La electrofisiología del Wolff-Parkinson-White en el paciente asintomático con actividad o riesgo profesional alto / The electrophysiology of Wolff-Parkinson-White in the asymptomatic patient with activity or with high professional risk

Objetivo: Describir las características electrofisiológicas en individuos con Wolff-Parkinson-White asintomático con actividad deportiva o alta responsabilidad profesional. Métodos: Se evaluaron 19 individuos, edad media 33 ± 13 años (grupo A). Las características electrofisiológicas fueron comparadas con un grupo control similar con WPW sintomático (grupo B). Resultados: En estado basal el periodo refractario anterógrado y la conducción anterógrada 1:1 sobre el fascículo accesorio fueron más largos en el grupo A (300 ± 48 ms vs 262 ± 32 ms, p < 0.05) y (355 ± 108 ms vs 307 ± 86 ms, p < 0.05), respectivamente. Ningún individuo del grupo A tuvo un periodo refractario anterógrado < 250 ms; y 58% no tuvieron conducción retrógrada sobre el fascículo accesorio vs 4% del grupo B (p< 0.001). La inducción de taquicardia fue significativamente menor (5.2%) en el grupo A vs grupo B (95%) (p < 0.001). Se indujo fibrilación auricular (FA) sólo en uno del grupo A vs en 32% grupo B (p< 0.001). Conclusión: Se confirman las características electrofisiológicas benignas en individuos asintomáticos comparados con sintomáticos. La deficiente conducción anterógrada junto con ausencia de conducción retrógrada explica la baja frecuencia de taquiarritmias y no apoyaría la investigación rutinaria en toda la población asintomática, pero debido a las posibles consecuencias, se mantiene la indicación sistemática con fines de ablación preventiva en el subgrupo de individuos asintomáticos con actividad deportiva o alta responsabilidad profesional.

Objective: Describe the electrophysiological characteristics in subjects with asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White with sports activities or high professional responsibility. Methods: Nineteen subjects, mean age 33 ± 13 years (group A). The electrophysiological characteristics were compared with a matched group with symptomatic WPW (group B). Results: At baseline the anterograde refractory period and the anterograde conduction 1:1 over the accessory pathway were longer in group A (300 ± 48 ms vs 262 ± 32 ms, p <0.05 and 355 ± 108 ms vs 307 ± 86 ms, p <0.05), respectively. None of group A had a anterograde refractory period < 250 ms and 58% showed absence of retrograde conduction over the accessory pathway vs 4% of group B (p < 0.001). Induction of tachycardia was significantly less in group A (5%) than in group B (92%) (p < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation was induced in only one of group A vs 32% of group B (p< 0.001). Conclusion: We confirm the benign electrophysiological characteristics in asymptomatic compared to symptomatic subjects. Poor anterograde conduction along with absence of retrograde conduction explains the low frequency of tachyarrhythmias and would not support the routine investigation of all asymptomatic subjects. But, due to possible consequences, remains the systematic indication for preventive ablation in the subgroup of asymptomatic subjects with sporting activities or high professional responsibility.

Modified electrocardiographic algorithm for differentiating typical atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia from atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia mediated by concealed accessory pathway / 中国实用内科杂志

Objective To evaluate the frequently used electrocardiographic criteria and propose a modified algorithm for differentiating typical atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia(AVNRT)from atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia(AVRT).Methods Twelve-lead electrocardiograms(ECGs)during sinus rhythm and atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia(AVNRT)or atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia(AVRT)with a narrow QRS complex were obtained from 154 patients who had received successful radiofrequency catheter ablation from Jan.2003 to Nov.2005.The ECGs of initial 104 patients were analyzed by 3 observers without knowledge of the electrophysiological diagnosis.According to these initial results,we proposed a modified stepwise ECG algorithm which used pseudo r′/S/Q waves,RP interval,and ST-segment elevation in lead aVR during tachycardia.Two observers assessed the algorithm in additional 50 patients.Results The algorithm was able to increase the overall accuracy from 77% and 79% with original algorithm to 84% and 87% with the modified algorithm,respectively.The inter-observer concordance was 85%.The intra-observer concordance was 89% in both investigators.Conclusion The modified algorithm can improve the accuracy of differential diagnosis between typical AVNRT and AVRT via concealed accessory pathway.