ABSTRACT
SUMMARY: Barrett's esophagus is a condition where the distal third of the esophagus changes its epithelial lining from non- keratinized stratified squamous to simple columnar. This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted to characterize the esophageal mucosa in the third trimester of pregnancy and determine possible variants in its development and was carried out in the Morphology Laboratory of the Health Faculty of the Industrial University of Santander, Colombia, with 45 human fetuses in the third trimester of gestation (weeks 25-40). A section of the distal esophagus and the first portion of the cardial region of the stomach were obtained, and the histological sections were subjected to a fixation process with 5 % formaldehyde solution. The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and were evaluated for the presence of epithelial change or glands in the esophageal lamina propria. The change from non- keratinized stratified squamous epithelium to simple columnar epithelium was observed in the esophageal mucosa in five fetuses (11.1 %). In 15 cases (33.3 %), the presence of mucous glands underlying the epithelium was determined. In two fetuses, simple columnar epithelium was observed in the esophageal mucosa and underlying submucosal glands (4.4 %). The lack of replacement of the columnar epithelium by squamous epithelium in the distal third of the esophagus and the presence of mucous glands in the last third of gestation may suggest the presentation of Barret's esophagus in adulthood and thus, a predisposition to develop esophageal adenocarcinoma.
El esófago de Barrett es una afección en la que el tercio distal del esófago cambia su revestimiento epitelial de escamoso estratificado no queratinizado a columnar simple. Este estudio descriptivo de corte transversal tiene como objetivo caracterizar la mucosa esofágica en el tercer trimestre del embarazo y determinar posibles variantes en su desarrollo y se realizó en el laboratorio de Morfología de la Facultad de Salud de la Universidad Industrial de Santander-Colombia, con 45 fetos humanos en el tercer trimestre de gestación (semanas 25-40). Se obtuvo una sección del esófago distal y la primera porción de la región cardial del estómago y las secciones histológicas se sometieron a un proceso de fijación con solución de formaldehído al 5 %. Los cortes se tiñeron con hematoxilina y eosina y se evaluaron determinando la presencia de cambio epitelial y glándulas en la lámina propia del esófago. El cambio de epitelio escamoso estratificado no queratinizado a epitelio cilíndrico simple se observó en la mucosa esofágica en cinco fetos (11,1 %). En 15 casos (33,3 %) se determinó la presencia de glándulas mucosas subyacentes al epitelio. En dos fetos se observó epitelio cilíndrico simple en la mucosa esofágica y glándulas submucosas subyacentes (4,4 %). La falta de reemplazo del epitelio cilíndrico por epitelio escamoso en el tercio distal del esófago y la presencia de glándulas mucosas en el último tercio de la gestación pueden sugerir la presentación de esófago de Barrett en la edad adulta y una predisposición a desarrollar adenocarcinoma de esófago.
Subject(s)
Humans , Barrett Esophagus/etiology , Esophageal Mucosa/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/complications , Esophageal Neoplasms/etiology , Adenocarcinoma/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Epithelium/pathology , Fetus , Metaplasia/pathologyABSTRACT
AIM:To compare the differences, correlations and consistency of IOL Master 700 or Lenstar LS900 in preoperative ocular biometry and the accuracy of intraocular lens(IOL)degree calculation of cataract patients with high myopia.METHODS: Retrospective study. A total of 136 cases(136 eyes)of high myopia and cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification at the ophthalmology department of Army Medical Center of PLA from March 2021 to March 2023 were collected, with a mean age of 57.38±8.08 years. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on axial length(AL): 41 eyes in group A(26 mm≤ AL ≤28 mm), 43 eyes in group B(28 mm< AL ≤30 mm)and 52 eyes in group C(AL >30 mm). AL, mean keratometry(Km), anterior chamber depth(ACD), lens thickness(LT)and white-to-white(WTW)were preoperatively measured by two instruments, respectively. Barrett Universal II formula was used to calculate the IOL degrees of all patients, the appropriate reserved diopter was decided individually, and the prediction error(PE)and absolute error(AE)of the two instruments were compared.RESULTS:The AL and ACD of patients in the three groups measured by Lenstar LS900 were higher than the AL measurd by IOL Master 700(all P<0.05), with a difference of AL measured by the two devices: group C>group B>group A. However, there was no statistical significance in LT, Km, and WTW measured by the two instruments(all P>0.05). All biometric parameters measured by the two devices were positively correlated(all r>0.9, P<0.05), and consistent(95% LoA of all groups were narrow). There was no statistically significant difference in AE calculated by the two devices(P>0.05), but the IOL Master 700 calculated a smaller PE than Lenstar LS900(P<0.05), with lower percentage of hyperopic shift in IOL Master 700.CONCLUSION:In cataract patients with high myopia, AL measured by Lenstar LS900 is longer than that by IOL Master 700, and the differences of AL increase along with the growth of AL. Both devices have a good prediction for IOL calculation, but IOL Master 700 has less refractive error, lower percentage of hyperopic shift, and greater clinical advantages IOL Master 700.
ABSTRACT
El esófago de Barrett (EB) se define como la condición en la cual una mucosa columnar metaplásica predispuesta a neoplasia reemplaza la mucosa escamosa del esófago distal. La guías actuales recomiendan que el diagnóstico requiere el hallazgo de metaplasia intestinal (MI) con células caliciformes de al menos 1 cm de longitud. El EB afecta aproximadamente al 1% de la población general y hasta en 14% de los pacientes con enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE). El EB es precursor del adenocarcinoma esofágico (ACE), neoplasia en aumento en países occidentales. Los principales factores de riesgo descritos para ACE asociado a EB son: sexo masculino, edad > 50 años, obesidad central y tabaquismo. El riesgo anual de ACE en EB sin displasia, displasia de bajo (DBG) y alto grado es 0,1-0,3%, 0,5% y 5-8%, respectivamente. El tratamiento del EB no displásico consiste en un cambio de estilo de vida saludable, quimioprevención mediante inhibidores de la bomba de protones y vigilancia endoscópica cada 3 a 5 años. Se recomienda que a partir de la presencia de DBG los pacientes sean referidos a un centro experto para la confirmación del diagnóstico, estadio y así definir su manejo. En pacientes con EB y displasia o cáncer incipiente, el tratamiento endoscópico consiste en la resección y ablación, con un éxito cercano al 90%. El principal evento adverso es la estenosis esofágica que es manejada endoscópicamente.
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the condition in which a metaplastic columnar mucosa predisposed to neoplasia replaces the squamous mucosa of the distal esophagus. The current guidelines recommends that diagnosis requires the finding of intestinal metaplasia (IM) with goblet cells of at least 1 cm in length. BE affects approximately 1% of the general population and up to 14% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). BE is a precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), which has increased in western countries. The main risk factors described for EAC associated with BE are male sex, age > 50 years, central obesity and tobacco use. Annual risk of EAC in patients with BE without dysplasia, low grade (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia is 0,1-0,3%, 0,5% y 5-8%, respectively. Treatment of non-dysplastic BE consists mainly of a healthy lifestyle change, chemoprevention with proton pump inhibitors and surveillance endoscopy every 3 to 5 years. It is recommended that from the presence of LGD patients are referred to an expert center for confirmation of the diagnosis, stage and thus define their management. In patients with BE and dysplasia or early-stage cancer, endoscopic therapy with resection and ablation is successful in about 90% of the patients. The main adverse event is esophageal stricture, which is managed endoscopically.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/etiology , Barrett Esophagus/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/etiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/etiology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Precancerous Conditions/therapy , Risk Factors , EsophagoscopyABSTRACT
Purpose: The ideal formula for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation following cataract surgery in pediatric eyes till date has no answer. We compared the predictability of the Sanders–Retzlaff–Kraff (SRK) II and the Barrett Universal (BU) II formula and the effect of axial length, keratometry, and age. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of children who were under eight years of age and who underwent cataract surgery with IOL implantation under general anesthesia between September 2018 and July 2019. The prediction error of SRK II formula was calculated by subtracting the target refraction and the actual postoperative spherical equivalent. Preoperative biometry values were used to calculate the IOL power using the BU II formula with the same target refraction that was used in SRK II. The predicted spherical equivalent of the BU II formula was then back?calculated using the SRK II formula with the IOL power obtained with the BU II formula. The prediction errors of the two formulae were compared for statistical significance. Results: Seventy?two eyes of 39 patients were included in the study. The mean age at surgery was 3.8 ± 2 years. The mean axial length was 22.1 ± 1.5 mm, and the mean keratometry was 44.7 ± 1.7 D. The group with an axial length >24 mm showed a significant and strong positive correlation (r = 0.93, P = 0) on comparison mean absolute prediction errors using the SRK II formula. There was a strong negative correlation between the mean prediction error in the overall keratometry group using the BU II formula (r = ?0.72, P < 0.000). There was no significant correlation between age and refractive accuracy using the two formulae in any of the subgroups of age. Conclusion: There is no perfect answer to an ideal formula for IOL calculation in children. IOL formulae need to be chosen keeping in mind the varying ocular parameters.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Barrett toric calculator (BTC) is known for its accuracy in toric IOL (tIOL) calculation over standard calculators; however, there is no study in literature to compare it with real?time intraoperative aberrometry (IA). The aim was to compare the accuracy of BTC and IA in predicting refractive outcomes in tIOL implantation. Methods: This was an institution?based prospective, observational study. Patients undergoing routine phacoemulsification with tIOL implantation were enrolled. Biometry was obtained from Lenstar?LS 900 and IOL power calculated using online BTC; however, IOL was implanted as per IA (Optiwave Refractive Analysis, ORA, Alcon) recommendation. Postoperative refractive astigmatism (RA) and spherical equivalent (SE) were recorded at one month, and respective prediction errors (PEs) were calculated using predicted refractive outcomes for both methods. The primary outcome measure was a comparison between mean PE with IA and BTC, and secondary outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), postoperative RA, and SE at one month. SPSS Version?21 was used; P < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Thirty eyes of 29 patients were included. Mean arithmetic and mean absolute PEs for RA were comparable between BTC (?0.70 ± 0.35D; 0.70 ± 0.34D) and IA (0.77 ± 0.32D; 0.80 ± 0.39D) (P = 0.09 and 0.09, respectively). Mean arithmetic PE for residual SE was significantly lower for BTC (?0.14 ± 0.32D) than IA (0.001 ± 0.33D) (?0.14 ± 0.32D; P = 0.002); however, there was no difference between respective mean absolute PEs (0.27 ± 0.21 D; 0.27 ± 0.18; P = 0.80). At one?month, mean UCDVA, RA, and SE were 0.09 ± 0.10D, ?0.57 ± 0.26D, and ?0.18 ± 0.27D, respectively. Conclusion: Both IA and BTC give reliable and comparable refractive results for tIOL implantation.
ABSTRACT
Prune Belly syndrome, also known as Eagle-Barret syndrome, is a rare disease, with a prevalence of 3.8 live births per 100,000 births. Its main characteristic is the hypoplasia of the abdominal muscles, giving rise to the name "prune belly syndrome". The gold standard treatment is surgery, ideally with correction of cryptorchidism and phimosis between 6 to 18 months of life. Correction of urinary malformations and abdominoplasty should be performed up to 4 years of age. Little evidence exists in the literature about late treatment and its implications for prognosis. The context mentioned above led us to present an uncommon case of a six years old child in which a surgical approach was performed later than usual.
Introdução: A síndrome de Prune Belly é uma doença rara, com prevalência de 3,8 nascidos vivos a cada 100 mil nascimentos. Tem como principal caraterística a hipoplasia da musculatura abdominal gerando a origem do nome "síndrome da barriga de ameixa". O tratamento padrão ouro é cirúrgico, idealmente com correção da criptorquidia e fimose entre 6 a 18 meses e a correção das malformações urinárias e abdominoplastia devem ser realizadas até os 4 anos. Aqui descreve-se um caso ainda menos comum, em que foi realizada abordagem cirúrgica de forma mais tardia que o habitual. Há pouca evidência na literatura acerca do tratamento tardio e suas implicações em relação ao prognóstico.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate a method using measured values of total corneal refractive power (TCRP) for a manufacturer’s online calculator by comparing it with the Barrett toric calculator (BTC) and Kane toric calculator (KTC) combined with simulated keratometry values (SimK). Methods: This was a retrospective case series. Patient records were reviewed to identify the patients who had biometry with the IOL Master 700 and Pentacam recorded before toric IOL implantation and refractive follow?up data after implantation. The predicted error in residual astigmatism was calculated by vector analysis according to the calculation methods and the measurements used. Results: A total of 70 eyes of 56 patients were included. The mean absolute astigmatism prediction errors were 0.6 ± 0.32, 0.59 ± 0.35, and 0.61 ± 0.35 D for the ATCTCRP, BTCSimK, and KTCSimK calculators, respectively (P = 0.934), and the centroid of the prediction errors were 0.3 D @ 178°, 0.11 D @ 102°, and 0.09 D @ 147°, respectively (P = 0.23). In the with?the?rule subgroup, the centroid of the prediction error was 0.34 D @ 176° for ATCTCRP and was the highest among the three calculation methods (P = 0.046). Conclusion: The ATCTCRP, BTCSimK, and KTCSimK calculators had similar performance with regards to their astigmatism prediction accuracy. The ATCTCRP calculator combined with 4.0?mm apex/ ring readings of TCRP was slightly intended to result in against?the?rule residual astigmatism.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the influence of using tourniquet on the postoperative pain,the muscle injury,the meniscal healing and the rehabilitation of meniscus function after surgery of meniscus suture and repair under arthroscopy.Methods:A total of 144 patients who underwent surgery of suture and repair for meniscus of knee joint in hospital were selected and they were divided into tourniquet group(81 cases)and non-tourniquet group(63 cases)according to whether used tourniquet.Postoperative muscle injury was assessed according to postoperative serum creatine kinase(CK),and postoperative pain was assessed by using visual analogue scale(VAS).The international k nee documentation committee(IKDC)scoring system,Lysholm knee joint score and Tegner knee joint score system were used to assess the rehabilitation effect of the function of knee joint of patient after surgery,and the clinical healing after the surgery of meniscus suture was evaluated according to Barrett standard.Results:There were no significant differences in CK levels between the two groups before surgery,2 days and 8 days after surgery,and at the last follow-up(t=1.667,t=-2.143,t=-4.461,t=-6.380,P>0.05),respectively.There were no significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups before surgery,2 days and 8 days after surgery,and at the last follow-up(Z=-1.121,Z=-1.364,Z=0.745,Z=-0.894,P>0.05),respectively.There were no significant differences in IKDC scores and Lysholm scores before and after surgery between the two groups(tIKDC=-1.680,t=0.533,tLysholm=-3.162,t=-2.543,P>0.05),respectively.There were no significant differences in Tegner score before and after operation between the two groups(Z=-0.803,Z=-0.370,P>0.05),respectively.There was no significant difference in the healing rate of meniscus after surgery between the two groups(Z=-0.247,P>0.05).Conclusion:The use of tourniquet in the surgery of meniscus suture under arthroscopy would not cause muscle injury,and would not aggravate pain,and does not affect healing rate and rehabilitation of meniscus function of patients.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The addition of endoscopic ablative therapy plus proton pump inhibitors or fundoplication is postulated for the treatment of patients with long-segment Barrett´s esophagus (LSBE); however, it does not avoid acid and bile reflux in these patients. Fundoplication with distal gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy is proposed as an acid suppression-duodenal diversion procedure demonstrating excellent results at long-term follow-up. There are no reports on therapeutic strategy with this combination. AIMS: To determine the early and long-term results observed in LSBE patients with or without low-grade dysplasia who underwent the acid suppression-duodenal diversion procedure combined with endoscopic therapy. METHODS: Prospective study including patients with endoscopic LSBE using the Prague classification for circumferential and maximal lengths and confirmed by histological study. Patients were submitted to argon plasma coagulation (21) or radiofrequency ablation (31). After receiving treatment, they were monitored at early and late follow-up (5-12 years) with endoscopic and histologic evaluation. RESULTS: Few complications (ulcers or strictures) were observed after the procedure. Re-treatment was required in both groups of patients. The reduction in length of metaplastic epithelium was significantly better after radiofrequency ablation compared to argon plasma coagulation (10.95 vs 21.15 mms for circumferential length; and 30.96 vs 44.41 mms for maximal length). Intestinal metaplasia disappeared in a high percentage of patients, and histological long-term results were quite similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic procedures combined with fundoplication plus acid suppression with duodenal diversion technique to eliminate metaplastic epithelium of distal esophagus could be considered a good alternative option for LSBE treatment.
RESUMO RACIONAL: A adição de terapia ablativa endoscópica associado a inibidores da bomba de prótons ou fundoplicatura tem sido postulada para o tratamento de pacientes com esôfago de Barrett de segmento longo (EBSL), no entanto, essa conduta não evita o refluxo ácido/biliar nesses pacientes. A fundoplicatura com gastrectomia distal e gastrojejunostomia em Y de Roux (FGD-Y) foi proposta como procedimento de supressão de ácido, demonstrando excelentes resultados no seguimento a longo prazo. Não há relatos na literature com a combinação dessa estratégia terapêutica. OBJETIVOS: Determinar os resultados precoces e a longo prazo observados em pacientes com EBSL com ou sem dysplasia de baixo grau, submetidos a FGD-Y, combinado com terapia endoscópica. MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo incluindo pacientes com EBSL, empregando a classificação de Praga, sendo o comprimento circunferencial (C) e máximo (M) e confirmado por estudo histológico. Os pacientes foram submetidos à coagulação com plasma de argônio (CPA, 21 pacientes) ou ablação por radiofrequência (ARF, 31 pacientes). Após o tratamento, eles foram seguidos precoce e tardiamente (5-12 anos), mediante avaliação endoscópica e histológica. RESULTADOS: Foram observadas poucas complicações após o procedimento (úlcera ou estenose). Re-tratamento foi necessário em ambos os grupos de pacientes. A redução do comprimento do epitélio metaplásico foi significativamente melhor após ARF em comparação com CPA (10,95 versus 21,15 mm para C e 30,96 versus 44,41 mm para M). A metaplasia intestinal desapareceu em elevada porcentagem de pacientes, e os resultados histológicos a longo prazo foram bastante semelhantes em ambos os grupos. CONCLUSÕES: Procedimentos endoscópicos combinados com fundoplicatura e gastrectomia distal e gastrojejunostomia em Y de Roux, para eliminar o epitélio metaplásico do esôfago distal podem ser considerados uma boa opção alternativa para o tratamento da EBSL.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Despite endoscopic eradication therapy being an effective and durable treatment for Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia, even after achieving initial successful eradication, these patients remain at risk of recurrence and require ongoing routine examinations. Failure of radiofrequency ablation and argon plasma coagulation is reported in 10-20% of cases.
RESUMO Apesar de a terapia de erradicação endoscópica ser um tratamento eficaz e durável para a neoplasia relacionada ao esôfago de Barrett (BE), mesmo após a erradicação inicial bem-sucedida, esses pacientes permanecem em risco de recorrência e requerem exames de rotina contínuos. A falha na ablação por radiofrequência e na coagulação com plasma de argônio é relatada em 10-20% dos casos.
ABSTRACT
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a known precursor of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic resection and surgery are the techniques used to treat these kinds of lesions. However, endoscopic resection is considered the first choice for the management of superficial lesions. Dysplasia in BE most commonly appears like a flat lesion but here we describe an unusual case of dysplasia and superficial adenocarcinoma looking like an extensive polypoid lesion.
El esófago de Barrett (EB) es un precursor conocido de displasia y adenocarcinoma. La resección endoscópica y la cirugía son las técnicas utilizadas para tratar este tipo de lesiones. Sin embargo, la resección endoscópica se considera la primera opción para el manejo de las lesiones superficiales. La displasia en EB aparece más comúnmente como una lesión plana, pero aquí describimos un caso inusual de displasia y adenocarcinoma superficial que parece una lesión polipoide extensa.
ABSTRACT
RESUMEN Introducción: El esófago de Barrett es una condición esofágica adquirida, que puede evolucionar a un adenocarcinoma. Con el paso de los años, la terapia endoscópica ha remplazado la cirugía en el tratamiento de esta afección. Objetivos: Mostrar los resultados de la aplicación de la técnica de resección endoscópica de la mucosa y la ablación con Hibrid-APC en pacientes portadores de esófago de Barrett con displasia de bajo o alto grado. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo en 29 pacientes entre los años 2014-2019, en el Servicio de endoscopias del Centro Nacional de Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso. Se estudiaron variables sociodemográficas, se estableció la clasificación endoscópica del esófago de Barrett, se describieron las características de la lesión, el diagnóstico histológico, la terapéutica endoscópica, la presencia de complicaciones, la resección incompleta y recidiva. Se aplicaron técnicas de estadística descriptiva y métodos no paramétricos. Resultados: Predominó el sexo masculino (58,62 %) y el grupo de 41-60 años (58,62 %). El segmento corto con lesiones planas y el largo con lesiones elevadas fueron más frecuentes (37,93 %). Se realizaron 15 resecciones y 14 ablaciones con Hibrid-APC; se observó una estenosis como complicación de la resección endoscópica de la mucosa y recidivas con ambas técnicas (5 pacientes, 17 %), tres relacionadas con la resección y dos con el Hibrid-APC. El Hibrid-APC alcanzó una efectividad terapéutica del 85,71 % y la resección del 80 %. Conclusiones: El tratamiento endoscópico con displasia de bajo y alto grado, mostró ser un procedimiento efectivo y seguro, con bajo porciento de complicaciones y recidivas.
ABSTRACT Introduction: Barrett's esophagus is an acquired esophageal condition that can evolve into an adenocarcinoma. Over the years, endoscopic therapy has replaced surgery in the treatment of this condition. Objectives: to show the results of the application of the endoscopic mucosal resection and Hybrid-APC ablation technique in patients with Barrett's esophagus with low-grade or high-grade dysplasia. Methods: a descriptive and retrospective study was carried out in 29 patients between 2014 and 2019, in the Endoscopy service of the National Center for Minimal Access Surgery. Social and demographic variables were studied; endoscopic classification of Barrett's esophagus was established, as well as the characteristics of the lesion, histological diagnosis, endoscopic therapy, the presence of complications, incomplete resection and recurrence were described. Descriptive statistics techniques and non-parametric methods were applied. Results: male gender (58.62%) and the group aged 41-60 years (58.62%) predominated. The short segment with flat lesions and the long segment with raised lesions were more frequent (37.93%). A number of 15 resections and 14 ablations were performed with Hybrid-APC; one stricture was observed as a complication of endoscopic mucosal resection and recurrences with both techniques (5 patients, 17%), three related to resection and two to Hybrid-APC. The Hybrid-APC achieved a therapeutic effectiveness of 85.71% and the resection one of 80%. Conclusions: endoscopic treatment with low- and high-grade dysplasia proved to be an effective and safe procedure, with a low percentage of complications and recurrences.
Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/surgery , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Argon Plasma CoagulationABSTRACT
RESUMEN Introducción: El esófago de Barrett es una lesión del esófago con elevado potencial degenerativo; para su diagnóstico se requiere la confirmación histológica de metaplasia intestinal en el esófago. Objetivo: Determinar la prevalencia del esófago de Barrett y las características epidemiológicas de los pacientes con esta afección. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo, entre enero del 2018 y junio del 2019, en 14 pacientes con diagnóstico histológico de esófago de Barrett. Las variables estudiadas fueron: edad, sexo, color de la piel, antecedentes epidemiológicos, síntomas y signos, longitud del segmento, de acuerdo con la clasificación de Sharma y presencia de hernia hiatal. Se realizó el diagnóstico histológico según la clasificación de Viena. Se determinó la prevalencia respecto del total de endoscopias digestivas altas realizadas en el periodo; emplearon de estadísticas descriptivas. Resultados: Se obtuvo una prevalencia de 0,37 %. El sexo masculino (78,6 %) y el color de piel blanca (71,4 %) predominaron; la edad media fue de 51,64 años. El consumo de tabaco fue referido por el 50 % de los pacientes. Los síntomas típicos de reflujo gastroesofágico, regurgitación (64,3 %) y pirosis (42,9 %) fueron los más frecuentes. La variedad de segmento corto fue la más observada y la hernia hiatal se encontró en 28,6 % de los casos. Conclusiones: Predominan las características epidemiológicas de ser pacientes masculinos, color de piel blanca, entre la 5ta y 6ta décadas de la vida y síntomas típicos de enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico. La prevalencia de la afección es baja.
ABSTRACT Introduction: Barrett's esophagus is an injury to the esophagus with high degenerative potential; histological confirmation of intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus is required for its diagnosis. Objective: To determine the frequency and epidemiological characteristics of patients with Barrett's esophagus. Methods: An observational and descriptive study was conducted between January 2018 and June 2019 in 14 patients with a histological diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus. The variables studied were: age, sex, skin color, epidemiological history, symptoms and signs, segment length according to the Sharma classification and presence of hiatal hernia, as well as the histological diagnosis according to the Vienna classification. The prevalence was determined with respect to the total number of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies performed in the period; descriptive statistical techniques were used. Results: A prevalence of 0,37 % was obtained. Males (78,6 %) and white skin color (71,4 %) predominated; the mean age was 51,64 years. Smoking was reported by 50 % of patients. Typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux, regurgitation (64,3 %) and heartburn (42,9 %) were the most frequent. The short segment variety was the most observed and hiatal hernia was found in 28,6 % of cases. Conclusions: The epidemiological characteristics of male patients, white skin color, between the 5th and 6th decades of life and typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease predominate.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To compare the accuracy in astigmatism reduction by using IOLM 700 steep total keratometry (TK) axis, Berdahl and Hardten astigmatism fix, and Barrett Rx formula following misaligned toric intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: Ten patients with residual refractive astigmatism due to misalignment following toric IOL implantation were included in this retrospective study. They were analyzed at days 4, 7/8, and 10/11 following primary cataract surgery on the platform of Berdahl and Hardten astigmatism fix, Barrett Rx formula, and IOLM 700 to determine the optimum axis of repositioning, and underwent IOL realignment on the steep TK axis of IOLM 700 assisted by the Callisto eye. The final outcome parameters were subjective refraction and orientation of toric IOL assessed 22 ± 1 days following repositioning surgery. These parameters were fed in the Barrett Rx formula and its vector analysis graph was utilized to determine the predicted ideal axis with the least residual astigmatism and the estimated residual astigmatism if the toric IOL was realigned according to the axis suggested by Berdahl and Hardten astigmatism fix and Barrett Rx formula. Results: Realigning the toric IOL on IOLM 700 steep TK axis along with the Callisto eye reduces the residual refractive astigmatism significantly (P = 0.003) from 2.00 ± 0.78 D to 0.18 ± 0.12 D (90.5 ± 7.6%) in comparison to the estimated 0.57 ± 0.31 D (68.4 ± 21.9%) by Berdahl and Hardten astigmatism fix and 0.61 ± 0.33 D (66.4 ± 23.5%) by Barrett Rx formula. Conclusion: Realigning the misaligned toric IOL on the IOLM 700 steep TK axis gives a better reduction in the residual refractive astigmatism in comparison to Berdahl and Hardten astigmatism fix and Barrett Rx formula
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the endoscopic therapeutic effect on Barrett esophagus (BE) with special intestinal metaplasia.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on data of 56 patients of BE with special intestinal metaplasia who were diagnosed in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2017 to December 2019 and treated with endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (ERFA) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). The postoperative bleeding rate, feeding obstruction rate, operative time, hospital stay and residual or recurrent intestinal metaplasia lesions were studied.Results:There were no significant differences between the ERFA group ( n=43) and the EMR group ( n=13) in terms of age, gender, length of BE, preoperative gastrointestinal symptoms and comorbidity ( P>0.05). The postoperative bleeding rate [23.1% (3/13) VS 0, P=0.010] and feeding obstruction rate [30.8% (4/13) VS 4.7% (2/43), P=0.022] were higher in the EMR group compared with those in the ERFA group, and the operative time [6.0 (5.6, 6.2) min VS 5.4 (5.2, 5.5) min, Z=4.95, P<0.001] and hospital stay [6.0 (5, 7) d VS 3.5 (3, 4) d, Z=5.76, P<0.001] were longer in the EMR group. There were no significant differences in the incidences of postoperative pain or fever between the two groups ( P>0.05). No residual or recurrent intestinal metaplasia lesions were observed during the follow-up in any EMR patient, and follow-up biopsies after the first treatment in the ERFA group revealed residual intestinal metaplasia lesions in 41.9% (18/43) patients, with a significant difference ( P=0.005). Conclusion:EMR is more thorough in the treatment of BE with special intestinal metaplasia, while ERFA is more widely used in clinical practice for simpler operation, shorter operative time, and less postoperative complications.
ABSTRACT
Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is the recognized precancerous lesion and risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and has a high miss diagnosis rate and low survival rate when malignantly transformed into EAC, moreover, there are only limited monitoring method and treatment. Therefore, the screening of biomarkers is highly expected, especially the risk stratification biomarkers related to the progression of malignant transformation of BE. Such biomarkers can help to determine early, quickly and accurately the disease process, and guide the stratified management and precise treatment of BE, reduce the malignancy rate and mortality. This article focused on the dynamic evolutionary process of intra‑tumor heterogeneity, and reviewed the current status and challenges of research on BE biomarkers in risk stratification from the genetics, epigenetics and serology perspectives.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus is an acquired condition that predisposes to the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. AIMS: The aim of this study was to establish an association between the endoscopic and the histopathological findings regarding differently sized endoscopic columnar epithelial mucosa projections in the low esophagus, under 3.0 cm in the longitudinal extent. METHODS: This is a prospective study, including 1262 patients who were submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in the period from July 2015 to June 2017. The suspicious projections were measured and subdivided into three groups according to the sizes encountered (Group I: <0.99 cm; Group II: 1.0-1.99 cm; and Group III: 2.0-2.99 cm), and biopsies were then performed. RESULTS: There was a general prevalence of suspicious lesions of 6.42% and of confirmed Barrett's lesions of 1.17%, without a general significant statistical difference among groups. However, from Groups I and II to Group III, the differences were significant, showing that the greater the lesion, the higher the probability of Barrett's esophagus diagnosis. The absolute number of Barrett's lesions was 7, 9, and 6 for Groups I, II, and III, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The findings led to the conclusion that even projections under 3.0 cm present a similar possibility of evolution to Barrett's esophagus. If, on the one hand, short segments are more prevalent, on the other hand, the long segments have the higher probability of Barrett's esophagus diagnosis, which is why biopsies are required in all suspicious segments.
RESUMO RACIONAL: O esôfago de Barrett é uma condição adquirida que predispõe ao desenvolvimento de adenocarcinoma de esôfago. OBJETIVOS: Estabelecer uma associação entre os achados endoscópicos e histopatológicos em relação às projeções endoscópicas da mucosa epitelial colunar de diferentes tamanhos no esôfago, abaixo de 3,0 centímetros de extensão longitudinal. MÉTODOS: Foi realizado um estudo prospective incluindo 1262 pacientes submetidos à endoscopia digestiva alta, no período de julho de 2015 a junho de 2017. As projeções suspeitas foram medidas, subdivididas em 3 grupos de acordo com os tamanhos encontrados (Grupo I: <0,99 cm; Grupo II: 1,0 cm-1,99 cm; Grupo III: 2,0 cm-2,99 cm) e biópsias foram então realizadas. RESULTADOS: Houve prevalência geral de lesões suspeitas de 6,42% e de lesões de Barrett confirmadas de 1,17%, sem diferença estatística geral significativa entre os grupos. Porém, dos Grupos I e II, para o Grupo III, as diferenças foram significativas, mostrando que quanto maior a lesão, maior a probabilidade de diagnóstico de esôfago de Barrett. O número absoluto de lesões de Barrett foi 7, 9 e 6 para os grupos I, II e III, respectivamente. CONCLUSÕES: Os achados permitiram concluir que mesmo projeções abaixo de 3,0 cm apresentam possibilidade semelhante de evolução para o esôfago de Barrett. Se, por um lado os segmentos curtos são mais prevalentes, por outro os segmentos longos têm maior probabilidade de diagnóstico de esôfago de Barrett, razão pela qual são necessárias biópsias em todos os segmentos suspeitos.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Determinar los resultados refractivos en pacientes operados de catarata con cirugía refractiva corneal, según el cálculo del poder dióptrico de la lente intraocular con la fórmula Barrett True K. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio pre-experimental, del tipo antes y después, en el cual fueron incluidos 18 pacientes (31 ojos). En ellos se analizaron variables demográficas y clínicas. La principal variable de salida fue la predictibilidad del componente esférico ± 0,50 D, ± 1,0 D según la longitud axial. Resultados: Fueron estudiados pacientes con un promedio de edad de 59,4 años, predominantemente del sexo femenino (66,7 por ciento). El 77,4 por ciento fue operado con queratotomía radial. Con la cirugía de catarata se produjo una mejora ostensible de la agudeza visual no corregida (mediana preoperatoria: 0,12 y mediana posoperatoria: 0,60). Solo el 9,7 por ciento de los ojos analizados presentó una agudeza visual sin corregir de 20/20 y el 90,3 por ciento de 20/40 o más. La cantidad de ojos con un equivalente esférico de ± 0,50 disminuyó en la medida en que aumentó la longitud axial (corta: 100 por ciento; normal: 57,1 por ciento; larga: 22,7 por ciento), no así la predictibilidad del componente esférico de ± 0,50, que aumentó (corta: 50,0 por ciento; normal: 57,1 por ciento; larga: 63,6 por ciento). Conclusiones: La fórmula Barrett True K resulta útil para el cálculo de la lente intraocular en pacientes operados de catarata y cirugía refractiva corneal previa(AU)
Objective: Determine refractive outcomes in patients undergoing cataract corneal refractive surgery based on intraocular lens dioptric power calculation with the Barrett True-K formula. Methods: A pre-experimental before/after study was conducted of 18 patients (31 eyes). Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed. The main output variable was spherical component predictability ± 0.50 D, ± 1.0 D according to axial length. Results: Mean age was 59.4 years; female sex prevailed (66.7 percent). Of the patients studied, 77.4 percent underwent radial keratotomy. Cataract surgery led to notable uncorrected visual acuity improvement (preoperative mean: 0.12; postoperative mean: 0.60). Only 9.7 percent of the eyes examined had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20, whereas 90.3 percent had 20/40 or more. The number of eyes with a spherical equivalent of ± 0.50 fell as axial length rose (near: 100 percent; normal: 57.1 percent; far: 22.7 percent), unlike ± 0.50 spherical component predictability, which rose from near: 50.0 percent; normal: 57.1 percent; far: 63.6 percent. Conclusions: The Barrett True-K formula is useful for intraocular lens calculation in patients undergoing previous cataract and corneal refractive surgery(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods , Refractive Surgical Procedures/methods , Keratotomy, Radial/methodsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of esophageal superficial neoplasm is associated with a high en bloc R0 resection rate and low recurrence. OBJECTIVE: We aim to compare the performance and clinical outcomes of ESD via ESD after circumferential incision (ESD-C) versus submucosal tunneling (ESD-T). METHODS: Single-center retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent ESD for superficial esophageal cancer, between 2009 and 2018. ESD-T was defined as the technique of making the mucosal incisions followed by submucosal tunneling in the oral to anal direction. ESD-C consisted of completing a circumferential incision followed by ESD. Main study outcomes included en bloc and R0 resection rates. Secondary outcomes included procedural characteristics, curative resection rate, local recurrence and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 65 procedures (23 ESD-T and 42 ESD-C) were performed for ESCC (40; 61.5%) and BE-neoplasia (25; 38.5%). There were no statistically significant differences between patients who underwent ESD-T versus ESD-C in en bloc (91.3% vs 100%, P=0.12), R0 (65.2% vs 78.6%, P=0.24), curative resection rates (65.2% vs 73.8%, P=0.47) and mean procedure time (118.7 min with vs 102.4 min, P=0.35). Adverse events for ESD-T and ESD-C were as follows: bleeding (0 versus 2.4%; P=0.53), perforation (4.3% vs 0; P=0.61), esophageal stricture (8.7% versus 9.5%; P=0.31). Local recurrence was encountered in 8.7% after ESD-T and 2.4% after ESD-C (P=0.28) at a mean follow-up of 8 and 2.75 years, respectively (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: ESD-T and ESD-C appear to be equally effective with similar safety profiles for the management of superficial esophageal neoplasms.
RESUMO CONTEXTO: A dissecção endoscópica submucosa (DES) no tratamento da neoplasia superficial do esôfago está associada a uma alta taxa de ressecção R0 em bloco e baixa taxa de recorrência. OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo é comparar o desempenho e os resultados clínicos da DES com incisão circunferencial (DES-C) versus com DES com túnel submucoso (DES-TS). MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo de banco de dados coletados prospectivamente de um centro especializado em DES, investigando pacientes consecutivos submetidos à DES por câncer de esôfago superficial, entre 2009 e 2018. DES-TS foi definida como a técnica de realizar primeiro incisões na mucosa seguida de tunelamento submucoso no sentido oral para anal. DES-C consistiu em completar uma incisão circunferencial seguida da dissecção submucosa. As principais variáveis do estudo incluíram taxas de ressecção em bloco e R0. Os resultados secundários incluíram características do procedimento, taxa de ressecção curativa, recorrência local e eventos adversos. RESULTADOS: Um total de 65 procedimentos (23 DES-TS e 42 DES-C) foram realizados para CCE de esôfago (40; 61,5%) e neoplasia associada ao EB (25; 38,5%). Não houve diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os pacientes submetidos a DES-TS versus DES-C nas taxas de ressecção em bloco (91,3% vs 100%, P=0,12), R0 (65,2% vs 78,6%, P=0,24), taxas de ressecção curativa (65,2% vs 73,8%, P=0,47) e tempo médio do procedimento (118,7 min com vs 102,4 min, P=0,35). Os eventos adversos para DES-TS e DES-C foram os seguintes: sangramento (0 vs 2,4%; P=0,53), perfuração (4,3% vs 0; P=0,61), estenose esofágica (8,7% vs 9,5%; P=0,31). A recorrência local foi encontrada em 8,7% após DES-TS e 2,4% após DES-C (P=0,28) em um seguimento médio de 8 e 2,75 anos, respectivamente (P=0,001). CONCLUSÃO: DES-TS e DES-C demostram ser igualmente eficazes com perfil de segurança semelhante para o tratamento das neoplasias superficiais do esôfago.