The Effects Of Smartphone Addiction On Childrens Cervical Posture And Range Of Motion

Background: This study examined the effects of smartphones addiction on cervical posture, and compared the cervical range of motion (ROM) between addicted and non-addicted boys and girls 8 to 13 years of age. Methods: Twenty-four boys and 26 girls were assigned to 2 groups; addicted group (score > 32, n=32) and non-addicted group (score ≤ to 32, n=18). Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) was assessed using side view photographs, forward head posture (FHP) was measured using ImageJ 64 software, and cervical ROM in each direction was measured using a cervical (CROM) device. Results: A forward multiple regression showed that addiction score and body mass index (BMI) were significant predictors of CVA (R2 =0.31, p<0.001). Twenty-three percent of the variability in CVA was related to addiction score. A forward logistic regression showed that addiction to smartphone use and BMI were significant predictors of having FHP, and participants who were addicted were more than four times as likely to have FHP than those who were not: Odds Ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI)=4.5 (1.2, 10.7), p= 0.03. A significant reduction was found in mean cervical angle in addicted versus non-addicted boys (49.4±6.7 vs. 55.5±7.6,η2=0.5, p=0.03) and girls (47.3±6.3 vs. 52.9±6.1,η2=0.9, p=0.02). A significantly more limited cervical ROM found in most neck movements in addicted participants with FHP compared to participants without FHP. Conclusion: Children who are addicted to smartphones may develop faulty habitual posture due to constant neck flexion downward, which may place them at high risk of spine abnormalities.

Validity study of Coda Motion Analysis System for measuring cervical lateral flexion in normal adults / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To investigate the validity of Coda Motion Analysis System for measuring cervical lateral flexion in normal adults in order to explore a new measuring tool for clinical and research practice.@*METHODS@#A total of 43 participants were involved in the study. Cervical range of lateral flexion were measured with Coda Motion Analysis System and "gold standard" X-ray simultaneously. The validity and agreement were assessed using the scatter diagram, the Pearson correlation coefficient and limits of agreement.@*RESULTS@#Cervical range of lateral flexion measured by Coda Motion Analysis System had no statistical differences with those measured by X-ray(>0.05). The Coda Motion Analysis System demonstrated a very good linear relation with the X-ray measurements in cervical range of right lateral flexion, left flexion and total lateral flexion, and the Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.72, 0.85 and 0.90 respectively.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Coda Motion Analysis System showed good validity for measuring cervical lateral flexion in normal adults. Because the reliability of Coda Motion Analysis System was established previously, the results of this study suggest that the system has the potential to be used to measure cervical lateral flexion in clinical and research practice.

The Effect of Forward Head Posture and Tension Type Headache on Neck Movement: For Office Worker

PURPOSE: This study examined the effects of the forward head posture and tension type headache on neck movement among office workers. METHODS: The subjects were 6 male and 21 female patients composed of a forward head posture group, forward head posture group with a tension type headache and a normal group. Each group consisted of 2 males and 7 females. The cranio-vertebral angle of the head and the angle of motion of the neck were measured. SPSS 23.0 was used for data analysis and one-way ANOVA was performed for the mean comparison of the neck movements in the three groups. RESULTS: The participants had a limitation in the movement of all necks between the forward head posture group and forward head posture with tension type headache group compared to the normal subjects. The forward head posture with tension headache group had limited neck extension and lateral bending compared to the forward head posture group. CONCLUSION: Office workers have limitations in the movement of the neck when they are accompanied by forward head posture and tension headache. In particular, when accompanied with a tension headache, there is a restriction on the neck extension and side bending. This study is expected to provide basic data for the relief of tension headache and the treatment of forward head posture in office workers.

Combining K-line to analyse the relationship between cervical range of motion of patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament and surgical prognosis / 中国骨伤

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>Combining K-line (the connecting line of the midpoint of C₂ and C₇ spinal canal on the cervical lateral X-ray film) to analyze the relationship between cervical range of motion of patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and surgical prognosis.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total 42 patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament underwent cervical posterior single open-door laminoplasty between April 2014 and March 2017 were retrospectively ananyzed. The patients were dividing into K-line (+) group and K-line (-) group according to the position realationship of OPLL and K-line. The lesion of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament was not over than the K-line known as K-line (+). Conversely, the lesion of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament crossing the K-line was called K-line (-). Preoperative and postoperative 3 months JOA scores were observed, and postoperative 3 months JOA improvement rate were computed to assess patient's neurological function recovery. Preoperation and postoperative 3 months, OPLL occupation ratio (OOR), cervical lordotic angles (CLA) and cervical lordotic value (CLV) were measured respectively. The realationship between postoperative neurologic functional recovery in patients of CLV>0 group and CLV<=0 group was evaluated in different K-line subgroups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>For the patients in K (+) group and K (-) group, preoperative CLA were (14.7±9.6)° and (-6.4±9.5)°(<0.05) respectively, postoperative at 3 months CLA were (14.0±8.0)° and (-1.4±10.4)°(<0.05) respectively; preoperative JOA scores were 10.9±3.2 and 11.2±2.5 (>0.05) respectively, postoperative at 3 months JOA scores were 14.2±1.8 and 12.6±2.2 (<0.05) respectively, and postoperative at 3 months JOA score improvement rate were (54.7±17.6)% and (25.5±15.7)%(<0.05) respectively. In the K-line (+) group, there were 29 patients in CLV>0 group at 3 months after operation, with improvement rate of (52.3±17.2)%, and 4 patients in CLV<=0 group, with improvement rate of (72.2±7.8)%. The improvement rate of the patients in CLV<=0 group was significantly better than that of the patients in CLV>0 group (<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>No matter whether the ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament was classified as K-line (+) or K-line (-), the cervical posterior single open-door laminoplasty can improve the neurological symptoms of patients, especially the patients in the K-line(+) group with better prognosis. The patinets in K-line(+) group, when postoperative at 3 months CLV>0, their improvement rate was lower than that of the patients with postoperative at 3 months CLV<=0.</p>

Change of 3D cervical range of motion after single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion / 中国骨伤

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To study the change trend of cervical range of motion(ROM) after single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion(ACCF) in treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinical data of 23 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy was retrospectively analyzed from February 2015 to April 2016. There were 11 males and 12 females, with an average age of (54.6±13.3) years. All the patients were diagnosed as cervical spondylotic myelopathy by interrogation, physical examination and radiology, and were treated by ACCF. The Coda motion system was applied to assess the cervical range of motion pre-and post-operation. JOA and VAS scores were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The mean follow-up time was (9.4±1.6) months. Cervical ROM in all directions at 3 months postoperatively were significantly lower except for the left rotation(<0.05). There was significant difference of cervical ROM in all directions between preoperative and 6 months postoperatively(>0.05). The right lateral bending and the left rotation at 9 months postoperatively increased significantly(<0.05). Postoperative extension at 6 months was significantly better than that of 3 months postoperatively(<0.05). The extension, left and right lateral bending and left rotation at 9 months postoperatively were significantly better than of 6 months postoperatively(<0.05). Postoperative JOA scores at each time points were significantly higher than that of preoperative(<0.05) and VAS scores at each time points were significantly lower than that of preoperative(<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The change trend of three-dimensional cervical ROM after single-level ACCF revealed that the ROM decreased in short term, and later increased and was better than the preoperative level. Meanwhile, the neurological function improved significantly. But the short-term and long-term change trend of ROM postoperatively and the change trend of ROM after multi-level ACCF need to be further studied.</p>

Concordância e confiabilidade de dois métodos não-invasivos para a avaliação da amplitude de movimento cervical em adultos jovens / Agreement and reliability of two non-invasive methods for assessing cervical range of motion among young adults

CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO: A amplitude de movimento (ADM) cervical é fundamental na avaliação funcional e na intervenção fisioterapêutica. O Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) destaca-se por ser um método confiável, não invasivo e de fácil manuseio, porém de alto custo. Na prática clínica, opta-se por aparelhos mais acessíveis, como o Flexímetro, cuja confiabilidade ainda não foi adequadamente testada para o segmento cervical. OBJETIVOS: Comparar o Flexímetro com o CROM na análise da ADM cervical e verificar a confiabilidade intra e interexaminadores de ambas as ferramentas. MÉTODOS: Os movimentos cervicais de flexão, extensão, inclinação lateral e rotação foram mensurados, com ambas as ferramentas, por três examinadores em 20 indivíduos jovens, do sexo feminino, assintomáticos. A análise estatística foi realizada pelo Coeficiente de Correlação Intraclasse (ICC). RESULTADOS: A concordância entre as ferramentas foi considerada moderada nos movimentos de flexão e rotação esquerda (0,71;0,58) e excelente nos demais movimentos (0,76-0,87). A confiabilidade intraexaminadores com o CROM foi moderada para os movimentos de flexão e rotação direita (0,70; 0,69) e excelente para os demais movimentos (0,79-0,88); com o Flexímetro, foi excelente para inclinação e rotação direita (0,80; 0,77) e moderada para os demais movimentos (0,69-0,75). A confiabilidade interexaminadores com o CROM foi excelente em todos os movimentos (0,76-0,93) e, com o Flexímetro, foi moderada para os movimentos de rotação direita e esquerda (0,66; 0,75) e excelente para os demais movimentos (0,81-0,88). CONCLUSÕES: Os valores obtidos na avaliação da ADM cervical feita pelo Flexímetro concordam com aqueles mensurados pelo CROM. Além disso, ambas as ferramentas apresentam confiabilidades aceitáveis para a prática clínica.

BACKGROUND: Cervical range of motion (CROM) is a fundamental component of the functional evaluation in physical therapy interventions. The CROM device stands out as a reliable, non-invasive and easy-to-use method, but it is a very expensive tool. In clinical practice, more affordable tools such as Fleximeters are preferred. However, the reliability of Fleximeters for the cervical spine has not been adequately tested. OBJECTIVES: To compare the Fleximeters and the CROM device for the analysis of CROM, and to investigate the intra- and inter-examiner reliability of both tools. METHODS: Cervical movements (flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation) were assessed in 20 asymptomatic young women by three examiners using both tools. The statistical analyses were performed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The agreement between the tools was considered moderate for flexion and left rotation (0.71; 0.58) and excellent for all of the other movements (0.76-0.87). The intra-examiner reliability for the CROM device was moderate for flexion and right rotation (0.70; 0.69) and excellent for all of the other movements (0.79-0.88). For the Fleximeter, the agreement was excellent for inclination and right rotation (0.80; 0.77) and moderate for all of the other movements (0.69-0.75). The inter-examiner reliability for the CROM device was excellent for all movements (0.76-0.93) and for the Fleximeter, it was moderate for right and left rotation (0.66; 0.75) and excellent for all of the other movements (0.81-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: There was agreement between the CROM assessments using the Fleximeter and the CROM device. Furthermore, both devices showed acceptable reliability for clinical practice.