ABSTRACT
Objective:To provide a basis for selecting the optimization method for intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (IC/ISBT) of cervical cancer by comparing graphical optimization (GO), inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA), and hybrid inverse planning optimization (HIPO) using dosimetric and radiobiological models.Methods:This study selected 65 patients with cervical cancer who were treated with image-guided IC/ISBT. The afterloading therapy plans for these patients were optimized using GO, IPSA, and HIPO individually, with a prescription dose high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) D90 of 6 Gy. The non-parametric Friedman test and the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank test were employed to analyze the differences in duration, dose-volume parameters, and radiobiology between the three types of optimized plans. Results:Inverse planning optimization (IPSA: 46.53 s; HIPO: 98.36 s) took less time than GO (135.03 s). In terms of gross target volume (GTV) dose, the high-dose irradiation V150% (53.66%) was slightly higher in the HIPO-optimized plans, while the V200% (30.29%) was higher in the GO-optimized plans. The GO-optimized plans had a higher conformity index (CI; 0.91) than other plans, showing statistically significant differences. Compared with other plans, the HIPO-optimized plans showed the lowest doses of D1 cm 3 and D2 cm 3 at bladders and rectums and non-statistically significant doses at small intestines ( P > 0.05). In terms of the equivalent uniform biologically effective dose (EUBED) for HRCTV, the HIPO-optimized plans showed a higher value (12.35 Gy) than the GO-optimized plans (12.23 Gy) and the IPSA-optimized plans (12.13 Gy). Moreover, the EUBED at bladders was the lowest (2.38 Gy) in the GO-optimized plans, the EUBED at rectums was the lowest (3.74 Gy) in the HIPO-optimized plans, and the EUBED at small intestines was non-significantly different among the three types of optimized plans ( P = 0.055). There was no significant difference in the tumor control probability (TCP) predicted using the three types of optimized plans ( P > 0.05). The normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) of bladders and rectums predicted using the HIPO-optimized plans were lower than those predicted using the GO- and IPSA-optimized plans( χ2 = 12.95-38.43, P < 0.01), and the NTCP of small intestines did not show significant differences ( P > 0.05). Conclusions:Among the three types of optimization algorithms, inverse optimization takes less time than GO. GO-optimized plans are more conformal than IPSA- and HIPO-optimized plans. HIPO-optimized plans can increase the biological coverage dose of the target volume and reduce the maximum physical/biological exposure and NTCP at bladders and rectums. Therefore, HIPO is recommended preferentially as an optimization algorithm for IC/ISBT for cervical cancer.
ABSTRACT
Objective To establish a model for the calculation of biologically effective dose (BED) and EQD2 (Equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions) in radioactive seed implantation brachytherapy.Methods The BED formula for EBRT(external beam radiotherapy) and for continuous low dose-rate irradiation established under the L-Q model were introduced.The EDQ2 formula for the continuous low dose-rate irradiation (radioactive seed implantation) was established according to the definition of EQD2 and the formula of BED.The α/β values of common tissues and the Tr 1/2 values reported in the literature were summarized.The EDQ2 formula were further simplified by using the actual values.The empirical formula of EDQ2 for early reaction tissues and late reaction tissues were proposed,named as Wang-Peng empirical formula.EDQ2≈ (10/12) D (Wang-Peng Formula 1) was fit for early response tissue,and EDQ2≈ D/2 (Wang-Peng Formula 2) for late reaction tissues.Further examples on the clinical applications of the proposed formula were given,including primary lung cancer,supraclavicular lymph node metastasis of esophageal cancer and celic lymph node metastasis of cervical carcinoma.Results According to the Wang-Peng empirical formula,the EDQ2 of the late reaction tissue adjacent to the tumor was only about half that of the tumor tissue,so the radioactive seed implantation brachytherapy naturally protected the late reaction tissue by the biological equivalent dose.The actual calculation,showed that the empirical formula of early reaction tissue was more accurate,but the empirical formula of late reaction orgtissue was less inaccurate and could only be roughly estimated.Conclusions The BED calculation formula introduced here and the set of EQD2 calculation formula and Wang-Peng empirical formula established here were theoretically feasible and could be used for the conversion and superposition between the physical dose of radioactive seed implantation brachytherapy and the external irradiation dose.But it should be careful to apply the formula,pay attention to the default conditions,and carefully interpret the calculated results.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal biologically equivalent dose (BED) for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) by comparing local control rates in proportion to various total doses and fractionation schedules. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with early non-small-cell lung cancer and a single metastatic lung tumor were included in this study. Differences in local control rates were evaluated according to gender, primary tumor site, response, tumor size, and BED. For comparison of BEDs, the prescribed dose for SBRT was stratified according to three groups: high (BED > 146 Gy), medium to high (BED, 106 to 146 Gy), and low to medium (BED or = 3 cm showed a significant dose-response relationship. The observed 2-year local recurrence-free survival rates in patients with a tumor size of or = 3 cm were 96.2% and 50.0%, respectively, which were significantly different (p=0.007). CONCLUSION: BED > 100 Gy is required in order to achieve a > 85% local control rate regardless of tumor size. The optimal dose for small tumors of 150 Gy) may be required for patients with a tumor size larger than 3 cm.
Subject(s)
Humans , Appointments and Schedules , Lung Neoplasms , Lung , Neoplasm Metastasis , Radiosurgery , Recurrence , Survival RateABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the advantage of altered fractionation radiotherapy by calculating the accumulative effects of daily biologically effective dose (BED) to find out the difference between conventional fractionated radiotherapy and altered fractionation radiotherapy.Methods The data in the report of hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer published by Cochrane Collaboration in 2010 was analyzed.Based on the radiotherapy processes mentioned in this report,the accumulative effects of daily BED were calculated and compared in different radiotherapy processes by using linear-quadratic mode.The variation of BED in different radiotherapy processes was find out.Results In total dose of unity as the premise of 70 Gy,altered fractionation especially the hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy could give a higher BED to the tumor during a shorter period,hyperfractionated radiotherapy could give a lower BED to normal tissues,and hyperfractionated radiotherapy with split course could give higher BED to the tumor while lower BED to normal tissues.Conclusions The variation of BED in different radiotherapy processes can be shown clearly by linear-quadratic mode.It can be simple and shortcut through mathematical models for the evaluation of different radiotherapy plan,on clinical symptomatic selection play a guiding role in tumor therapy.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To find the optimal values of total arc degree to protect the normal brain tissue from high dose radiation in stereotactic radiotherapy planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: With Xknife-3 planning system & 4 MV linear accelerator, the authors planned under various values of parameters. One isocenter, 12, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 mm of collimator diameters, 100degrees, 200degrees, 300degrees, 400degrees, 500degrees, 600degrees of total arc degrees, and 30degrees or 45degrees of arc intervals were used. After the completion of planning, the plans were compared each other using V50 (the volume of normal brain that is delivered high dose radiation) and integral biologically effective dose. RESULTS: At 30degrees of arc interval, the values of V50 had the decreased pattern with the increase of total arc degree in any collimator diameter. At 45degrees arc interval, up to 400degrees of total arc degree, the values of V50 decreased with the increase of total arc degree, but at 500degrees and 600degrees of total arc degrees, the values increased. At 30degreesdegreesof arc interval, integral biologically effective dose showed the decreased pattern with the increase of total arc degree in any collimator diameter. At 45degrees arc interval with less than 40 mm collimator diameter, the integral biologically effective dose decreased with the increase of total arc degree, but with 50 and 60 mm of collimator diameters, up to 400degrees of total arc degree, integral biologically effective dose decreased with the increase of total arc degree, but at 500degrees and 600degrees of total arc degrees, the values increased. CONCLUSION: In the stereotactic radiotherapy planning for brain lesions, planning with 400degrees of total arc degree is optimal. Especially, when the larger collimator more than 50 mm diameter should be used, the uses of 500degrees and 600degrees of total arc degrees make the increase of V50 and integral biologically effective dose. Therefore stereotactic radiotherapy planning using 400degrees of total arc degree can increase the therapeutic ratio and produce the effective outcome in the management of personal and mechanical sources in radiotherapy department.