ABSTRACT
Presentations of scoliosis to primary health care physicians are not rare. Challenges may arise when it comes to screening and who require treatment once diagnosed. Idiopathic scoliosis is a three-dimensional spine and trunk deformity that is considered the most common form of scoliosis in children. It commonly does not cause symptoms and may be overlooked. However, if there was progressive deformity and it remained untreated, it may cause serious complications. Apart from medical concerns, emotional and cosmetic worries due to visible deformity may lead to psychological and social effects. Despite advances in understanding scoliosis, there are still controversies when it comes to optimal screening and treatment of this condition. This case is about a thirteen years old female who presented with intermittent back symptoms and was found to have a severe form of idiopathic thoracolumbar scoliosis. Through this case, author will be discussing different aspects of scoliosis (prevalence, screening, diagnosis, and treatment options) with emphasis on psychological support and guidance to the physician on how to overcome this challenge.
ABSTRACT
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study. PURPOSE: To provide an ideal correction angle of lumbar lordosis (LL) in degenerative flat back deformity. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The degree of correction in degenerative flat back in relation to pelvic incidence (PI) remains controversial. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with flat back deformity who underwent corrective surgery were enrolled. Posterior-anterior-posterior sequential operation was performed. Mean age and mean follow-up period was 65.6 years and 24.2 months, respectively. We divided the patients into two groups based on immediate postoperative radiographs-optimal correction (OC) group (PI-9degrees or =55degrees). Radiological and clinical results were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients in OC group had significantly less correction loss and maintained normal sagittal alignment (sagittal vertical axis<5 cm), as compared to patients in UC group (p<0.05). LL of low PI group significantly maintained within 9degrees better than high PI group (p<0.05). Oswestry disability index (ODI) significantly decreased at last follow-up, as compared to preoperative state. However, there was no significant difference in last follow-up ODI between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In flat back deformity, correction of LL to within 9degrees of PI will result in better sagittal balance. Thus, we recommend sufficient LL to prevent correction loss, especially in patients with high PI.