The impact of caudally administrated tramadol on immune response and analgesic efficacy for pediatric patients: a comparative randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Immune responses appear to be affected by anesthetics and analgesics. We investigated the effects of caudal tramadol on the postoperative immune response and pain management in pediatric patients. METHODS: Sixty ASA-I pediatric patients aged 3–10 years undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Patients were randomly assigned either to a caudal bupivacaine (0.25%) group (group B), or a group that received caudal tramadol (1 mg/kg) added to the bupivacaine (0.25%) (group T). Both were diluted in a 0.9% NaCl solution to a total volume of 1ml/kg. The systemic immune response was measured by collecting blood samples preoperatively, at the end of anesthesia, and at 24 and 72 hours postoperatively, and studied for interleukin IL-6, C-reactive proteins (CRP) cortisol levels, and leucocytes with its differential count. Postoperative pain was assessed along with sedation scales. RESULTS: Postoperative production of IL-6 was significantly higher in group B at the end of anesthesia, than at the 24th hour, and at the 72nd hour in group B and group T, respectively. The immune response showed leukocytosis with increased percentages of neutrophil and monocytes, and a decreased lymphocyte response rate within both groups with no significant differences between the groups. Cortisol and CRP were significantly higher in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Adding tramadol to a caudal bupivacaine block can attenuate the pro-inflammatory cytokine response, Cortisol, and CRP in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery.

Preemptive Caudal Ropivacaine: An Effective Analgesic during Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comprising 60 patients undergoing lumbosacral spine (noninstrumentation/nonfusion) surgery. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.2% ropivacaine (20 mL) administered alone as a single, preoperative, caudal epidural block injection versus that of intravenous analgesics in providing effective postoperative analgesia to patients undergoing lumbosacral spine surgery. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Various studies have shown the effectiveness of a caudal epidural injection (bupivacaine or ropivacaine) in providing postoperative analgesia in combination with steroids or other analgesics. This study uniquely analyzed the efficacy of a single injection of caudal epidural ropivacaine in providing postoperative pain relief. METHODS: Sixty patients who were scheduled to undergo surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease (noninstrumentation/nonfusion) were consecutively divided into two groups, group R (Study) and group I (Control). 30 group R patients received a caudal epidural block with 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine after the administration of general anesthesia. 30 group I patients received no preoperative analgesia. Intravenous analgesics were administered during the postoperative period after a complaint of pain. Various parameters indicating analgesic effect were recorded. RESULTS: There was a significant delay in the average time to the first demand for rescue analgesia in the study group, suggesting significantly better postoperative pain relief than that in the control group. In comparison with the control group, the study group also showed earlier ambulation with minimal adverse effects. The requirement for intraoperative fentanyl was higher in the control group than that in the study group. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive analgesia with a single epidural injection of ropivacaine is a safe, simple, and effective approach, providing better postoperative pain relief, facilitating early mobilization, and decreasing the intraoperative requirement for opioid administration.

Heart rate variability may be more useful than pulse transit time for confirming successful caudal block under general anesthesia in children

BACKGROUND: Confirming a successful caudal block is challenging in the pediatric population. Pulse transit time (PTT) may reflect the decrease in arterial resistance and may act as a potential indicator for confirming successful peripheral nerve or axial block. Heart rate variability (HRV) is also a possible candidate because it may be influenced by variation in sympathetic tone. We expected an increasing PTT pattern and change in HRV parameters after caudal block. METHODS: We enrolled 27 male patients (range, 1–4 years old) who were scheduled for urological surgeries. Caudal block was performed with 1 ml/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine and 1 : 200,000 epinephrine under sevoflurane anesthesia after the surgery. Successful block was confirmed by auscultation and ultrasonography. PTT and HRV parameters, such as standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals, root mean square of successive differences, very low-frequency power, low-frequency power (LF), high-frequency power (HF), LF/HF ratio, approximate entropy (ApEn) were calculated based on electrocardiography from 1 min before to 5 min after the block. Those variables were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: No significant change was found in PTT with time interval after caudal block. Heart rate and ApEn of the R-R interval decreased with time interval (P = 0.001, 0.033, respectively). Some HRV parameters showed notable changes, although statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: The PTT pattern may not be an indicator for successful caudal block. However, heart rate with parameters of HRV analysis may be alternatives.

The Use of Contrast in Caudal Epidural Injections under Image Intensifier Guidance: Is It Necessary?

BACKGROUND: We investigated the value of using contrast as an additional aid to confirm the accuracy of needle placement for caudal epidural injections under intraoperative image intensifier guidance. METHODS: A total of 252 consecutive patients were included in this study. Their mean age was 46.7 years (range, 32 to 76 years). There were 133 males (53%) and 119 females (47%) over a 12-month period. RESULTS: Of the 252 consecutive procedures, the contrast enhanced image intensifier confirmed accurate needle placement on first attempt in 252 cases (100%). Needle resiting following the infiltration of contrast was required in 0 case. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study demonstrate that a surgeon beyond the learning curve can accurately place caudal epidural injections using image intensification only, without the use of contrast.

Comparing Three Different Doses of Caudal Morphine for Analgesia after Salter Innominate Osteotomy.

Background: Single dose caudal block application is preferred among children since it is a safe and easy method. Caudal morphine has an important advantage with its long half-life. However, caudal morphine application has some side effects such as nausea-vomiting, urinary retention, pruritus, sedation and respiratory stiffness and many of those are dose-dependent. The aim of this study was to determine the minimum morphine doses that will provide adequate analgesia and by this way to diminish the life threatening side effects such as respiratory depression as well as comfort-threatening side effects such as nausea-vomiting. Methods: This double blind, randomized, prospective study, was performed in Gaziantep University among 60 pediatric patients aged between 1-9 years, who were planned to have Salter operation for congenital hip dislocation, with ASA classification of I-II. Premedication was not applied in any of the cases. Patients were sub-grouped randomly and for 15, 20 or 25 μg.kg-1 caudal morphine administration: G15, G20 and G25. Caudal injections were performed under general anesthesia just before the operations. Having total volumes of 0.75 ml.kg-1, caudal injections were performed with 15, 20 or 25 μg.kg-1 morphine together with 0.25% bupivacaine according to the groups. The first time of analgesic requirement was recorded. Results: The number of cases required analgesia in first 24 hours was determined as 4 (20%), 3 (15%) and 2 (10%) in Group 15, Group 20 and Group 25, respectively. There was not statistically significant difference between groups (P>0.05). In none of the patients, the pain level was as high as causing restlessness (score 2). With single dose Paracetamol, pain cured in all of these patients. Postoperative nausea and vomiting in first 24 hours was reported in 1 (5%), 2 (10%) and 8 (40%) cases in 15, 20 and 25 µg.kg-1 groups, respectively. Although the difference between Groups 15 and 20 was not statistically significant (p=0.548), the number of patients with nausea and vomiting in Group 25 was statistically significantly higher than that of Group 15 and Group 20 (p=0.009 and p=0.025, respectively). In first 24 hours in postoperative period, respiratory depression was not observed in any of the cases. Conclusions: We determined that decreasing the caudal morphine dose to 15 µg.kg-1 in Salter osteotomy does not decrease analgesia in 24 hours but minimizes nausea-vomiting incidence.

The use of EMLA cream reduces the pain of skin puncture associated with caudal block in children / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Caudal block is a popular regional anesthesia in children undergoing infraumbilical surgeries including inguinal hernia repair and orchiopexy. We evaluated the efficacy of eutectic mixture of local anesthetic (EMLA) cream for reducing needle insertion pain during caudal block in pediatric patients. METHODS: Forty-one children between the ages of 13 months and 5 years undergoing infraumbilical surgery were randomized to receive either topical EMLA or placebo cream over the sacral hiatus one hour before caudal block. All children were assessed with the Multidimensional Assessment Pain Scale (MAPS) at the following time points. T0: arrival at the operation room; T1: just before needle insertion; T2: immediately after needle insertion into the sacral hiatus. The need for sevoflurane inhalation due to procedural pain response was also assessed at the same time as MAPS assessment. RESULTS: MAPS scores were significantly lower in the EMLA group compared with the placebo group at T2 (P = 0.001). Moreover, need for sevoflurane inhalation due to procedural pain response was significantly lower in the EMLA group compared with the control group at T2 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that pretreatment with EMLA cream over the sacral hiatus before caudal block has significant advantages in alleviating procedure pain during caudal block in children.

A Comparison of Two Techniques for Ultrasound-guided Caudal Injection: The Influence of the Depth of the Inserted Needle on Caudal Block

BACKGROUND: Caudal epidural injections have been commonly performed in patients with low back pain and radiculopathy. Although caudal injection has generally been accepted as a safe procedure, serious complications such as inadvertent intravascular injection and dural puncture can occur. The present prospective study was designed to investigate the influence of the depth of the inserted needle on the success rate of caudal epidural blocks. METHODS: A total of 49 adults scheduled to receive caudal epidural injections were randomly divided into 2 groups: Group 1 to receive the caudal injection through a conventional method, i.e., caudal injection after advancement of the needle 1 cm into the sacral canal (n = 25), and Group 2 to receive the injection through a new method, i.e., injection right after penetrating the sacrococcygeal ligament (n = 24). Ultrasound was used to identify the sacral hiatus and to achieve accurate needle placement according to the allocated groups. Contrast dyed fluoroscopy was obtained to evaluate the epidural spread of injected materials and to monitor the possible complications. RESULTS: The success rates of the caudal injections were 68.0% in Group 1 and 95.8% in Group 2 (P = 0.023). The incidences of intravascular injections were 24.0% in Group 1 and 0% in Group 2 (P = 0.022). No intrathecal injection was found in either of the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The new caudal epidural injection technique tested in this study is a reliable alternative, with a higher success rate and lower risk of accidental intravascular injection than the conventional technique.

Anaphylactic Shock Following Nonionic Contrast Medium during Caudal Epidural Injection

Caudal epidural injection is a common intervention in patients with low back pain and sciatica. Even though the complications of fluoroscopically directed epidural injections are less frequent than in blind epidural injections, complications due to contrast media can occur. We report a case of anaphylactic shock immediately after injection of an intravenous nonionic contrast medium (iohexol) during the caudal epidural injection for low back pain and sciatica in a patient without a previous allergic history to ionic contrast media (ioxitalamate). Five minutes after the dye was injected, the patient began to experience dizziness, and the systolic blood pressure dropped to 60 mmHg. Subsequently, the patient exhibited a mild drowsy mental state. About 30 minutes after the subcutaneous injection of 0.2 mg epinephrine, the systolic blood pressure increased to 90 mmHg. The patient recovered without any sequela. Life-threatening complications after injection of intravenous contrast medium require immediate treatment.

Anesthesia for a patient with Fanconi anemia for developmental dislocation of the hip: a case report / Anestesia em paciente com anemia de Fanconi e displasia do desenvolvimento do quadril: relato de caso / Anestesia en paciente con anemia de Fanconi y displasia del desarrollo de la cadera: caso clínico

Fanconi anemia is a rare autosomal recessive inherited bone marrow failure syndrome with congenital and hematological abnormalities. Literature regarding the anesthetic management in these patients is limited. A management of a developmental dislocation of the hip was described in a patient with fanconi anemia. Because of the heterogeneous nature, a patient with fanconi anemia should be established thorough preoperative evaluation in order to diagnose on clinical features. In conclusion, we preferred caudal anesthesia in this patient with fanconi anemia without thrombocytopenia, because of avoiding from N2O, reducing amount of anesthetic, existing microcephaly, hypothyroidism and elevated liver enzymes, providing postoperative analgesia, and reducing amount of analgesic used postoperatively.

A anemia de Fanconi é uma síndrome hereditária autossômica recessiva rara, caracterizada por deficiência da medula óssea e anomalias congênitas e hematológicas. A literatura sobre o manejo anestésico dos pacientes é limitada. O manejo de uma displasia do desenvolvimento do quadril foi descrito em um paciente com anemia de Fanconi. Por causa da natureza heterogênea, um paciente com anemia de Fanconi deve ser submetido à avaliação pré-operatória para diagnosticar as características clínicas. Em conclusão, o bloqueio caudal foi a nossa escolha para esse paciente com anemia de Fanconi, sem trombocitopenia, para evitar o N2O, reduzir a quantidade de anestésico, a microcefalia existente, o hipotireoidismo e o aumento das enzimas hepáticas, proporcionar analgesia pós-operatória e reduzir a quantidade de analgésico usada no pós-operatório.

La anemia de Fanconi es un síndrome hereditario autosómico recesivo raro, caracterizado por deficiencia de la médula ósea y por anomalías congénitas y hematológicas. La literatura sobre el manejo anestésico de esos pacientes es limitada. El manejo de una displasia del desarrollo de la cadera fue descrito en un paciente con anemia de Fanconi. Debido a la naturaleza heterogénea, un paciente con anemia de Fanconi debe ser sometido a la evaluación preoperatoria para diagnosticar las características clínicas. En conclusión, el bloqueo caudal fue nuestra elección para ese paciente con anemia de Fanconi sin trombocitopenia para evitar el N2O, reducir la cantidad de anestésico, microcefalia existente, hipotiroidismo y aumento de las enzimas hepáticas, proporcionar analgesia postoperatoria y reducir la cantidad de analgésico usado en el postoperatorio.

Morphologic Diversities of Sacral Canal in Children; Three-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Study

BACKGROUND: Caudal block is a common technique in children for reducing postoperative pain, and there have been several reports on the variations of the sacral canal in children. However, previous studies have mainly focused on the needle trajectory for caudal block, and there is limited information on the structural variations of the sacrum in children. The purpose of this study was to analyze the anatomic variations of sacral canals in children. METHODS: Three-dimensional computed tomographic images were analyzed. The data from the images included fusion of the sacral vertebral laminae and the sacral intervertebral space existence of the sacral cornua and the types of sacral hiatus. The types of sacral hiatus were classified into 3 groups: group I (fusion of S3 or S4 vertebral laminae), group II (unfused vertebral arch with the distance of the S3 and S4 vertebral laminae or = 50% of the distance between the cornua). RESULTS: A total of 143 children were included in this study. All of the sacral vertebral arches were not fused in 22 children (15.4%). Cornua were not identified bilaterally in 5 (3.5%) and unilaterally in 6 (4.2%) children. In the sacral hiatus, group II and group III were identified in 22 (15.4%) and 31 (21.7%) children, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The sacral canal has various anatomical variations in children. Careful attention must be paid to identify the correct anatomic landmark.

Male Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Male chronic pelvic pain syndrome (MCPPS) is defined as chronic pain, pressure, or discomfort localized to the pelvis, perineum, or genitalia of males lasting more than 3 months that is not due to readily explainable causes. Other names for the disorder include prostatodynia and chronic nonbacterial (abacterial) prostatitis, although it is unclear how the symptoms relate to the prostate. And it appears to be extensive variability in clinical presentation and may result in chronic neuropathic pain and neuromuscular pain. Therefore patients with MCPPS should be cared by multimodal treatment including antihyperalgesics, antidepressants and pain intervention procedures such as caudal block. We report successful care in two men with MCPPS.

The effect of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for caudal anesthesia in infant and children / 中国医师进修杂志

Objective To compare the effect of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for caudal anesthesia in infant and children.Methods Forty patients with age 3-6 years old in the state of ASA Ⅰ grade were randomly divided into bupivacaine group and levobupivacaine group,each 20 patients.Both groups received respectively bupivacaine or levobupivacine with the same concentration and volume.The blood pressure,heart rate and pulse oxygen saturation were monitored during the operation.The degree of pain and motor was assessed after the operation.Results Bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for caudal anesthesia in infant and children could provide good analgesic effects.The scores of pain was similar between the two groups and had no statistic significance (P ＞ 0.05).The scores of motor block in bupivacaine group was significantly higher than that in levobupivacaine group after anesthesia 60,90,120 min [(1.5 ±0.6) scores vs.(0.9 ±0.3) scores,(1.0 ±0.8) scores vs.(0.1 ±0.5) scores,(0.6 ±0.5) scores vs.(0.0 ±0.7)scores],there was significant difference (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions Bupivacaine and levobupivacaine have the same analgesic potency.Levobupivacaine is better than bupivacaine in motor block.

The Metastatic Sacrococcygeal Tumor from Adenocarcinoma of Lung Recognized after the Caudal Anesthesia: A case report / 대한마취과학회지

The caudal block has been used as an alternative to general anesthesia in specific circumstances such as anal surgery, perineal surgery or surgery of lower extremity etc. It has been also used as an adjunct to general anesthesia, administered at the completion of surgery to provide postoperative analgesia especially in children. But, it has variable complications such as generalized intoxication, pain on the injection site, infection or urinary retention etc. We report an unusual case of metastatic sacrococcygeal tumor from adenocarcinoma of lung presenting as severe anal pain and sciatica which was aggravated after the trial of caudal anesthesia.

Spinal Anesthesia Combined with Caudal Anesthesia in a Preterm Infant: A case report / 대한마취과학회지

Spinal anesthesia in preterm infants offers a safe alternative to general anesthesia, especially if general anesthesia is not preferred because of coexisting diseases, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia and recurring of apnea. But the single-shot technique of spinal anesthesia has some limitations because the duration of surgical anesthesia is approximately 60 min. Since some procedures may require more time, alternative regional techniques which provide more prolonged surgical anesthesia are needed. We present our experience with a combined spinal caudal anesthesia in a preterm infant.

Comparison of 0.5%, 0.75% Ropivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine for Caudal Anesthesia / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine is a long acting, amide-type local anesthetic with a chemical structure similar to that of bupivacaine. In this study we investigated the efficacies of 18 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, and of 0.5% and 0.75% ropivacaine to provide caudal anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty ASA physical status 1 or 2 patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy were randomly allocated to 3 parallel treatment groups to receive either 18 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, or 0.5% or 0.75% ropivacaine. Caudal anesthesia was performed using the loss of resistance method via sacral hiatus. Soft touch testing around the anal sphincter muscle, the pin prick method at the S3 dermatome, onset time of loss of anal sphincter reflex, and sensory block were checked following local anesthetic injection. Duration of sensory block was assessed at 30 minute intervals through out block duration. Quality of muscle relaxation was assessed by the surgeon at the end of each operation. Blood pressures were measured and the incidences of nausea, vomiting and dizziness were recorded. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between the 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.75% ropivacaine groups (P <0.05) with regard to onset time of loss of anal sphincter muscle reflex and sensory block. The 0.75% ropivacaine group showed a longer duration of analgesia. No significant differences were found between the 0.5% bupivacaine, or the 0.5% or 0.75% ropivacaine groups in terms of the onset time of loss of anal sphincter muscle reflex or sensory block, or the duration of analgesia. Quality of muscle relaxation was similar in the three groups. CONCLUSION: In our study the 0.75% ropivacaine group showed rapid loss of anal sphincter tone, rapid onset of sensory block, and longer analgesia duration than the 0.5% ropivacaine group, and 0.75% ropivacaine was similar to 0.5% bupivacaine in these respects. These results suggest that 0.5% or 0.75% ropivacaine may be as useful as 0.5% bupivacaine in caudal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy.

Urinary Retention Following Caudal Anesthesia Operation:Nursing Countermeasures / 中华医院感染学杂志

OBJECTIVE To post correlation between urinary retention following caudal anesthesia operation and nursing countermeasures,and to supply credible gist for reducing intra-urethral cannula. METHODS A total of 146 patients with urinary retention following caudal anesthesia and anal canal operation from Jun to Oct 2003 in our hospital were analyzed. RESULTS It was obvious that patients with caudal anesthesia taken no intra-urethral cannula way to induce urination especially for adolescent.Nineteen patients taken intra-urethral cannula were with an average of(53.7 years),it was significant different between patients of different age with urinary retention taking physical methods to induce urination. CONCLUSIONS It must be thought much of taking physical methods without analgesia,irritation,and side-effect to help patient′s urination,reducing invasive operation,and avoiding iatrogenic infection.

Primary Irritant Dermatitis to Povidone-Iodine after Caudal Anesthesia: A Case Report / 대한마취과학회지

Povidone-iodine (PVP-1) is a widely used antiseptic because of its low toxicity and germicidal effect. A 16 year old patient who had undergone incision and debridement of an anal abscess developed contact dermatitis on his buttocks postoperatively. The lesion had been exposed to a gauze immersed in a 10% povidone-iodine solution for 8 hours, but the skin around the surgical field directly painted with 10% povidone-iodine solution didn't show any effect. A patch test with povidone-iodine produced a negative response in this patient. These observations indicate that prolonged exposure to wet povidone-iodine is harmful. It is important that povidone-iodine be used carefully to prevent contact dermatitis.

Effect of Lidocaine Injected on Lower Rectal Submucosa During Hemorrhoidectomy under Caudal Anesthesia

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The caudal anesthesia for anal surgery is simple and effective. Also, it is relatively safe because there is no headache or other neurologic complications. But, during the operation under caudal anesthesia, the unwanted symptoms such as lower abdominal pain or hypotensive symptoms were experienced in some patients. These unwanted symptoms may occur due to anal and lower rectal dilatation. The precise mechanism is unknown. But we speculated that some sensory nerve endings in rectal submucosa may be involved in this mechanism. So, we think that it is possible to prevent or reduce these symptoms if we block these sensory nerve endings effectively with local anesthetics. Therefore, the aim of this study is to see whether the locally injected lidocaine can reduce or prevent the unwanted symptoms during anal surgery under caudal anesthesia. METHODS: There were 100 consecutive patients in this study who had hemorrhoidectomy with Jack-knife position under caudal anesthesia at our clinic. We divided evenly these 100 patients into two groups, injection and control groups(in each group, 50 patients were included.). In injection-group, We injected 10 cc(100 mg) of 1% lidocaine solution cir cumferentially into the lower rectal submucosa at the beginning of the operation. In control-group, we did not inject lidocaine solution initially, but the lidocaine injection was done during the operation in the same manner in the injection-group if the severe unwanted symptoms occurred. We used Parks-type retractor to dilate the anus and recorded the patient,s complaints. RESULTS: In injection-group, male to female ratio was 33:17, mean age was 42.1 years(20~69) and mean operation time was 38.3 minutes(15~80). In control-group, male to female ratio was 25:25, mean age was 43.7 years(17~65) and mean oeration time was 38.5 minutes(15~80). Lower abdominal pain was present in 11 patients(22%) among injection-group and in 37 patients(74%) among control-group(p=0.000). Hypotensive symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, sweating and dizziness were present in 1 patient(2%) among injection-group and in 8 patients(16%) among control-group(p=0.014). We injected lidocaine solution into lower rectal submucosa during the operation in 18 patients with severe symptoms among control-group. The effect of the injected lidocaine solution in 18 control patients was good in 13(72%) and fair in 5(28%). With regard to factors influencing the occurrence of symptoms, there was a tendency of higher occurrence in male, the younger-aged and the longer-operation groups. CONCLUSION: The lower rectal submucosal lidocaine injection reduced the unwanted symptoms such as lower abdominal pain and hypotensive symptoms during the anal surgery under the caudal anesthesia.

Comparison of Mepivacaine and Bupivacaine as an Adjuvant of Morphine for Benign Anorectal Surgery under Caudal Anesthesia

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The caudal anesthsia is most commonly used for benign anorectal surgery, The combination of long-acting anesthetics and opiates has been used for longer duration and successful control of postoperative pain. But the side effects of peridural anesthesics and morphine have commonly occured in caudal anesthesia. This study was performed to assess the difference in clinical effects between peridural mepivacaine and bupivacaine with morphine. METHODS: We evaluated the clinical effects in 60 patients who had anal operation with Jack-Knife position under caudal anesthesia. We divided randomly these 60 patients into two groups, M and B groups (in each group, 30 patients included). Group M (n=30) was given 2% mepivacaine 20 ml with morphine 2 mg caudally, and Group B (n=30) was given 0.5% bupivacaine 20 ml with morphine 2 mg in the same manner. We measured the onset time, duration, postoperative analgesia, and side effects including urinary retention. RESULTS: The onset time for analgesia was significantly shorter in group M than in group B. The duration of postoperative pain complaints was significantly longer in group M than in group B. The postoperative analgesic effects and side effects were not significantly different between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal mepivacaine and morphine mixture is effective for control of postoperative pain without significant side effects.

An Evaluation of Caudal Anesthesia / 대한마취과학회지

Caudal anesthesia appears to be a safe and reliable technique for surgical anesthesia as well as an alternative to narcotics for postoperative analgesia for procedure below umbilicus. From January 1990 to December 1992, we examined the trend and distribution of the 1038 cases of caudal anesthesia retrospectively according to year, age, surgieal department, type of operation, operation time, local anesthetics and suecess rate. Annual numbers of caudal anesthesia increased with years and the first decade of life was the greatest number. The most common department and operation time were general surgery and 30~60 minutes. 2% or 1% lidocaine with epinephrine was the major local anesthetics used during caudal anesthesia and overall success rate was 95.5%.