ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the influence of different size related parameters of common CT scanned body parts on body-specific dose estimate (SSDE) , in order to establish rapid conversion factors for SSDE.Methods:A total of 189 clinical cases were collected from 6 common CT scanned body parts, including head, nasal bone, sinus, neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis, at Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University from March 8 to May 10, 2021. Batch-processing of image was carried out by using Matlabcode. The axial images′area, anteroposterior (AP) dimension, lateral (LAT) dimension and average CT values were calculated. The conversion factors for estimating body-specific dose values were obtained from the real effective diameter ( De) and water equivalent diameter ( Dw) of the clinical cases, and the differences in values were compared between SSDE ED and SSDE WED. Based on the information on AP, LAT, AP + LAT, estimated De, the real De and Dw obtained in clinical practices, the SSDE rapid correction factors for adult body parts were established. The convenient conversion relation between Dw and De was obtained. Based on the correction factors for Dw, the relative errors of the correction factors for various sizes related parameters were compared. Results:The SSDE fast conversion factors for the real De of the 6 body parts were 1.01, 1.01, 1.01, 0.97, 1.28, 1.32, and those for Dw were 0.87, 0.97, 0.98, 0.99, 1.42, 1.36, respectively. The relative errors of different conversion factors ranged from 0.68% to 18.05%. The conversion factors for abdomen and pelvis had the smallest difference, and those for AP and LAT of the chest had the smallest error. The differences between CTDI vol, SSDE ED and SSDE WED in sinus, chest and abdomen were statistically significant ( tsinus=2.44, 4.23, tchest=17.67, 17.00, tabdomen and pelvis =17.93, 18.75, P<0.05) . The differences between CTDI vol and SSDE WED in head, nasal bone, were statistically significant ( t=-22.27, 2.80, P<0.05) , but not with SSDE ED ( P>0.05) . The difference between CTDI vol and SSDE ED in neck was statistically significant ( t=-3.06, P<0.05) but without statistical insignificance in camparison with SSDE WED ( P>0.05) . Conclusions:SSDE WED can be used to accurately evaluate the body-specific dose estimatates, and different size related parameters can be selected for correction in different scanned body parts. The rapid conversion factor can be easily used in clinical practice to improve the accuracy of estimated radiation dose.
ABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Determinar a dose efetiva recebida nos exames de tomografia computadorizada abdominal e estudar a influência das características dos pacientes na dose recebida. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram realizadas medições dos valores de dose com uma câmara de ionização em objetos simuladores, de forma a verificar se os valores obtidos estavam de acordo com os valores apresentados pelo equipamento de tomografia computadorizada e se estes não ultrapassavam os níveis de referência de dose recomendados. Posteriormente, foram medidos os valores de dose recebida pelos pacientes, com autonomia física, nos exames de tomografia computadorizada abdominal (n = 100) e a relação existente com as suas características antropométricas. Por último, foi simulada a dose nos órgãos por meio do método de Monte Carlo utilizando o software de simulação CT-Expo V 1.5, e estudado o efeito do controle automático de exposição nestes exames. RESULTADOS: As principiais características com influência direta na dose são a massa corporal, o perímetro abdominal e o índice de massa corporal do paciente, cuja relação é linear e positiva. CONCLUSÃO: A dose de radiação recebida nos exames abdominais depende de algumas características dos pacientes, sendo importante ajustar os parâmetros de aquisição às suas dimensões.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effective dose in abdominal computed tomography imaging and to study the influence of patients' characteristics on the received dose. MATERIALS AND METHODOS: Dose values measurements were performed with an ionization chamber on phantoms to check the agreement between dose values and those presented by the computed tomography apparatus, besides their compliance with the recommended reference dose levels. Later, values of dose received by physically able patients submitted to abdominal computed tomography (n = 100) were measured and correlated with their anthropometric characteristics. Finally, the dose to organs was simulated with the Monte Carlo method using the CT-Expo V 1.5 software, and the effect of automatic exposure control on such examinations. RESULTS: The main characteristics directly influencing the dose include the patients' body mass, abdominal perimeter and body mass index, whose correlation is linear and positive. CONCLUSION: The radiation dose received from abdominal CT scans depends on some patient's characteristics, and it is important to adjust the acquisition parameters to their dimensions.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Young Adult , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anthropometry , Dosimetry/methods , Abdomen , Body Mass Index , Monte Carlo Method , Software , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Estudar a viabilidade de redução da dose de radiação em protocolos de aquisição de imagens de tomografia helicoidal em um hospital universitário. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foi realizado levantamento de dose de radiação de protocolos de tomografia com objetos simuladores e câmara de ionização. Foram propostas variações de kVp e mAs, determinando-se a média de ruído. Protocolos com valores de ruído menores ou iguais a 1 por cento foram submetidos à avaliação qualitativa de contraste e resolução espacial por três observadores. RESULTADOS: Foram realizados 22 testes de variações para o protocolo de crânio pediátrico, 26 para crânio adulto, 28 para abdome e 18 para tórax. A redução da dose conseguida variou entre 7,4-13 por cento para protocolo de crânio pediátrico, 3,8-25 por cento para crânio adulto, 9,6-34,3 por cento para abdome e 6,4-12 por cento para tórax. Notou-se também que a utilização de ferramentas de janelamento e zoom favoreceu o aceite das imagens pelos observadores. CONCLUSÃO: É possível reduzir os níveis de dose de radiação em até 34,4 por cento, comparativamente aos protocolos utilizados na rotina, mantendo-se o ruído em níveis aceitáveis. O uso de ferramentas de manipulação digital das imagens possibilitou a aceitação de imagens com níveis maiores de ruído, favorecendo o processo de redução de dose de radiação.
OBJECTIVE: To study the feasibility of reducing radiation dose in protocols for acquisition of helical computed tomography images in a University Hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of radiation doses in computed tomography protocols was performed with phantoms and ionization chamber. Changes in kVp and mAs were proposed, determining the average noise. Protocols with noise values 1 percent were submitted to qualitative assessment of contrast and spatial resolution by three observers. RESULTS: Tests of variations were performed with 22 protocols for pediatric skulls, 26 for adult skulls, 28 for abdomen, and 18 for chest. The reduction in dose achieved ranged between 7.4 percent and13 percent for pediatric skull, 3.8 percent and 25 percent for adult skull, 9.6 percent and 34.3 percent for abdomen, 6.4 percent and 12 percent for chest. It was also noted that the use of windowing and zoom tools supported the acceptance of images by the observers. CONCLUSION: Radiation dose levels can be reduced by up to 34.4 percent in comparison with routine protocols, keeping the noise at acceptable levels. The use of digital manipulation tools allowed the acceptance of images with higher noise levels, thus resulting in radiation dose reduction.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Dosage , Radiation Dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Tomography, Spiral Computed , Process Optimization , Signal-To-Noise RatioABSTRACT
The purpose of this study provides measurements of radiation dose from MDCT of head, chest, abdomen and pelvic examinations. A series of dose quantities that are measured of patient weight to compare the dose received during MDCT examinations. Data collected included: weight together with CT dose descriptors, volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP). The effective dose was also estimated and served as collective dose estimation data. Data from 1,774 adult patients attending for a CT examination of the head (n=520) or chest (n=531) or abdomen (n=724) was obtained from spiral CT units using a same CT protocol. Mean values of CTDIvol was a range of 48.6 mGy for head and 6.9, 10.5 mGy for chest, abdomen examinations, respectively. And mean values of DLP was range of 1,604 mGy.cm for head, 250 mGy.cm for chest, 575 mGy.cm for abdomen examinations, respectively. Mean effective dose values for head, chest, abdominal CT were 3.6, 4.2, and 8.6 mSv, respectively. The degree of CTDIvol and DLP was a positive correlation with weight. And there was a positive correlation for weight versus CTDIvol (r2=0.62), DLP (r2=0.694) in chest. And head was also positive correlation with weight versus CTDIvol (r2=0.691), DLP (r2=0.741). We conclude that CTDIvol and DLP is an important determinant of weight within the CT examinations. The results for this study suggest that CT protocol should be tailored according to patient weight.
Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Abdomen , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Cytarabine , Gynecological Examination , Head , Subject Headings , Thioguanine , Thorax , Tomography, Spiral ComputedABSTRACT
Objective To improve children′s radiation dosage through adjusting CT head scanning parameter. Methods During December 2006 to June 2007,292 cases were selected at random to adjust CT head scanning parameter, mainly for charge of voltage, tube current and scan time. At the same time,all images were appraised by two doctors. Results Adjustment of children′ s head scanning parameter could reduce the radiation dosage obviously, and no influence for diagnosis. Conclusion It′s no affect for diagnosis to improve children′s head CT scanning parameter, and leads reduction of CT dosage obviously.