Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático: atualidades e perspectivas / Atraumatic Restorative Treatment: advances and perspectives

O Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático (Atraumatic Restorative Treatment) atualmente é entendido como uma abordagem minimamente invasiva que compreende medidas preventivas, terapêuticas e restauradoras em relação à cárie dental e no controle dessa doença, inclusive no atendimento à pacientes especiais. O tratamento é feito apenas com a utilização de instrumentos manuais e com o uso do cimento de ionômero de vidro (CIV), aplicado para o selamento de cicatrículas e fissuras em risco de cárie e na restauração de dentes com cavidades nas quais as fissuras adjacentes também são seladas. As razões mais frequentes para as falhas das restaurações ART estão associadas ao deslocamento do ionômero de vidro em função de insuficiente remoção de esmalte desmineralizado e dentina decomposta; manipulação inadequada do pó/líquido do ionômero de vidro; grau de umidade e temperatura da mistura do ionômero no momento da manipulação; não preenchimento completo da cavidade com o material restaurador; contaminação por saliva e/ou sangue; limpeza ou condicionamento insuficiente das cavidades; grau de cooperação do paciente; habilidade do operador. Materiais com propriedades estéticas melhoradas têm surgido no mercado odontológico e devem servir de estímulo para a realização de trabalhos de ART nos dentes anteriores. No preparo do dente para as restaurações de ART de Classe II, é recomendável confeccionar retenções adicionais nas paredes vestibular e lingual para evitar o deslocamento da restauração. O ART é capaz de diminuir o nível de ansiedade e medo dos pacientes quando o operador não é um especialista, além de ser um tratamento que proporciona menor dor e desconforto, podendo ser realizado num consultório odontológico ou fora dele. Sugestões para novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o ART são propostas.

The Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (A R T) is understood as a minimally invasive approach comprising preventive, therapeutic and restorative measures in relation to dental caries and in the control of this disease, including in attendance to patients of special needs. The treatment is done only with the use of hand instruments and with the use of glass ionomer cement (GIC), applied to the sealing of pits and fissures in caries risk and in the restoration of teeth with cavities in which the adjacent pits and fissures are also sealed. The most frequent reasons for the failures of ART restorations are the displacement of the glass ionomer due to inadequate removal of demineralized enamel and dentin decomposed; improper handling of the glass ionomer powder and liquid; degree of humidity and temperature of the mix GIC at the time of handling; not full fill of the cavity with the restorative material; contamination by saliva and/or blood; cleaning or conditioning of cavities; degree of cooperation of the patient; skill of the operator. Materials with improved aesthetic properties have emerged on the market and must serve as a stimulus for the works of ART in the anterior teeth. In the preparation of the tooth for class II ART restorations, we recommend that you make additional retentions in the vestibular and lingual walls to prevent the displacement of the restoration. The ART is able to reduce the level of anxiety and fear of patients when the operator is not an expert, and is a treatment that provides less pain and discomfort, and can be performed in a dental office or out of it. Suggestions for new research agendas on the ART are proposed.

A field-trial of two restorative materials used with atraumatic restorative treatment in rural Turkey: 24-month results

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical performance of high-strength glass ionomer cement (HSGIC) and resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) in single and multiple surface carious cavities in the field conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A split-mouth design, including ninety-one fillings placed on contra lateral molar pairs of 37 children, was used in permanent dentition. As filling materials, a HSGIC (Ketac Molar/3M ESPE) and a RMGIC (Vitremer/ 3M ESPE) were used with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART). Baseline and 6, 12 and 24-month evaluations of the fillings were made with standard-ART and USPHS criteria by two examiners with kappa values of 0.92 and 0.87 for both criteria. RESULTS: According to the USPHS criteria, the retention rates of RMGIC and HSGIC restorations were 100 percent and 80.9 percent for single surface, and 100 percent and 41.2 percent for multiple surface restorations after 24 months, respectively. Irrespective of surface number, RMGIC was significantly superior to HSGIC (p= 0.004), according to both standard-ART and USPHS criteria. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that RMGIC may be an alternative restorative technique in comparison to high-strength GIC applications in ART-field-trials. However, further clinical and field trials are needed to support this conclusion.

Evolution of the the ART approach: highlights and achievements

Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) was initiated in the mid-eighties in Tanzania in response to an inappropriately functioning community oral health programme that was based on western health care models and western technology. The approach has evolved to its present standing as an effective minimal intervention approach mainly because the originators anticipated the great potential of ART to alleviate inequality in oral health care, and because they recognised the need to carry out research to investigate its effectiveness and applicability. Twenty-five years later, ART was accepted by the World Health Organisation (1994) and the FDI World Dental Federation (2002). It is included in textbooks on cariology, restorative dentistry and minimal intervention dentistry. It is being systematically introduced into public oral health service systems in a number of low- and middle income countries. Private practitioners use it. Many publications related to aspects of ART have been published and many more will follow. To achieve quality results with ART one has to attend well-conducted and sufficiently long training courses, preferably in combination with other caries preventive strategies. ART should, therefore, not be considered in isolation and must be part of an evidence-based approach to oral health with a strong foundation based on prevention.

Dental anxiety and pain related to ART

Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) is considered to be well accepted, both by children and by adult patients. The objective of this review is to present and discuss the evidence regarding the acceptability of ART, from the patient's perspective. Aspects related to dental anxiety/fear and pain/discomfort have been highlighted, to facilitate better understanding and use of the information available in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: The ART approach has been shown to cause less discomfort than other conventional approaches and is, therefore, considered a very promising "atraumatic" management approach for cavitated carious lesions in children, anxious adults and possibly, for dental-phobic patients.

The ART approach: clinical aspects reviewed

The success of ART as a caries management approach is supported by more than 20 years of scientific evidence. ART follows the contemporary concepts of modern cariology and restorative dentistry. It challenges treatment concepts such as step-wise excavation and the need for complete removal of affected dentine. The ART approach so far has mainly used high-viscosity glass-ionomer as the sealant and restorative material. Cariostatic and remineralization properties have been ascribed to this material which requires further research to establish its clinical relevance. The adhesion of high-viscosity glass-ionomer to enamel in pits and fissures is apparently strong, as its remnants, blocking the pits and fissures, have been considered a possible reason for the low prevalence of carious lesion development after the glass-ionomer has clinically disappeared from it. Encapsulated high-viscosity glass-ionomers may lead to higher restoration survival results than those of the hand-mixed version and should, therefore, not be neglected when using ART. Similarly, the use of resin-modified glass-ionomer with ART should be researched. The effectiveness of ART when compared to conventional caries management approaches has been shown in numerous studies. Proper case selection is an important factor for long-lasting ART restoration survival. This is based on the caries risk situation of the individual, the size of the cavity opening, the strategic position of the cavitated tooth and the presence of adequate caries control measures. As the operator is one of the main causes for failure of ART restorations, attending a well-conducted ART training course is mandatory for successful implementation of ART.

Transferring ART research into education in Brazil

The aim of this study was to evaluate the teaching of the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in Brazilian dental schools. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire on this subject was sent to Pediatric Dentistry, Operative Dentistry and Public Health Dentistry professors. The questions approached the followig subjects: the method used to teach ART, the time spent on its teaching, under which discipline it is taught, for how many years ART has been taught and its effect on the DMFT index. RESULTS: A total of 70 out of 202 dental schools returned the questionnaire. The ART approach is taught in the majority of the Brazilian dental schools (96.3 percent), and in most of these schools it is taught both in theory and in clinical practice (62.9 percent). The majority (35.3 percent) of professors teach ART for 8 hours, and most often as part of the Pediatric Dentistry discipline (67.6 percent). It has been taught for the last 7 to 10 years in 34.3 percent of dental schools. Most professors did not observe a change in the DMFT index with this approach. There is a diversity in the teaching of ART in Brazil in terms of the number of hours spent, the teaching method (theory and practice), and the disciplines involved in its teaching. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to address the training of professors in the ART approach for the whole country. An educational model is proposed whereby a standard ART module features as part of other preventive and restorative caries care educational modules. This will facilitate and standardize the introduction and adoption of the ART approach in undergraduate education in Brazil.

ART integration in oral health care systems in Latin American countries as perceived by directors of oral health

The aim of this study was to carry out a situation analysis of: a) prevalence of ART training courses; b) integration of ART into the oral healthcare systems and; c) strengths and weaknesses of ART integration, in Latin American countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured questionnaire, consisting of 18 questions, was emailed to directors of national or regional oral health departments of all Latin American countries and the USA. For two countries that had not responded after 4 weeks, the questionnaire was sent to the Dean of each local Dental School. The questions were related to ART training courses, integration of ART in the dental curriculum and the oral healthcare system, barriers to ART implementation in the public health system and recommendations for ART implementation in the services. Factor analysis was used to construct one factor in the barrier-related question. Means and percentages were calculated. RESULTS: The response rate, covering 55 percent of all Latin American countries, was 76 percent. An ART training course had been given in all Latin American countries that responded, with more than 2 having been conducted in 64.7 percent of the respondent countries. ART was implemented in public oral health services in 94.7 percent of the countries, according to the respondents. In 15.8 percent of the countries, ART was applied throughout the country and in 68.4 percent, in some areas or regions of a country. ART had been used for more, or less, than three years in 42.1 percent and 47.4 percent of the countries, respectively. Evaluation and monitoring activities to determine the effectiveness of ART restorations and ART sealants had been carried out in 42.1 percent of the countries, while evaluation training courses had taken place in only 3 countries (15.8 percent). Respondents perceived the "increase in the number of treated patients" as the major benefit of ART implementation in public oral health services. The major perceived barrier factors to ART implementation were "operator opinion" and "high patient load", followed by "lack in supplies of materials and instruments and operators" and "lack of ART training". Respondents recommended that the number of ART courses should be increased. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of ART into the public oral health systems in Latin American countries has taken place but is still in its infancy. More ART training courses need to be organized if the approach is to be adopted in oral health service systems in these countries.

The implementation and preliminary evaluation of an ART strategy in Mexico: a country example

The massive use of preventive measures in Mexico including fluoride toothpaste, a national program of salt fluoridation and education on prevention has resulted in a large decline in dental caries over the past two decades. There does however remain a largely unmet need for restorative treatment. This paper describes the steps leading up to the adoption of a strategy, as part of general health policy, to use Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) within the Mexican public health service as a means to address this. This included the development of training materials, the organization of training courses for existing dentists and the incorporation of ART into the undergraduate curriculum. RESULTS: Six years after the introduction of ART in the year 2000, it was estimated that over 2 million ART procedures had been provided. As part of the planning cycle, an evaluation was undertaken in 2008 to determine amongst Mexican dentists what were the perceived problems when implementing the ART approach. Such research identified that the scarcity of appropriate dental materials and the lack of suitable instruments were the major problems. In addition, a preliminary evaluation of ART restorations and sealants placed as part of this National Oral Health Program was undertaken. The survival outcomes after one year compared favorably with one other study conducted in Mexico but were somewhat lower than the results reported from a number of other countries. CONCLUSION: The ambitious and forward thinking policy for improving the oral health in Mexico is now showing dividends. One example is the ART strategy, which has been successful both in terms of the number of ART procedures provided and generally in terms of clinical outcomes.

Two decades of ART: improving on success through further research

Since the introduction of the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach over twenty years ago, more than 190 research publications have appeared. The last research agenda defining research priorities for ART was published in 1999. The objective of the present work was to review existing research in the context of future research priorities for ART. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An internet survey was conducted amongst those who had published on ART or were known to be working on the ART approach, to solicit their views as to areas of future ART research. Three broad categories were defined, namely: 1. Basic and laboratory research; 2. Clinical research, and, 3. Community, Public Health, Health Services Research. RESULTS: A 31 percent response rate was achieved. The study identified a number of new areas of research as well as areas where additional research is required. These are expressed as recommendations for future ART research. CONCLUSIONS: The ART approach is based on a robust, reliable and ever-growing evidence base concerning its clinical applications which indicates that it is a reliable and quality treatment approach. In common with all other oral health care procedures, targeted applied research is required to improve the oral health care offered.

Conclusions from the symposium: Two decades of ART: success through research

Two decades of ART research has served as the catalyst for a new way of thinking about oral health care. It is now necessary to build on the success of ART research by educating existing and future oral health professionals and health decision makers about the benefits of the ART approach. It is also important to build upon the sound research base that already exists on ART even though enough is known about ART to consider it is a reliable and quality approach to control caries. While oral health promotion through prevention remains the essential foundation of oral health, the ART approach is an important corner stone in the building of global oral health.

ART sealants placed in Chinese school children——Follow up results after 6 years / 实用口腔医学杂志

Objective:To assess whether ART sealants could be applied on children in school environment in China, and to evaluate long term effects of this treatments. Methods:The study was conducted in Deyang, Sichuan Province. Four dentists placed a total of 191 fissure sealants in 140 children in four secondary schools. Standard instruments and procedures for ART were used. The material used was a high-strength glass-ionomer (Ketac-Molara, ESPE). The treatments were evaluated annually by the same dentist who was not involved in the treatment using explorers and mouth-mirrors. Results:The cumulative 1-year, 2-year, 4-year and 6-year complete survival rates of the sealants were 75.4%,62.5%,50.0%,34.6% and the partial or complete retained survival rates were 89.6%, 78.8%, 68.5% and 57.9%. No incidence of new caries was occurred 1 year after ART sealants. The incidence of recurrent caries was very low after 2 and 3 years, which were 1.6% and 2.8% respectively. But there was a high increase of caries 4 years after sealants application. The prevalence of caries were 8.5%,16.1%,15.0% respectively over 4, 5 and 6 years after ART sealants application. Conclusion:The ART approach for preventing teeth caries in school children is effective and acceptable. The 3-year survival rates of the sealant are high with low prevalence of new caries. Six years after sealants application, the result is acceptable though there is a drop of survival rate. New caries is occurred with a highly increased prevalence three years after sealants missing without re-sealant. ART sealant is a simple, acceptable technique and is suitable for widespread application in China.