ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare clinical effects of core decompression with stem cell transplantation and tantalum rod implanting in treating stage II non-traumatic osteonecrosis of femoral head.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From March 2012 to September 2012, 45 patients(55 hips)with stage ARCO II non-traumatic osteonecrosis of femoral head were treated and divided into core decompression with stem cell transplantation group(group A) and tantalum rod implanting group(group B) according to number table. In group A, there were 23 cases(28 hips) , including 12 males and 11 females aged from 23 to 51 years old with an average of (36.87±9.52) years, the courses of disease ranged from 2 to 28 months with an average of (17.13±7.74) months, preoperative Harris score was for 35 to 70 with an average of(54.74±11.81), treated with core decompression with stem cell transplantation. In group B, there were 22 cases(27 hips), including 11 males and 11 females aged from 26 to 46 years old with an average of (35.59±7.39) years, the courses of disease ranged from 3 to 26 months with an average of(16.00±7.46) months, preoperative Harris score was for 35 to 76 with an average of (57.18±12.95), treated with core tantalum rod implanting. Operative time, blood loss, hospital stays, hospitalization expenses were observed and compared after treatment between two groups, the clinical effects were evaluated according to Harris criteria.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All patients were followed up from 6 to 12 months with an average of 10.8 months. There were significant difference in hospitalization expenses between two groups(<0.05), while there was no significant statistical difference in blood loss and hospital stay (>0.05). At the final following-up, Harris score in group A was(83.04±8.97), 6 cases obtained excellent results, 14 good, 2 good and 1 poor;while Harris score in group A was(84.41±9.94), and 9 cases obtained excellent results, 9 good, 3 good and 1 poor; there was no statistical meaning differences between two groups(>0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Core decompression with stem cell transplantation and tantalum rod implanting could both improve function of hip joint, while core decompression with stem cell transplantation had advantages of shorter operation time, less cost, and higher potency ratio. It is suitable for stage ARCO II non-traumatic femoral head necrosis.</p>
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical results of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) with radiographic staging on patients with avascular necrosis of femoral head (AVNFH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 24 patients diagnosed with AVNFH (32 hip joints) who were treated with ESWT from 1993 to 2012. Average follow-up period was 27 months, and the average age of patients was 47.8 years. The Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) system was used to grade radiographic stage prior to treatment. For this study patients were divided into two groups based on their ARCO stage, group 1 (ARCO stages I and II) and group 2 (ARCO stage III). Comparative analyses were done between the two groups using the visual analogue scale (VAS) score and the Harris hip score (HHS) at pre-treatment and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. Failure was defined when radiographic stage progressed or arthroplasty surgery was needed due to clinical exacerbation. RESULTS: Both groups showed clinical improvements with VAS scoring at final follow-up (group 1: median 7 to 1.5, P<0.001; group 2: mean 7 to 4, P=0.056). Using HHS, group 1 showed a significant improvement (from 65.5 to 95 [P<0.001]), while no significance was observed for group 2 (P=0.280). At final follow-up, 3 hips from group 1 and one hip from group 2 showed radiographic improvement; however, two patients underwent total hip arthroplasty due to persistent pain and dysfunction. CONCLUSION: ESWT can be considered as an interventional option before surgical treatment in patients with not only early stage AVNFH but also with mid stage.