ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficiency in aortic root disease .Methods From April 2017 to April 2018,46 cases of aortic root disease accepted DavidⅠ[20 cases, 15 males and 5 females, aged(39.6 ±15.8)years, aortic root diameter was(58.3 ±4.4)mm] or Bentall[26 cases, 22 males and 4 females, aged(50.8 ±12.6)years,aortic root diam-eter was(59.5 ±5.0)mm], the data in the peri-operation and heart function in recent period after operation.Results No mortality was observed in the study.Morbidity occurred in both group was comparable.Mean cross-clamp time(129.5 ±28.6) min vs.(94.3 ±35.3)min(P<0.05).Blood transfusion(342.0 ±476.4)ml vs.(330.8 ±651.3)ml(P>0.05).ICU sta-ying time(1.0 ±0.2)day vs.(1.1 ±0.3)day(P>0.05).At the latest visit(10.5 ±6.8)months in David Ⅰ, no obviously regurgitation of aortic valve were observed 0.75 ±0.44 vs 1.0 ±1.3(P>0.05).Conclusion Except for the prolonged cross-clamp time, David Ⅰ is safely and effective in aortic root disease compared with Bentall in peri-operative period .The long term results need further follow-up.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the valve sparing aortic reimplantation in selected patients with acute type A aortic dissection(AAAD).Methods From October 2012 to March 2014, 65 AAAD patients with entry tear located in the sinus of Valsalva and/or genetic: syndrome underwent emergent operation.Of them, 34 patients had valve sparing aortic reimplantation(David Ⅰ group) , and 31 patients underwent aortic composite replacement(Bentall group).Results No operative mortality was observed in this study.In-hospital mortality(8.8％ vs.9.7％ , P ＞ 0.05) and morbidity (25.4％ vs.27.9％, P ＞0.05) were comparable between two groups.All the patients underwent arch replacement and stented elephant trunk implantation concomitantly.Mean cross-clamp time [(149 ± 23) min v s.(124 ± 21) min, P ＜ 0.05] was longer for David Ⅰ group, while mean cardiopulmonary bypass time[(186 ± 77) min vs.(193 ± 89) min, P ＞0.05] and mean operation time [(341 ± 137) min vs.(378 ± 174) min, P ＞ 0.05] had no significant difference between two groups.The blood transfusion was significantly reduced in David Ⅰ group than that in Bentall group[(1 180 ±490) ml vs.(1 790 ±560) ml, P ＜0.05].The mean follow-up was(17.6 ± 5.4) months(range, 8-26 months).In David Ⅰ group, one patient with genetic syndrome died of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm 18 months postoperatively.Two late deaths occurred in Bentall group due to intracranial hemorrhage after 9 months and ruptured infective pseudoaneurysm after 13 months respectively.In David Ⅰ group, average grade of aortic regurgitation 6 months postoperatively was 0.6 ± 0.4.At the latest visit, no pseudoaneurysm on anastomosis was observed.Besides two patients from Bentall group were in NYHA class Ⅱ , all the other patients presented in NYHA class Ⅰ.Conclusion David Ⅰ aortic root reimplantation can be performed safely and obtain excellent short-term results in selected patients with AAAD.Long-term results need continuing follow-up.
ABSTRACT
Objective Evaluate the outcome of aortic root reconstruction on the analysis of the risk factors influencing surgical results. Methods Between August 1996 and November 2009, 92 patients(56 men, 36 women) aged from 14 to 77years [mean (44.8 ±1.4) years] with aortic root aneurysm underwent aortic root reconstruction. 72 patients had over moderate aortic valve insufficiency. 47 patients suffered from Marfan syndrome. The aortic pathology was aortic dissection in 45. Bentall technique was used in 59 patients, the button technique in 13, the David I with the Valsalva graft in 6 patients and the aortic valve resuspension in 14 patients. Results The hospital mortality rate was 8.7%. The major complications 31. 7%. 18patients died during the period of follow-up. Late complications among 55 survivors were 12. Univariate predictors of the morbidity were the presence of male, non-Marfan, concomitant procedure, deep hypothermia cardiac arrest, aortic cross clamp time and blood infusion. Risk facts for mortality were emergent or urgent operation, aortic dissection, concomitant procedure, aortic cross clamp time and blood infusion. Multivariate analysis revealed risk factors of concomitant procedure and blood infusion were responsible for both morbidity and mortality. The overall long-term survival rate is (97.1 ±2.0)% at 1-year, (88.1 ±4.7)% at 5-year, (54.0 ±9.2)% at 10-year. The mean for survival time is (9.9 ±0.59) years, 95% confidence interval 8.70 -11.01. Conclusion The aortic root restitution procedures are safe and effective in general. The short and long-term outcome is satisfactory. The button technique is the first choice for reimplantation coronary patch. Valve-sparring aortic root reconstructions show promise in safety and applicability.