Manometría de alta resolución en la acalasia de esófago / High-resolution manometry in achalasia of esophagus

Introducción: La manometría esofágica de alta resolución es la prueba ideal para el diagnóstico de la acalasia y muestra la presencia de ondas terciarias o aperistalsis y el aumento de presión, con ausencia de relajación, del esfínter esofágico inferior. Objetivo: Evaluar la utilidad de la manometría esofágica de alta resolución en el diagnóstico y clasificación de la acalasia esofágica. Métodos: Se realizó una investigación descriptiva, trasversal, en el Centro Nacional de Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso entre octubre del 2018 y diciembre del 2019, en 46 pacientes con diagnóstico de acalasia esofágica. Se excluyeron aquellos con cirugía previa del esófago. Las variables incluidas fueron: edad, sexo, tiempo de evolución, síntomas y hallazgos manométricos. Para el análisis de las variables cuantitativas se emplearon medidas de tendencia central, media y de dispersión, la desviación estándar. Las frecuencias y proporciones fueron utilizadas para describir las variables cualitativas. Resultados: Predominó la acalasia tipo II, en el sexo femenino (57 por ciento). La disfagia fue el síntoma más frecuente (84, 76 y 100 por ciento en los tipos I, II y III, respectivamente). El 70 por ciento de los casos presentó más de un año de evolución de los síntomas. La media de la presión de relajación integrada estuvo por encima de 21 mmHg independientemente del tipo. No se encontraron pacientes con subtipos de la acalasia tipo III. Conclusiones: La manometría esofágica de alta resolución es útil para el diagnóstico y clasificación de la acalasia esofágica(AU)

Introduction: High-resolution esophageal manometry is the ideal test for the diagnosis of achalasia and shows the presence of tertiary waves or aperistalsis and increased pressure, in the absence of relaxation, of the lower esophageal sphincter. Objective: To assess the usefulness of high-resolution esophageal manometry in the diagnosis and classification of esophageal achalasia. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional investigation was carried out at the National Center for Minimal Access Surgery, between October 2018 and December 2019, in 46 patients with a diagnosis of esophageal achalasia. Those with previous esophageal surgery were excluded. The variables included were: age, sex, time of evolution, symptoms and manometric findings. For the analysis of the results, the percentage and measures of central tendency (arithmetic mean and standard deviation) were used. Results: Type II achalasia predominated in females (57 percent). Dysphagia was the most frequent symptom (84, 76, and 100 percent in types I, II, and III, respectively). 70 percent of the cases presented more than one year of evolution of the symptoms. Regarding the high-resolution manometry parameters, it was observed that regardless of the type, the mean integrated relaxation pressure was above 21 mmHg. No patients with type III achalasia subtypes were found. Conclusions: High-resolution esophageal manometry is useful for the diagnosis and classification of esophageal acalasia(AU)

Manometría de alta resolución en pacientes con trastornos motores esofágicos / High resolution manometry in patients with esophageal motor disorders

Introducción: La manometría de alta resolución es la prueba de referencia para el estudio de los trastornos motores esofágicos. Objetivo: Determinar la factibilidad de la manometría de alta resolución para el estudio de las características de los trastornos motores esofágicos. Métodos: Se realizó una investigación descriptiva, transversal, en el Centro Nacional de Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso, entre septiembre de 2018 y diciembre de 2019, en 56 pacientes cubanos con diagnóstico de trastorno motor esofágico por manometría de alta resolución, con edades entre 18 y 80 años, que dieron su consentimiento para participar en el estudio. Se excluyeron pacientes con acalasia esofágica y los trastornos menores de la peristalsis. Las variables incluidas fueron: edad, sexo, diagnósticos manométricos y sus características, síntomas, tipos de unión esofagogástrica, diagnósticos imagenológicos o endoscópicos. Para el análisis de los resultados se empleó el porcentaje, medidas de tendencia central y ji cuadrado de Pearson de homogeneidad, con un nivel de significación p 8804; 0,05 y 95 por ciento de confiabilidad. Resultados: Predominó la contractilidad ausente (39,28 por ciento), el sexo femenino (58,9 por ciento) y la disfagia (66,07 por ciento). A la obstrucción al flujo de la unión esofagogástrica correspondió la media de presión de reposo del esfínter esofágico inferior más alta (43,28 mmHg) y la media de la presión de relación integrada por encima de 15 mmHg (38,88 mmHg). El esófago hipercontráctil presentó media de contractilidad distal integrada elevada (5564,25 mmHg/s/cm). Se comprobó la existencia de contracciones rápidas en el espasmo esofágico distal (media de 21,4 cm/ s). Conclusiones: La manometría de alta resolución es factible de ser empleada para el diagnóstico de los trastornos motores esofágicos(AU)

Introduction: High-resolution manometry is the gold standard for the study of esophageal motor disorders. Objective: A descriptive, cross-sectional research was carried out in el Centro Nacional de Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso, between September 2018 and December 2019, in 56 patients, diagnosed with esophageal motor disorder by high-resolution manometry, aged between 18 and 20 years, who gave their consent to participate in the study. Esophageal achalasia and minor peristalsis disorders were excluded. The variables included were: age, sex, manometric diagnoses and their characteristics, symptoms, types of esophagogastric junction, imaging or endoscopic diagnoses. For the analysis of the results, the percentage, measures of central tendency and Pearson's chi square of homogeneity were used, with a level of statistical significance 8804; 0.05 and 95 percent reliability. Development: Absent contractility (39,28 percent), female sex (58,9 percent) and dysphagia (66,07 percent) predominated. The obstruction to the flow of the esophagogastric junction corresponded to the highest mean resting pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (43,28 mmHg) and the mean integrated pressure ratio above 15 mmHg (38,88 mmHg). The hypercontractile esophagus presented mean high integrated distal contractility (5564,25 mmHg/s/cm). Rapid contractions were found in distal esophageal spasm (mean 21,4 cm/s). Conclusions: High resolution manometry was feasible to be used for the diagnosis of major esophageal motor disorders(AU)

To evaluate the motility of the esophageal phase of swallowing among brainstem stroke survivors / 中华物理医学与康复杂志

Objective@#To evaluate the motility of the esophagus while swallowing of brainstem stroke survivors.@*Methods@#Eighteen patients and 10 healthy subjects were included in the study. There was no significant difference in average age, gender, weight or body mass index between the two groups. All underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry to assess esophageal motility while swallowing, and they were rated using the version 3.0 of the Chicago classification.@*Results@#Fourteen of the 18 stroke survivors displayed abnormal esophageal dynamics (77.8%), compared with only 10.0% of the healthy control group, but that difference was not statistically significant. The typical abnormalities were a lack of contraction, high pressure contractile esophagus, gastroesophageal junction outflow obstruction and/or distal esophageal spasm. Compared with the control group, the average resting pressure of the patients′ upper esophageal sphincters (UESs) was significantly lower, while the UES residual pressure and integrated relaxation pressure of their lower esophageal sphincters (LESs) were higher and the average UES relaxation time was significantly shorter. No significant differences were found in the LES resting pressures, distal contractile integrals or the distal latency between the two groups.@*Conclusions@#Abnormal esophageal motility is highly prevalent in brainstem stroke survivors and due attention should be paid to it. High-resolution manometry can be used to assess this condition.

Understanding the Chicago Classification: From Tracings to Patients

Current parameters of the Chicago classification include assessment of the esophageal body (contraction vigour and peristalsis), lower esophageal sphincter relaxation pressure, and intra-bolus pressure pattern. Esophageal disorders include achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, major disorders of peristalsis, and minor disorders of peristalsis. Sub-classification of achalasia in types I, II, and III seems to be useful to predict outcomes and choose the optimal treatment approach. The real clinical significance of other new parameters and disorders is still under investigation.

High-resolution Manometry: Esophageal Disorders Not Addressed by the "Chicago Classification"

The development of the high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) and the Chicago classification have improved the diagnosis and management of esophageal motility disorders. However, some conditions have yet to be addressed by this classification. This review describes findings in HRM which are not included in the current Chicago classification based on the experience in our center. This includes the analysis of the upper esophageal sphincter, proximal esophagus, longitudinal muscle contraction, disorders related to gastroesophageal reflux disease and respiratory symptoms. The utility of provocative tests and the use of HRM in the evaluation of rumination syndrome and post-surgical patients will also be discussed. We believe that characterization of the manometric findings in these areas will eventually lead to incorporation of new criteria into the existing classification.