Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Clinics ; 67(5): 463-467, 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-626342

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the existence of radiographic abnormalities in two groups of patients, those with and without hip pain. METHODS: A total 222 patients were evaluated between March 2007 and April 2009; 122 complained of groin pain, and 100 had no symptoms. The individuals in both groups underwent radiographic examinations of the hip using the following views: anteroposterior, Lequesne false profile, Dunn, Dunn 45º, and Ducroquet. RESULTS: A total of 1110 radiographs were evaluated. Female patients were prevalent in both groups (52% symptomatic, 58% asymptomatic). There were statistically significant differences between the groups in age (p<0.0001), weight (p = 0.002) and BMI (p = 0.006). The positive findings in the group with groin pain consisted of the presence of a bump on the femoral head in the anteroposterior view (p<0.0001) or in the Dunn 45º view (p = 0.008). The difference in the a angle in the anteroposterior, Dunn, Dunn 45º, and Ducroquet views for all of the cases studied was p,0.0001. The joint space measurement differed significantly between groups in the Lequesne view (p = 0.007). The Lequesne anteversion angle (ρ) and the femoral offset measurement also differed significantly (p = 0.005 and p = 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the best views for diagnosing a femoroacetabular impingement are the anteroposterior pelvic orthostatic, the Dunn 45º, and the Ducroquet views. The following findings correlated with hip pain: a decrease in the femoral offset, an increase in the α angle, an increase in the Lequesne ρ angle, a decrease in the CE angle of Wiberg, a thinner articular space and the presence of a bump on the femoral head-neck transition.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Arthralgia , Femoracetabular Impingement , Femur Head , Hip Joint , Osteoarthritis, Hip , Case-Control Studies , Femur Neck , Osteoarthritis, Hip/etiology , Statistics, Nonparametric
2.
Braz. dent. j ; 21(4): 356-360, 2010. ilus, graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-562099

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the improvement of the mandibular movements and painful symptoms in individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Forty patients were randomly divided into two groups (n=20): Group 1 received the effective dose (GaAlAs laser ? 830 nm, 40 mW, 5J/cm2) and Group 2 received the placebo application (0 J/cm2), in continuous mode on the affected condyle lateral pole: superior, anterior, posterior, and posterior-inferior, twice a week during 4 weeks. Four evaluations were performed: E1 (before laser application), E2 (right after the last application), E3 (one week after the last application) and E4 (30 days after the last application). The Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant more improvements (p<0.01) in painful symptoms in the treated group than in the placebo group. A significant improvement in the range of mandibular movements was observed when the results were compared between the groups at E4. Laser application can be a supportive therapy in the treatment of TMD, since it resulted in the immediate decrease of painful symptoms and increased range of mandibular movements in the treated group. The same results were not observed in the placebo group.


O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a eficácia da terapia com laser de baixa intensidade na melhora dos movimentos mandibulares e dos sintomas dolorosos em pacientes com disfunção temporomandibular (DTM). Quarenta pacientes foram aleatoriamente divididos em dois grupos (n=20): Grupo 1 recebeu a dose efetiva (laser de AsGaAl 830 nm, 40 mW, 5 J/cm2) e Grupo 2 recebeu a aplicação placebo (0 J/cm2), no modo contínuo no pólo lateral do côndilo afetado: superior, anterior, e posterior-posterior e inferior, 2 vezes por semana, por 2 meses. Quatro avaliações foram feitas: A1 (antes da aplicação), A2 (imediatamente após a última aplicação), A3 (uma semana após a última aplicação) e A4 (um mes após a última aplicação). O teste estatístico de Kruskal-Wallis mostrou melhoras significativas (p<0,01) nos sintomas dolorosos no grupo 1, diferentemente do grupo 2. Uma melhora significativa na extensão dos movimentos mandibulares foi observada quando os resultados foram comparados entre os dois grupos na A4. A aplicação do laser é uma terapia de suporte no tratamento da DTM, uma vez que resultou em imediata redução dos sintomas dolorosos e aumento na extensão dos movimentos mandibulares no grupo experimental. Os mesmos resultados não foram observados no grupo placebo.


Subject(s)
Humans , Facial Pain/radiotherapy , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Lasers, Semiconductor/therapeutic use , Range of Motion, Articular , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/radiotherapy , Facial Pain/etiology , Low-Level Light Therapy/instrumentation , Pain Measurement , Treatment Outcome , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/complications
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL