Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Audiology and Speech Pathology ; (6): 425-429, 2016.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-504782

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the performance of Mandarin screening version of hearing handicap inven-tory in elderly (HHIE-S)and the single question of hearing loss in the hearing screening in the old adults.Methods A total of 570 participants,aged from 50~85 years,of native Mandarin speakers were tested with standard pure tone audiometry (PTA),HHIE-S and single questionAre you now having difficulty in hearing?.HHIE-S>8 was taken as an indicator of hearing handicap.Sensitivity,specificity,negative predictive values and positive predic-tive values of both HHIE-S and single question inquiry when 0.5~4 kHz PTA average > 25 dB,>40 dB and >60 dB were compared.Results The prevalence was 83.9% (478)measured by PTA.The prevalence was 55.3%and 52.5% for HHIE-S and positive answer for single question,respectively.The sensitivity of HHIE-S when the participants grouped with 0.5~4 kHz PTA average > 25 dB,>40 dB and > 60 dB was 61%,85% and 96%, respectively,whereas the sensitivity of single question of the above 3 conditions was 58%,81% and 100%,respec-tively.The specificity of HHIE-S decreased with greater hearing loss.It was 72%,88% and 47% respectively for HHIE-S and 75%,61% and 50% for the single question.There was no significant difference either for sensitivity and specificity between the HHIE-S and the single question.Conclusion Both the Mandarin version of HHIE-S and single question are effective in the hearing screening of old adults.Depending on the purpose and availability of resources,one or both of them can be adopted.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL