Fluid preloading before beach chair positioning for arthroscopic shoulder procedures: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background and objectives The Beach Chair Position (BCP) has many advantages such as less neurovascular injury and better intra-articular visualization, but it has also negative consequences, including hemodynamic instability. Although maintaining normal Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) is important, fluid management is also a crucial concept for hemodynamic stability. The main objective of this study is whether preloading before positioning would be effective for less hemodynamic instability. Methods This randomized, controlled study was conducted in a single center in the Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine. Forty-nine patients undergoing elective arthroscopic surgery in the BCP were recruited. In the study group, crystalloid fluid at 10 mL.kg-1 of ideal body weight was administered intravenously 30 min before the BCP for preloading. The primary outcome measures were differences of hemodynamic variables as MAP, Stroke Volume (SV), Heart Rate (HR), and Cardiac Output (CO). The secondary outcome measures were Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) rates in postoperative first day, surgical satisfaction scale, total ephedrine dose used during surgery, and total amount of fluid. Results The MAP, CO, and SV measurements of the study group were higher than those of the control group in the 5th minute after the BCP (respectively, p= 0.001, p= 0.016, p= 0.01). The total amount of crystalloid and surgical satisfaction scales were higher in the study group (respectively, p= 0.016, p= 0.001). Total amount of colloid and ephedrine dose used in the intraoperative period, and PONV rates were lower in the study group (p= 0.003, p= 0.018, p= 0.019, respectively). Conclusion Consequently, preloading can be favorable approach to preserve hemodynamic stability.

Comparison of interscalene brachial plexus block and superior trunk block with ropivacaine in shoulder arthroscopic surgery / 药学实践杂志

Objective To compare the clinical effects of interscalene brachial plexus block and superior trunk block in arthroscopic shoulder surgery with 0.25% ropivacaine. Methods 46 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy surgery were included and randomly divided into group ISB (n=23) and group ST (n=23). Patients in group ISB received 10 ml 0.25% ropivacaine on the lateral side of C5 and C6. Patients in group ST were treated with 5 ml 0.25% ropivacaine on both sides of the superior trunk of brachial plexus. The diaphragmatic excursion, Numerical Rating Scale(NRS), duration of the block, handgrip strength were recorded at different time. Results No statistical difference was detected between the two groups in the reduction of diaphragmatic excursion within 30 min after block (P>0.05). Compared with ISB patients, ST patients had significantly less diaphragmatic excursion at 3 h after block（P<0.05). 30 minutes after block, 8.7% patients in ISB group reached complete HDP and 52.2% patients reached partial HDP. At the same time, no complete HDP and 26.1% partial HDP were detected in ST group. 3 hours after block, patients in ST group had lower complete HDP rate (0.0% vs 17.4%) and lower partial HDP rate (39.1% vs 65.2%) than patients in ISB group. At 30 minutes and 3 h after block, the reduction of grip strength in ST group was significantly lower than that in ISB group (P<0.001). ST group had lower NRS than ISB group (P<0.05). The average block time in ISB group (8.3±1.97 )h was significantly lower than that in ST group (10.9±1.26)h (P<0.01). Conclusion Superior trunk block with 10 ml 0.25% ropivacaine is superior compared to interscalene brachial plexus block in occurrence of HDP, decrease of grip strength, postoperative pain and block duration.

Effect of short-term prewarming on body temperature in arthroscopic shoulder surgery

BACKGROUND: Hypothermia (< 36°C) is common during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. It is known that 30 to 60 minutes of prewarming can prevent perioperative hypothermia by decreasing body heat redistribution. However, the effect of short-term prewarming (less than 30 minutes) on body temperature in such surgery has not been reported yet. Therefore, the aim of this prospective study was to investigate the effect of short-term prewarming for less than 30 minutes using forced-air warming device on body temperature during interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) procedure in arthroscopic shoulder surgery before general anesthesia. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery to receive either cotton blanket (not pre-warmed, group C, n = 26) or forced-air warming device (pre-warmed, group F, n = 26). Temperature was recorded every 15 minutes from entering the operating room until leaving post-anesthetic care unit (PACU). Shivering and thermal comfort scale were evaluated during their stay in the PACU. RESULTS: There were significant differences in body temperature between group C and group F from 30 minutes after induction of general anesthesia to 30 minutes after arrival in the PACU (P < 0.05). The median duration of prewarming in group F was 14 min (range: 9-23 min). There was no significant difference in thermal comfort scale or shivering between the two groups in PACU. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that short-term prewarming using a forced-air warming device during ISBPB in arthroscopic shoulder surgery had beneficial effect on perioperative hypothermia.

Effect of short-term prewarming on body temperature in arthroscopic shoulder surgery

BACKGROUND: Hypothermia (< 36°C) is common during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. It is known that 30 to 60 minutes of prewarming can prevent perioperative hypothermia by decreasing body heat redistribution. However, the effect of short-term prewarming (less than 30 minutes) on body temperature in such surgery has not been reported yet. Therefore, the aim of this prospective study was to investigate the effect of short-term prewarming for less than 30 minutes using forced-air warming device on body temperature during interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) procedure in arthroscopic shoulder surgery before general anesthesia. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery to receive either cotton blanket (not pre-warmed, group C, n = 26) or forced-air warming device (pre-warmed, group F, n = 26). Temperature was recorded every 15 minutes from entering the operating room until leaving post-anesthetic care unit (PACU). Shivering and thermal comfort scale were evaluated during their stay in the PACU. RESULTS: There were significant differences in body temperature between group C and group F from 30 minutes after induction of general anesthesia to 30 minutes after arrival in the PACU (P < 0.05). The median duration of prewarming in group F was 14 min (range: 9-23 min). There was no significant difference in thermal comfort scale or shivering between the two groups in PACU. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that short-term prewarming using a forced-air warming device during ISBPB in arthroscopic shoulder surgery had beneficial effect on perioperative hypothermia.

Cranial nerve XII (hypoglossal nerve) palsy after arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia combined with sono-guided interscalene brachial plexus block: A case report

Neurologic complications after shoulder surgery may result from surgical procedures or anesthesia. Hypoglossal nerve is a pure motor nerve that supplies mylohyoid and hyoglossus muscles. Isolated hypoglossal nerve injury may be caused by direct trauma, head malposition (hyperextension or hyperflexion), and indirect compression or traction during intubation. We report a case of left hypoglossal nerve palsy after arthroscopic left shoulder surgery in the beach chair position under general anesthesia combined with brachial plexus block.

The effect of preemptive intravenous ketamine on postoperative pain in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with intra articular ropivacaine injection

BACKGROUND: A low dose of ketamine can be an effective preemptive analgesic by preventing central sensitization when administered before surgical trauma. In this study, we assessed the preemptive analgesic effect of low-dose ketamine administered intravenously to patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with intra articular ropivacaine injection. METHODS: This randomized, double-blinded study included fifty-six patients scheduled for elective arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Normal saline (group C) or 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine (group K) was injected intravenously before the skin incision. An intra articular injection using 20 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine was performed in both groups just before wound closure by the surgeon at the end of the surgery. Postoperative pain was assessed by the numeric rating scale (NRS) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. The total dose of fentanyl consumption and side effects were recorded. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the C and K groups for the NRS of pain in the PACU and at 12, 24, and 48 hours after the surgery. In addition, there was also no significant difference in total fentanyl consumption between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive ketamine did not reduce preemptive pain scores and fentanyl consumption in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with intra articular local anesthetic injection. Therefore, more aggressive and multimodal pain control is required in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery regardless of the use of preemptive intravenous ketamine injection.

Comparison of interscalene brachial plexus block and intra-articular local anesthetic administration on postoperative pain management in arthroscopic shoulder surgery / Comparação de bloqueio do plexo braquial por via interescalênica e administração de anestésico local intra-articular no manejo da dor no pós-operatório de cirurgia artroscópica do ombro / Comparación de bloqueo del plexo braquial por vía interescalénica y administración de anestésico local intraarticular en el manejo del dolor en el postoperatorio de cirugía artroscópica del hombro

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In this study, the aim was to compare postoperative analgesia effects of the administration of ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block and intra-articular bupivacaine carried out with bupivacaine. METHODS: In the first group of patients 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine and ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISPB) were applied, while 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine was given via intra-articular (IA) administration to the second group patients after surgery. Patients in the third group were considered the control group and no block was performed. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine was used in all three groups for postoperative analgesia. RESULTS: In the ISPB group, morphine consumption in the periods between 0-4, 6-12 and 12-24 postoperative hours and total consumption within 24 h was lower than in the other two groups. Morphine consumption in the IA group was lower than in the control group in the period from 0 to 6 h and the same was true for total morphine consumption in 24 h. Postoperative VASr scores in the ISPB group were lower than both of the other groups in the first 2 h and lower than the control group in the 4th and 6th hours (p < 0.05). In the IA group, VASr and VASm scores in the 2nd, 4th and 6th hours were lower than in the control group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Interscalene brachial plexus block was found to be more effective than intra-articular local anesthetic injection for postoperative analgesia. .

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Comparar os efeitos na analgesia no pós-operatório da administração de bloqueio do plexo braquial por via interescalênica guiado por ultrassom e bupivacaína intra-articular, feito com bupivacaína. MÉTODOS: No primeiro grupo de pacientes, 20 mL de bupivacaína a 0,25% e bloqueio do plexo braquial por via interescalênica guiado por ultrassom (BPBI) foram administrados, enquanto 20 mL de bupivacaína a 0,25% foram administrados por via intra-articular (IA) ao segundo grupo de pacientes após a cirurgia. Os pacientes do terceiro grupo foram considerados grupo controle e nenhum bloqueio foi feito. Analgesia controlada pelo paciente (ACP) com morfina foi usada nos três grupos para analgesia pós-operatória. RESULTADOS: No grupo BPBI, o consumo de morfina nos períodos entre 0-4, 6-12 e 12-24 horas após a cirurgia e o consumo total em 24 horas foram mais baixos do que nos outros dois grupos. O consumo de morfina no grupo IA foi menor do que no grupo controle no período de 0-6 horas, como também foi menor o consumo total de morfina em 24 horas. Os escores EVAr no pós-operatório do grupo BPBI foram menores do que os escores dos dois outros grupos nas primeiras duas horas e menores do que os do grupo controle nos períodos de 4 e 6 horas (p < 0,05). No grupo IA, os escores EVAr e EVAm nos períodos de 2, 4 e 6 horas foram menores do que no grupo controle (p < 0,05). CONCLUSÃO: O bloqueio do plexo braquial por via interescalênica mostrou ser mais eficaz do que a injeção intra-articular de anestésico local para analgesia pós-operatória. .

JUSTIFICACIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: En este estudio, nuestro objetivo fue comparar en el período postoperatorio los efectos analgésicos de la administración de la bupivacaína en el bloqueo del plexo braquial por vía interescalénica guiado por ecografía y bupivacaína intraarticular. MÉTODOS: En el primer grupo de pacientes se administraron 20 mL de bupivacaína al 0,25% y se llevó a cabo el bloqueo del plexo braquial por vía interescalénica (BPBI) guiado por ecografía, mientras que al segundo grupo de pacientes se le administraron 20 mL de bupivacaína al 0,25% por vía intraarticular (IA) tras la cirugía. Los pacientes del tercer grupo fueron considerados como grupo control y en ellos no se realizó ningún bloqueo. La analgesia controlada por el paciente con morfina se usó en los 3 grupos para la analgesia postoperatoria. RESULTADOS: En el grupo BPBI, el consumo de morfina en los períodos entre 0-4, 6-12 y 12-24 h del postoperatorio y el consumo total en 24 h fueron más bajos que en los otros 2 grupos. El consumo de morfina en el grupo IA fue menor que en el grupo control en el período de 0-6 h, como también fue menor el consumo total de morfina en 24 h. Las puntuaciones EVAr en el postoperatorio del grupo BPBI fueron menores que las de los otros 2 grupos en las primeras 2 h y menores que los del grupo control en los períodos de 4 y 6 h (p < 0,05). En el grupo IA, las puntuaciones EVAr y EVAm en los períodos de 2, 4 y 6 h fueron menores que en el grupo control (p < 0,05). CONCLUSIÓN: El BPBI mostró ser más eficaz que la inyección intraarticular de anestésico local para analgesia postoperatoria. .

Postoperative pain relief effect of a suprascapular nerve block before arthroscopic shoulder surgery

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic shoulder surgery results in severe postoperative pain in 45% of patients which requires a large amount of opioids for relief. We hypothesized that a suprascapular nerve block before arthroscopic shoulder surgery would improve the quality of postoperative pain relief thereby allowing patients to require significantly reduced amounts of opioids. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomized from a elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery list either into a control group (group 1, n = 30) with only intravenous, patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) or an experimental group (group 2, n = 30) involving a suprascapular nerve block before arthroscopic shoulder surgery. The patients had an induction of general endotracheal anesthesia with or without suprascapular nerve block before operation. The IV PCA was connected to the patients 10 minutes after induction. Both groups were analyzed by chi square test and t-test. RESULTS: The postoperative VAS scores for group 2 decreased more than those for group 1. In particular, the VAS scores for group 2 within 12 hours after the operation were significantly higher than those 12 hours postoperative, as compared to group 1. CONCLUSIONS: Increased pain relief and less reliance on opioid can be expected through the use of a suprascapular nerve block prior to arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

The effect of sono-guided brachial plexus block on postoperative pain control for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: comparison with general anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Interscalene brachial plexus block (IS-BPB) offers many advantages over general anesthesia for both arthroscopic and open surgeries of the shoulder, including shorter hospital stay, reduced postoperative analgesia requirements, and avoidance of the risks and side effects of general anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of postoperative pain control by IS-BPB to general anesthesia for performing arthroscopic shoulder surgery. METHODS: Sixty patients were divided into three groups: general anesthesia (group A, n=20), general anesthesia and suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) (group B, n=20), and only IS-BPB(group C, n=20). All patients received patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and were instructed to rate their pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10. VAS was measured at 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. Hospital stays were recorded. RESULTS: VAS decreased significantly with time in group A and B (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1), but not in group C. Group C had less pain at 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, hours postoperatively than the other groups (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1). Group C had shorter hospital stays than the other groups (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2). CONCLUSIONS: IS-BPB results in less postoperative pain and a shorter hospital stay than general anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery (P < 0.05).

A comparative study on the analgesic effect of continuous intraarticular infusion with ropivacaine, ropivacaine/fentanyl and ropivacaine/fentanyl/ketorolac after arthroscopic shoulder surgery / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic shoulder surgery can result in severe postoperative pain. A variety of methods have been used to control pain in postoperative period and the results are variable. The purpose of this study was to compare the relative analgesic efficacies of the postoperative intraarticular infusion of ropivacaine, ropivacaine/fentanyl, and ropivacaine/fentanyl/ketorolac after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to three groups. At the end of surgery, 0.5% ropivacaine 20 ml was infused into the articular space and a continuous infusion catheter was inserted into intraarticular operated site. After surgery, continuous infusion of 0.5% ropivacaine 100 ml (Group 1, n = 10), 0.5% ropivacaine 100 ml including fentanyl 10 microg/kg (Group 2, n = 10), or 0.5% ropivacaine 100 ml including fentanyl 10 microgram/kg and ketorolac 150 mg (Group 3, n = 10) was started through catheter at rate of 2 ml/hr with bolus dose of 0.5 ml with a lock out time of 15 minutes for 2 days. The level of pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) postoperative 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours and the amounts of supplemental analgesics were recorded. RESULTS: The VAS was significantly lower after 2, 6, 12 hours in Group 2 than in Group 1. In Group 3, the VAS was significantly lower all hours than in the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of fentanyl and ketorolac with ropivacaine did provide better postoperative analgesia than the other groups after arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Pleural effusion caused by extravasation of irrigation fluid during arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A case report / 대한마취과학회지

Arthroscopic shoulder surgery has become a common and routine procedure because it provides several advantages for the diagnosis and therapy of shoulder injuries. However, shoulder arthroscopy is not a technique that's void of complications. We describe here a unique case of a patient who experienced pleural effusion caused by extravasation of irrigation fluid during arthroscopic shoulder surgery, and this surgery was done under general anesthesia.

Comparison of Intra-articular versus Intra-venous Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) following Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the postoperative analgesic effects and side effects of an intra-articular PCA infusion of bupivacaine and morphine using an intravenous PCA infusion of morphine following arthroscopic shoulder surgery. METHODS: Seventy-one patients, undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia, were randomly assigned to one of two groups. In group 1 (n = 32), morphine and ondansetron, 8 and 4 mg, respectively, were intravenously injected following surgery, with the subsequent infusion of normal saline 100 ml, including morphine and ondansetron, 32 and 12 mg, respectively, through an intra-venous PCA catheter. In group 2 (n = 39), 0.25% bupivacaine, 40 ml, including an intra-articular injection of morphine, 3 mg, followed by an infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine, 100 ml, including morphine, 5 mg, were administered through an intra-articular PCA catheter. In groups 1 and 2, the PCA infusion rate was 2 ml/h, with a bolus dose of 0.5 ml, with a lock out time of 8 min. The VAS for pain at rest, and the range of motion (ROM) exercise and side effects were assessed 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 12, 18 and 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: The patients in group 2 had significantly lower VAS for pain for the ROM than those in group 1 30 min postoperatively. However, the VAS for pain at rest was significantly lower in group 1 than 2 after 18 and 24 h, but the VAS for pain for the ROM was significantly lower in group 1 than 2 24 h postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the side effects between the two groups, with the exception of dizziness, which was more severe in group 2 at 1, 2 and 4 h postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: An intra-articular PCA infusion of bupivacaine and morphine is no more effective than an intra-venous PCA infusion of morphine and ondansetron with respect to postoperative analgesia and side effects.

Analgesia after Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: Study of Effective Concentration of Continuous Patient-Controlled Subacromial Ropivacaine Infusion / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate the effective concentration of subacromial ropivacaine for the control of postoperative pain after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized double-blind trial, 60 patients were divided equally into 3 groups; Groups I, II, and III. At the end of surgery, a bolus dose (0.75% ropivacaine 150 mg, depomedrol 40 mg) was injected via the trocar and a continuous subacromial infusion catheter was inserted into all patients. The drugs were administered for 48 hours after surgery. Group I was given 0.11% ropivacaine in 96 ml of normal saline, which consisted of 0.75% ropivacaine (15 ml), and fentanyl (10 microgram/kg). Group II received 0.15% ropivacaine in 96 ml saline consisting of 0.75% ropivacaine (20 ml) and fentanyl, (10 microgram/kg). Group III received 0.23% ropivacaine in saline consisting of 0.75% ropivacaine (30 ml) and fentanyl (10 microgram/kg). The rate of continuous infusion was, 2 ml/hr. The VAS for pain at rest and the range of motion (ROM) exercise, the amounts of supplemental analgesics and side effects were assessed postoperative 3, 9, 24 and 48 hours. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the VAS for pain at rest and ROM exercise as well as in the amounts of supplemental analgesics between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: 0.11% ropivacaine with 10 microgram/kg fentanyl provides effective postoperative analgesia at rest and during ROM exercise after arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

The Analgesic Effect of Continuous Suprascapular Nerve Block after Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic shoulder surgery is often associated with severe postoperative pain. It is important to control pain in this setting, not only to improve the patient's well-being but also to facilitate rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a continuous suprascapular nerve block for pain relief after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. METHODS: Forty patients (20 in each group) scheduled for elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery received a suprascapular nerve block and a catheter was introduced before surgery. The patients were received standardized general anesthesia. After surgery, a single bolus of normal saline (Group I) or 0.2% ropivacaine (Group II) 6 ml was injected through a catheter in each group. All patients received either a continuous infusion of normal saline (Group I) or a continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine (Group II) through the catheter at a rate of 3 ml/hr plus a bolus of 3 ml with a lock out time of 30 min. Pain relief was assessed at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 hours using visual analog scale (VAS) and verbal pain scores (VPS). RESULTS: VAS and VPS were lower in the ropivacaine group (Group II) than in the normal saline group (Group I). There were no complication in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous suprascapular nerve block using 0.2% ropivacaine is a safe and efficacious treatment for postoperative shoulder pain.