Experimental research of treating osteoporosis with the method of kidney-tonifying and bone-strengthening massage therapy / 国际中医中药杂志

Based on the kidney controlling bones of traditional Chinese medicine theory,this article researched the effects of treating osteoporosis with the method of kidney-tonifying and bone-strengthening massage therapy.Commonly used method of modeling included ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis (OVX),senile rat model of osteoporosis and glucocorticoid induced rat model of osteoporosis (GIOP),kidney-tonifying and bone-strengthening massage therapy were applied on these models,and the rat bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical marker of bone metabolism changes were observed.Confirmed by animals experiment,it was effective to repair a bone in all rat osteoporosis models with kidney-tonifying and bone-strengthening massage,which provided theoretical basis and methodological guidance for the use of kidney-tonifying and bone-strengthening massage therapy in the clinical treatment of osteoporosis.

Comparison of the Effects of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Bone Mineral Density, Lipid Profiles, and Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism / 대한폐경학회지

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of hormone replacement therapy on bone mineral density (BMD), biochemical markers of bone turnover, and lipid profiles in postmenopausal women. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 199 postmenopausal women who had received care at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Catholic University Seoul St. Mary's Hospital between January 1994 and December 2008. The patients were divided into the following three groups: group 1 received combined estrogen and progesterone therapy (n = 91); group 2 received estrogen only (n = 65); and group 3 received tibolone (n = 43). We compared the changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover, lipid profiles, and BMD during therapy. RESULTS: The BMD of the lumbar spine increased in groups 1 and 3 by 2.0% and 1.2%, respectively, and the BMD of the total femur increased in groups 1 and 2 by 2.3% and 0.5% from the initial values after 3 years, respectively. However, the BMD of the femoral neck and total femur decreased significantly in group 3 by 4.8% and 1.9%, respectively, 3 years after treatment initiation (P < 0.05). Serum osteocalcin and urinary deoxypyridinoline decreased in all groups 1 year after treatment. In groups 1 and 3, the total cholesterol level decreased and the triglycerides level increased. However, there were no definite changes in the total cholesterol and triglycerides levels in group 2. The high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL)-cholesterol level increased in groups 1 and 2, but decreased in group 3. As a result, the BMD of the lumbar spine increased and the total cholesterol level decreased in the combined therapy and tibolone groups. Tibolone had no beneficial effect on the BMD of the femoral neck. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that each therapy has different effects on BMD, biochemical markers of bone metabolism, and lipid profiles. A prospective study involving a larger group, and considering multiple factors, will be required to obtain more clinically meaningful conclusions.

Comparison of the Effects of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Bone Mineral Density, Lipid Profiles, and Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism / 대한폐경학회지

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of hormone replacement therapy on bone mineral density (BMD), biochemical markers of bone turnover, and lipid profiles in postmenopausal women. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 199 postmenopausal women who had received care at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Catholic University Seoul St. Mary's Hospital between January 1994 and December 2008. The patients were divided into the following three groups: group 1 received combined estrogen and progesterone therapy (n = 91); group 2 received estrogen only (n = 65); and group 3 received tibolone (n = 43). We compared the changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover, lipid profiles, and BMD during therapy. RESULTS: The BMD of the lumbar spine increased in groups 1 and 3 by 2.0% and 1.2%, respectively, and the BMD of the total femur increased in groups 1 and 2 by 2.3% and 0.5% from the initial values after 3 years, respectively. However, the BMD of the femoral neck and total femur decreased significantly in group 3 by 4.8% and 1.9%, respectively, 3 years after treatment initiation (P < 0.05). Serum osteocalcin and urinary deoxypyridinoline decreased in all groups 1 year after treatment. In groups 1 and 3, the total cholesterol level decreased and the triglycerides level increased. However, there were no definite changes in the total cholesterol and triglycerides levels in group 2. The high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL)-cholesterol level increased in groups 1 and 2, but decreased in group 3. As a result, the BMD of the lumbar spine increased and the total cholesterol level decreased in the combined therapy and tibolone groups. Tibolone had no beneficial effect on the BMD of the femoral neck. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that each therapy has different effects on BMD, biochemical markers of bone metabolism, and lipid profiles. A prospective study involving a larger group, and considering multiple factors, will be required to obtain more clinically meaningful conclusions.