Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 54
Filter
1.
Chinese Journal of Traumatology ; (6): 174-177, 2023.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-981920

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE@#Abdominal CT scan using oral and intravenous (IV) contrast is helpful in the diagnosis of intra-abdominal injuries. However, the use of oral and IV contrast delays the process of diagnosis and increases the risk of aspiration. It has also been shown that CT scan with IV contrast alone is as helpful as CT scan with oral and IV contrast and rectal CT scan in detecting abdominal injuries. Therefore, the present study aims to prospectively compare the diagnostic value of CT scan with oral and IV contrast versus CT scan with IV contrast alone in the diagnosis of blunt abdominal trauma (BAT).@*METHODS@#Altogether 123 BAT patients, 60 (48.8%) women and 63 (51.2%) men with the mean age of (40.4 ± 18.7) years who referred to the emergency department of Imam Khomeini Educational and Medical Center in Sari, Iran (a tertiary trauma center in north of Iran) from November 2014 to March 2017 and underwent abdominal CT scans + laparotomy were investigated. Those with penetrating trauma or hemodynamically unstable patients were excluded. The participants were randomly allocated to two groups: abdominal CT scan with oral and IV contrast (n = 63) and CT scan with IV contrast alone (n = 60). No statistically significant difference was found between two groups regarding the hemodynamic parameters, age, gender, injury mechanisms (all p > 0.05). The results of CT scan were compared with that of laparotomy results. The collected data were recorded in SPSS version 22.0 for Windows. Quantitative data were presented as mean and SD.@*RESULTS@#The sensitivity and specificity of CT scan using oral and IV contrast in the diagnosis of BAT were estimated at 96.48 (95% CI: 90.73 - 99.92) and 92.67 (95% CI: 89.65 - 94.88), respectively; while CT scan with IV contrast alone achieved a comparable sensitivity and specificity of 96.6 (95% CI: 87.45 - 99,42 and 92.84 (95% CI: 89.88 - 95.00), respectively.@*CONCLUSION@#CT scan with IV contrast alone can be used to assess visceral injuries in BAT patients with normal hemodynamics to avoid diagnostic delay.


Subject(s)
Male , Humans , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Delayed Diagnosis , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Sensitivity and Specificity , Retrospective Studies
2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-218753

ABSTRACT

Two cases of blunt mesenteric injury were presented. In both cases, contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen showed contrast extravasation in the intraperitoneal cavity (indicating injury of the superior mesenteric artery), bowel Wall thickening, hemoperitoneum and mesenteric hematoma. Under impression of mesenteric injury, emergency laparotomy was performed in both of the patients: two lacerations of the jejunal mesentery were identified in patient I and one laceration of the ileal mesentery was found in patient 2. Bowel resection was carried out in both of the patients. The course was uneventful during the 12 days and 11 days of hospitalization for patients 1 and 2 respectively

3.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-221258

ABSTRACT

Background: Gastrointestinal perforation is a common abdominal emergency having a high morbidity and mortality. Missed diagnosis and late intervention are frequent causes of increased morbidity and mortality especially in patients who survive the initial phase of insult. Diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal perforation remains a formidable problem in our country. Aim & Objevtives: To compare certain common etiologies and their outcomes in the following diseases and sites respectively Acid Peptic Disease–Duodenal/Gastric Typhoid- Ileal Diverticulitis-Colon Trauma-Any Part Retrospec Methods: tive observational study of 50 Operated Patients done in Government Medical College Surat during period of September 2019 to December 2020 According to Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. Data is analysed using descriptive statistics (Percentage, Proportions). Among 50 cases of hollow viscus Results & Conclusion: perforation, Peptic perforation was common (33 out of 50 cases). Next being Ileal perforation. Jejunum was common site of perforation in blunt abdominal trauma. Peptic Perforations are more commonly seen in 40-60yrs of age group with alcohol and smoking as their addiction, with worker as occupation. Typhoid Perforations are more commonly seen in 20-40yrs of age group. In this study except for wound dehiscence in 4 cases which needed secondary suturing, no major morbidity noted. 4% mortality noted in the present study.

4.
Rev. cuba. cir ; 61(1)mar. 2022.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1408227

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El traumatismo abdominal cerrado puede provocar lesiones orgánicas graves con hemorragias que demandan un tratamiento quirúrgico emergente y es la principal causa de muertes evitables en todos los grupos de edad. Objetivo: Evaluar las características clínico quirúrgicas de los pacientes con trauma cerrado de abdomen. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo y retrospectivo para evaluar el comportamiento del trauma cerrado de abdomen en 81 pacientes atendidos en el Hospital General Provincial Docente "Roberto Rodríguez Fernández" de Morón desde enero del 2014 hasta diciembre de 2019. Resultados: El adulto joven fue el grupo de edad predominante (34,6 por ciento) del sexo masculino (19,8 por ciento), el accidente de tránsito (48,1 por ciento) fue la causa principal. El cuadro hemorrágico (39,5 por ciento) seguidos del cuadro doloroso abdominal (38,3 por ciento) representaron los síntomas clínicos más relevantes. La positividad de los exámenes auxiliares estuvo representada por la ecografía abdominal (74,1 por ciento) seguida de la punción abdominal (9,9 por ciento. Las lesiones hepáticas (27,0 por ciento) seguidas de las esplénicas (19,0 percent) fueron las vísceras macizas más afectadas. El 77,8 por ciento fue intervenido quirúrgicamente y las técnicas quirúrgicas hepáticas fueron las más empleadas para un total de 17 casos (26,9 por ciento). El choque hipovolémico (12,7 por ciento) fue la complicación posoperatoria más encontrada. Se reportó un 12,3 por ciento de fallecidos. Conclusiones: El paciente con trauma cerrado de abdomen debe ser considerado siempre politraumatizado cuyo tratamiento inicial se dirige a la estabilización rápida e identificación de lesiones que amenacen la vida(AU)


Introduction: Blunt abdominal trauma can cause severe organ injury with hemorrhage demanding emergent surgical treatment. It is the leading cause of preventable death among all age groups. Objective: To assess the clinical-surgical characteristics of patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Methods: A descriptive and retrospective observational study was carried out to assess the characteristics of blunt abdominal trauma in 81 patients treated at Roberto Rodríguez Fernández General Provincial Teaching Hospital of Morón from January 2014 to December 2019. Results: Young adults represented the predominant age group (34.6 percent), together with the male sex (19.8 percent). Traffic accident (48.1 percent) was the main cause. Hemorrhagic symptoms (39.5 percent) was the most relevant clinical symptoms, followed by abdominal pain (38.3 percent). Positive results in complementary tests were represented by abdominal ultrasound (74.1 percent), followed by abdominal puncture (9.9 percent). Hepatic lesions (27.0 percent) was the most affected solid viscera, followed by splenic lesions (19.0 percent). 77.8 percent of cases were operated on and hepatic surgical techniques were the most frequently used, accounting for 17 cases (26.9 percent). Hypovolemic shock (12.7 percent) was the most frequent postoperative complication. A death rate of 12.3 percent was reported. Conclusions: The patient with blunt abdominal trauma should always be considered polytraumatized, in which case the initial treatment is aimed at rapid stabilization and identification of life-threatening injuries(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Young Adult , Postoperative Complications , Accidents, Traffic , Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Shock/complications , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Retrospective Studies , Observational Studies as Topic
5.
Vive (El Alto) ; 4(11)ago. 2021.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1390532

ABSTRACT

Resumen El bazo es el órgano que se lesiona con más frecuencia en el trauma abdominal cerrado, presentándose en 30 a 50% de los casos, principalmente por su fragilidad y localización, su tratamiento ha estado en constante cambio a lo largo del tiempo, siendo hoy en día más utilizado el manejo conservador por sobre el intervencionista, considerando sobre todo el mayor riesgo de mortalidad y las condiciones fisiológicas posteriores a la esplenectomía principalmente en niños y adolescentes. Objetivo. Realizar una revisión actual del diagnóstico, clasificación y tratamiento del trauma esplénico. Metodología . Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica incluyendo los descriptores relacionados con trauma esplénico y su tratamiento. Resultados. La identificación del trauma esplénico es de vital importancia para la supervivencia del paciente, el diagnostico se puede realizar mediante estudios de imagen eco-FAST o tomografía en dependencia del estado hemodinámico del paciente, la clasificación depende de las características anatómicas de las lesiones y orienta el tratamiento adecuado. Conclusiones. Actualmente el tratamiento conservador está recomendado para lesiones I-III; los estadios mayores (IV y V) o cualquier grado siempre y cuando exista compromiso hemodinámico implican tratamiento intervencionista o quirúrgico, no existe una diferencia significativa entre la utilización de técnica abierta vs laparoscópica.


Abstract The spleen is the organ that is most frequently injured in blunt abdominal trauma, occurring in 30 to 50% of cases, mainly due to its fragility and location, its treatment has been in constant change over time, today the conservative management is more widely used than interventionist, considering above all the greater risk of mortality and the physiological conditions after splenectomy, mainly in children and adolescents. Objective . To carry out a current review of the diagnosis, classification and treatment of splenic trauma. Methodology . A bibliographic review was carried out including the descriptors related to splenic trauma and its treatment. Results .The identification of splenic trauma is of vital importance for the survival of the patient, the diagnosis can be made by imaging studies, FAST ultrasound or tomography depending on the hemodynamic status of the patient, the classification depends on the anatomical characteristics of the lesions and guides the appropriate treatment. Conclusions . Conservative treatment is currently recommended for lesions I-III; the major stages (IV and V) or any grade whit hemodynamic compromise imply interventional or surgical treatment, there is no significant difference between the use of open versus laparoscopic technique.


Resumo O baço é o órgão mais frequentemente lesado no trauma abdominal fechado, ocorrendo em 30 a 50% dos casos, principalmente devido à sua fragilidade e localização, seu tratamento tem mudado constantemente ao longo do tempo, sendo hoje o manejo conservador mais utilizado que o intervencionista, considerando sobretudo o maior risco de mortalidade e as condições fisiológicas após a esplenectomia, principalmente em crianças e adolescentes. Objetivo . Fazer uma revisão atual do diagnóstico, classificação e tratamento do trauma esplênico. Metodologia . Foi realizada uma revisão bibliográfica incluindo os descritores relacionados ao trauma esplênico e seu tratamento. Resultados . A identificação do trauma esplênico é de vital importância para a sobrevida do paciente, o diagnóstico pode ser feito por exames de imagem echo-FAST ou tomografia dependendo do estado hemodinâmico do paciente, a classificação depende das características anatômicas das lesões e orienta o tratamento adequado. Conclusões . O tratamento conservador é atualmente recomendado para lesões I-III; os estágios principais (IV e V) ou em qualquer grau, desde que haja comprometimento hemodinâmico, implicam em tratamento intervencionista ou cirúrgico, não havendo diferença significativa entre o uso da técnica aberta e laparoscópica.

6.
Rev. méd. Paraná ; 79(Supl): 67-70, 2021.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1380528

ABSTRACT

O trauma é a 5ª. causa de morte no mundo e, na população com menos de 40 anos, é a maior causa de óbitos. O abdome é região frequentemente lesada e requer tratamento cirúrgico com frequência. Em se tratando de trauma contuso, exames de imagem oferecem diagnóstico mais acurado conduzindo tratamento mais adequado. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a relação dos achados tomográficos, do exame físico e a prevalência das lesões. Foram selecionados 39 politraumatizados e vítimas de trauma abdominal contuso, através de um estudo prospectivo. Foram comparados exame físico e o achado tomográfico. Em conclusão, mostrou-se que a avaliação clínica isoladamente pode fazer com que lesões passem desapercebidas; a tomografia computadorizada teve boa sensibilidade e especificidade devendo ser realizada para diagnosticar e melhor guiar a terapêutica.


Trauma is the 5th cause of death in the world and, in the population under 40 years old, it is the biggest cause of death. The abdomen is a frequently injured region and often requires surgical treatment. In the case of blunt trauma, imaging tests offer a more accurate diagnosis leading to more appropriate treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between tomographic and physical examination findings and the prevalence of lesions. Thirty-nine polytraumatized and victims of blunt abdominal trauma were selected through a prospective study. Physical examination and tomographic findings were compared. In conclusion, it has been shown that clinical assessment alone can make lesions go unnoticed; computed tomography had good sensitivity and specificity and should be performed to diagnose and better guide therapy.


Subject(s)
Humans , Therapeutics , Wounds and Injuries , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Abdomen , Abdominal Injuries
7.
Rev. chil. pediatr ; 91(5): 754-760, oct. 2020. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1144275

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los accidentes en bicicleta son una causa frecuente de trauma abdominal contuso en pediatría. En Chile no existen publicaciones científicas que traten sobre las lesiones abdominales por manubrio de bicicleta, su presentación y manejo. OBJETIVO: Describir tres casos clínicos de trauma abdominal contuso provocados por manubrio de bicicleta en niños, ilustrar las distintas lesiones observadas, sus formas de presentación y manejo. CASOS CLÍNICOS: 1) Paciente masculino, 11 años, consulta tras golpe con manubrio de bicicleta en epigastrio; en la Tomografía Computada (TC) de abdomen y pelvis se describió neumoretroperitoneo. Se realizó laparotomía exploradora, reparándose una perforación duodenal. 2) Paciente masculino, 14 años, consulta tras golpe en el hipocondrio izquierdo con el manubrio de la bicicleta; en la TC se evidenció fractura esplénica con múltiples laceraciones. Por la presencia de sangrado activo se trató con angioembolización, lográndose resolución de la lesión y viabilidad del órgano luego de 6 semanas de seguimiento. 3) Paciente masculino, 9 años, ingresó tras sufrir golpe con manubrio de bicicleta en el hipocondrio derecho. En TC se observó una laceración hepática, que fue manejada de forma expectante, con resolución de la lesión luego de 8 semanas de seguimiento. Todos los pacientes tuvieron una evolución favorable. CONCLUSIÓN: El trauma abdominal contuso por golpe con manubrio de bicicleta puede ser potencialmente grave en pacientes pediátricos, pudiendo afectar órganos sólidos y vísceras huecas. El manejo no quirúrgico cada vez es más utilizado, logrando altas tasas de éxito en pacientes estables. Los pacientes inestables o en los que se sospeche perforación de víscera hueca, requerirán cirugía como primera aproximación.


INTRODUCTION: Bicycle accidents are a frequent cause of blunt abdominal trauma in children. In Chile, there are no scientific articles about such accidents, their presentation and management. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe three cases of blunt abdominal trauma due to handlebar injury in children, in order to illustrate the different kinds of lesions, their presentation, and management. CLINICAL CASES: 1) 11-year-old boy presented to Emergency Department (ED) after falling on a bi cycle handlebar, hitting his epigastric region. A CT scan showed signs of duodenal perforation. A la parotomy was performed and the duodenal perforation repaired. 2) 14-year-old boy seen at ED after a bicycle accident in which the handlebar hit him in the abdomen area. A CT scan showed a splenic injury with multiple lacerations and active bleeding that was treated with angioembolization. After 6 weeks of follow-up, he presented resolution of the lesion and viability of the spleen. 3) 9-year-old boy admitted due to a hit with the bicycle handlebar on the abdomen area. A CT scan showed a he patic injury that was managed with non-surgical procedures, achieving resolution of the lesion after 8 weeks of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Blunt abdominal trauma caused by handlebar can be potentially serious in pediatric patients, since it may affect solid and hollow abdominal viscera. Non-surgical ma nagement is becoming more used for stable patients, achieving high success rates. Unstable patients or those with suspicion of hollow viscera perforation will require surgery as first approach.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child , Adolescent , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Bicycling/injuries , Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis , Abdominal Injuries/therapy , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Emergency Service, Hospital , Abdominal Injuries/etiology
8.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-213109

ABSTRACT

Background: Blunt abdominal trauma is fairly common emergency and it is one of the important components of polytrauma. It requires high degree of suspicion, investigation and management. Inspite of improved imaging techniques leading to early recognition it is still associated with high morbidity and mortality. Trauma is the leading cause of blunt abdominal injury. This aim of the study was to find etiology, early diagnosis and management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma.Methods: This a retrospective study conducted in Gandhi medical college, Bhopal in which 90 cases of blunt abdominal trauma presented to emergency and outpatient department were included in the study duration of January 2019 to December 2019.Results: Motor vehicle accident was the most common mode of injury. Liver being the most common visceral organ injured while the most common surgery performed was the repair or resection and anastomosis of hollow viscous perforation. Rib fracture was the most common extra abdominal injury seen in 17.7% cases. Mortality rate was 5.5%. Most of the liver, spleen and renal injuries can be managed non-operatively whereas hollow viscous injury needs laparotomy.Conclusions: The result of present study is similar to other studies. Rapid diagnosis, early and timely referral, adequate and trained staff, close and careful monitoring, early wise and skilled decision to go for operative or non-operative management can help save many lives.

9.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-212954

ABSTRACT

Background: worldwide road traffic accidents accounts as the leading cause of death of young people. For a very long time most of the intra-abdominal injuries following blunt abdominal trauma were managed operatively. Conservative management is becoming more acceptable and effective management option for blunt abdominal trauma during the last few decades.Methods: This study was conducted in Government Medical College, Kottayam during September 2007 to December 2008. All conservatively managed blunt abdominal trauma patients during the study period were included in the study.Results: Out of 22 patients, 4 patients failed conservative management. Success rate was 81%. Most commonly injured solid organ in the study group was liver (77%). Maximum cases were of age group 10 to 20 (31.81%) years. 81% of patients were males. Motor vehicle accident was the most common cause of trauma (77%). Mean stay in intensive care unit was 4.2 days and mean hospital stay was 15.7 days. Mean systolic blood pressure was 110 mmHg ranging from 70 to 130 mmHg. 50% of patients had moderate hemoperitoneum and non-had massive hemoperitoneum.Conclusions: Non operative management is safe and effective approach in blunt spleen and liver injuries. Non operative management should be treatment of choice for all hemodynamically stable patients with blunt liver and splenic trauma.

10.
Rev. cir. (Impr.) ; 72(1): 76-81, feb. 2020. tab, ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1092895

ABSTRACT

Resumen Introducción La lesión de la vesícula biliar secundaria a trauma abdominal cerrado constituye un evento infrecuente de perforación traumática de ella, de presentación tardía. Objetivo Revisar la literatura científica actualmente disponible y además describimos un caso. Materiales y Método Utilizando la plataforma PubMed se buscan las siguientes palabras clave: " Blunt abdominal trauma ". Se seleccionan las series con lesiones de la vesícula biliar: " Traumatic gallbladder rupture". Se seleccionan los reportes de lesiones aisladas de la vesícula biliar: " Isolated gallbladder rupture ". Se seleccionan los reportes de presentación tardía de lesiones aisladas de la vesícula biliar: " Delayed presentation of isolated gallbladder rupture ". Resultados De todas estas publicaciones se seleccionan las que a criterio de los autores son relevantes para el presente caso. Discusión La mayoría de las perforaciones de la vesícula biliar se producen en vesículas sanas de paredes delgadas distendidas por el ayuno o el consumo de alcohol. No existe una presentación clínica clásica. Los estudios imagenológicos son inespecíficos y se llega al diagnóstico definitivo durante la exploración quirúrgica. El tratamiento de esta lesión es la colecistectomía. Conclusiones El diagnóstico no es fácil, pero la resolución es relativamente simple y el pronóstico es bueno. El presente caso ilustra este tipo de lesiones en pacientes con trauma abdominal cerrado.


Introduction Gallbladder injury secondary to blunt abdominal trauma is a rare event. Aim Review the current available scientific literature and describe a case. Materials and Method Using the PubMed platform, the following keywords were searched: "Blunt abdominal trauma". Series with gallbladder lesions were selected: "Traumatic gallbladder rupture". Reports of isolated lesions of the gallbladder were selected: "Isolated gallbladder rupture". Reports of late presentation of isolated lesions of the gallbladder were selected: "Delayed presentation of isolated gallbladder rupture". Of all these publications, those that were relevant to the present case were selected according to the criteria of the authors. Case report A 20 years-old male patient suffered an abdominal trauma two weeks before presentation at our Institution. He underwent an exploratory laparotomy showing bilious content and a gallbladder perforation over the peritoneal wall as an isolated injury. Discussion Most isolated gallbladder perforations occur in healthy gallbladders with thin walls and distended because fasting or alcohol consumption. There are no classical clinical features to diagnose this specific injury and radiologic studies are nonspecific. Definitive diagnosis is often reached during surgery as it was with our patient. Recommended treatment is cholecystectomy. Conclusions This case illustrates this unique kind of gallbladder injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. A clear diagnosis is not easy however, the treatment is simple and prognosis is good.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Young Adult , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Cholecystectomy/methods , Gallbladder/injuries , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Gallbladder/surgery , Abdominal Injuries/surgery , Abdominal Injuries/complications , Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis
11.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-212663

ABSTRACT

Background: The liver is one of the most commonly injured organ in blunt abdominal trauma. Management of liver injury due to blunt abdominal trauma has been dramatically evolved in recent years. Dramatic change from operative management to non-operative management has improved survival in these patients, becoming the standard of care for most liver injuries.Methods: A retrospective study of the patients admitted with the diagnosis of isolated liver injury due to blunt abdominal trauma between 2013-2018. Data collected of 30 patients of isolated liver injury who either treated conservative management of operative management. Variable analyzed included demographic data, mechanism of injury, associated injury, conservative treatment, operative treatment, morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay.Results: A total of 30 patients were analyzed of isolated liver injury due to blunt abdominal trauma, 27 patient sustained minor liver injury (grade I, II and III), whereas 3 patients had major liver injury (grade IV, V and VI). 25 cases due to road traffic accident and 5 cases were due to falls from a height. 27 patients with American Association for the surgery of trauma grade I, II, III and 2 patients with grade IV, V managed conservatively, surgical intervention required in 1 patient with grade V, mortality occurred in 1 patient out of 29 who were treated conservatively.Conclusions: Isolated liver injury is common in the blunt abdominal trauma patient. Most of the patients with the liver injury with hemodynamically stable treated conservatively. Only a few of them require surgical management if they are hemodynamically unstable.

12.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-212048

ABSTRACT

Background: Blunt Abdominal trauma is one of the most common injuries caused due to road traffic accidents. The rapid increase in number of motor vehicles and its aftermath has caused rapid increase in number of victims due to blunt abdominal trauma. As the care of patients with blunt abdominal injuries is largely a surgical responsibility and abdominal injuries involving major hemorrhage from solid viscera constitute surgical emergencies. Abdominal blunt traumas represent a real diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to even a most experienced surgeon, thereby representing importance of its study. Early diagnosis and effective management help in decreasing mortality in blunt abdominal trauma.Methods: Prospective study of 50 patients admitted to the institute with history of Blunt Abdominal Trauma. After initial resuscitation of the patients, thorough assessments for injuries were carried out in all the patients. Documentation of patients, which included identification, history, clinical findings, diagnostic test, operative findings, operative procedures and complications during the stay in the hospital were all recorded on a Performa specially prepared. The management was decided depending upon history, clinical examination and investigations.Results: Males were predominantly affected, and most cases were between the age group of 21-40 years (76%). Majority of the patients (90%) presented with the complaint of abdominal pain followed by abdominal distension (56%). 36(60%) patients were managed conservatively while operative interventions were required in 24(40%) patients. The common surgeries performed in the patients included splenectomy, primary closure of perforation and resection and anastomosis of bowel. Majority of the patients (80%) were discharged within 20 days of admission. The mortality in present study was 13.3%.Conclusions: Blunt Abdominal Trauma is one of the important causes of morbidity and mortality in young adults. Immediate resuscitative measures, management of associated injuries and appropriate operative intervention are important parts of management of such cases.

13.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-210039

ABSTRACT

Purpose:Blunt abdominal trauma in children results in renal injury in approximately 10 to 20% of cases. In about 20% of these patients, significant complications may arise; for example urinoma(1%) and post trauma extravasation (2-18%). Urinomas and persistent hematuria were traditionally managed surgically by partial or total nephrectomy. Today, nonoperative management is well accepted for the majorityof high grade renal injuries, as organ preservation is highly desirable due to patients’ projected lifespan. We present a retrospective review of two cases of high renal injuries seen at GPHC’s Paediatric Surgical Department.Methods:In February and April 2019, two patients met the criteria for grade four renal injury. All medical records were reviewed. Cause of injury, complications, interventions and hospital stay were analyzed. These patients were followed up post discharge, clinically and radiologically. Results:Two males, ages 11 and 10 years, sustained blunt abdominal trauma and presented to GPHC with hematuria and abdominal tenderness. On initial assessment, they were hemodynamically stable and were diagnosed with grade four renal injuries by computed tomography. Complications developed after one week of hospitalization. One patient had persistent hematuria lasting over a week, requiring blood transfusions in excess of 4 units, and the other developed a urinoma, urinary tract infection and deep vein thrombosis. Both patients hadparalytic ileus and acute hypertension. These complications were all managed nonoperatively. The very large urinoma was successfully treated with percutaneous drainage after 25 days. Average hospital stay was 35 days and both patients had complete resolution of their renal injuries within 90 days post trauma. Conclusion:Nonoperative management of high-grade renal injury is highly successful and safe in children. Even in the presence of significant complications, preservation of renal tissue should be considered

14.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-185433

ABSTRACT

Background: Unrecognized blunt abdominal injuries are often causing of the preventable death. Clinical examination is frequently inaccurate and therefore, the reliable, accurate and repeatable bed-side diagnostic test should be chosen such as Sonography. This study was under-taken to assess Focused Assessment Sonography in Trauma (FAST) examination for in rural area in the patients with Blunt Abdominal Trauma.Material and Methods:This was the prospective study including all the trauma team cases in a 24 months period between March 2016 to February 2018 in emergency department of a Uttarpradesh University of Medical Sciences& hospital,Saifai. The results of the FASTscans were analyzed and when the FASTwas positive or followed by the period of the clinical observation when FASTwas negative. Descriptive statistics & sensitivity, specicity, & predictive values were calculated.Results: Total of 100 patients were included in our study and the majority of them were males and the commonest cause of injury was a Road Trafc Accident. The sensitivity & specicity of FASTwere 92.68% and 98.31%, respectively, with an accuracy of 96.0%.Conclusion:Our study found that FASTis the highly sensitive, specic, accurate initial bedside and reliable investigation in the patients with blunt abdominal trauma, which may be done rapidly even in the haemodynamically unstable patients, making it a useful tool.

15.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-188813

ABSTRACT

Blunt injury to abdomen is one of the most common injury caused by road traffic accidents. The advent of newer imaging techniques with high resolution computed tomography scanners (CT scan) has enabled the clinicians to exactly diagnose the extent of the intra abdominal injuries. High grade injuries are commonly managed by surgery but the shift to selective non operative management (NOM) of blunt injuries to abdominal solid organs are one of the most notable trends in the case of trauma. Methods: This study was conducted on 50 patients of blunt abdominal trauma admitted in Guru Nanak Dev Hospital, attached to Govt. Medical College, Amritsar. Patients of all age groups with blunt trauma abdomen were admitted in hospital. Results: In the present study, most common age group affected was 21-40 years (70%); out of which males were more commonly affected (90%); most common mode of injury was road traffic accident accounting for 76% of patients of all age groups. In this study, 2 out of 13 patients expired who were kept on NOM due to liver injuries. Failure to resuscitate these patients was the main cause of mortality. 4 out of 12 operative cases expired. Most common organ injured was liver (50%) followed by spleen (36%). Other organs injured were pancreas and kidney, 6% each. Mortality rate in patients who were receiving NOM was 5.26% while patients who received operative management had mortality rate of 33.3%. Conclusion: Morbidity and mortality can be prevented by timely initial resuscitation and correct diagnosis as well as management (non operative or operative) which depends on patient’s hemodynamic stability and findings of imaging studies.

16.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-202176

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Blunt abdominal trauma occurs when injuryto organs inside abdominal cavity is present due to externalforces exerted over abdomen as result of trauma. Widespectrum of clinical presentation is seen ranging from milderforms of injury to fatal solid organ injuries with irreversibleshock and ongoing bleeding. Management ranges fromwatchful observation to emergency laparotomy. Aim ofthis study was to evaluate different clinical presentation,organ specific injury and management of blunt abdominaltrauma.Material and Methods: A retrospective study with 25patients sustaining Blunt abdominal trauma who came toTrauma centre in Guru Gobindsingh Government Hospital,Jamnagar attached to medical college from 2016 to 2018 wereincluded. The patients were selected randomly.Results: Blunt abdominal injury was seen in all age from 1 to60 years. Highest incidence noted in age group 11 to 20 years.Male predominance was noted with Male: Female ratio21:4 of5.25:1.Most common mode of injury was road traffic accident(44%). Most common injured organ was Liver (32%).Liver and spleen injuries were associated with rib fractures.Abdominal pain and tenderness was most common clinicalpresentation (90%). Patients with hemodynamic instabilityhad more mortality.Conclusion: Blunt abdominal injury is one of the commonestinjuries encountered in polytrauma patients. Morbidity andmortality can be prevented by timely initial resuscitation andcorrect diagnosis as well as management (operative or nonoperative) which depend on patient’s hemodynamic stabilityand findings of imaging studies.

17.
Clinics ; 74: e729, 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1011901

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship between the serum levels of NLRP3 and HMGB-1 and the prognosis of patients with severe blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: In total, 299 patients were included in the current study from July 2014 to December 2015. All patients were divided into the mild/moderate blunt abdominal trauma group and the severe blunt abdominal trauma group according to their injury severity scores. Serum levels of NLRP3 and HMGB-1 were measured upon admission (0 h) and at 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 7 days after admission. RESULTS: Compared with the healthy controls, both the mild/moderate and severe blunt abdominal trauma groups had higher serum levels of NLRP3 and HMGB-1 at admission. At all points, the serum levels of NLRP3 and HMGB-1 were significantly higher in the severe group than in the mild/moderate group. The serum levels of both NLRP3 and HMGB-1 were significantly higher in the deceased patients than in the living patients. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that compared with patients with higher levels of NLRP3 or HMGB-1, those with lower levels had longer survival times. The serum levels of both NLRP3 and HMGB-1 were independent risk factors for 6-month mortality in severe blunt abdominal trauma patients. CONCLUSION: The serum levels of NLRP3 and HMGB-1 were significantly elevated in severe blunt abdominal trauma patients, and the serum levels of both NLRP3 and HMGB-1 were correlated with 6-month mortality in severe blunt abdominal trauma patients.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , HMGB1 Protein/blood , NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein/blood , Abdominal Injuries/blood , Prognosis , Injury Severity Score , China/epidemiology , Abdominal Injuries/mortality , Abdominal Injuries/therapy
18.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-187714

ABSTRACT

Background: Gastrointestinal and mesenteric injuries are the third most common type of injury from blunt trauma abdomen and are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality.Objectives: To determine the clinico-demographic profile, localization of injury, diagnostic and management methods and the outcome in cases of hollow viscus injury (HVI) following blunt trauma abdomen which were admitted to our unit. Methods: Records of patients who were admitted emergently with gastrointestinal injuries and blunt abdominal trauma between July 2014 and July 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Results: The study group comprised 65 patients with mean age of 33.3 ± 16.2 years and a male predominance (89.2%). The commonest cause of injury was road traffic accident in 44 (67.7%) cases. Ileum was the most common site of injury detected in 31 (41.3%) followed by jejunum in 26 (34.7%) cases. Treatment comprised primary closure of perforation in 48 (64%) cases, segmental resection and anastomosis in 22 (29.3%), and stoma in 5 (6.7%) cases. Three out of 5 cases of anastomotic leak occurred in patients who were operated at 8-24 hours or beyond. Associated injury to intra-abdominal solid viscera and other sites were present in 30.7%. The mean duration of hospitalization was longer in patients with associated injuries as compared to those with isolated HVI (12.2±4.6 days versus 9.3±0.8 days). Conclusion: Early diagnosis followed by prompt surgical intervention and careful monitoring for associated injuries is the key to favourable outcome in blunt HVI.

19.
Rev. chil. pediatr ; 88(4): 470-477, 2017. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-900005

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El manejo no operatorio (MNO) es el manejo estándar del trauma cerrado esplénico y hepático en el paciente pediátrico. Se han identificado como fallas a este manejo inestabilidad hemodinámica y transfusiones masivas. Pocos trabajos evalúan si existen factores que permitan una anticipación a estos eventos. El objetivo fue determinar la existencia de factores asociados a la falla en MNO de las lesiones esplénicas y/o hepáticas secundarias al trauma abdominal cerrado. Pacientes y Método: Análisis retrospectivo 2007 a 2015 de los pacientes que ingresaron al servicio de Cirugía infantil del Hospital Universitario San Vicente Fundación con trauma hepático y/o esplénico cerrado. Resultados: Ingresaron 70 pacientes con trauma cerrado de abdomen, 3 fueron excluidos por cirugía inmediata (2 inestabilidad hemodinámica y 1 irritación peritoneal). De 67 pacientes que recibieron MNO, 58 tuvieron éxito y 9 presentaron falla (8 inestabilidad hemodinámica y 1 lesión de víscera hueca). Encontramos 3 factores asociados a la falla MNO: presión arterial (PAS) < 90 mmHg al ingreso (p=0,0126; RR =5,19), caída de la Hemoglobina (Hb) > 2 g/dl en las primeras 24 h (p=0,0009; RR= 15,3), y transfusión de 3 o más unidades de glóbulos rojos (UGR) (0,00001; RR= 17,1). Mecanismo del trauma, severidad e Índice de Trauma Pediátrico no se asociaron con fallo MNO. Conclusiones: Los niños con trauma cerrado hepático o esplénico responden al MNO. Los factores como PA menor de 90 al ingreso, caída de la Hb >2 g/dl en las primeras 24 h y la transfusión de 3 o más UGR pueden asociarse con la falla en el MNO.


Introduction: The non operative management (NOM) is the standard management of splenic and liver blunt trauma in pediatric patients.Hemodynamic instability and massive transfusions have been identified as management failures. Few studies evaluate whether there exist factors allowing anticipation of these events. The objective was to identify factors associated with the failure of NOM in splenic and liver injuries for blunt abdominal trauma. Patients and Method: Retrospective analysis between 2007-2015 of patients admitted to the pediatric surgery at University Hospital Saint Vincent Foundation with liver trauma and/or closed Spleen. Results: 70 patients were admitted with blunt abdominal trauma, 3 were excluded for immediate surgery (2 hemodynamic instability, 1 peritoneal irritation). Of 67 patients who received NOM, 58 were successful and 9 showed failure (8 hemodynamic instability, 1 hollow viscera injury). We found 3 factors associated with failure NOM: blood pressure (BP) < 90 mmHg at admission (p = 0.0126; RR = 5.19), drop in hemoglobin (Hb) > 2 g/dl in the first 24 hours (p = 0.0009; RR = 15.3), and transfusion of 3 or more units of red blood cells (RBC) (0.00001; RR = 17.1). Mechanism and severity of trauma and Pediatric Trauma Index were not associated with failure NOM. Conclusions: Children with blunted hepatic or splenic trauma respond to NOM. Factors such as BP < 90 mmHg at admission, an Hb fall > 2 g/dl in the first 24 hours and transfusion of 3 or more units of RBC were associated with the failure in NOM.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Spleen/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnosis , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Conservative Treatment , Liver/injuries , Prognosis , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Treatment Failure
20.
Chinese Journal of Traumatology ; (6): 52-55, 2017.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-235704

ABSTRACT

Adrenal hemorrhage following blunt abdominal trauma is extremely rare. Most of the lesions are unilateral and right sided. Although often asymptomatic, life-threatening adrenal insufficiency may develop in the bilateral adrenal gland hemorrhage. Isolated adrenal injuries are very rare. They are often associated with other organ injuries. The mortality rates of patients range from 7% to 32%. In this report, we present the computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings of unilateral adrenal hemorrhages in two patients with a history of fall from a height.


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Male , Abdominal Injuries , Diagnostic Imaging , Adrenal Gland Diseases , Diagnostic Imaging , Hemorrhage , Diagnostic Imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Diagnostic Imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL