Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine mixed with Ropivacaine for adductor canal block combined with general anesthesia in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery / 中国内镜杂志

Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of Dexmedetomidine mixed with Ropivacaine for adductor canal block combined with general anesthesia in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery. Methods Ninety patients underwent elective unilateral arthroscopic knee surgery were randomly divided into three groups (n = 30 each): general anesthesia group (Group G), general anesthesia + Ropivacaine for adductor canal block group (Group G+R) and general anesthesia + Dexmedetomidine mixed with Ropivacaine for adductor canal block group (Group G+DR). After the end of anesthesia induction, ultrasound-guided adductor canal block was performed in G+R and G+DR groups. In G+R and G+DR groups, 20 ml of 0.375% Ropivacaine and 20 ml of 0.375% Ropivacaine mixed with 0.6 μg/kg Dexmedetomidine were injected, respectively. After the induction of general anesthesia, the i-gel laryngeal mask airway was inserted, and the patients were mechanically ventilated in the two groups. Anesthesia was maintained with Remifentanil 0.15 μg/(kg?min) and Propofol adjusted to maintain BIS between 45 and 55. The time for recovery of spontaneous breathing, emergence time, and time for removal of LMA were recorded. The VAS scores at rest, during active functional exercise (AFE) and continuous passive movement (CPM) were recorded at the following points: 1 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h after surgery. And quadriceps strength was evaluated at the following points: preoperative evaluation, 1 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h and 24 h after surgery. The total consumption of rescue analgesics, complications associated with adductor canal block, and occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events, over-sedation and postoperative nausea and vomiting were also recorded. Results Compared with Group G and Group G+R, the time for recovery of spontaneous breathing, emergence time, and time for removal of LMA were significantly shorter (P < 0.01). Compared with Group G, the VAS scores at rest, during AFE and CPM at 1 h and 4 h after surgery and the total consumption of Flurbiprofen axetil in Group G+R, and the VAS scores at rest, during AFE and CPM at 1 h, 4 h, 8 h and 12 h after surgery and the total consumption of Flurbiprofen axetil in Group G+DR were lower (all P < 0.05). Compared with Group G+R, the VAS scores at rest, during AFE and CPM at 8 h and 12 h after surgery and the total consumption of Flurbiprofen axetil in Group G+DR were lower (P < 0.01). No significant differences were seen among three groups in the terms of quadriceps strength, Dezocine consumption and adverse reactions (P > 0.05). Conclusion 0.6 μg/kg Dexmedetomidine mixed with 0.375% Ropivacaine 20 ml can provide faster recovery from anesthesia and effectively improve postoperative analgesia without inducing obvious adverse reactions when used for adductor canal block combined with general anesthesia in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery.

Tourniquet-induced ischaemia-reperfusion injury: the comparison of antioxidative effects of small-dose propofol and ketamine / Lesão de isquemia-reperfusão induzida por torniquete: comparação dos efeitos antioxidantes de propofol e cetamina em doses baixas

Abstract Objectives: The aim of the present study was to investigate the preventive effects of propofol and ketamine as small dose sedation during spinal anaesthesia on tourniquet-induced ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Methods: 30 patients were randomly assigned into two groups of 15 patients. In the propofol group, sedation was performed with propofol 0.2 mg·kg-1 followed by infusion at a rate of 2 mg·kg-1·h-1. In the ketamine group, a continuous infusion of ketamine 0.5 mg·kg-1·h-1 was used until the end of surgery. Intravenous administration of midazolam was not used in any patients. Ramsay sedation scale was used for assessing the sedation level. Venous blood samples were obtained before propofol and ketamine infusion (T1), at 30 minutes (min) of tourniquet ischaemia (T2), and 5 min after tourniquet deflation (T3) for malondialdehyde (MDA) measurements. Results: No differences were noted between the groups in haemodynamic (p > 0.05) and demographic data (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of T1, T2 and T3 periods (p > 0.05). There was a statistically increase observed in MDA values respectively both in Group P and Group K between the reperfusion period (1.95 ± 0.59, 2.31 ± 0.48) and pre-ischaemia (1.41 ± 0.38, 1.54 ± 0.45), and ischaemia (1.76 ± 0.70, 1.71 ± 0.38) (µmoL-1) periods (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Small-dose propofol and ketamine has similar potential to reduce the oxidative stress caused by tourniquet-induced ischaemia-reperfusion injury in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery under spinal anaesthesia.

Resumo Objetivos: O objetivo do presente estudo foi investigar os efeitos preventivos de propofol e cetamina em sedação com doses baixas durante a raquianestesia sobre lesão de isquemia-reperfusão induzida por torniquete. Métodos: 30 pacientes foram randomicamente alocados em dois grupos de 15 pacientes cada. No grupo propofol, a sedação foi feita com 0,2 mg.kg-1 de propofol seguida por infusão a uma taxa de 2 mg.kg-1.h-1. No grupo cetamina, uma infusão contínua de 0,5 mg.kg-1.h-1 de cetamina foi usada até o final da cirurgia. Midazolam intravenoso não foi administrado em nenhum dos pacientes. A Escala de Sedação de Ramsay (ESR) foi usada para avaliar o nível de sedação. Amostras de sangue venoso foram colhidas antes da administração de propofol e infusão de cetamina (T1), aos 30 minutos (min) de isquemia do torniquete (T2) e 5 min após a desinsuflação do torniquete (T3), para medir os valores de malondialdeído (MDA). Resultados: Não observamos diferenças entre os grupos em relação à hemodinâmica (p > 0,05) e dados demográficos (p > 0,05). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os dois grupos nos períodos T1, T2 e T3 (p > 0,05). Um aumento estatisticamente significativo foi observado nos valores de MDA, respectivamente, no Grupo P e Grupo C entre os períodos de reperfusão (1,95 ± 0,59, 2,31 ± 0,48) e pré-isquemia (1,41 ± 0,38, 1,54 ± 0,45) e isquemia (1,76 ± 0,70, 1,71 ± 0,38) (µmoL-1) (p < 0,05). Conclusões: Propofol e cetamina em doses baixas apresentam potencial semelhante para reduzir o estresse oxidativo causado pela lesão de isquemia-reperfusão induzida por torniquete em pacientes submetidos à artroscopia de joelho sob raquianestesia.

Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound?guided adductor canal blockade after minor arthroscopic knee surgery / 实用医学杂志

Objective To investigate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound?guided adductor canal blockade (ACB)after minor arthroscopic knee surgery. Methods Sixty patients undergone minor arthroscopic knee surgery were randomly divided into group ACB(n=20)and group Control(n=20). All patients received spinal anesthesia. The patients in group ACB received ultrasound?gGuided ACB with 20 ml 0.5% ropivacaine,and patients in group Control received 20 ml saline after the surgery. In addition ,all patients have a basic analgesic regimen with etoricoxib. Visual analogue scales(VAS) during rest and passive movement ,additional analgesic dose and side effects were recorded at 4,8,12,24 h Post?operation. At 24 h post?operation,the numbers of patients who can walk for 5 meters were recorded. Results VAS during rest and movement at 4 h,8 h and 12 h post?operation in group ACB were significantly lower than those in group Control. And all patients could walk 5m at 24 h post?operation. No headache,nausea and vomiting,urinary retention and other adverse reactions were observed in group ACB. There were four patients who received additional analgesic and one patient vomitted. Conclusions Significant analgesic effect of the ACB could be detected after minor arthroscopic knee surgery ,with less reduction in requirements for supplemental opioids.

Comparison of intrathecal versus intra-articular dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine on postoperative pain following knee arthroscopy: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain is a common, distressing symptom following arthroscopic knee surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the potential analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine after intrathecal versus intra-articular administration following arthroscopic knee surgery. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing unilateral elective arthroscopic knee surgery were randomly assigned into three groups in a double-blind placebo controlled study. The intrathecal dexmedetomidine group (IT) received an intrathecal block with intrathecal dexmedetomidine, the intra-articular group (IA) received an intrathecal block and intra-articular dexmedetomidine, and the control group received an intrathecal block and intra-articular saline. The primary outcome of our study was postoperative pain as assessed by the visual analogue scale of pain (VAS). Secondary outcomes included the effect of dexmedetomidine on total postoperative analgesic use and time to the first analgesic request, hemodynamics, sedation, postoperative nausea and vomiting, patient satisfaction, and postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. RESULTS: Dexmedetomidine administration decreased pain scores for 4 h in both the intrathecal and intra-articular groups, compared to only 2 h in the control patient group. Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in pain scores for 6 h in the intra-articular group. The time to the first postoperative analgesia request was longer in the intra-articular group compared to the intrathecal and control groups. The total meperidine requirement was significantly lower in the intra-articular and intrathecal groups than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Both intrathecal and intra-articular dexmedetomidine enhanced postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic knee surgery. Less total meperidine was required with intra-articular administration to extend postoperative analgesia to 6 h with hemodynamic stability.

A comparison of different densities of levobupivacaine solutions for unilateral spinal anaesthesia / Uma comparação das diferentes densidades das soluções de levobupivacaína para raquianestesia unilateral

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare the block characteristics and clinical effects of dextrose added to levobupivacaine solutions at different concentrations to provide unilateral spinal anaesthesia in lower extremity surgery. METHODS: This prospective, randomised, double-blind study comprised 75 ASA I-II risk patients for whom unilateral total knee arthroscopy was planned. The patients were assigned to three groups: in Group I, 60 mg dextrose was added to 7.5 mg of 0.5% levobupivacaine, in Group II, 80 mg and in Group III, 100 mg. Spinal anaesthesia was applied to the patient in the lateral decubitus position with the operated side below and the patient was kept in position for 10 min. RESULTS: The time for the sensorial block to achieve T12 level was slower in Group I than in Groups II and III (p < 0.05, p< 0.00). The time to full recovery of the sensorial block was 136 min in Group I, 154 min in Group II and 170 min in Group III. The differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The mean duration of the motor block was 88 min in Group I, 105 min in Group II, and 139 min in Group III and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The time to urination in Group I was statistically significantly shorter than in the other groups (p < 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study showed that together with an increase in density, the sensory and motor block duration was lengthened. It can be concluded that 30 mg mL-1 concentration of dextrose added to 7.5 mg levobupivacaine is sufficient to provide unilateral spinal anaesthesia in day-case arthroscopic knee surgery.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Comparar as características do bloqueio e os efeitos clínicos da adição de dextrose às soluções de levobupivacaína em diferentes concentrações para proporcionar raquianestesia unilateral em cirurgia de extremidade inferior. MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo, randômico e duplo-cego conduzido com 75 pacientes, estado físico ASA I-II, programados para artroplastia unilateral total do joelho. Os pacientes foram divididos em três grupos: no Grupo-I, 60 mg de dextrose foram adicionados a 7,5 mg de levobupivacaína a 0,5%; no Grupo II, 80 mg e no Grupo III, 100 mg. A raquianestesia foi aplicada ao paciente posicionado em decúbito lateral, com o lado operado abaixo, e o paciente foi mantido em posição durante 10 minutos. RESULTADOS: O tempo para o bloqueio sensorial atingir o nível T12 foi mais lento no Grupo-I do que nos grupos II e III (p < 0,05,p < 0,00). O tempo de recuperação total do bloqueio sensorial foi de 136 minutos no Grupo-I, 154 minutos no Grupo-II e 170 minutos no Grupo III. As diferenças foram estatisticamente significativas (p < 0,05). A média da duração do bloqueio motor foi de 88 minutos no Grupo-I, 105 minutos no Grupo-II e 139 minutos no Grupo-III e as diferenças foram estatisticamente significativas (p< 0,05). O tempo de micção foi significativamente menor no Grupo-I do que nos outros grupos (p < 0,00). CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados do estudo mostraram que, junto com um aumento da densidade, a duração dos bloqueios sensorial e motor foi prolongada. Pode-se concluir que uma concentração 30 mg mL-1 de dextrose adicionada a 7,5 mg de levobupivacaína é suficiente para proporcionar raquianestesia unilateral para artroscopia do joelho em regime ambulatorial.

Comparison of the Analgesic Effect between Bupivacaine and Morphine by Intra- articular Infiltration after Arthroscopic Knee Surgery

Relief of postoperative pain after arthroscopic knee surgery is important to promote early rehabilitation of patients. This study was aimed to compare the analgesic effects of bupivacaine and morphine injected into the knee after arthroscopic surgery. In a double-blind, randomized trial, we studied 60 patients who received one of three injections at the end of surgery. The patients were randomly divided into three groups; group 1 received 25ml of 0.25% bupivacaine, group 2 received 5mg of morphine mixed with 25ml of 0.9% normal saline and group 3 received a mixture of 25ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and Smg of morphine. Postoperative pain was assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale(VAS). We recorded the total number of injections of supplemental analgesics, and the occurrence of side effects of bupivacaine and morphine were monitored. In group 1, VAS was significantly lower than group 2 at one and two hours after injection, but it was higher than the other two groups after four hours. In group 2, VAS was significantly lower than group 1 after four hours and later, but it was higher than the other two groups at one and two hours after injection. In group 3, VAS was maintained low during early and late postoperative period. No side effect was found in all patients. We conclude that intra-articular bupivacaine decreases early postoperative pain, morphine decreases late postoperative pain, and the mixture of bupivacaine and morphine is the most effective in controlling the postoperative pain during early and late period.

The Analgesic Effect of Intraarticular Bupivacaine and Morphine after Arthroscopic Knee Surgery

Many authors have studies to relieve the pain after arthniscopic knee surgery. We undertook a randomized, double-blind trial to compare the efficacy of intraarticular morphme and bupivacaine between arthroscopic meniscus surgery group and cruciate ligament reconstruction group. As an results, intraarticular injection of morphine-bupivacaine combination is effective to control pain after minor athroscopic surgery such as menisectomy and meniscal repair ancf intraarticu]ar injection of mor- phine-bupivacaine combination is not effective to relieve pain after major arthroscopic surgery including cru- ciate ligament reconstruction. So, more potent analgesics should be adminishated.

The Analgesic Effect of Intraarticular Bupivacaine and Morphine after Arthroscopic Knee Surgery / 대한마취과학회지

The effects of intrarticular bupivacaine(20 ml, 0.25%), morphine(1 mg in 20 ml NaCl), or combination of the two(morphine 1 mg or 2 mg in 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine) on postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic knee surgery were studied in randomized, prospective, double-blind trial in ASA I-II patients receiving spinal anesthesia. The pain was assessed 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 24 and 48 hours after procedure by the visual analogue pain scale(VAS) scores, and additional analgesic requirement was recorded. There was no significant difference in VAS scores and additional analgesic requirements among groups except 5 hours after procedure. Both parameters were significantly greater in the bupivacaine-only-treated group than in the other three groups at that time. It is suggested that we'd better use morphine 1 mg in normal saline without bupivacaine after arthroscopic knee surgery to get the desirable postoperative analgesic effect.