Psychodynamic Profile in an Early Dropout Case: Comparing Therapist's and External Judges' perspectives

INTRODUCTION: contemporary psychodynamic therapy research supports combining clinical judgment with empirical evidences. Recent studies suggest that systematically analyzing single cases may contribute to such efforts. Also, current criteria for evidence-based case studies recommend different perspectives on therapeutic process and outcome, such as therapist's and external judges' ratings. Finally, client's dropout conforms a challenge for psychotherapy research. AIMS & METHODS: as part of a SPR Small Research Grant, this study analyzed and compared the psychodynamic profile proposed both by therapist and two external judges, for the same case of early dropout from focused psychodynamic psychotherapy, consisting of two diagnostic interviews and five subsequent sessions, in a patient with an emotional disorder. Being blind to the rating process of the counterpart, Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD-2) was used by therapist and judges to generate a psychodynamic profile including five therapeutic foci. External judges rating was achieved through consensus, following CQR's guidelines. RESULTS & DISCUSSION: similarities and differences among therapist's and judges' psychodynamic profiles were found. Result's contributions to the understanding of case's early dropout are discussed, along with OPD-2's usefulness for psychodynamic practice-oriented research.(AU)

El estudio del cambio en psicoterapia: desafíos conceptuales y problemas de investigación empírica / The study of change in psychotherapy conceptual challenges and empirical research issues

Introducción: A pesar de su obvio protagonismo, existe un escaso consenso en la forma de comprender y estudiar el cambio en psicoterapia. Objetivos y estructura: el presente trabajo ofrece una síntesis de las principales formas de conceptualizar y analizar el cambio en tratamientos psicoterapéuticos. Se describen tres conjuntos de problemas asociados con la temática, a saber: 1) los debates respecto a qué elementos debe modificar una psicoterapia, 2) los distintos esfuerzos y estrategias para medir el constructo "cambio", y 3) los diferentes criterios metodológicos para establecer si el cambio efectivamente ocurre en una psicoterapia. Se analiza cada eje tanto desde un punto de vista teórico como a la luz de los resultados de la investigación empírica. Discusión: Se presentan conclusiones del trabajo y se discuten las implicancias de la revisión efectuada para la práctica clínica y la investigación en psicoterapia.

Introduction: Although its importance in psychotherapy, there is a scarce consensus about how change must be understand and study. Aims and structure: this paper present a synthesis of the main ways of conceptualizing and analyzing change in psychotherapeutic treatments. We describe three types of challenges in this topic: 1) The debates about what its need to change by the therapy, 2) the strategies used to measure the "change" construct, & 3) the methodological criteria to establish if the change occurs. We analyze each of these axes from a theoretical point of view, and also based on the results of empirical research. Discussion: We present conclusions of the paper and discuss their implications for clinical practice and psychotherapy research.