Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
China Journal of Endoscopy ; (12): 62-65, 2016.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-621339

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the effect of water-infusion colonoscopy and conventional air-infusion colonoscopy on the bowel cleanliness during withdrawing.Methods A single blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. 222 patients were randomly divided into water-infusion group (group A, 112 cases) and air-infusion group (group B, 110 cases). The cleanliness scores, scores improvement, pain scores, time of reaching cecum, depth of colonoscopy, rate of whole colon examination, adenoma detection rate (ADR), operator’s dififculty and complications were compared between the two groups.Results The cleanliness score during withdrawing was higher in group A [M(8)/IQR(1) vs M(8)/IQR(2),P = 0.000], the improvement was higher in group A [(0.53 ± 0.74) vs (0.23 ± 0.55), P = 0.000], the abdominal pain score was signiifcantly lower in group A [M(2)/IQR(1) vs M(4)/IQR(2),P = 0.000] and the ADR was higher in group A (36.61 % vs 23.64 %,P = 0.041). The operator’s dififculty evaluation score was signiifcantly lower in group A [M(1)/IQR(1) vs M(2)/IQR(1),P = 0.005]. There were no signiifcant differences at the time of reaching cecum, the depth of colonoscopy and the whole colon examination rate between the two groups.Conclusion Water-infusion colonoscopy could signiifcantly improve the bowel cleanliness during withdrawing scope, improve the ADR and reduce abdominal pain of patients, without increasing the time to reach cecum.

2.
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy ; (12): 611-613, 2013.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-439403

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the impact of sequence on the quality of bowel preparation in patients with anesthesia for same-day sequential bidirectional endoscopy and propose the optimal procedural sequence.Methods Single center blinded randomized observational study.Sixty-five patients were randomized to either the gastroscopy-first group or the colonoscopy-first group.Bowel cleanliness according to Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) scores were evaluated,also done the propofol dosage,caecal intubation time,procedure duration and complications.Results The BBPS score of entire colon showed no difference (6.72 ± 1.34 vs.6.89 ± 1.50,P =0.638),but the BBPS of ileal-cecum portion was higher in the colonoscopy-first group (1.21 ±0.54 vs.1.55 ±0.73,P =0.035).The total procedure time,propofol dosage and complications were similar between the two groups.Conclusion The bowel cleanliness of ileal-cecum portion in colonoscopy-first group is better than that of gastroscopy-first group during sequential bidirectional endoscopy in patients with propofol sedation.We propose colonoscopy first in patients with suspicious ileal-cecum lesion.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL