ABSTRACT
Objective:By comparing the advantages and disadvantages of different forms of purse suture, to explore how to minimize the incidence of anastomotic complications after cervical anastomosis of esophageal cancer.Methods:The clinical data of 45 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent mediastinal endoscopy combined with laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer from Jan.2019 to Jun.2020 in Department of Thoracic Surgery, Henan Chest Hospital were selected. In the observation group, 22 cases were sutured with spiral packing at the esophageal stump, and in the control group, 23 cases were sutured with conventional loading forceps. The clinical effects of the two groups were objectively evaluated.Results:There was no significant difference between the two groups in operation time, intraoperative blood loss or hospitalization days ( P>0.05) . In terms of postoperative complications, the incidence of anastomotic leakage and anastomotic stenosis in the observation group (4.54%, 9.09%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (17.39%, 39.13%) , and there was significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic stenosis ( P<0.05) . Conclusion:The spiral continuous suture of esophageal stump can reduce the incidence of anastomotic fistula/anastomotic stenosis without increasing surgical trauma or prolonging operation time, which is worthy of clinical application.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the feasibility, safety, and short-term effect of minimally invasive McKeown esophagecto-my. Methods: We conducted a retrospective evaluation of 88 patients with esophageal carcinoma who received minimally invasive esophagectomy in our center from October 2013 to April 2014. Among the 88 patients, 46 patients underwent total endoscopy McKe-own esophagectomy (TEME) and 42 patients underwent thoracoscope combined with laparotomy Mckeown esophagectomy (TLME). The clinicopathologic factors, operational factors, and postoperative complications of the two approaches were compared. Results:The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, tumor location, preoperative staging, and co-morbidity. The TEME approach was associated with a significant decrease in abdominal blood loss and postoperative pain relative to the TEME approach (P0.05). The total morbidity and total re-spiratory complications in the TEME group were lower than those in the TLME group (P<0.05). Incidences of pneumonia, arrhythmia, wound infection of minor complications, and pneumonia of major complications were relatively low in the TEME approach. Conclu-sion:Our TEME technique can be safely and effectively performed for cervical anastomosis during esophageal surgeries to achieve fa-vorable early outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of circinal stapled suture and manual suture in cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in esophageal resection.Methods The clinical data of 187 patients with esophageal cancer who were admitted to the Cancer Hospital of Sichuan Province from January 2010 to January 2012 were retrospectively analyzed.All the patients were divided into the stapled suture group (98 patients) and manual suture group (89 patients).The time of anastomosis,operation time,time for dieting,duration of hospital stay,the incidence of postoperative complications and positive rate of esophageal remnant cancer cells of the 2 groups were compared.All data were analyzed using the t test or chi-square test.Results The time of anastomosis,operation time,time for dieting and duration of hospital stay were (7.8 ± 1.4) minutes,(227 ± 60) minutes,(6.3 ± 0.9) days and (14 ±4)days in the stapled suture group,which were significantly shorter than (28.5 ±2.3)minutes,(301 ±81)minutes,(8.4 ± 1.0)days and (22 ±9) days in the manual suture group (t =75.44,7.14,7.71,7.41,P ＜0.05).The incidence of anastomotic fistula was 1％ (1/98) in the stapled suture group,which was significantly lower than 8％ (7/89) of the manual suture group (P ＜ 0.05).The incidence of anastomotic stricture was 5％(5/98) in the stapled suture group,which was lower than 7％ (6/89) in the manual suture group,but no significant difference was detected (P ＞0.05).The positive rate of esophageal remnant cancer cells was 0(0/98),which was signifiantly lower than 4％ (4/89) in the manual suture group (P ＜0.05).Conclusion Circinal stapled suture in esophagogastric cervical anastomosis not only reduce the time of anastomosis,operation time and duration of hospital stay,but also decrease the incidence of anastomotic fistula and the positive rate of esophageal remnant cancer cells.
ABSTRACT
Cervical anastomosis by the thoracic approach for the treatment of upper esophageal cancer can simplify surgical steps and reduce incidence of anastomotic leak. This approach has been used for 26 patients with upper esophageal cancer who were admitted to the Jiangsu Cancer Hospital from July 2006 to August 2009. The mean length between lesion and incisor was 23.3 cm. General anesthesia and double-lumen intubation through left posterolateral incision in the fifth intercostal space was adopted. The stomach was dissociated with the technique of "in situ dissociation", and esophagus was dissociated conventionally. Double purse-string suture was adopted to fix the esophageal mucosa onto the supportive base of the stapler, and make purse-string suture to fix stomach on the center pole of the stapler. There was one failure case which has been converted to the manual cervical anastomosis, and the operations for the rest 25 cases were completed successfully, without anastomotic leakage and positive margin. The average blood loss was (352 ±211 )ml, and the average operation time was (3.7 ±0.6 )hours.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the efficacy of small-axillary-incision esophagectomy combined with mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal carcinoma.Methods From April 2005 to April 2007,56 patients with esophageal cancer underwent small-axillary-incision esophagectomy combined with mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis in our hospital.After thoracotomy was performed via a small axillary incision,the stomach and esophagus were separated.Circular stapler was used for esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy.The anastomotic segment was then enveloped and placed at the esophageal bed.Results The average length of the axillary incision was(13.2?1.6)cm(10-15 cm).No anastomotic leak and hemorrhage,injury to the laryngeal nerve,or chylothorax occurred in this series.53 of the patients were followed up for 4-16 months(mean,7.8 months),during which 1(1.9%)patient developed slight anastomotic stenosis,and 4(7.5%)had gastroesophageal reflux.Conclusions Small axillary incision causes less trauma to the patients leading to a quick recovery.By using mechanical cervical anastomosis,man-mad injuries to the anastomotic segment are avoided,resulting in a low rate of postoperative complications.