Morphometric Analysis Of The Sacral Hiatus In Indians: Its Clinical Importance

Introduction: Sacral hiatus (SH) is a significant landmark during caudal epidural block (CEB) which is employedfor analgesia and anaesthesia during a wide range of clinical conditions. This requires a thorough knowledge ofmorphometric characteristics of SH and surrounding landmarks, but variability in morphometric dimensionsexists among different populations.Aim: The aim of this study was to identify different anatomical landmarks to detect the location of SH andprovide a reference database for morphometric dimensions of SH in Indian population.Materials and Methods: The study was done on 108 dry adult human sacra. Linear measurements of the sacrawere taken with the help of digital vernier caliper and angular parameters were determined with a goniometer.Results: The most common shape of the sacral hiatus was inverted ’V’ shaped (59.3%) with the level of the apexat S4 in 66.7% and base at S5 in 86.1% cases. Morphometric dimensions of SH were found to be smaller in presentstudy as compared to reports by other researchers. Left crest-apex angle was observed to be significantly greaterthan the right crest-apex angle. (p 0.001).Conclusion: Multiple bony landmarks and their morphometric dimensions should be considered to locate the SHduring CEB. Values for various morphometric parameters of SH are less in Indians in comparison to otherpopulations, which should be contemplated during caudal epidural injections and trans-sacral thecaloscopy.

Impact of Position on Efficacy of Caudal Epidural Injection for Low Back Pain and Radicular Leg Pain Due to Central Spinal Stenosis and Lumbar Disc Hernia

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate and compare the efficacies of caudal epidural injections performed at prone and lateral decubitus positions. METHODS: A total of 120 patients suffering from low back pain and radicular leg pain were included and patients were randomly distributed into 2 groups according to the position during injection. In Group 1 (n=60; 32 women, 28 men), caudal epidural injection was performed at prone position, whereas it was implemented at lateral decubitus position in Group 2 (n=60; 33 women, 27 men). Visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), walking tolerance (WT) and standing tolerance (ST) were compared in 2 groups before and after injection. RESULTS: In Group 1, ODI values were higher at 30th minute (p=0.007), 3rd week (p=0.043) and 6th month (p=0.013). In Group 1, ODI, VAS and ST values were improved significantly at all follow-up periods compared to initial values. In Group 1, WT scores were better than initial values at 30th minute, 3rd week and 3rd month. In Group 2, ODI scores at 30th minute, 3rd week, 3rd month and 6th month were improved while VAS and ST scores were improved at all periods after injection. WT scores were better at 30th minute, 3rd week and 3rd month compared to initial WT scores. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that application of injection procedure at lateral decubitus position allowing a more concentrated local distribution may provide better relief of pain.

The Effective Steroid Dose of Caudal Epidural Injection with Unilateral Epidural Catheter Position in Patients with Symptomatic Herniated Nucleus Purposus / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: The epidural steroid injection is commonly used in the management of chronic low back pain and radiating pain. We compared the efficacy of 40, 60, and 80 mg of methylprednisolone acetate in patients with lumbar herniated disc disease treated with caudal epidural block. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with lumbar herniated nucleus purposes on magnetic resonance imaging were included.All patients received fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections, with the guidewire-reinforced epidural catheter introduced through a Tuohy needle.After confirming the catheter tip position at the affected nerve root, contrasts were injected until patients felt discomfort in their site of pain.24 patients in each group received 40 mg, 60 mg, 80 mg of methylprednisolone acetate, respectively.We evaluated the improvements by pain relief scale (0-100%) after 2 weeks. RESULTS: There are no significant differences in the pain improvement between three groups (P = 0.537 ). CONCLUSIONS: Sixty and 80 mg methylprednisolone acetate injection during caudal epidural block showed no further benefit compared to 40 mg injection.

Caudal Epidural Injection with a Guidewire-Reinforced Epidural Catheter in Patients with Herniated Nucleosus Pulpose / 대한통증학회지

BACKGROUND: The epidural injection technique is a commonly used intervention in the management of chronic spinal pain, which has the advantage of delivering various drugs, such as local anesthetics or steroids, in higher concentrations to the inflamed nerve root. A guidewire-reinforced epidural catheter was introduced through a Tuohy needle during the caudal epidural procedure, with a catheter threaded into the affected nerve roots and the spread-pattern of contrast agents observed under fluoroscopy. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with low back pain, who showed evidence of a herniated nucleus pulposus on magnetic resonance imaging, were included. All patients received fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections, with the guidewire-reinforced epidural catheter introduced through a Tuohy needle and threaded either to the right or left side toward the target nerve roots. After confirming the catheter tip position at the affected nerve root, 2 ml increments of contrast agents (up to 6 ml) were injected, and their corresponding AP fluoroscopic views were obtained. Three radiologists reviewed all the radiographic findings and measured the proportion of the area of contrast spread at the side of target nerve roots. RESULTS: Greater proportion of the area of contrast spread was observed at the side of the target nerve roots (P < 0.0001). At each level of contrast injection (2- , 4- and 6 ml), more than 70% of the spread of contrast dye was observed at the side of the target nerve roots in 85%, 70%, and 55% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a caudal epidural injection and use of a guidewire-reinforced epidural catheter significantly enhances the target specificity, as revealed by the selective spread of contrast dye at the side of target nerves.

Confirming of Needle Position and Spreading of Solution according to Injection Volume in Caudal Epidural Injection

OBJECTIVE: To know the accuracy of caudal epidural steroid injection procedure without fluoroscopy guidance, and determine ascending level of injected solution according to injection volume. METHOD: The subjects were 35 patients with low back pain. Needle insertion was performed without fluoroscopy, then we confirm the position of needle with fluoroscopy. The level of injected solution was measured with fluoroscopy and x-ray after injecting every 5 ml of solution, which is mixture of triamcinolone, 2% lidocaine, contrast medium, and normal saline. The effect of treatment was measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). RESULTS: Successful needle placement occurred in 27 cases without fluoroscopy. After injecting 20 ml of solution, the ascending level of solution were S1 in 8 cases, L5 in 12 cases, L4 in 8 cases, L3 in 1 case, L2 in 4 cases, L1 in 2 cases. In the comparison of the VAS before and after treatment, it was 6.3+/-1.2 and 2.9+/-1.3 respectively, which demonstrated statistically significant decrease (p+/-0.05). CONCLUSION: Caudal epidural injection could be performed more accurately under the fluoroscopic guidance. After injecting 20 ml of solution, the ascending level of the solution were restricted at lower lumbosacral area in most of cases.

The Effect of Caudal Epidural Injection for the Pseudoclaudication of Spinal Stenosis

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy of caudal epidural injection in relieving pseudoclaudication of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. METHOD: Fifteen patients with a spinal stenosis which was confirmed by the magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) studies, received a caudal epidural steroid injection of triamcinolone acetate 120 mg, in a solution mixed with 2 ml of 1% lidocaine, and 15 ml of normal saline. RESULTS: The visual analogue scales checked at 1 hour prior to injection, 1 hour postinjection, and 1 month postinjection were 8.1+/-0.8, 3.7+/-1.7, and 6.4+/-1.9, respectively. The exercise tolerance on the treadmill with 0o ramp inclination and 1.8 km/h speed was measured at 1 hour prior to injection, 1 hour postinjection, and 1 month postinjection. The time intervals to the first symptom of the pseudoclaudication were 2.3+/-0.8 minutes, 6.5+/-0.7 minutes, and 4.6+/-1.9 minutes, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our study, the caudal epidural injection offered a significant short-term relief for the pseudoclaudication. Also it appeared to be a reasonable therapeutic option among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis after 1 month postinjection.