Stent angioplasty of narrowed right ventricular outflow conduits and pulmonary arteries consistently reduces right ventricular systolic pressures and delays subsequent surgeries

Objectives Narrowed right ventricular (RV) outflow conduits and pulmonary arteries (PA) increase RV pressures and warrant interventions. Stent angioplasty is an alternative to more morbid redo-surgery in developing countries. We evaluate the efficacy and safety of stenting and assess need for redo-surgical reinterventions on midterm follow-up after stent angioplasty. Methods Patients who underwent conduit, main PA and bilateral branch PA stenting for elevated RV pressures were analyzed retrospectively. Success was defined as 20% reduction in RV pressures or RV-aortic pressure ratio; 50% reduction in gradients or 50% increase of luminal diameter. Procedural results, complications and need for redo surgeries on follow-up were assessed. Results Among 60 patients aged 1–46 years, 57 were post-operative patients, who needed stenting at a median period of 48 months after surgery. Stenting succeeded in 98% and reduced RV pressures from 105.42 ± 28.39 mmHg to 54.46 ± 16.89 mmHg. Direct major procedural complications in five (8%) patients included procedural failure in one, stent migration in three and lung hemorrhage in one. None of the stented conduits needed a surgical change on a follow-up ranging 3–120 months. Following bilateral PA stenting in twenty-four patients, only two needed a repeat open-heart surgery during follow-up ranging 3–108 months. Catheter reinterventions on follow-up included elective percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation in nine patients and stent redilation in seven patients. Conclusions Stent angioplasty was safe and effective. Surgery was postponed in all stenosed conduits. Elective redilation of stents after bilateral PA stenting may be needed for somatic growth; but open-heart repeat surgeries can be avoided in a majority.

Long-term outcomes following left main bifurcation stenting in Indian population—Analysis based on SYNTAX I and II scores

Background Syntax 1 and recently Syntax 2 (SS2) scores are validated risk prediction models in coronary disease. Objectives To find out the long term outcomes following stenting for unprotected left main bifurcation disease (LMD) and to validate and compare the performance of the SYNTAX scores 1 and 2 (SS1 and SS2 PCI) for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in Indian population. Methods Single-center, retrospective, observational study involving patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with at least one stent implanted for the LMD. Discrimination and calibration models were assessed by ROC curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Results Data of 103 patients were analyzed. The mean SS1 and SS2 scores were 27.9 and 30.7 and MACE was 16.5% at 4 years. The target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate at 4 years was 11(10.7%). There were 4 deaths (3.8%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was the only variable in SS2, which predicted cardiac events. ROC curve analysis showed both models to be accurate in predicting TLR and mortality following LM PCI. SS2 score showed a better risk prediction than SSI with AUC for TLR (SSI 0.560 and SS2PCI 0.625) and AUC for mortality (SS1 0.674 and SS2PCI 0.833). Hosmer-Lemeshow test validated the accuracy of both the risk models in predicting the events. Conclusions Both risk models were applicable for Indian patients. The SS2 score was a better predictor for mortality and TLR. In the SS2 score, the LVEF was the most useful predictor of events after LM PCI.