ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the clinical curative effect of Bushen Tiaochong method on treating early unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA). Methods 200 patients who conformed to the inclusion criteria were randomly and paralleled control study divided into two groups.The control group (routine tocolysis group,n =100 ),with 8 cases fell off. The experimental group (routine tocolysis group +traditional Chinese medicine group,n =100 ),with 10 cases fell off. Results After the treatment,the total efficiency of the control group was 70.65%,and the experimental group was 88.89%. The total efficiency of comparative difference was statistically significant (p<0.05 ). And compared the experimental group with the control group,the former group improved the level of human chorionic gonadotropin(HCG)in patients. Conclusion Bushen Tiaochong method with traditional Chinese medicine combined western medicine treatment can significantly improve the symptoms of URSA patients with threatened abortion. Compared with simple western medicine therapy,the former group has better curative effect on early unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion.
ABSTRACT
Healthy skin sources from sex hormone, the reproductive health is closely related with skin, they grow and decline together. The methods of regulating menstruation and whites, nourishing kidney for pregnancy clinically can make patients’ skin regain brilliance in the meantime of curing sterility, menstruation disease and pelvic inflammation, from this we can know TCM has broad prospect in beautification.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To observe clinical therapeutic effect of Bushen Tiaochong Decotion on anovulatory dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Methods:One hundred and twenty-eight out-patients were randomly divided into two groups.The treatment group(n=78)was treated by oral administration of Bushen Tiaochong Decoction and the control group(n=50)by oral administration of Provera. Results:The cured rate and the total effective rate were 67.9% and 94.8% in the treatment group and 50.0% and 88.0% in the control group,respectively,with significant difference between the two groups(both P