ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of Saccharomyces boulardii and Bifidobacterium triple live bacteria in the treatment of pediatric diarrhea. METHODS Retrieved from PubMed， Embase， the Cochrane Library， CBM， Wanfang data， CNKI and VIP， randomized controlled trials （RCTs） about S. boulardii （S. boulardii group） versus Bifidobacterium triple liver bacteria （Bifidobacterium group） were collected. After screening the literature， extracting data and evaluating the quality， meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS A total of 9 RCTs were included， involving 898 patients. Results of meta-analysis showed there was no statistical significance in total response rate [OR＝1.69， 95%CI （0.93， 3.09）， P＝0.09]， duration of diarrhea [MD＝－1.39， 95%CI （－3.35， 0.57）， P＝0.16]， the time of abdominal pain disappearance [MD＝0.09， 95%CI（－0.87， 1.05），P＝0.86] or the incidence of adverse reactions [OR＝0.65， 95%CI （0.05， 8.03）， P＝0.74]. The number of stools in S. boulardii group was significantly less than Bifidobacterium group [MD＝－0.91， 95%CI （－1.80， －0.02）， P＝0.04]. The results of subgroup analysis showed that the duration of diarrhea in children with antibiotic-associated diarrhea in S. boulardii group was significantly shorter than Bifidobacterium group （P＜0.05）. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy and safety of S. boulardii are similar to those of Bifidobacterium in the treatment of diarrhea， but S. boulardii is better than Bifidobacterium in terms of stool number， the duration of diarrhea in children with antibiotic-associated diarrhea.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the beauty of mesalazine combined with Bifid Triple viable bacilli clinical efficacy in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.Methods 72 patients with ulcerative colitis ( UC) in zhoushan maternal and child health hospital were selected and divided into experimental group and control group,36 cases in each group.The control group was treated with oral administration of melamine and the experimental group was treated with Bifidobacterium triple live bacteria on the basis of oral control group.The levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA) and reactive protein ( CRP) concentration in serum of patients were detected.Follow up observation and record of the experimental group and the control group to improve the symptoms, clinical efficacy and adverse reactions after treatment.Results After treatment,serum MDA, CRP concentrations of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment concentration, SOD concentration was significantly increased, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05) , serum MDA, CRP levels in the experimental group were lower than the control group, the concentration of SOD was significantly higher than control group,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05) .After treatment, abdominal pain, diarrhea, mucus and blood stool symptoms of two groups were significantly improved compared with before treatment, abdominal pain, diarrhea and bloody mucus symptoms in the experimental group were lower than the control group(P<0.05).Incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group was significantly lower than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion The efficacy of oral administration of methadiazole in combination with Bifidobacterium triple live bacteriain the treatment of ulcerative colitis is significant, Can reduce MDA, CRP concentration, increased SOD activity.