Midterm Outcomes of Open Surgical Repair Compared with Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Isolated Descending Thoracic Aortic Disease

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the surgical morbidity and mortality of thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) as compared with open surgical repair (OSR) for isolated descending thoracic aortic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1, 2006 through May 31, 2010, a total of 68 patients with isolated descending thoracic aortic disease were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of perioperative complication, 30-day mortality, and clinical success. The patients were divided into two groups (group 1, OSR, n = 40 vs. group 2, TEVAR, n = 28) and these groups were compared for major variables and late outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age was 58 years (group I = 54 vs. group II = 63 years, p = 0.011). Significant perioperative complications occurred in 12 patients: 8 (20%) in group I and 4 (13%) in group II (p = 0.3). There were five 30 day mortalities of which 4 occurred in group I and 1 in group II (p = 0.23). Clinical success (effective aortic remodeling and complete false lumen obliteration or thrombosis) was achieved in 20 patients (71%). Mean Kaplan-Meier survival rate at 1 year was similar for both groups (group 1 = 87% vs. group 2 = 80%, p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: Thoracic endovascular repair for isolated thoracic aortic disease shows comparable results to OSR. However, the potential for endoleak or rupture remains a challenge that needs to be addressed in the future. Therefore, close follow-up study is needed for the evaluation of satisfactory long-term outcomes.

Usefulness of Abdominal Aortic Calcification for Screening of Peripheral Vascular Disease

PURPOSE: We wanted to evaluate the value of abdominal aortic calcification (AAC), as detected on CT, as a predictor of atherosclerotic stenotic disease of the lower extremity arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred three patients who had CT angiography performed for the evaluation of peripheral vascular disease were enrolled in this retrospective study. The volume (mm3) of the AAC was measured on CT. Each lower extremity was divided into 8 segments. The extent of stenosis of the lower extremity artery was manifested as the sum of the stenosis scores for 16 segments (total stenosis score: TSS). The significant stenosis scores (SSS-50 and SSS-75) were defined as the sum of scores for the lower extremity artery segments that had significant stenosis of more than 50% and 75%, respectively. AAC was correlated to the TSS, SSS-50 and SSS-75 with using Spearman's correlation coefficient. The diagnostic performance of AAC for stenosis of a lower extremity artery of more than 50% and 75%, respectively, was evaluated by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve RESULTS: The Spearman's correlation coefficients were 0.728 (AAC vs. TSS), 0.662 (AAC vs. SSS-50), and 0.602 (AAC vs. SSS-75), respectively. For significant stenosis more than 50% and 75%, the areas under the ROC curve were 0.898 and 0.866, respectively. The cutoff value, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 1030 mm3, 87%, 88%, 89%, 86% and 87% for stenosis more than 50% and 1030 mm3, 87%, 80%, 79%, 88% and 84% for stenosis more than 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Abdominal aortic calcification detected on CT may be a useful predictor of atherosclerotic stenotic disease of lower extremity arteries.

Tuberculous Aneurysm of the Abdominal Aorta: Endovascular Repair Using Stent Grafts in Two Cases

Tuberculous aneurysm of the aorta is exceedingly rare. To date, the standard therapy for mycotic aneurysm of the abdominal aorta has been surgery involving in-situ graft placement or extra-anatomic bypass surgery followed by effective anti-tuberculous medication. Only recently has the use of a stent graft in the treat-ment of tuberculous aortic aneurysm been described in the literature. We report two cases in which a tuberculous aneurysm of the abdominal aorta was success-fully repaired using endovascular stent grafts. One case involved is a 42-year-old woman with a large suprarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm and a right psoas abscess, and the other, a 41-year-old man in whom an abdominal aortic aneurysm ruptured during surgical drainage of a psoas abscess.

CT Findings of Aortic Intramural Hematoma with or without associated Penetrating Aortic Ulcer

PURPOSE: To analyze the CT findings of aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) with or without associated penetrating aortic ulcer (PAUH), as seen on initial and follow-up CT scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the CT findings of 36 cases diagnosed clinically and radiologically as IMH (n=7) and PAUH (n=29) after initial and follow-up CT scanning. The period between initial and follow-up scanning-which was performed between two and four times-ranged from 1 week to 91 months (mean: IMH, 18.4 months;PAUH, 16.2 months). RESULTS: With regard to maximal thickness and extension of IMH, maximal diameter of the involved aorta, inward displacement of intimal calcification, Stanford type of IMH, and pleural and pericardial effusion between IMH & PAUH, the results were not statistically significant, but PAUH tends to develop in older patients and shows a more frequent incidence of aortic atherosclerosis. Only PAUH involved abdominal aortic a-neurysm and focal right renal infarction, each in one case. Penetrating aortic ulcers (PAU) were more frequently found in the proximal descending thoracic aorta (n=24) than in the mid(n=11) to distal(n=10) descending thoracic aorta. Among 53 cases of PAU, seven could not be detected on initial CT scans; this was due to excessive scan thickness (n=4) and masking of the aortic ulcer by IMH(n=3), circumstances which were visualized after resolution of IMH. Follow-up CT scanning showed that PAU progressed to fusiform or saccular aortic dilatation (n=15) or localized aortic dissection (n=4), and that in 34 cases, there was no interval change. Follow-up CT findings of IMH in cases of PAUH were as follows: Type A (n=8), with four resolutions after surgery and four after conservative treatment; Type B (n=21), with 21 resolutions after conservative treatment. Follow-up CT findings of IMH were as follows: Type A (n=2), with one resolution after surgery and one after conservative treatment; Type B (n=5), with progression of typical aortic dissection in two cases, and three resolutions after conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: PAUH is characterized by its occurrence in older patients, a more frequent incidence of aortic atherosclerosis and abdominal aortic aneurysm, but no difference in the extension of IMH and other CT findings between PAUH and IMH. Branch vessel involvement was noted in one case of PAUH but not in cases of IMH. Follow-up CT scanning showed that in the absence of surgery, IMH progressed to aortic dissection or resolution. In all patients who did not undergo surgery, PAU progressed to saccular or fusiform aortic dilatation, localized aortic dissection and no interval change, with resolution of IMH after conservative treatment. Initial and follow-up thin-slice spiral CT scanning can provide correct diagnosis and treatment planning (especially ascending aorta is involved), and permit differentiation between PAUH and IMH.

Acute Aortic Intramural Hematoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiologic findings of acute intramural hematoma of the aorta, and the clinical follow up thereof. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 34 cases confirmed clinically and radiologically as aortic dissection, an analysis was carried out based on 15 cases in which intramural hematoma without false lumen was demonstrated, on initial CT, 12 cases of in which follow up CT was used and five cases involving an aortogram. Elements such as the shape of the thickened aortic wall, ulcer-like intimal defects, and intimal calcification were examined. Changes in these elements were also examined on follow up CT. RESULTS: DeBackey types I and III accounted for one and 14 cases. respectively. Initial precontrast CT demonstrated continuous, crescentic high attenuation areas along the wall of the descending aorta. In postcontrast scans, the crescentic areas were of relatively lower-attenuation and appeared along the aorta wall. Displaced intimal calcifications were seen in nine of fifteen patients. There was no intimal flap on all five aortogram, while aortic wall thickening and atherosclerotic change were demonstrated in four cases and in one case, case, respectively. Focal ulcers were seen in three cases. Ulcer-like intimal defects were demonstrated in a total of eleven cases (eight on CT, two on aortogram, and one on both). In ten of the twelve cases seen on follow up CT, the thickness of the intramural hematoma was seen to be reduced. Among the 15 cases, the operation was performed in two cases, and the remaining 13 received conservative treatment. In ten cases observed for more than twelve months, a recurrence of symptoms did not occur. CONCLUSION: Eccentric aortic wall thickening in patients who complain of acute chest pain is the result of acute aortic dissection with intramural hematoma, or a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the aorta.The latter may be differentiated from the former by the presence of on ulcer-like intimal defect. When both diseases are limited to the descending aorta, conservative treatment may be effective, unless patients experience persistent or recurrent chest pain, or unless intramural hematoma progresses further.