Distribution characteristics and drug resistance changes of bacteria detected in the pediatric intensive care unit / 中华实用儿科临床杂志

Objective:To investigate the tendency of bacterial distribution and drug resistance of clinically isolated pathogens in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), which provided references for the reasonable application of antibiotics.Methods:The distribution characteristics of all clinical isolates from PICU of Children′s Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University from January 2010 to December 2018 and their trend of drug resistance were retrospectively analyzed.Results:A total of 2 749 strains of bacteria were isolated, including 1 912 strains (69.6%) Gram-negative bacteria and 837 strains (30.4%) Gram-positive bacteria.The top 6 detected bacteria were Acinetobacter baumannii (749 stains, 27.2%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (289 stains, 10.5%), Staphylococcus aureus (214 stains, 7.8%), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (207 stains, 7.5%), Escherichia coli (204 stains, 7.4%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (189 stains, 6.9%). Among them, the detective rate of Maltophilia Stenotrophomonasannually increased from 6 strains (2.8%) in 2010 to 39 strains (9.5%) in 2018.The resistance rates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae to carbapenems increased year by year, which was up to 96.0% and 71.4% to Meropenem by 2018.Their resistance rates to the third-generation cephalosporins, aminoglycosides and sulfonamides were higher than 70.0%.The sensitivity rate to Tigecycline and Polymyxin was 100.0%.The detection rate of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) significantly increased from 18.2% in 2010 to 50.0% in 2018 ( χ2=19.38, P=0.013). No Vancomycin-resistant strains were found. Conclusions:Gram-negative bacteria are the main clinical isolates of PICU.Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and especially Pseudomonas maltophilus, have a significant growth trend in the detection rate. Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumoniae are highly resistant to carbapenems.MRSA annually grows, but it still maintains a high degree of sensitivity to Vancomycin.

Analysis of the distribution and drug resistance of common bacteria in hospital infections in a Grade III class A hospital in 2015-2019 / 公共卫生与预防医学

Objective To determine the distribution of common bacteria in hospital infections and to provide a basis for the prevention and control of bacterial infection and for rational use of antibiotics in clinical departments. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on common bacterial strains isolated from inpatients of a Grade III class A hospital from 2015 to 2019, including sample source and drug sensitivity changes. Results A total of 4,924 strains of Escherichia coli, 2 762 strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae, 1 297 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 967 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 1 585 strains of Acinetobacter baumannii were detected during the past 5 years. The bacteria were detected mainly from sputum. The resistance rate of Escherichia coli to ampicillin was as high as 88%, and the resistance rate to ceftriaxone was 58.22%. The resistance rate of Klebsiella pneumoniae to ampicillin was higher than 97%. The resistance rate of Staphylococcus aureus to penicillin G reached 93%, and the resistance rates to erythromycin and clindamycin were 60% and 70%, respectively. Pseudomonas aeruginosa had a high resistance rate to ampicillin, but a low resistance rate to other types of antibiotics. Acinetobacter baumannii had a high resistance to common antibacterial drugs. Conclusion Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae had a high incidence of nosocomial infections. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii both showed serious multi-drug resistance. Clinical departments should strengthen the monitoring of drug sensitivity changes of pathogenic bacteria, and manage and use antibiotics purposefully.

Bacterial flora distribution and antimicrobial resistance of pyogenic liver abscess: a multicenter retrospective study (A report of 897 cases) / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective@#To investigate the bacterial flora distribution and antimicrobial resistance of patients with pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) in multi-centers of China.@*Methods@#The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. The clinical data of 897 patients with PLA at 3 medical centers in China from October 2007 to April 2018 were collected, including 656 cases in the First Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 109 cases in Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology and 132 cases in the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital of Naval Military Medical University. There were 582 males and 315 females, aged (59±11)years, with a range of 6-86 years. Observation indicators: (1) bacterial flora distribution; (2) bacterial resistance. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD and measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M (range). Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages.@*Results@#(1) Bacterial flora distribution: among 897 patients, 733 cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae, 75 cases of Escherichia coli, 11 cases of Staphylococcus aureus, 10 cases of Streptococcus viridians, 9 cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae, 7 cases of β-emolytic streptococcus, 6 cases of Acinetobacter baumannii, 5 cases of Streptococcus intermadius, 5 cases of Enterococcus faecium, 3 cases of Alcaligenes xylosoxidans subsp. xylosoxidans, 2 cases of Proteus mirabilis, 2 cases of Streptococcus isthmus, 2 cases of Enterobacter cloacae subsp. cloacae, 1 case of Citrobacter koseri, 1 case of Proteus vulgaris, 1 case of Pasteurella pneumotropica, 1 case of Curobacter freudii, 1 case of Enterobacter amnigenus, 1 case of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, 1 case of Acinetobacter lwoffii, 1 case of Streptococcus salivarius, 1 case of Streptococcus bacterium, 1 case of Enterococcus avium, 1 case of Enterococcus faecalis, 1 case of Klebsiella oxytoca, and 1 case of Staphylococcus epidermidis were cultured in the pus respectively. There were 12 cases of double bacterial infection, and 2 cases of multiple bacterial infections. (2) Bacterial resistance. ① Resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli: the drug resistance rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae to ampicillin, piperacillin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefotetan, cefepime, cefoxitin, amoxicillin/carat Retinoic acid, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam, aztreonam, imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, tigaricycline, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole were 99.79%(474/475), 4.09%(7/171), 12.18%(82/673), 7.34%(49/668), 2.34%(4/171), 1.96%(11/562), 5.85%%(10/171), 0(0/562), 0.55%(4/733), 1.42%(9/635), 0(0/733), 2.46%(18/733), 0.55%(4/733), 0.27%(2/733), 1.36%(10/733), 0.14%(1/733), 0(0/733), 0.36%(2/562), 0.95%(7/733), 0.41%(3/733), 0(0/733), 0(0/562), 1.64%(12/733), 0.95%(7/733), and 4.50%(33/733), respectively. The drug resistance rates of Escherichia coli to above antibiotics were 78.67%(59/75), 40.91%(18/44), 65.33%(49/75), 56.00%(42/75), 38.64%(17/44), 41.94%(13/31), 20.00%(15/75), 3.23%(1/31), 25.33%(19/75), 5.77%(3/52), 18.67%(14/75), 32.00%(24/75), 8.00%(6/75), 16.00%(12/75), 37.33%(28/75), 1.33%(1/75), 0(0/75), 0(0/31), 40.00%(30/75), 14.67%(11/75), 1.33%(1/75), 0(0/31), 54.67%(41/75), 37.33%(28/75), and 52.00%(39/75), respectively. ② Drug resistance of other Gram-negative bacteria: the drug resistance rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae to ampicillin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefotetan, cefepime, amoxicillin/carat Retinoic acid, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam, aztreonam, imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole were 8/8, 0/5, 0/5, 0/1, 0/9, 0/2, 0/9, 0/8, 0/9, 0/9, 0/6, 0/9, 0/9, 0/7, 0/1, 0/9, 0/8, 0/9, 0/9, 0/9, and 0/9. The drug resistance rates of Acinetobacter baumannii to ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam, aztreonam, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, tigaricycline, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole were 2/6, 4/6, 3/6, 0/6, 4/6, 1/6, 2/6, 4/6, 2/6, 4/6, 4/6, 3/6, 0/6, 4/6, 2/6, and 3/6, respectively. The drug resistance rates of Alcaligenes xylosoxidans subsp. xylosoxidans to ampicillin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, amoxicillin/carat Retinoic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, aztreonam, imipenem, gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin were 3/3, 3/3, 3/3, 1/3, 1/3, 1/3, 0/3, 3/3, 2/3, 3/3, 3/3, 3/3, 3/3, and 1/3. ③ Drug resistance of other Gram-positive bacteria: the drug resistance rates of Staphylococcus aureus to penicillin, ampicillin, piperacillin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, cefoxitin, amoxicillin/carat Retinoic acid, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam, aztreonam, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, tetracycline, tigaricycline, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, linezolid, erythromycin, clindamycin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, and rifampin were 2/6, 6/8, 4/5, 4/5, 4/5, 4/5, 4/5, 4/5, 4/5, 4/5, 4/5, 4/5, 4/5, 3/5, 2/5, 2/5, 3/8, 3/5, 3/5, 0/8, 0/8, 3/8, 3/11, 0/5, 1/8, 0/8, 0/8, 2/6, 3/3, 1/3, and 0/3. The drug resistance rates of Streptococcus viridians to penicillin, ampicillin, ceftriaxone, cefoperazone/sulbactam, gentamicin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, linezolid, erythromycin, clindamycin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, and rifampin were 3/10, 0/8, 0/7, 0/7, 2/8, 6/10, 0/8, 0/8, 0/7, 0/5, 4/10, 6/10, 0/5, 0/5, and 0/3. The drug resistance rates of β-emolytic streptococcus to antibacterial agents were 0. ④ Drug resistance of complex bacteria. For the 12 patients with double bacterial infection, in the Klebsiella pneumoniae combined with Gram-negative bacteria, the drug resistance rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae to cefotetan, cefoxitin, ampicillin/sulbactam, meropenem, ertapenem, tobramycin, tigecycline, and trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole were 0. The drug resistance rates of Acinetobacter baumannii to ertapenem, levofloxacin, and trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole were 0. The drug resistance rates of Escherichia coli to ceftazidime, cefoxitin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, tobramycin, amikacin, and tigecycline were 0. Citrobacter florida was sensitive to other antibiotics than levofloxacin and trimethoprim cotrimoxazole. In the Escherichia coli combined with Gram-positive bacteria, the drug resistance rates of Escherichia coli to cefotetan, cefepime, cefoxitin, cefoperazone/sulbactam, meropenem, tobramycin, and amikacin were 0. The drug resistance rates of Enterococcus faecalis to penicillin, ampicillin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, linezolid, vancomycin, and teicoplanin were 0. The drug resistance rates of Enterococcus casselifavus to ampicillin, tetracycline, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, linezolid, and erythromycin were 0. The drug resistance rates of Staphylococcus hominis subspecies to levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, linezolid, vancomycin, teicoplanin, and rifampicin were 0. The drug resistance rates of Enterococcus faecium to tetracycline, linezolid, vancomycin, and teicoplanin were 0. In the multiple bacterial infections of Klebsiella pneumoniae + Escherichia coli + Staphylococcus aureus subspecies + Pseudomonas aeruginosa + Torulopsis glabrata, the drug resistance rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae to ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefotetan, cefepime, cefoxitin, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam, aztreonam, imipenem, tobramycin, amikacin, and levofloxacin were 0. The drug resistance rates of Escherichia coli to ceftazidime, cefotetan, cefepime, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam, aztreonam, imipenem, and amikacin were 0. The drug resistance rates of Staphylococcus aureus subspecies to ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefotetan, cefepime, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoperazone/sulbactam, aztreonam, imipenem, tobramycin, amikacin, tigecycline, moxifloxacin, cotrimoxazole, teicoplanin, vancomycin, linezolid, and clindamycin were 0. The drug resistance rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin were 0. The drug resistance rates of Torulopsis glabrata to 5-fluorocytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole were 0. In the multiple bacterial infections of Klebsiella pneumoniae + Escherichia coli + Acinetobacter baumannii, the drug resistance rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae to cefotetan, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, ertapenem, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin were 0. The drug resistance rates of Escherichia coli to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, meropenem were 0. The drug resistance ratets of Acinetobacter baumannii to trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole was 0.@*Conclusions@#Klebsiella pneumoniae is the main pathogen of PLA, followed by Escherichia coli. Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli are sensitive to meropenem and tigecycline. Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae and other Gram-negative bacteria are sensitive to ertapenem. Staphylococcus aureus are sensitive to Linezolid. Antibiotics are selected after drug sensitivity test for patients.

Bacterial flora distribution and antimicrobial resistance of pyogenic liver abscess: a multicenter retrospective study (A report of 897 cases) / 中华消化外科杂志

Objective To investigate the bacterial flora distribution and antimicrobial resistance of patients with pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) in multi-centers of China.Methods The retrospective and descriptive study was conducted.The clinical data of 897 patients with PLA at 3 medical centers in China from October 2007 to April 2018 were collected,including 656 cases in the First Hospital of Harbin Medical University,109 cases in Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology and 132 cases in the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital of Naval Military Medical University.There were 582 males and 315 females,aged (59± 11) years,with a range of 6-86 years.Observation indicators:(1) bacterial flora distribution;(2) bacterial resistance.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean±SD and measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M (range).Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages.Results (1) Bacterial flora distribution:among 897 patients,733 cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae,75 cases of Escherichia coli,11 cases of Staphylococcus aureus,10 cases of Streptococcus viridians,9 cases of Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp.pneumoniae,7 cases of β-emolytic streptococcus,6 cases of Acinetobacter baumannii,5 cases of Streptococcus intermadius,5 cases of Enterococcus faecium,3 cases of Alcaligenes xylosoxidans subsp.xylosoxidans,2 cases of Proteus mirabilis,2 cases of Streptococcus isthmus,2 cases of Enterobacter cloacae subsp.cloacae,1 case of Citrobacter koseri,1 case of Proteus vulgaris,1 case of Pasteurella pneumotropica,1 case of Curobacter freudii,1 case of Enterobacter amnigenus,1 case of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia,1 case of Acinetobacter lwoffii,1 case of Streptococcus salivarius,1 case of Streptococcus bacterium,1 case of Enterococcus avium,1 case of Enterococcus faecalis,1 case of Klebsiella oxytoca,and 1 case of Staphylococcus epidermidis were cultured in the pus respectively.There were 12 cases of double bacterial infection,and 2 cases of multiple bacterial infections.(2) Bacterial resistance.① Resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli:the drug resistance rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae to ampicillin,piperacillin,cefazolin,cefuroxime,cefotaxime,ceftriaxone,ceftazidime,cefotetan,cefepime,cefoxitin,amoxicillin/carat Retinoic acid,ampicillin/sulbactam,piperacillin/tazobactam,cefoperazone/sulbactam,aztreonam,imipenem,meropenem,ertapenem,gentamicin,tobramycin,amikacin,tigaricycline,ciprofloxacin,levofloxacin,and trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole were 99.79％ (474/475),4.09％ (7/171),12.18％ (82/673),7.34％(49/668),2.34％(4/171),1.96％(11/562),5.85％％(10/171),0(0/562),0.55％(4/733),1.42％(9/635),0(0/733),2.46％(18/733),0.55％(4/733),0.27％(2/733),1.36％(10/733),0.14％ (1/733),0 (0/733),0.36％ (2/562),0.95％ (7/733),0.41％ (3/733),0 (0/733),0 (0/562),1.64％ (12/733),0.95％ (7/733),and 4.50％ (33/733),respectively.The drug resistance rates of Escherichia coli to above antibiotics were 78.67％ (59/75),40.91％ (18/44),65.33％ (49/75),56.00％ (42/75),38.64％ (17/44),41.94％ (13/31),20.00％ (15/75),3.23％ (1/31),25.33％ (19/75),5.77％ (3/52),18.67％ (14/75),32.00％(24/75),8.00％(6/75),16.00％(12/75),37.33％(28/75),1.33％(1/75),0(0/75),0(0/31),40.00％(30/75),14.67％(11/75),1.33％(1/75),0(0/31),54.67％(41/75),37.33％ (28/75),and 52.00％ (39/75),respectively.② Drug resistance of other Gram-negative bacteria:the drug resistance rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp.pneumoniae to ampicillin,cefazolin,cefuroxime,ceftriaxone,ceftazidime,cefotetan,cefepime,amoxicillin/carat Retinoic acid,ampicillin/sulbactam,piperacillin/tazobactam,cefoperazone/sulbactam,aztreonam,imipenem,meropenem,ertapenem,gentamicin,tobramycin,amikacin,ciprofloxacin,levofloxacin,and trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole were 8/8,0/5,0/5,0/1,0/9,0/2,0/9,0/8,0/9,0/9,0/6,0/9,0/9,0/7,0/1,0/9,0/8,0/9,0/9,0/9,and 0/9.The drug resistance rates of Acinetobacter baumannii to ceftriaxone,ceftazidime,cefepime,ampicillin/sulbactam,piperacillin/tazobactam,cefoperazone/sulbactam,aztreonam,imipenem,meropenem,gentamicin,tobramycin,amikacin,tigaricycline,ciprofloxacin,levofloxacin,and trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole were 2/6,4/6,3/6,0/6,4/6,1/6,2/6,4/6,2/6,4/6,4/6,3/6,0/6,4/6,2/6,and 3/6,respectively.The drug resistance rates of Alcaligenes xylosoxidans subsp.xylosoxidans to ampicillin,cefazolin,cefuroxime,ceftazidime,cefepime,amoxicillin/carat Retinoic acid,piperacillin/tazobactam,aztreonam,imipenem,gentamicin,tobramycin,amikacin,ciprofloxacin,and levofloxacin were 3/3,3/3,3/3,1/3,1/3,1/3,0/3,3/3,2/3,3/3,3/3,3/3,3/3,and 1/3.③ Drug resistance of other Gram-positive bacteria:the drug resistance rates of Staphylococcus aureus to penicillin,ampicillin,piperacillin,cefazolin,cefuroxime,cefotaxime,ceftazidime,cefepime,cefoxitin,amoxicillin/carat Retinoic acid,ampicillin/sulbactam,piperacillin/tazobactam,cefoperazone/sulbactam,aztreonam,imipenem,meropenem,gentamicin,tobramycin,amikacin,tetracycline,tigaricycline,ciprofloxacin,levofloxacin,moxifloxacin,trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole,linezolid,erythromycin,clindamycin,vancomycin,teicoplanin,and rifampin were 2/6,6/8,4/5,4/5,4/5,4/5,4/5,4/5,4/5,4/5,4/5,4/5,4/5,3/5,2/5,2/5,3/8,3/5,3/5,0/8,0/8,3/8,3/11,0/5,1/8,0/8,0/8,2/6,3/3,1/3,and 0/3.The drug resistance rates of Streptococcus viridians to penicillin,ampicillin,ceftriaxone,cefoperazone/sulbactam,gentamicin,tetracycline,ciprofloxaein,levofloxaein,moxifloxacin,linezolid,erythromycin,clindamycin,vancomycin,teicoplanin,and rifampin were 3/10,0/8,0/7,0/7,2/8,6/10,0/8,0/8,0/7,0/5,4/10,6/10,0/5,0/5,and 0/3.The drug resistance rates of β-emolytic streptococcus to antibacterial agents were 0.④ Drug resistance of complex bacteria.For the 12 patients with double bacterial infection,in the Klebsiella pneumoniae combined with Gramnegative bacteria,the drug resistance rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae to cefotetan,cefoxitin,ampicillin/sulbactam,meropenem,ertapenem,tobramycin,tigecycline,and trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole were 0.The drug resistance rates of Acinetobacter baumannii to ertapenem,levofloxacin,and trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole were 0.The drug resistance rates of Escherichia coli to ceftazidime,cefoxitin,amoxicillin/clavulanic acid,piperacillin/tazobactam,imipenem,meropenem,ertapenem,tobramycin,amikacin,and tigecycline were 0.Citrobacter florida was sensitive to other antibiotics than levofloxacin and trimethoprim cotrimoxazole.In the Escherichia coli combined with Gram-positive bacteria,the drug resistance rates of Escherichia coli to cefotetan,cefepime,cefoxitin,cefoperazone/sulbactam,meropenem,tobramycin,and amikacin were 0.The drug resistance rates of Enterococcus faecalis to penicillin,ampicillin,levofloxacin,moxifloxacin,linezolid,vancomycin,and teicoplanin were 0.The drug resistance rates of Enterococcus casselifavus to ampicillin,tetracycline,levofloxacin,moxifloxacin,linezolid,and erythromycin were 0.The drug resistance rates of Staphylococcus hominis subspecies to levofloxacin,moxifloxacin,linezolid,vancomycin,teicoplanin,and rifampicin were 0.The drug resistance rates of Enterococcus faecium to tetracycline,linezolid,vancomycin,and teicoplanin were 0.In the multiple bacterial infections of Klebsiella pneumoniae + Escherichia coli + Staphylococcus aureus subspecies + Pseudomonas aeruginosa + Torulopsis glabrata,the drug resistance rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae to ceftriaxone,ceftazidime,cefotetan,cefepime,cefoxitin,ampicillin/sulbactam,piperacillin/tazobactam,cefoperazone/sulbactam,aztreonam,imipenem,tobramycin,amikacin,and levofloxacin were 0.The drug resistance rates of Escherichia coli to ceftazidime,cefotetan,cefepime,ampicillin/sulbactam,piperacillin/tazobactam,cefoperazone/sulbactam,aztreonam,imipenem,and amikacin were 0.The drug resistance rates of Staphylococcus aureus subspecies to ceftriaxone,ceftazidime,cefotetan,cefepime,ampicillin/sulbactam,piperacillin/tazobactam,cefoperazone/ sulbactam,aztreonam,imipenem,tobramycin,amikacin,tigecycline,moxifloxacin,cotrimoxazole,teicoplanin,vancomycin,linezolid,and clindamycin were 0.The drug resistance rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime,cefepime,piperacillin/tazobactam,imipenem,gentamicin,tobramycin,amikacin,ciprofloxacin,and levofloxacin were 0.The drug resistance rates of Torulopsis glabrata to 5-fluorocytosine,fluconazole,itraconazole,and voriconazole were 0.In the multiple bacterial infections of Klebsiella pneumoniae + Escherichia coli + Acinetobacter baumannii,the drug resistance rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae to cefotetan,cefepime,piperacillin/tazobactam,imipenem,ertapenem,tobramycin,ciprofloxacin,and levofloxacin were 0.The drug resistance rates of Escherichia coli to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid,piperacillin/tazobactam,imipenem,meropenem were 0.The drug resistance ratets of Acinetobacter baumannii to trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole was 0.Conclusions Klebsiella pneumoniae is the main pathogen of PLA,followed by Escherichia coli.Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli are sensitive to meropenem and tigecycline.Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp.pneumoniae and other Gram-negative bacteria are sensitive to ertapenem.Staphylococcus aureus are sensitive to Linezolid.Antibiotics are selected after drug sensitivity test for patients.

Bacterial distribution and surveillance of drug resistance in patients with peri-implant bacterial infection / 国际检验医学杂志

Objective To investigate the bacterial distribution and drug resistance in patients with peri-implant bacterial infec-tion.Methods A total of 81 cases of patients with peri-implant bacterial infection were diagnosed from December 2014 to December 2016.The bottom of gingival sulcus specimens was collected and bacteria were isolated and cultured.The bacteria were identified by French company's VITEK23 bioMerieux identification system,and chemosensitivity test were carried out by disc diffusion method. Results 94 strains from 81 patients were detected,of which 75 strains were anaerobic bacteria(79.79%)and 19 strains were aero-bic bacteria(20.21%).The anaerobic bacteria distribution was streptococcus oralis,prevotella intermedia,and porphyromonas gingi-valis;the resistance rates of anaerobic bacteria to levofloxacin,benzyl penicillin and clindamycin were relatively higher.Drug resist-ance rate of streptococcus oralis to levofloxacin,benzyl penicillin and clindamycin were 82.05%,89.74% and 94.87% respectively;drug resistance rate of prevotella intermedia to levofloxacin,benzyl penicillin and clindamycin were 85.00%,75.00% and 100.00%respectively;drug resistance rate of porphyromonas gingivalis to levofloxacin,benzyl penicillin and clindamycin were 87.50%, 81.25% and 87.50% respectively.Conclusion Pathogen in patients with peri-implant bacterial infection mainly was anaerobic bac-teria,which have a high drug resistance rate to levofloxacin,benzyl penicillin and clindamycin.

The profile of antibiotic resistantpathogens isolated from ascites fluid patients in intensive care unit during past 12 years / 中华危重病急救医学

Objective To investigate the profile and antibiotic resistance of bacteria in patients with ascites infection in intensive care unit (ICU) patients in order to provide a reference for rational clinical use of antibiotics. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted. The bacteria isolated from ascetic fluid patients admitted from January 1st, 2004 to October 31st, 2015 to ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were identified, and their susceptibility to antibiotics was analyzed. Patients, who were admitted from January 1st, 2004 to December 31st, 2009 were assigned to group A, and patients admitted afterwards were assigned to group B. Results A total of 637 specimens of ascetic fluid were examined, with 185 positive culture (29.0%) during the 12 years, and 203 strains of bacteria were found. Among them 126 strains (62.1%) of gram-negative bacteria (G-), 54 (26.6%) of gram-positive bacteria (G+) and 23 (11.3%) strains of fungi were found. Compared the result of group B with that of group A, the proportion of G- bacteria was increased [71.2% (99/139) vs. 44.2% (27/64)], and that of G+ decreased [17.3% (24/139) vs. 46.9% (30/64)] in group B. The difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 20.34, P = 0.001). The main pathogenic bacteria were G-, and Enterobacteriaceae was the most common pathogenic bacteria in intra-abdominal infection of ICU patients. The isolation rate of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae(35.7%, 10.3%) ranked in the first and third in G- bacteria, respectively. The resistant rate of Escherichia coli against penicillin and third generation cephalosporin were > 95.0% and > 73.3%, and it showed a sensitive rate of 70% to β-lactam/inhibitor, amikacin and minocycline, and a higher sensitivity to carbapenems and tigecycline (11.1%, 0). Forty-eight strains of non-fermentation bacteria were found with a rate of 23.7%. The positive rates of Acinetobacter baumannii in groups A and B were 7.8% (5/64) and 23.7% (33/139), respectively, and they ranked first among non-fermentation bacteria. Twenty strains (62.5%) multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii were found. Acinetobacter baumannii showed a resistance rate of 84.6% to cefoperazone/sulbactam, 35.3% to minocycline, and 53.3% to tigecycline. Candida albicans was the most commonly isolated fungus in intra-abdominal infections (87.5%). No strains resistant to common antifungal drugs were isolated. Conclusions G- bacteria was the main pathogen in intra-abdominal infection in patients with ascites. Non-fermenters showed an increasing trend of producing infection, and the proportion of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection increased year by year, and more attention should be taken by attending doctors.

Distribution and Drug Resistance of Carbapenem-resistant Citrobacter Freundii from 2012 to 2014 / 昆明医科大学学报

Objective To investigate the distribution and susceptibility of carbapenem resistant citrobacter freundii for rational antimicrobial therapy.Methods The C.freumdii were collected between January 2011 and December 2014 from inpatients.The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were detected by an automated analyzer (VITEK 2) to analyze the characteristic of tested bacteria.Results (1) Of the 21 strains of carbapenemresistant citrobacter freundii,95％ were collected from urine,among which most of the strains were isolated from the Department of Transplantology (66.7％) and Urology (19％);(2) Antimicrobials Susceptibility test showed that Citmbacter freund were highly resistant to Cephalosporins and relevant beta-lactamase inhibitors.Even carbapenem were highly resistant.Imipenem had a resistance rate of 90％ (95％ confidence interval:70 to 99),Meropenem 85.7％ (95％ confidence interval:64 to 97),The drug resistance rate to Amikacin was only 4.8％,followed by Nitrofuran toin (10.5％) and Fosfomycin (15％).Conclusions Carbapenem resistant citrobacter freundii,which often causes urinary tract infection in our hospital,was characterized by multi-drug resistant (MDR).Monitoring of the Citrobaeter freundii should be strengthened to control the prevalence of drug resistance.

Distribution of common pathogens and resistance analysis in a tertiary hospital / 药学实践杂志

Objective To analyse the distribution of main pathogens and drug resistance in a tertiary hospital during 2014 ,and to provide the reference for the clinical rational use of antimicrobial agents .Methods Conventional methods were used for bacterial culture ,VITEK-2 automatic detection system of French BioMerieux company was used for bacteria identifica-tion ,and bacterial resistance analysis ,and WHO NET 5 .5 software was used for data analysis .Results Gram negative bacte-ria accounted for 78 .09% ;Gram positive bacteria accounted for 21 .91% .K lebsiella pneumoniae detection rate was the high-est ,that is 16 .07% ,followed by EscherichiaColi (12 .75% ) ,Bauman Acinetobacter (12 .69% ) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10 .91% ) .The resistant rate of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA)was 42 .8% (101) ,and the resistant rate of methicillin resistant coagulase negative staphylococci (MRCNS) was 75 .62% (152) .Resistant rates of Staphylococcus au-reus ,both coagulase negative staphylococcus and enterococcus faecalis to vancomycin and linezolid were zero .Resistant rates of enterococcus faecium to vancomycin and linezolid were 5 .5% and zero respectively .Pathogens were detected mainly in emer-gency department ,and the main pathogens were widely distributed .Conclusion Conducting monitoring of bacterial drug re-sistance and grasping the change trend of drug resistance have important significance to guide clinical rational drug use .

Analysis on distribution and drug resistance of pathogenic bacteria of pus in patients with acute mastitis / 国际检验医学杂志

Objective To explore the bacterial flora distribution characteristics and drug resistance of pus bacterial culture in a‐cute mastitis and to analyze thechange trend of drug resistance spectrum to provide a evidence‐based basis for the rational use of an‐timicrobial agents in clinic .Methods The pus collected from 207 cases of acute mastitis was conducted the bacterial culture .The bacterial identification and antibacterial susceptibility test were performed by adopting the manual experiment combined with the DL‐96 system .Partial drug susceptibility test was performed by combining with the K‐B method .Results Among 207 specimens , 82 strains of pathogenic bacteria were detected with the detection rate of 39 .6% ,including 51 strains (62 .2% ) of staphylococcus aureus ,7 strains (8 .5% ) of pseudomonas aeruginosa ,4 strains (4 .9% ) of staphylococcus intermedius ,4 strains (4 .9% ) of staphy‐lococcus epidermis ,3 strains (3 .7% ) of acid‐producing klebsiella bacteria and each 1 strain of staphylococcus hemolyticus and other 13 kinds of bacterium .The resistance rates of staphylococcus aureus to azithromycin ,erythromycin and clarithromycin were 92 .2% ,84 .3% and 84 .3% respectively ,indicating that macrolides drugs had a higher overall drug resistance rate and were not suitable for selection and use;the resistance rates of moxifloxacin and ciprofloxacin were 3 .9% and 4 .1% respectively ,the MRSA detection rate was 27 .5% .The resistance rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ticarcillin/clavulanic acid was 85 .7% ;the drug resitance rate of cefoperazone was 83 .3% ;which of gentamycin and amikacin was 71 .4% ;which of aztreonam was 14 .3% ;which of ceftazidime was 28 .6% and which of meropenem was 28 .6% .Conclusion The majority of detected bacteria in pus from the pa‐tients with acute mastitis are Staphylococcus aureus ,followed by pseudomonas aeruginosa ,which is different from that reported by other literatures ,showing the bacterial distribution has regional difference .Staphylococcus aureus has high resistance rate to macrol‐ides antibacterial drugs ,but is highly sensitive to ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin;Pseudomonas aeruginosa has higher resistant rate to ticarcillin/clavulanic and cefoperazone ,but it is highly sensitive to aztreonam ,ceftazidime and meropenem .Empirical medication should be comprehensively considered by combining with drug resistance spectrum of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ,and the sensitive drugs should be selected according to the drug susceptibility results after the antimicrobial susceptibili‐ty test for conducting the targeted medication .

Distribution and Drug Resistance of Genital Tract Pathogenic Bacteria in Pregnant Women with Premature Rupture of Membrane / 现代检验医学杂志

Objective To investigate the distribution and drug resistance of genital tract pathogens in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes (PROM),and provide guidance for clinical rational use of antibiotics.Methods From 2011 to 2013,3 162 cases of patients with premature rupture of membranes were cultured for bacteria,Mycoplasma and Chlamydia.Identification and drug sensitive test of the bacteria were detected by VITEK II system;all of the data were ana-lyzed by WHONET5.6 software.Results The rate of infection was 33.30%,in which the positive rate of bacteria,Fung, Mycoplasma culture and Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection were 13.19%,4.87%,24.89% and 2.72% respectively. The ratio of Escherichia coli producing extended spectrum beta lactamases (ESBLS)were 13.76%.The ratio of Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)and Methicillin resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus (MRCNS)were 27.27%and 66.25% respectively.Mycoplasma was most sensitive to minocycline,doxycycline.Conclusion Mycoplasma in-fection was the first,followed by bacteria.clinical should strengthen the surveillance of pathogen infection,and rational use of antibiotics according to the results of drug sensitive test.

Analysis of bacterial distribution and resistance from exacerbation of COPD patients in C and D Classification in our emergency department / 中华急诊医学杂志

Objective To analyze the bacterial distribution and resistance of clinical isolates from exacerbation of COPD patients in C and D classification in our emergency department.Methods The sputums were taken to culture and antimicrobial susceptibility test.VITEK-2 compact automicrobe system was used to identify bacteria.Disc diffusion test was used to determine the antimicrobial resistance.Results Of 222 clinical isolates,27.0％ were Gram positive bacteria,73.0％ were Gram negative bacteria.The Gram positive bacteria mainly was Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae.The detection rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were 50.00％.The MRSA were more resistant than methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA),and they were all sensitive to vancomycin,linezolid or tigecycline.The Gram negative bacteria mainly was Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Escherichia coli,Klebsiella spp and Acinetobacter baumannii.Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii had high resistant rates.The extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) producing strains in Escherichia coli were higher than in Klebsiella spp,which had multiple drug resistance.Conclusions The bacterial resistance situation is very severely in exacerbation of COPD patients in C and D classification in our emergency department.The first isolating rate was Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Surveillance of bacterial resistance is very important and effective control measures to reduce resistance is very necessary.

Drug Resistance and Distribution of Common Nosocomial Pathogens / 中华医院感染学杂志

OBJECTIVE To investigate the distribution of commonly encountered pathogenic microbes during the last five years.METHODS A total of 9318 strains of NI pathogens during from Jan 2004 to Dec 2008 were surveyed and analyzed.RESULTS From them the percentage of Gram-positive cocci was 13.6%,the main pathogen was coagulase negative Staphylococcus,Gram-negative bacilli(28.8%).The predominant pathogens were Escherichia coli,Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.The drug resistance of NI pathogens was markedly increased.Especially,the rate of drug resistance of P.aeruginosa to imipenem was from 0 to 31.8% in 2005,and that of Enterococcus to vancomycin was 4.0% in 2007.The percentage of fungi was 26.4% and increased sharply year by year.CONCLUSIONS The Gram-negative bacteria play a dominant role in clinics and drug resistance of isolated pathogenic bacteria is a serious problem.Monitoring the trends of pathogenic bacteria′s distribution and drug resistance is very important in guiding the clinical administration of drugs and we should pay attention to fungal infection.

Nosocomial Infection Pathogens in an Orthopedic Hospital:Their Drug Resistance and Distribution / 中华医院感染学杂志

OBJECTIVE To investigate the drug resistance and distribution of nosocomial infection (NI) pathogens. METHODS A total of 519 strains of NI pathogens during from Jan 2006 to Dec 2007 were completely surveyed. RESULTS Among all pathogens,Gram-positive cocci were 209 strains (40.27%),the main pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus. Gram-negative bacilli were 256 strains (49.33%). Fungi were 54 strains (8.28%). resistance the rate in nosocomial infectionis was increased year by year. CONCLUSIONS The Gram-negatives of NI pathogens are markedly increased year by year. The drug resistance rate of pathogens is higher and the clinically selected anti-bacterial drugs should be based on the bacterial culture and drug susceptibility test.

Bacterial Distribution and Drug Resistance in Patients in Intensive Care Unit / 中华医院感染学杂志

OBJECTIVE To investigate the bacterial distribution and drug resistance in patients in intensive care unit(ICU) and provide theoretical bases for rational usage of antibiotics.METHODS The distribution and drug resistance of 372 strains isolated from patients in ICU collected from Jul 2007 to Jun 2008 were investigated and studied retrospectively.RESULTS Among them,the Gram-negative bacilli covered 59.14 %,the Gram-positive cocci 28.49%,and the fungi covered 12.37%.Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Klebsiella,Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Ancinetobacter were the main Gram-negative bacilli.Staphylococcus aureus,coagulation-negative Staphylococcus and Enterococcus were the main Gram-positive cocci.The resistance rate of P.aeruginosa,S.maltophilia and Acinetobacter to imipenem was over 10%,and the S.maltophilia was 96.7%,the resistance rate of three main Gram-positive cocci to vancomycin and teicoplanin was zero,and the isolated bacteria showed serious multidrug-resistance.CONCLUSIONS Periodic monitoring should be done to learn the drug resistance and bacterial distribution in ICU in order to rationally use antibiotics to avoid the generation of new drug resistant strains and control the infection of patients in ICU.

Microbiology and management of gaseous gangrene:the Sichuan experience of 20 earthquake cases / 中华内科杂志

Wound secretion from 20 patients with gaseous gangrene was collected for Gram staining,bacterial culture and drug sensitivity tests.The results indicated that gaseous gangrene was caused by the co-infection of both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.Gram-negative bacilli were slishtly more common than other aerobic bacteria in gageous gangrene wound,which was different from the findings of ordinary gaseous gangrene.

Distribution and Antibacterial Resistance of Nosocomial Infection Pathogens in Hospital / 中华医院感染学杂志

OBJECTIVE To investigate the tendency of bacterial distribution and resistance of hospitial infections,and to provide the reference for the clinical treatment and infection control in hospital.METHODS Bacteria isolated from patients in our hospital from Jan 2004 to Dec 2005 were identified by ATB expression,and bacterial susceptibility tests were performed on strains using Kirby-Bauer method.RESULTS A total of 3066 pathogens strains were isolated,among them 927 strains were Gram-positive cocci(30.2%).The most common pathogens of them were Staphylococcus.Meticillin resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative Staphylococcus(CNS) accounted for 69.0% and 77.6%,respectively.In our data,no vancomycin resistant S.aureus were isolated.There were 2134 strains of Gram-negative bacilli(69.6%),the most common pathogens of them were Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Escherichia coli,Klebsiella pneumoniae,Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacter cloacae.The ESBLs producing strains of E.coli and K.pneumoniae accounted for 30.1% and 40.1%,respectively.The highest susceptible to Gram-negative bacilli was carbapenem,then were cefoperazone/sulbactam,piperacillin /tazobactam and cefepime.Mainly pathogenic bacteria were multi-resistant to some antibiotics.CONCLUSIONS Drug resistance of the nosocomial infection bacteria is a serious problem.It's important and urgent to carry out surveillance of bacterial resistance for appropriate using of antibiotics and effective controlling nosocomial infections.

Drug Resistance and Distribution of Nosocomial Infection Pathogens / 中华医院感染学杂志

OBJECTIVE To investigate the drug resistance and distribution of nosocomial infection(NI) pathogens.METHODS A total of 1 163 strains of NI pathogens during Jan 2002-Dec 2005 were completely surveyed and analyzed.RESULTS From them Gram-positive cocci were 376 strains(32.3%),the main pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus(12.7%),the average isolation rate of MRSA was 82.5%.Gram-negative bacilli were 474 strains(40.8%),the predominant pathogens were Escherichia coli(9.9%),Klebsiella pneumoniae(7.1%),Pseudomonas aeruginosa(5.4%),and Enterobacter cloacae(5.2%).The drug resistance of NI pathogens was markedly increased.Especially,the rates of drug resistance of P.aeruginosa to ceftazidime and imipenem were from 0 to 48.9% in 2005.CONCLUSIONS The Gram-negatives of NI pathogens are markedly increase year by year.The drug resistance rate of pathogens is higher,the clinically selected anti-bacterial drugs should be based on the bacterial culture and drug susceptibility test.

Bacterial Distribution and Drug-resistance of Isolated Enterococci in Clinical Specimens / 中华医院感染学杂志

OBJECTIVE In order to supply the basis of reasonable use of antibiotics,investigation of the change in distribution and drug-resistance of isolated enterococci was made in our hospital.METHODS Enterococci were cultured,isolated and identified with ATB Expression microbe identification system.Drug-resistance was detected with ATB ENTEROC and was statistically analyzed.RESULTS A total of 1 354 strains of enterococci were isolated from 50 148 clinical specimens,the isolation rate was 2.7%.The main strain of enterococci was Enterococcus faecalis.E.faecium was the second one.The isolation rate of enterococci,which were the highest in urine specimens,was increasing in sputum specimens year by year.The drug-resistance rate of enterococci to erythromycin,rifampin,ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin was high,but it was still sensitive to vancomycin and teicoplanin.CONCLUSIONS Great changes have taken place in bacterial distribution and drug-resistance of isolated enterococci,and the drug-resistance of strains of enterococci differed greatly.To insure effective treatment and decrease the infection of enterococci in hospital,the antibiotics sensitive to enterococci should been used on the basis of drug-resistance test when the infection of enterococci was treated clinically.

Mohnarin Report 2006-2007:Bacterial Distribution and Resistance in Biliary Tract Infections / 中华医院感染学杂志

OBJECTIVE To determine the bacterial distribution and resistance of biliary tract infections in China.METHODS Disc diffusion test,MIC test or E-test were used to detect the antimicrobial sensitivity of bacterial isolates from bile specimens.WHONET software was applied for analysis of the bacterial sensitive data from 84 tertiary Mohnarin member hospitals at different area in China from June 1,2006 to May 31,2007.RESULTS A total of 1441 bacterial strains were collected in the survey period,which included 952 Gram-negative strains(66.1%),of which the top three were Escherichia coli(31.0%),Klebsiella pneumoniae(8.4%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa(7.8%) and 489 Gram-positive strains(33.9%),the top three were Enterococcus faecalis(11.6%),E.faecium(9.5%) and Staphylococcus(7.4 %).Susceptibility results showed that the resistant rates of E.coli and K.pneumoniae to three generation cephalosporins and quinolones were 25.9-70.0%,17.9-44.8% and 66.9-70.9%,34.6-40.0%,respectively,which were comparable with the results of overall bacteria collection.The resistant rates of P.aeruginosa to imipenem and cefoperazone/sulbactam were 37.5%,13.8%,and the detection rate of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) from bile samples was higher than the results of overall bacteria collection.Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus(VRE) were rare.CONCLUSIONS Gram-negative bacilli are still the predominant pathogens in biliary tract infections;the overall bacterial resistance is severe.MRSA is increasing.Prudent application of antibiotics in biliary tract infections needs to be emphasized.

Microbial Population Distribution in Intensive Care Unit: Analysis of Its Alteration / 中华医院感染学杂志

OBJECTIVE To study the alteration of microbial population distribution in intensive care unit (ICU) for the reference to clinical drug administration. METHODS The distributed features of 413 strains of infection germs detected among the patients of ICU were statistically analyzed during the years of 2002 to 2005. RESULTS The main germs of 413 strains were Pseudomonas aeruginosa(87 strains), Acinetobacter baumannii(48 strains), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia(34 strains), Staphylococcus epidermidis(30 strains), S. aureus (20 strains) and Escherichia coli (19 strains). The first 3 species were P. aeruginosa (21.07%), A. baumannii(11.62%) and Sten. maltophilia (8.23%). CONCLUSIONS Most pathogens in ICU are Gram-negative bacteria and the proportion of Sten. maltophilia increases gradually. It is a very important clinical value to inspect the bacterial distribution and antibiotics should be used rationally.