ABSTRACT
RESUMEN Introducción: La producción científica es el conjunto de productos derivados de la actividad de investigación, donde destacan los artículos científicos, la presentación de trabajos en eventos científicos, premios, distinciones y muchos otros. Objetivo: Caracterizar la producción científica de los profesores de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas Miguel Enríquez durante el periodo 2016-2020. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo un estudio observacional, descriptivo, de corte retrospectivo. El universo estuvo conformado por los resultados científicos anuales del claustro de profesores en relación con las publicaciones científicas, eventos científicos, premios y proyectos de investigación. Los artículos se clasificaron en grupos según las bases de datos a las que están indexadas. Adicionalmente, se analizaron los índices equivalentes por profesor de las publicaciones, proyectos, eventos y premios. Resultados: Se contabilizaron en total 403 publicaciones científicas, la cuarta parte de estas en el año 2020. Predominaron los trabajos publicados en editoriales nacionales, escritas en castellano, por profesores a tiempo completo. La investigación fue el campo que aportó la mayoría de publicaciones, indexadas en Scopus y otras bases de datos internacionales. Predominaron los eventos y premios de carácter nacional. Se presentaron como promedio unos 20 proyectos anuales. El índice de publicaciones equivalente por profesor, aunque bajo, evidenció una tendencia al incremento durante el periodo estudiado. Conclusiones: El análisis de cinco años de los resultados científicos del claustro de profesores de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas Miguel Enríquez revela la necesidad imperiosa de incrementar la producción científica.
ABSTRACT Introduction: Scientific production is the set of products derived from research activity, where scientific articles, the presentation of studies at scientific events, awards, distinctions and many others stand out. Objective: To characterize the scientific production of the professors of the Faculty of Medical Sciences Miguel Enríquez during the period 2016-2020. Methods: An observational, descriptive, retrospective study was carried out. The universe was made up of the annual scientific results of the faculty in relation to scientific publications, scientific events, awards and research projects. The articles were classified into groups according to databases that were indexed. Additionally, equivalent professor indexes for publications, projects, events and awards studied were analyzed. Results: A total of 403 scientific publications were counted, a quarter of them in 2020. The works published in national publishers, written in Spanish, by full-time professors predominated. Research was the field that contributed most of publications, indexed in Scopus and other international database. National events and awards prevailed. An average of 20 projects were submitted per year. The index of publications per equivalent professor, although low, showed an upward trend during the studied period. Conclusions: The analysis of five years of scientific results of the Faculty of Medical Sciences Miguel Enríquez reveals the imperative need to increase scientific production.
Subject(s)
HumansABSTRACT
Objective:This study conducted a statistical analysis of the 2010 to 2019 Chinese Medical Science and Technology Award to understand its current situation and research hotspots, to provide references for medical science and technology investigators and administrators.Methods:Through the official website of the Chinese Medical Association, the 2010 to 2019 Chinese Medical Science and Technology Award data was collected. Information includes gender of the awardees, award level, geographical distribution, discipline distribution, and completion unit of the first person was analyzed. Network metrology, social network analysis and word cloud graph analysis are used to analyze the " development status" , " cooperative relationship" and " research hotspots" of medical research in China.Results:The total number of winning projects was 857. Among them, the number of first, second, and third prizes were 76, 249 and 475. Beijing is the area with the largest number of winners (277), followed by Shanghai (167) and Jiangsu (92). Among the winning projects, the top 3 subject were oncology, cardiology, orthopaedics, general surgery with percentages accounted by 9.78%, 7.94%, 6.21%.Conclusions:The geographical distribution of winning projects presented a regional concentration trend. The disciplines of award-winning projects have been diversified, especially in oncology. The gender ratio of principal investigators is uneven, most were male. Future research should pay more attention to multidisciplinary, cross-regional facilitation, and promote the coordinated development of holistic medicine.
ABSTRACT
Alejandro Goic, M.D., son of Croatian immigrants, graduated as M.D. in 1955, studying at the Catholic University of Chile Medical School. After a residency in internal medicine, he followed post graduate studies in psychosomatic medicine at the University of Oklahoma and in gastroenterology at Harvard University. Upon his return to Chile he had a brilliant career as clinician and medical educator, becoming a leader and advisor in medical education, clinical ethics and public health. Elected Dean of the University of Chile School of Medicine (1986-1994), he promoted important changes in undergraduate studies as well as in Magister and PhD programs in Biomedical Sciences. During the difficult years of the military government intervention in Chilean universities, he was one of the leaders of critical opposition. In parallel he was chief editor of Revista Médica de Chile (1976-1996), improving the editorial process according to the recommendations of ICMJE and WAME. In 1989 he was elected member of the Chilean Academy of Medicine and became its President (2000-2010). He was awarded honors and membership in prominent national and foreign institutions. In 2006 he received the National Prize in Medicine, the highest medical distinction in Chile. His wise thinking and enthusiasm gave origin to several books that have become classics in Medicine and Medical Education, permeating our institutions.
Subject(s)
Humans , History, 20th Century , Awards and Prizes , Education, Medical , Schools, Medical , Universities , Chile , Internal MedicineABSTRACT
SUMMARY Smoking is a major global risk factor for preventable death and disability. EAT is an acronym for Education Against Tobacco, a multinational network of physicians and medical students that aims to improve tobacco control by means of school-based prevention targeted at adolescents through counseling, use of software and support materials. The first EAT-Brazil Award, launched in March 2018, was a competition designed to encourage the proposal of objective solutions for tobacco control in Brasil, and identify new talents in the area. Brazilian undergraduate students from any field of study could submit a one-page essay on the subject, competing for the amount of R$ 1000.00 (one thousand reais). There were a total of 39 applicants (20 women and 19 men) from 9 Brazilian states and 18 undergraduate programs, with a mean age of 22.5 years (SD = 3.7). Data from an online anonymous questionnaire answered after the submission of their essays revealed that most applicants were students of institutions from in the state of Minas Gerais (n = 26/39; 66.6%), studied medicine (n = 20/39, 51.3%), and had no prior knowledge of the EAT-Brazil Network (n = 27/39, 69.2%). The winner of the award was Lucas Guimarães de Azevedo, a fourth-year medical student at Federal University of Western Bahia. The next editions of the award should focus on increasing the number of applicants and diversifying their geographical distribution.
RESUMO O tabagismo é um dos principais fatores de risco globais para morte e incapacidade evitáveis. EAT é a sigla em inglês para Educação contra o Tabaco (Education Against Tobacco), uma rede mundial formada por médicos e estudantes de medicina cuja missão é atuar no combate ao tabagismo por meio da prevenção da iniciação ao tabagismo em adolescentes escolares mediante aconselhamento, uso de aplicativos móveis e de materiais de apoio. O primeiro Prêmio EAT-Brazil, lançado em março de 2018, foi um concurso destinado a encorajar a proposição de soluções objetivas para o avanço do controle do tabagismo no país e a identificação de novos talentos para a área. Estudantes de graduação brasileiros de qualquer curso submeteram um texto de uma página sobre o tema, concorrendo à quantia de R$ 1.000. Houve um total de 39 trabalhos inscritos (20 por mulheres e 19 por homens) de nove estados brasileiros e 18 cursos de graduação, com idade média de 22,5 anos (DP=3,7). Dados de um questionário anônimo on-line respondido pelos inscritos revelou que a maioria era composta por graduandos de alguma instituição do estado de Minas Gerais (n=26/39; 66,6%), que estudavam medicina (n=20/39; 51,3%) e não tinham conhecimento prévio sobre a Rede EAT-Brazil (n=27/39; 69,2%). O ganhador do prêmio foi Lucas Guimarães de Azevedo, aluno do oitavo período de medicina da Universidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia. As próximas edições do Prêmio devem focar o aumento do número de inscritos e a diversificação de sua distribuição geográfica.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Young Adult , Students/statistics & numerical data , Awards and Prizes , Smoking Prevention/methods , Brazil , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Objective To develop the management system of science and technology awards through understanding dynamically the trend of awards in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital,Capital Medical University.Methods The data from the department of science and technology in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital,Capital Medical University were used to learn about some informations of science and technology awards including the winner's age,education,title and department,the proportion of rank and level,the trend of awards from 1998 to 2017,the number of social association awards from 2013 to 2017.Results The kinds of science and technology awards were up to 11.The 23 awards were obtained from 1998 to 2017,which were mainly composed of social association awards (65％) and gave priority to the second rank (48％).The age of the first winners were from 51 to 55 years.There were 9 departments obtained awards,accounting for 45％ of all the hospital clinical medical department.The increasing trend in the number of awards were observed from 1998 to 2017,and in nearly five years,the number showed the fast rising trend.Conclusions The less number of awards were obtained in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital,Capital Medical University.Whereas the most of awards were supported by social association.We were lack of the high rank and high level awards.The higher age showed that there were not enough youth scientific research and talent reserves.The situation need to be further strengthened the management and promoted the development in science and technology awards.
ABSTRACT
Objective Through the root cause analysis of a particular hospital award-winning achievements during 2004-2015 to find out a way to improve and guide medical research output,especially the new ideas,new methods of scientific research management.Methods Using SPSS18.0 sta tistical analysis software to conduct analysis of the 97 winning outputs of the hospital during 2004 2015,indicators including the numbers and grades,the types of research,discipline distribution and other 6 aspects were comprehensively analyzed.Results Since 2012,the hospital administrative policies went through an evolving process of "repeal,change,establish",research management entities adjustment management policies to match the current situation in a timely manner,fine management of research were adopted,as a result,the achievements output is increased and becoming more balanced distribution of subjects.Conclusions To maintain a well-developing position of the research output,we must combine the national policy on scientific research with the management of our own development;bring in the competition for talent,as well as both positive and negative incentives.Strengthen the scientific and technological talent team building to establish a team good at medical practice and research,to form a connected effect based on the advantage subject,promote the balanced development of various disciplines,thereby further improving the hospital research outputs.
ABSTRACT
Objective Under the guidance of graduate education evaluation theory,to establish the comprehensive quality evaluation standard of medical graduate students and apply it in the research of the scholarship evaluation.Methods Byusing literature study,brainstorming,expert advice and other research methods,we established comprehensive quality assessment scale.In the work of graduate scholarship,the scale was used to carry out the evaluation work,and the application of the scale,the use value and the effect of moral evaluation were studied.Results A comprehensive quality assessment scale for medical graduate students,which included 4 dimensions of moral education,training process,scientific research and social activities was established so that the students' daily performance was quantified and evaluated,which,to a certain extent,eliminated the influence of the subjective judgment to the evaluation work,and had good guidance and practicality.Conclusion Establishing comprehensive quality quantitative evaluation mechanism of the graduate students and conducting the dynamic evaluation to graduates' moral education,their academic and social activities are conducive to stimulating the development of postgraduates' comprehensive quality and improving the quality of training.
ABSTRACT
In this study, the standard research methods were applied to account the awards and applications of scientific research achievements of Xiyuan hospital from 2010 to 2014. As for the scientific research awards, each department from Xiyuan hospital was active, but the awards application offices were relatively few, thus the quantity of the awards was decreasing year by year. And the distribution was relatively uneven. The basic characteristics of scientific research awards showed that the National Science and Technology Award was the most difficult award. And other characteristics of scientific research award showed that it was often based on a project with high social recognition and high authority, and with the first researchers were high rank professors. This work cast light on that scientific research management should improve the quality of projects and strengthen exchanges, propaganda and introduction of each project achievement, enhance team establishment as support, and establish a reasonable assessment system for scientific research achievements.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore awards setting and selection mechanism in American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. METHODS: Adopting the methods of history and comparison, the article analyzes the establishment or the first presentation time, purpose, naming, eligibility, period, approach, award. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: It is the main organization that American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy leads the development of America pharmaceutical education. Since 1969, 9 awards have been set up in pharmaceutical education category by American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. The article reveals the features and operation mechanism of the awards system and provides a reference for the study of the awards in the field of China pharmaceutical education.
ABSTRACT
Translational medicine is a more effective and efficient way to improve the investment return on bioscience and provide equitable access to high—quality healthcare.Recognizing the need for a new impetus to spur clinical and translational research,the National Institutes of Health established the Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program.
ABSTRACT
A deep analysis of the present 26 non-government awards on medical technology achievements was made to probe into setbacks in access to such awards.The findings include lack of independence due to the semi-official nature,tight budget caused by limited funding sources,variety of award sizes due to lack of levels,less corporate involvement to result in less sponsors,and lack of international awards due to unsatisfactory international awareness.The authors recommend such optimal paths as laws and regulations to regulate such awards to be hosted by legal persons,incentives for more enterprises participation to make the awards a public highlight among enterprises,control over the size and types of such awards for better branding,and greater efforts in international collaboration to make international awards.
ABSTRACT
Based on the released statistics from 1980 to 2009,this article summarized the scientific research awards gained by Xi' An health-related organizations. The analysis was mainly focused on the achievements of subordinate organizations of the city Health Bureau.In the end,the author discussed about the awards in aspects of quantity,level,institution,descipline,specialty and talents.
ABSTRACT
By analyzing the Military Health System winning "Heliang & Heli" Fund Award between 1994 and 2009,we found that the Military Health System possessed a good scientific basis and high level,but with an unbalanced scientific research development,which suggests the Military Health System should further strengthen its independent innovation ability.