A comparison of tensile weld strength and microstructural changes in four arch wires, before and after immersion in 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride solution: An in-vitro study.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate and to compare the tensile weld strengths and microstructural changes in four archwires namely beta titanium, stainless steel (SS), blue elgiloy and timolium before and after immersion in 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) solution. Materials and Methods: The mean tensile weld strength of a weld joint of four arch wires were compared pre‑fluoride (Group 1) with post fluoride (Group 2) and the microstructural characteristics of weld joints were evaluated under an optical microscope. Results: The mean tensile weld strength for beta titanium was 445.64 N/mm2, blue elgiloy was 363.26 N/mm2, SS was 358.30 N/mm2 and timolium was 308.62 N/mm2. After immersion in fluoride the mean tensile strength for beta titanium was 427.16 N/mm2, blue elgiloy was 359.86 N/mm2, SS is 349.44 N/mm2 and timolium is 294.86 N/mm2. After immersion in fluoride, the beta titanium and SS had a smooth fusion at the center of weld assembly with characteristic nugget formation. The beta titanium weld assembly had greater tensile weld strength than other welded assemblies. Blue elgiloy ranked second, whereas SS and timolium were third and fourth respectively. Conclusion: The wires in descending order of their mean tensile weld strength, on evaluation of their weld joints were found to be: Beta titanium > blue elgiloy > SS > timolium. The reduction in tensile weld strength was statistically insignificant for all the archwires after exposure to 1.23% APF at 37°C for 90 min.

The Clinical Relevance of Orthodontic Archwire Properties : A Revuew.

Archwires are the active components of a fixed appliance through which forces are generated and consequently tooth movement is achieved. Recent advances in orthodontic wire alloys have resulted in a varied array of wires that exhibit a wide spectrum of properties. Presently the orthodontist may select from all the available arch wires one that best meets the demands of a particular clinical situation and the efficiency of the operator. The selection of appropriate wire in turn would provide the benefit of optimum and predictable treatment results. The clinician must therefore be conversant with the difference in the mechanical properties and clinical application of this various types of wires