ABSTRACT
Objective To observe the clinical effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the treatment of cardiac arrest. Methods A retrospective analysis was coducted, 137 patients with cardiac arrest admitted to Department of Emergency of Fuyang People's Hospital from January 2017 to December 2018 were enrolled, emergency rescue with CPR machine. There were 116 cases of CPR in emergency room, including 44 cases of cardiac arrest before hospital and 72 cases of cardiac arrest in hospital. There were CPR was 21 cases of CPR in EICU. The difference of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate and rescue time between Emergency Room and Emergency Intensive Care Unit (EICU) and ROSC rate in patients with cardiac arrest before and after emergency rescue room were compared. Results There were 45 cases of ROSC in 137 patients, the success rate of rescue was 32.85%, rescue time was 30.00 (20.00-40.00) minutes, and the maximum duration of times was 180 minutes. The ROSC rate of EICU was significantly higher than that of emergency room [66.67% (14/21) vs. 26.72% (31/116), P < 0.05], and the rescue time was significantly shorter than that of emergency room [minutes: 25.00 (10.00-30.00) vs. 30.00 (25.00-40.00), P < 0.05]. The ROSC rate of patients with cardiac arrest in emergency room was significantly higher than that before hospitalization [33.33% (24/72) vs. 15.91% (7/44), P < 0.05], there was no significant difference in rescue time between patients with cardiac arrest in emergency room and that before hospitalization [minutes: 30.00 (20.00-40.00) vs. 30.00 (26.25-40.00), P > 0.05]. Conclusions The function of CPR provides high quality extrathoracic compression, which effectively saves the labor cost of cardiac compression, especially in the case of shortage of medical and nursing staff. In the face of patients who need continuous CPR for a long time, it is a feasible choice to use CPR machine instead of unarmed CPR, which is worth popularizing in clinic.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical effect of unarmed cardiopulmonary resuscitationand cardiopulmonary resuscitationmachine in the emergency room.Methods One hundred cases patients with cardiopulmonary arrest in Hainan Agricultural Reclamation General Hospital from February 2014 to February 2016 were analyzed.The control group(n=50) were given unarmed cardiopulmonary resuscitation,while thetest group(n=50) were given ardiopulmonary resuscitation machine.Two groups' before and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation of arterial blood gas index(oxygen saturation (SaO2),C02 partial pressure (PaC02),oxygen partial pressure(Pa02)),cardiopulmonary resuscitation effectiveness and the success rate,and complications were compared.Results Before cardiopulmonary resuscitation,there were no significant differences on arterial blood gas index (SaO2,PaCO2,PaO2) between the two groups (t =0.069,0.097,0.121,P ＞ 0.05).After cardiopulmonary resuscitation,the SaO2,PaO2 of the test group were higher than that of the control group ((98.60± 8.51) ％ vs.(86.37 ± 7.84) ％,(13.84 ± 1.40) kPa vs.(8.69± 1.21) kPa),while PaCO2 of test group was lower than the control group ((3.24 ± 0.56) kPa vs.(6.41 ± 0.87) kPa),the differences were significant(t =7.474,21.665,19.679,P ＜ 0.05).The cardiopulmonary resuscitation of effective rate,success rate of test group were higher than the control group (84.00％ (42/50) vs.62.00％ (31/50),26.00％ (13/50)vs.10.00％(5/50),x2=6.139,4.336,P＜0.05).The total complication rate of the test group was lower than the control group(8.00％ (4/50) vs.28.00％ (14/50)),the difference was significant (x2 =6.775,P ＜0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation machine is significantly superior to unarmed cardiopulmonary resuscitation,which can effectively improve the patient's arterial blood gas state,improve the efficiency and success rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation,and reduce the complications.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the effect of two different types of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)in cardiac arrest.Methods 150 patients with cardiac arrest were selected.The patients were divided into two groups according to the random number table method,each group in 75cases.The patients in the control group were treated with CPR.The patients in the observation group were treated with CPR machine.The body temperature,hemoglobin concentration,hematocrit,arterial blood gas analysis and resuscitation were compared between the two groups after 10min and 30min.Results There were no statistically significant differences in body temperature,hemoglobin and hematocrit between the control group and the observation group at 10min and 30min after CPR (t10min =1.44,2.01,1.23,t30min =1.69,1.81,1.02,all P ＞ 0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in PaCO2 between the two groups at 10 min and 30 min after resuscitation (t =1.54,1.02,all P ＞ 0.05).The arterial blood pH[(7.02 ±0.14)],PaO2 [(16.29 ± 4.38) kPa],HCO3 [(5.66 ± 1.73) kPa] and SaO2 [(0.84 ± 0.05) ％] of the control group recovered 30 min were significantly lower than recovered 10 min (t =7.14,6.55,6.20,7.03,all P ＜ 0.05).The arterial blood pH[(7.11 ± 0.1)],PaO2 [(18.36 ± 4.55) kPa],HCO3 [(6.34 ± 2.15) kPa],SaO2 [(0.86 ±0.04) ％] of the observation group recovered 30 min were significantly lower than recovered 10 min (t =6.75,6.21,6.01,6.60,all P ＜0.05).The arterial blood pH,PaO2,HCO3 and SaO2 of the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group at 10 min and 30 min,the differences were statistically significant (t10min =6.03,7.34,7.88,6.10,t30min =6.21,8.20,7.10,6.11,all P ＜ 0.05).The effective rate of CPR in the observation group was 69.33％,which was significantly higher than 46.67％ in the control group,the difference was statistically significant (x2 =9.34,P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Compared with artificial heart and lung resuscitation,CPR machine is more effective for patients with heartbeat respiratory arrest.It is more effective in cycling support and can improve the efficacy of CPR and is worthy of clinical application.
ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the effect of mechanical press and manual press in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was performed.A total of 95 cases who needed cardiopulmonary resuscitation were collected,according to the inclusion criteria,which including mechanical compression group (n =48),and the manual compression group (n =47).Demographic,clinical course of two groups were collected.Arterial and venous blood gas analysis in the recovery after the start of 5 minutes,15 minutes,30 minutes,the end of recovery were also collected and the pH value,partial pressure of oxygen,extracellular base remaining,actual bicarbonate,lactic acid,calcium and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) and other data were mainly analyzed.All data collation and statistical analysis were used Microsoft excel,SAS 9.4.The enumeration data were expressed by the frequency and percentage,and chi square test was used.The measurement data were expressed by mean and standard deviation,and t test was used.Multiple Logistic regression analysis was performed to analysis of the effect of various factors.Results There were no statistically differences in age and pathogenic factors between the mechanical compression group and manual compression group (P ＞ 0.05).The press time,success rate of resuscitation and hospitalization days were respectively (22 ±14) minutes,81％,(37 ± 16) days in the mechanical compression group and (27 ± 19) minutes,54％,(41 ±20) days in the manual compression group,with no statistically significant differences (all P ＞ 0.05).Mechanical compression group and manual compression group were cured in 17 cases,10 cases,survived in 21 cases,9 cases,deaded in 10 cases,28 cases,with statistically significant differences between 2 groups (P ＜0.05).The troponin Ⅰ and creatine kinase MB were respectively (4.1 ± 2.0) ng/ml,(31 ± 15) U/L in the manual compression group and (5.6 ± 1.9) ng/ml,(43 ± 22) U/L in the mechanical compression group,with statistically significant differences between 2 groups (P ＜ 0.05).The defibrillation energy and defibrillation times in manual group were significantly higher than that of mechanical compression group (P ＜ 0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the central venous oxygen saturation at the first 5 minutes after the start of compression (x2 =65.0538,P ＜ 0.0001),the arterial blood pH at the end of compression (x2 =21.5779,P ＜ 0.0001),and the 5％ sodium bicarbonate was significantly correlated with the prognosis of survival after resuscitation,mechanical compression group was better than the manual compression group (x2 =3.1421,P =0.0463).Conclusions The effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation machine is better than that of manual compression,which can effectively improve the clinical treatment effect.The result recommends the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation machine for patients with cardiac arrest.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation ( CPR) machine and unarmed CPR in rescuing patients with cardiac arrest , in order to seek effective rescue methods for cardiac arrest . Methods From January 2011 to January 2013,the clinical data of 100 patients with cardiac arrest were retrospec-tively analyzed.50 cases with cardiac arrest who admitted in our hospital from January 2011 to January 2012,were selected as control group,they received unarmed CPR rescue.50 cases with cardiac arrest who admitted in our hospital from January 2012 to January 2013 were selected as the observation group ,they used CPR machine for emergency treat-ment.The postoperative efficacy was observed and compared .Results After CPR,the systolic blood pressure,SpO2 and heart rate in the observation group were (95.2 ±10.4)mmHg,(93.1 ±8.2)%,(89.6 ±5.7)beats/min,which were significantly higher than (71.8 ±6.7)mmHg,(78.7 ±5.5)%,(70.8 ±5.2)beats/min in the control group, the differences between two groups were statistically significant (t=8.456,8.246,9.625,all P0.05).The successful resuscitation rate and survival rate of the observation group were 72%,46%, which were significantly higher than 44%,22%of the control group ,the incidence rate of adverse reactions in the observation group was 2%,which was significantly lower than 18%in the control group (χ2 =8.05,6.42,10.15,all P0.05);15min,30min after CPR,PaO2,PaCO2,SaO2 and other arteries blood gas anal-ysis indicators between the two groups had significant differences (t=5.984,4.673,4.685,9.647,8.356,5.534,all P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with unarmed CPR,CPR machine has obvious advantages in the rescue of cardiac arrest patients,it can significantly shorten the time of spontaneous circulation ,improve the success rate of CPR ,and has less side effects,it is a simple,safe and effective rescue method,which is worthy of widespread in clinical application.