Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
J. inborn errors metab. screen ; 10: e20220001, 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1386083

ABSTRACT

Abstract Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (CLN2) disease is a rare autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder caused by mutations in the CLN2/TPP1 gene, leading to a deficiency in tripeptidyl peptidase 1 activity. Enzyme replacement therapy with cerliponase alfa (recombinant human TPP1 [rhTPP1]; Brineura®) was approved in the United States and Europe for the treatment of CLN2 disease in 2017. We retrospectively report a cohort of 19 patients with CLN2 assisted in a specialized center in Argentina, including 8 newly diagnosed cases. Speech disorders and white matter changes/ventricular system enlargement were the most frequent clinical and imaging findings at CLN2 disease onset, respectively. Patients treated with cerliponase alfa presented a stable or improved course of the disease in this Latin American real world setting, as described in clinical trials.

2.
J. inborn errors metab. screen ; 6: e180005, 2018. tab
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1090971

ABSTRACT

Abstract Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type-2 (CLN2) disease is a rare, autosomalrecessive,pediatric-onset,neurodegenerative lysosomal storage disease caused by mutations in the TPP1 gene. Cerliponase alfa (Brineura®), a recombinant form of human tripeptidyl peptidase-1, was recently developed as a treatment for CLN2 disease. In clinical trials, the primary end point to evaluate treatment effect was the aggregate score for the motor and language (ML) domains of the CLN2 Clinical Rating Scale, an adaptation of the Hamburg scale's component items that include anchor point definitions to allow consistent ratings in multinational, multisite, clinical efficacy studies. Psychometric analyses demonstrated that the ML score of the CLN2 Clinical Rating Scale and individual item scores are well defined and possess adequate measurement properties (reliability, validity, and responsiveness) to demonstrate a clinical benefit over time. Additionally, analyses comparing the CLN2 Clinical Rating Scale ML ratings to the Hamburg scale's ML ratings demonstrated adequate similarity.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL