in much reduction in neonatal mortality rate at the cost of increase in prevalence of developmental delay. Hence, more emphasis is now to be given on early detection and intervention of developmental abnormalities. It is mandatory to focus not only on care during newborn period for reducing mortality but also on “care beyond survival” which is the sixth pillar of India Newborn Action Plan.
ABSTRACT
Background: Safe motherhood is about informing and educating woman about danger signs in pregnancy, how to identify and seek advice from health personnel and prepare for safe confinement. In public health system, in India it is the responsibility of ASHA to motivate the pregnant woman in her area for safe institutional delivery. BPACR is a tool which assesses, how well the pregnant women are prepared for the challenges in pregnancy. Aim& Objective: To ascertain the level of awareness of Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness (BPACR) among antenatal mothers residing in urban slums . Methodology: A community based cross-sectional study was conducted among pregnant women residing in urban slums of Shivamogga, Karnataka. Data was collected using pre-designed questionnaire, 揗onitoring BP/CR?tools and indicators for maternal and new born health� of the 揓HPIEGO�. Data was analysed and results were tabulated. Results: In this study, only 42% of pregnant women knew about the term 態irth preparedness� while the rest 58% pregnant women did not know it. Education status and complication experienced during present or previous pregnancy were found to have significant association with BPACR. Identification of blood donor and skilled birth provider were less among study group. Conclusions: Awareness of danger signs and complication readiness was found to be good in our study.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and improve the method in management of HBsAg positive mothers in Korea by the screening time and method. METHODS: From January 2003 to March 2003, questionnaires were obtained using mail or telephone from total 848 hospitals or clinics handling more than 100 deliveries in year 2001 and 341 of them (40.2%) returned their answers. 279,734 out of 507,151 (55.2%) were investigated in number of delivery cases. The screening time and method for HBsAg in antenatal period were analyzed. RESULTS: Most of hospitals tested for HBV infectivity more than once during antenatal period. 99.1% of hospitals tested for HBsAg and 96.1% of hospitals tested for HBsAb. 87.1% of pregnant women were tested for HBsAg on the first visit. HBsAb was tested at the same time with HBsAg in 96.2%. 41% of hospitals repeated test in third trimester for those with negative HBsAg and 54% of HBsAg positive mothers were retested in third trimester. For those who admitted only for delivery, 45.9% of hospitals tested for HBsAg irrespective of their history. Clinics used RPHA for test method in 38.1% which was higher in proportion compare to hospitals. CONCLUSION: HBV infectivity must be screened in all pregnant women. Repeating test in third trimester may be unnecessary and a policy should be made for those who admit for delivery alone. EIA method is recommended instead of RPHA method.