Comparison of haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation with two different videolaryngoscopes: A randomized clinical trial

Abstract Background: Endotracheal intubation (ETI), which is the gold standard in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), may cause myocardial ischaemia by disturbing the balance between haemodynamic changes and oxygen supply and consumption of the myocardium as a result of sympathetic stimulation. In this study, we aimed to compare two different videolaryngoscopes (C-MAC and Airtraq) in the hemodynamic response to ETI. Methods: Fifty ASA II-III CABG surgery patients were randomly assigned to C-MAC or Airtraq. The hemodynamic data included arterial blood pressure [systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP) and mean (MAP)] and heart rate (HR) and were recorded at six different points in time: before laryngoscopy-T1, during laryngoscopy-T2, immediately after intubation-T3, and 3 (T4), 5 (T5) and 10 (T6) minutes after intubation. Intraoperative complications were recorded. Patients were questioned about postoperative complications 2 and 24hours following extubation. Results: The hemodynamic response to ETI was significantly greater with C-MAC. The increase in HR started with the laryngoscopy procedure, whereas increases in SAP, DAP, and MAP started immediately after ETI (p = 0.024; p = 0.012; p = 0.030; p = 0.009, respectively). In group analyses, T1-T2, T2-T3 and T1-T3 comparisons did not show any significant differences in HR with Airtraq. However, with C-MAC, HR after intubation increased significantly compared to the pre-laryngoscopy values (T1-T3) (p = 0.004). The duration of laryngoscopy was significantly reduced with C-MAC (p < 0.001), but the duration of intubation and total intubation were similar (p = 0.36; p = 0.79). Conclusions: Compared to C-MAC, the hemodynamic response to ETI was less with Airtraq. Thus, Airtraq may be preferred in CABG patients for ETI.

Comparison of Truviewscope and C-Mac Video Laryngoscope with the Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope in Improving the Glottic View during Endotracheal Intubation

Background: In anesthetic practice, the introduction of multiple novel laryngoscopes has simplified visualization of the vocal cords and has reduced the complications arising due to difficult or failed tracheal intubation Both Truview scope and C-Mac video laryngoscope have been reported to provide a comparable or superior glottic view on comparison with conventional Macintosh laryngoscope Materials and methods: A randomized controlled study was conducted in 100 subjects scheduled for elective surgery equally divided into 2 groups Conventional Macintosh laryngoscopy was done initially in all subjects enrolled for the study For the Glottic view, One Group (n=50) underwent Truview laryngoscopy while the other (n=50) underwent C-Mac video laryngoscopy Results: The improvement in glottic view from original MCL (Modified Cormack & Lehane) grading obtained from Macintosh laryngoscope was 40% (n=23) in Truview compared to 46% (n=23) in CMac video laryngoscope while downgrading of view was observed in 10% (n=5) in group– T compared to none in C-Mac video laryngoscope There were no statistically significant difference in Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) scores between the groups (P = 0072) The mean duration of time R Vimal, A Sivanoli Comparison of Truviewscope and C-Mac Video Laryngoscope with the Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope in Improving the Glottic View during Endotracheal Intubation IAIM, 2018; 5(12): 125-133 Page 126 for endotracheal intubation with C-Mac video laryngoscope (2310 seconds) was significantly shorter compared with Truview laryngoscope (3126 seconds) Conclusions: There was an improvement in view of the glottis in both Truview and C-Mac video laryngoscope from the initial Macintosh laryngoscope view But C-Mac video laryngoscope offered better view improvement and also required a shorter time for intubation compared to Truview laryngoscope

Comparison of different stylets used for intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade® Videolaryngoscope: a randomized controlled study / Comparação de diferentes estiletes usados para intubação com o videolaringoscópio C-MAC D-Blade®: um estudo randômico e controlado

Abstract Objective The angle of the C-MAC D-Blade® videolaryngoscope, which is used for difficult airway interventions, is not compatible with routinely used endotracheal tubes. Methods A prospective randomized crossover study was performed comparing five intubation methods for use with standardized airways, including using different stylets or no stylet: Group HS, hockey-stick stylet; Group DS, D-blade type stylet; Group CS, CoPilot® videolaryngoscope rigid stylet®; Group GEB, gum elastic bougie; and Group NS, no stylet. A manikin was used to simulate difficult intubation with a Storz C-MAC D-Blade® videolaryngoscope. The duration of each intubation stage was evaluated. Results Participants in this study (33 anesthesiology residents and 20 anesthesiology experts) completed a total of 265 intubations. The number of attempts made using no stylet was significantly greater than those made for the other groups (p < 0.05 for group NS- group GEB, group NS- group DS, group NS- group CS and group NS- group HS). The duration to pass the vocal cords significantly differed among all groups (p < 0.001). The total intubation duration was shortest when using D-blade stylet, CoPilot stylet and hockey stick stylet. Although no difference was observed between stylet groups, a significant difference was found between each of these three and no stylet and gum elastic bougie (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Use of the correct stylet leads to a more efficient use of the Storz C-MAC D-Blade®. In our study, the use of the D-blade stylet, the CoPilot stylet and the hockey stick stylet provided quicker intubation, allowed easier passage of the vocal cords, and decreased the total intubation duration. To confirm the findings of our study, randomized controlled human studies are needed.

Resumo Objetivo O ângulo do videolaringoscópio C-D-MAC Blade®, usado para intervenções em via aérea difícil, não é compatível com os tubos endotraqueais rotineiramente usados. Métodos Um estudo prospectivo, randômico e cruzado foi conduzido para comparar cinco métodos de intubação em modelo de via aérea, com o uso de diferentes estiletes em cinco grupos: taco de Hockey; D-blade; CoPilot VL® rígido; Gum Elastic Bougie e controle (sem estilete). Um manequim foi utilizado para simular intubação difícil com o laringoscópio Storz C-MAC D-Blade®. Foi avaliada a duração de cada fase de intubação. Resultados Os participantes deste estudo (33 residentes de anestesiologia e 20 especialistas em anestesiologia) concluíram 265 intubações no total. O número de tentativas realizadas sem estilete foi significativamente maior que o dos outros grupos (p < 0,05 para SE-GEB, SE-DB, SE-CP e SE-HS). O tempo para passar pelas cordas vocais foi significativamente diferente entre todos os grupos (p < 0,001). O tempo total de intubação foi menor com o uso de D-blade, CoPilot VL® rígido e taco de Hockey. Embora não tenha havido diferença entre D-blade, CoPilot VL® rígido e taco de Hockey, uma diferença significativa foi observada entre cada um desses três e os grupos sem estilete e Gum Elastic Bougie (p < 0,05 e p < 0,001, respectivamente). Conclusão A escolha do estilete certo leva ao uso mais eficiente do videolaringoscópio Storz C-MAC D-Blade®. Em nosso estudo, o uso do D-blade, CoPilot VL® rígido e taco de Hockey proporcionou intubação mais rápida, facilitou a passagem pelas cordas vocais e diminuiu o tempo total de intubação. Para confirmar os resultados de nosso estudo, estudos controlados e randômicos com humanos são necessários.

Ease of Intubation with the McGRATH® MAC, C-MAC® or Macintosh Laryngoscopes by Novice Operators in Simulated Difficult Airways – A Manikin Study.

A variety of video laryngoscopes have been introduced to facilitate endotracheal intubations as failed intubations can result in morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the use of the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope, McGRATH® MAC and C- MAC® video laryngoscopes among novice operators. 37 medical students were recruited to perform oro-tracheal intubations in a human patient stimulator with simulated ‘difficult airway’ scenario using 3 devices: The Macintosh laryngoscope, McGRATH® MAC and C- MAC® video laryngoscopes. The success rate of tracheal intubation using the C-MAC® video laryngoscope (84%) was higher than both the McGRATH® MAC (59%) and the Macintosh laryngoscope (57%) (p=0.005). The use of video laryngoscopes were associated with lower incidence of oesophageal intubation (p<0.001) and deemed easier to use (p<0.001). Overall, the C-MAC® yielded a higher rate of successful tracheal intubation, a shorter time to glottic visualisation and was deemed to provide the greatest ease of intubation with novice practitioners.

Comparison of the conventional CMAC and the D-blade CMAC with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury-a manikin study / Comparação do C-MAC convencional e C-MAC D-blade com laringoscópios diretos em simulação de lesão da coluna cervical-estudo em modelo / Comparação do C-MAC convencional e C-MAC D-blade com laringoscópios diretos em simulação de lesão da coluna cervical-estudo em modelo / Comparación del C-MAC convencional y C-MAC D-blade con laringoscopios directos en simulación de lesión de la columna cervical (estudio en modelo)

BACKGROUND: CMAC videolaryngoscope has recently been introduced for videoscope guided intubation. The aim of our study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of the conventional blade and the angulated D blade of the CMAC videolaryngoscope with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury patients on the airway manikin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following power analysis, 33 resident doctors were enrolled to perform endotracheal intubation using all the 4 different laryngoscopes namely the Macintosh laryngoscope, McCoy laryngoscope, conventional CMAC videolaryngoscope and the D blade of the CMAC videolaryngoscopes on the airway manikin in simulated cervical spine injury. The demographic variables of the resident doctors were recorded. The outcomes measured included vocal cord visualization (Cormack-Lehane grading), time taken to intubate, number of attempts for successful intubation and optimizing maneuvers required. RESULTS: The use of indirect videolaryngoscopes resulted in better glottic visualization in comparison to the direct laryngoscopes (CL-I) in 20/33 (60.6%) in the Macintosh group, 24/33 (72.7%) in McCoy group, 30/33 in (90.9%) in Vlc group and 32/33 (96.9%) in Vld group. The time taken to intubate averaged to 15.54 ± 2.6 in Macintosh group, 18.90 ± 4.47 in McCoy group, 20.21 ± 7.9 in Vlc group and 27.42 ± 9.09 in Vld group. The 1st attempt intubation success rate was 84.8% (Macintosh), 72.7% (McCoy), 90.9% (Vlc) and, 78.7% (Vld). CONCLUSIONS: The overall performance of the conventional CMAC blade proved to be the best when compared with the D-blade CMAC, Macintosh blade and the McCoy blade for intubation in simulated cervical spine patients by anesthesia residents. .

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVO: o videolaringoscópio C-MAC foi recentemente introduzido para orientar a intubação. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar e avaliar a eficácia do laringoscópio C-MAC de lâmina convencional e C-MAC de lâmina angulada (D-blade) com laringoscópios diretos em simulação de pacientes com lesão de coluna cervical usando modelo de vias aéreas. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: após a análise do poder do estudo, 33 médicos residentes foram inscritos para realizar intubações endotraqueais, usando todos os quatro laringoscópios diferentes: laringoscópio Macintosh, laringoscópio McCoy, videolaringoscópios C-MAC convencional e C-MAC D-blade em modelos de vias aéreas com simulação de lesão da coluna cervical. As variáveis demográficas dos médicos residentes foram registradas. Os resultados avaliados incluíram visualização das pregas vocais (classificação de Cormack-Lehane), tempo necessário para intubar, número de tentativas para intubação bem-sucedida e manobras de otimização necessárias. RESULTADOS: o uso de laringoscópios indiretos resultou em melhor visualização da glote em comparação com os laringoscópios diretos (CL-I) em 20/33 (60,6%) no grupo Macintosh, 24/33 (72,7%) no grupo McCoy, 30/33 (90,9%) no grupo Vlc e 32/33 (96,9%) no grupo Vld. A média do tempo necessário para entubar foi de 15,54 ± 2,6 no grupo Macintosh, 18,90 ± 4,47 no grupo McCoy, 20.21 ± 7,9 no grupo Vlc e 27,42 ± 9,09 no grupo Vld. A taxa para a primeira tentativa de intubação bem-sucedida foi de 84,8% (Macintosh), 72,7% (McCoy), 90,9% (Vlc) e 78,7% (Vld). CONCLUSÃO: o desempenho geral da lâmina do C-MAC convencional mostrou ser melhor quando comparado com o das lâminas ...

JUSTIFICACIÓN Y OBJETIVO: el videolaringoscopio C-MAC fue recientemente introducido para orientar la intubación. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar y evaluar la eficacia del laringoscopio C-MAC de lámina convencional y C-MAC de lámina angulada (D-blade) con laringoscopios directos en una simulación de pacientes con lesión de la columna cervical usando modelo de vías aéreas. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: después del análisis del poder del estudio, 33 médicos residentes fueron inscritos para realizar intubaciones endotraqueales, usando 4 laringoscopios diferentes: laringoscopio Macintosh, laringoscopio McCoy, videolaringoscopios C-MAC convencional (Vlc) y C-MAC D-blade (Vld) en modelos de vías aéreas con simulación de lesión de la columna cervical. Las variables demográficas de los médicos residentes fueron registradas. Los resultados evaluados incluyeron la visualización de las cuerdas vocales (clasificación de Cormack-Lehane), tiempo necesario para intubar, número de intentos para intubación exitosa y maniobras de optimización necesarias. RESULTADOS: el uso de laringoscopios indirectos trajo como resultado una mejor visualización de la glotis en comparación con los laringoscopios directos (CL-I) en 20/33 (60,6%) en el grupo Macintosh, 24/33 (72,7%) en el grupo McCoy, 30/33 (90,9%) en el grupo Vlc y 32/33 (96,9%) en el grupo Vld. El tiempo medio necesario para intubar fue de 15,54 ± 2,6 en el grupo Macintosh; 18,90 ± 4,47 en el grupo McCoy; 20,21 ± 7,9 en el grupo Vlc; y 27,42 ± 9,09 en el grupo Vld. La tasa para el primer intento de intubación exitoso fue de un 84,8% (Macintosh), un 72,7% (McCoy), un 90,9% (Vlc) y un 78,7% (Vld). CONCLUSIÓN: el rendimiento global de la lámina del C-MAC convencional mostró ser mejor cuando se le comparó con el de las láminas ...