ABSTRACT
Introducción: promover autonomía significa transitar desde un modelo paternalista hacia uno que posi-cione en un rol activo a las personas durante el encuentro clínico, con participación en la toma de deci-siones relativas al cuidado de su salud. Este artículo describe la percepción de usuarios que viven con multimorbilidad respecto del ejercicio de su autonomía durante la atención clínica. Método: estudio de caso cualitativo en usuarios con multimorbilidad atendidos en un centro de salud familiar de Santiago (Chile).Se realizó análisis de contenido según Krippendorf. Resultados: la muestra quedó conformada por 19 participantes adultos con un promedio de 2.7 condiciones crónicas de salud. Del análisis de contenido de las entrevistas emergieron tres categorías: a) significado atribuido por los usuarios a la autonomía en la atención de salud, b) elementos que debe considerar una atención en salud que respete la autonomía del usuario y c) participación durante la atención clínica. Conclusiones: frente al aumento de las condicio-nes crónicas de salud es imperativo repensar la forma de brindar atención de salud, relevando el valor de la participación usuaria a través de la toma de decisiones compartida como expresión de respeto de su autonomía y una forma de fomentar el cuidado centrado en las personas
Aim: Promoting autonomy means changing from a paternalistic model to one in which individuals play an active role in their healthcare, which their participation in medical decision-making will reflect. This issue needs to be sufficiently explored in Chile, so this article aims to describe the perception of users liv-ing with multimorbidity regarding their ability to exercise autonomy in clinical care. Method: Qualitative case study conducted in a sample of patients with multimorbility from a family health center in Santiago de Chile. Content analysis was performed according to the Krippendorf method. Results: The sample com-prised 19 adult participants with an average of 2.7 chronic health conditions. Three categories emerged from the content analysis of the interviews: (a) Meaning attributed by users to autonomy in health care, (b) Elements that health care respecting user autonomy should consider, and (c) Participation during clinical care. Conclusions: Considering the sustained increase in chronic health conditions, it is impera-tive to rethink how health care is provided, highlighting the value of user participation through shared decision-making as an expression of respect for individuals' autonomy and the promotion of patient-cen-tered care
Objetivo: promover a autonomia significa passar de um modelo paternalista para um que posicione as pessoas num papel ativo durante o encontro clínico, com participação na tomada de decisões relaciona-das com os seus cuidados de saúde. Este manuscrito descreve a percepção de usuários que convivem com multimorbidade quanto ao exercício de sua autonomia durante o atendimento clínico. Método: estudo de caso qualitativo em usuários com multimorbidade atendidos em um Centro de Saúde da Família de Santiago, no Chile. A análise de conteúdo foi realizada segundo Krippendorf. Resultados: a amostra foi composta por 19 participantes adultos com média de 2.7 condições crônicas de saúde. Da análise de conteúdo das entrevistas emergem três categorias: a) Significado atribuído pelos usuários à autonomia no cuidado em saúde, b) Elementos que um cuidado de saúde que respeite a autonomia do usuário deve considerar, e c) Participação durante o atendimento clínico. Conclusões: face ao aumento das condições crónicas de saúde, é imperativo repensar a forma de prestar cuidados de saúde, destacando o valor da participação dos pacientes através da tomada de decisão partilhada como expressão de respeito pela sua autonomia e forma de promover o cuidado centrado nas pessoas
Subject(s)
Humans , Chile , DiseaseABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the predictive value of serum soluble tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis(sTWEAK)and Netrin-1 combined with acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHE Ⅱ)score for poor prognosis in patients with severe craniocerebral injury after surgery.Methods Totally 120 patients with severe craniocerebral injury admitted to a hospital from June 2020 to June 2022 were divided into good prognosis group and poor prognosis group according to the prognosis 30 days af-ter surgery.The serum levels of sTWEAK,Netrin-1 and APACHE Ⅱ score were compared between the two groups.Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression were used to analyze the influencing factors of poor prognosis in patients with severe craniocerebral injury,and the prediction model of serum sTWEAK,Netrin-1 and APACHE Ⅱ score combined was constructed.The predictive value of serum sTWEAK,Netrin-1 level and APACHE Ⅱ score in patients with severe craniocerebral injury after surgery was analyzed by receiver operat-ing characteristic(ROC)curve.Results The duration of intensive care unit stay in the poor prognosis group was longer than that in the good prognosis group,and the albumin level,Glasgow Coma scale and serum Ne-trin-1 level at admission were lower than those in the good prognosis group.The proportion of multiple brain contusion and laceration,the proportion of mechanical ventilation,APACHE Ⅱ score at admission and the lev-els of serum sTWEAK,blood creatinine and blood urea nitrogen were higher than those in the group with good prognosis,and the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that multiple brain contusion and laceration,decreased Netrin-1 level,increased APACHE Ⅱscore and increased sTWEAK level at admission were risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with severe craniocerebral injury(P＜0.05).ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve and 95％CI of ser-um sTWEAK,Netrin-1 and APACHE Ⅱ scores were 0.742(0.552-0.925),0.731(0.488-0.963),0.714(0.502-0.911)and 0.882(0.795-0.947)respectively when the three indexes were used alone and in com-bination.Conclusion Serum sTWEAK and Netrin-1 combined with APACHE Ⅱ score have good predictive value for the poor prognosis of patients with severe craniocerebral injury after surgery,and can provide refer-ence for the formulation of clinical treatment.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the correlation between the expression level of serum peptidylarginine deiminase type 2(PAD2)and acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHE Ⅱ)scores in patients with septic shock.Methods A total of 103 patients with septic shock admitted to the First People's Hospital of Neijiang from June 2020 to June 22 were regarded as the study group.According to the severity of the condition,the APACHE Ⅱ scores were used to classify study group into mild group(n=39),moderate group(n=51)and severe group(n=13).In addition,103 healthy individuals who underwent physical examination in the hospital during the same period,whose general information matched the study group patients,were selected as the control group.Serum PAD2 expression level in patients with septic shock was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.Spearman method was applied to analyze the correlation between serum PAD2 expression level and APACHE Ⅱ scores in patients with septic shock.Logistic regression was applied to analyze the factors affecting the severity of patients with septic shock.The diagnostic value of serum PAD2 in moderate and severe septic shock was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis.Results The differences in blood creatinine levels(137.52±9.01μmol/L vs 112.22±8.67μmol/L)and platelet counts(74.58±5.19 vs 86.02±5.34)×109/L between study group and control group were statistically significant(t=20.535,15.591,all P<0.05).The expression level of PAD2 in the study group(42.47±6.62 ng/ml)was higher than that in the control group(38.59±5.31 ng/ml),with significant difference(t=4.815,P<0.05).The expression level of serum PAD2 and APACHE Ⅱ scores in patients with septic shock gradually increased with the severity of the condition(F=3.777,176.582,all P<0.05).The expression level of serum PAD2 in patients with septic shock was positively correlated with APACHE Ⅱ scores(r=0.859,P<0.05).Serum creatinine(OR=1.927),PAD2(OR=1.803)and APACHE Ⅱscores(OR=1.657)were risk factors for moderate and severe septic shock(P<0.05),while platelet count(OR=0.781)was a protective factor(P<0.05).The area under the curve(AUC)of serum PAD2 in the diagnosis of moderate and severe septic shock was 0.880,and the sensitivity and specificity were 75.73%(95%CI:0.701～0.826)and 90.29%(95%CI:0.851～0.935),respectively,indicating it had high diagnostic value for moderate and severe septic shock.Conclusion The expression level of serum PAD2 was positively correlated with APACHE Ⅱ scores,and may have a good diagnostic value for moderate and severe septic shock.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Objective Advances in medicine have increased the life expectancy of pediatric patients with chronic illnesses, and challenges with the guided transition of adolescents and young adults from pediatric clinics to adult clinics have grown. The aim of this study was to better understand readiness and factors related to this transition process in Brazil. Method In this cross-sectional study of 308 patients aged from 16 to 21 years under follow-up in pediatric specialties, the degree of readiness for transition was assessed using the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ) and its domains. Associations with demographic data, clinical data, socio-economic level, medication adherence, family functionality, and parental satisfaction with health care were evaluated. Results The median TRAQ score was 3.7 (3.2 - 4.2). Better readiness was associated with female patients, socio-economic class A-B, current active employment, higher level of education, not failing any school year, attending medical appointments alone, functional family, and a good knowledge of disease and medications. A low correlation was observed between TRAQ and age. TRAQ presented good internal consistency (alpha-Cronbach 0.86). In the multiple linear regression, TRAQ score showed a significant association with female gender, advanced age, socio-economic class A-B, better knowledge of disease and medications, and independence to attend appointments alone. Conclusion TRAQ instrument can guide healthcare professionals to identify specific areas of approach, in order to support adolescents with chronic disease to set goals for their own personal development and improve their readiness to enter into the adult healthcare system. In this study, some factors were related to better TRAQ scores.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the value of serum procalcitonin (PCT) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score on predicting prognosis of elderly patients with sepsis.Methods:A retrospective cohort study, patients with sepsis who admitted to the department of emergency and the department of geriatric medicine of Peking University Third Hospital from March 2020 to June 2021 were enrolled. Patients' demographics, routine laboratory examinations, APACHE Ⅱ score that within 24 hours of admission were obtained from their electronic medical records. The prognosis during the hospitalization and one year after discharge were collected, retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors were performed. And Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to examine overall survival.Results:A total of 116 elderly patients met inclusion criteria, 55 were alive and 61 were died. On univariate analysis, clinical variables such as lactic acid [Lac, hazard ratio ( HR) = 1.16, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 1.07-1.26, P < 0.001], PCT ( HR = 1.02, 95% CI was 1.01-1.04, P < 0.001), alanine aminotransferase (ALT, HR = 1.00, 95% CI was 1.00-1.00, P = 0.143), aspartate aminotransferase (AST, HR = 1.00, 95% CI was 1.00-1.01, P = 0.014), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, HR = 1.00, 95% CI was 1.00-1.00, P < 0.001), hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (HBDH, HR = 1.00, 95% CI was 1.00-1.00, P = 0.001), creatine kinase (CK, HR = 1.00, 95% CI was 1.00-1.00, P = 0.002), MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase (CK-MB, HR = 1.01, 95% CI was 1.01-1.02, P < 0.001), Na ( HR = 1.02, 95% CI was 0.99-1.05, P = 0.183), blood urea nitrogen (BUN, HR = 1.02, 95% CI was 0.99-1.05, P = 0.139), fibrinogen (FIB, HR = 0.85, 95% CI was 0.71-1.02, P = 0.078), neutrophil ratio (NEU%, HR = 0.99, 95% CI was 0.97-1.00, P = 0.114), platelet count (PLT, HR = 1.00, 95% CI was 0.99-1.00, P = 0.108) and total bile acid (TBA, HR = 1.01, 95% CI was 1.00-1.02, P = 0.096) shown to be associated with poor prognosis. On multivariable analysis, level of PCT was an important factor influencing the outcome of sepsis ( HR = 1.03, 95% CI was 1.01-1.05, P = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that there was no significant difference with respect to the overall survival between the two groups, with patients of PCT ≤ 0.25 μg/L and PCT > 0.25 μg/L ( P = 0.220). It also showed that the overall survival rate in patients with high APACHE Ⅱ score (> 27 points) was significantly lower than that in patients with low APACHE Ⅱ score (≤ 27 points, P = 0.015). Conclusion:Serum PCT level is valuable prognostic factors of elderly patients with sepsis, and higher APACHE Ⅱ score (> 27 points) indicates a poor prognosis.
ABSTRACT
Esse estudo teve como objetivo descrever o perfil clínico-epidemiológico e fatores associados à polifarmácia de pacientes com insuficiência renal crônica hemodialítica. Trata-se de um estudo epidemiológico de corte transversal com delineamento descritivo-analítico realizado em um centro de hemodiálise no interior da Bahia. Foram avaliados dados sociodemográficos, clínicos, estilo de vida, farmacoterapia e sintomas durante as sessões de hemodiálise. Os medicamentos utilizados pelos pacientes foram classificados conforme a Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical. A análise dos dados foi realizada por meio da estatística descritiva e a associação entre as variáveis categóricas foi obtida por meio do Teste de Qui-quadrado de Pearson, nível de significância de 5%. Do total de 187 participantes, 56,1% eram homens, com idade <60 anos (69,5%), tendo como média de idade 52 (±15,3) anos. Com comorbidade 87,7%, em especial, a hipertensão arterial sistêmica 82,7%, com prevalência de polifarmácia 89,9%. Durante as sessões de hemodiálise os pacientes apresentaram: cefaleia (72,5%), câimbras 84,5%, calafrios 68,4%, tontura 51,3%, dor abdominal 33,7%, dispneia 27,3% e outros sintomas 23,5%. Houve associação estatística entre polifarmácia e tontura (p= 0,029) e dor abdominal (p= 0,009), durante as sessões de hemodiálise. Os medicamentos mais frequentes foram os pertencentes aos grupos anatômicos A (30,4%) e C (23,4%). Verificou-se alta prevalência de polifarmácia, sendo que os resultados obtidos poderão auxiliar gestores e profissionais da área da saúde nas tomadas de decisão, aperfeiçoando assim, a assistência ao paciente com doença renal crônica.
This study aimed to describe the clinical-epidemiological profile and factors associated with polypharmacy in patients with hemodialysis chronic renal failure. This is a cross-sectional epidemiological study with a descriptive-analytical design carried out in a hemodialysis center in the interior of Bahia. Sociodemographic, clinical, lifestyle, pharmacotherapy and symptoms data were evaluated during hemodialysis sessions. The medications used by patients were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and the association between categorical variables was obtained using Pearson's Chi-square test, significance level of 5%. Of the total of 187 participants, 56.1% were men, aged <60 years (69.5%), with a mean age of 52 (±15.3) years. With comorbidity 87.7%, in particular, systemic arterial hypertension 82.7%, with a prevalence of polypharmacy 89.9%. During hemodialysis sessions, patients presented: headache (72.5%), cramps 84.5%, chills 68.4%, dizziness 51.3%, abdominal pain 33.7%, dyspnea 27.3% and other symptoms 23.5%. There was a statistical association between polypharmacy and dizziness (p= 0.029) and abdominal pain (p= 0.009) during hemodialysis sessions. The most frequent medications were those belonging to anatomical groups A (30.4%) and C (23.4%). There was a high prevalence of polypharmacy, and the results obtained could help managers and health professionals in decision-making, thus improving care for patients with chronic kidney disease.
Este estudio tuvo como objetivo describir el perfil clínico-epidemiológico y los factores asociados a la polifarmacia en pacientes con insuficiencia renal crónica en hemodiálisis. Se trata de un estudio epidemiológico transversal, con diseño descriptivo- analítico, realizado en un centro de hemodiálisis del interior de Bahía. Durante las sesiones de hemodiálisis se evaluaron datos sociodemográficos, clínicos, de estilo de vida, farmacoterapéuticos y de síntomas. Los medicamentos utilizados por los pacientes se clasificaron según la Química Terapéutica Anatómica. El análisis de los datos se realizó mediante estadística descriptiva y la asociación entre variables categóricas se obtuvo mediante la prueba Chi-cuadrado de Pearson, nivel de significancia del 5%. Del total de 187 participantes, el 56,1% eran hombres, edad <60 años (69,5%), con una edad media de 52 (±15,3) años. Con comorbilidad 87,7%, en particular hipertensión arterial sistémica 82,7%, con prevalencia de polifarmacia 89,9%. Durante las sesiones de hemodiálisis los pacientes presentaron: dolor de cabeza (72,5%), calambres 84,5%, escalofríos 68,4%, mareos 51,3%, dolor abdominal 33,7%, disnea 27,3% y otros síntomas 23,5%. Hubo asociación estadística entre polifarmacia y mareos (p= 0,029) y dolor abdominal (p= 0,009) durante las sesiones de hemodiálisis. Los medicamentos más frecuentes fueron los pertenecientes a los grupos anatómicos A (30,4%) y C (23,4%). Hubo una alta prevalencia de polifarmacia y los resultados obtenidos podrían ayudar a gestores y profesionales de la salud en la toma de decisiones, mejorando así la atención a los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Several predictive scoring systems measuring disease severity are used to predict outcomes, typically mortality, of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Two common validated predictive scoring systems include acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) and modified sequential organ failure assessment score (mSOFA). To compare performance of APACHE II and mSOFA score in critically ill patients regarding the outcomes in the form of morbidity and mortality in ICU. Methods: This prospective observational clinical study was conducted on 100 patients over 6 months. For each patient, APACHE II score on day of admission and serial mSOFA scores on day 0, 3, 7 and 10 were calculated and compared. Results: The age of the non-survivors was significantly older than survivors was (57.1±11.76 and 54.28±15.16). [In our study we found that the mean length of ICU stay of non-survivors was (5.41±4.81) & survivors(8.63± 4.81) days.] In our study mortality rate was 40%.The APACHE II score with cut-off point of 23 demonstrated a sensitivity rate of 98.33% & specificity rate of 17.5%, accuracy of 66.00%. Serial mSOFA scores with cut-off of 11 on day0, day3, day7 better differentiated survivors from non-survivors with 98.3% sensitivity, 27.5% specificity and 70% accuracy. Conclusion: Both APACHE II and mSOFA scores can help ICU physicians as a significant predictive marker for mortality in critically ill patients. The serial measurement of mSOFA score in the first week is a better mortality predictor tool than APACHE II score in critically ill patients.
ABSTRACT
Resumen: Introducción: La obesidad es una enfermedad con impacto negativo en la sobrevida; se hace referencia al término «paradoja de la obesidad¼ utilizado como un efecto protector en la mortalidad. Objetivo: Determinar si la obesidad es un factor de protección en el paciente crítico. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohorte. Se obtuvo información de expedientes de Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI) del Hospital Regional Monterrey del Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales para los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE) Monterrey durante 2018. Se hizo análisis bivariado para asociación χ2 y U de Mann-Whitney para correlación fórmula de Pearson y análisis de supervivencia con curva de Kaplan-Meier. Resultados: Se analizaron 151 expedientes de pacientes, 73 obesos y 78 no obesos, se observó que la obesidad es un factor protector para mortalidad (p = 0.044, OR 0.431 (IC 0.187-0.992). El IMC no se correlaciona con el Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II (p = 0.066); sin embargo, con un impacto en la curva de supervivencia (p = 0.42). Conclusiones: Se detecta la obesidad como factor protector; sin embargo, su asociación con enfermedades crónicas degenerativas, estancia prolongada en UCI y sus complicaciones no dejan de tener impacto negativo en la supervivencia fuera de la unidad.
Abstract: Introduction: Obesity is a disease with a negative impact on survival; the prognosis of these patients is has controversial results. The term «obesity paradox¼ refers as a protective effect on mortality. Objective: To determine whether obesity is a protective factor in the critically ill patient. Material y methods: A cohort study was conducted. Data was obtained from ICU records of the ISSSTE Monterrey Regional Hospital during 2018, bivariate analysis was performed for χ2 and Mann Whitney's U association, for Pearson's formula correlation and survival analysis with Kaplan-Meier curve. Results: 151 records of 73 obese and 78 non-obese patients were analyzed, it was observed that obesity is a protective factor for mortality (p = 0.044, OR 0.431(IC 0.187-0.992), BMI does not correlate with APACHE II (p = 0.066), however, an impact on the survival curve was observed (p = 0.42). Conclusions: According to the results obtained, it matches with the term «obesity paradox¼, however, its association with chronic degenerative diseases, prolonged stay in the ICU and its complications do not cease to have a negative impact on survival outside the unit.
Resumo: Introdução: A obesidade é uma doença com impacto negativo na sobrevida; O termo «paradoxo da obesidade¼ refere-se a um efeito protetor sobre a mortalidade. Objetivo: Determinar se a obesidade é um fator protetor em pacientes críticos. Material e métodos: Foi realizado um estudo de coorte. As informações foram obtidas dos registros da UTI do ISSSTE Monterrey Regional Hospital durante o ano de 2018, foi realizada análise bivariada para associação χ2 eU Mann-Whitney, para correlação da fórmula de Pearson e análise de sobrevida com curva de Kaplan-Meier. Resultados: Foram analisados 151 prontuários de 73 pacientes obesos e 78 não obesos, observou-se que a obesidade é fator protetor para mortalidade (p = 0.044, OR 0.431(IC 0.187-0.992), IMC não se correlaciona com APACHE II (p = 0.066), porém, com impacto na curva de sobrevida (p = 0.42). Conclusões: A obesidade é encontrada como fator de proteção, porém, sua associação com doenças crônico-degenerativas, permanência prolongada na UTI e suas complicações não deixam de ter impacto negativo na sobrevida fora da unidade.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Magnesium is the second most common intracellular cation found in the body that is required as cofactor in numerous enzymatic reactions, smooth functioning of cardiac and neurological systems. Magnesium deficiency is often overlooked in critically ill patients and is linked with risk of electrolyte imbalance, difficulty weaning off ventilator, sudden cardiac deaths and poorer outcome. Objective- To assess prevalence of magnesium deficiency in critically ill patients admitted to Medical ICU and its association with requirement & duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, APACHE-II & mortality. Methods- Prospective descriptive study was conducted on 69 critically ill patients admitted in medical ICU. After taking informed consent serum magnesium level of patients were collected and entered in spreadsheet and final analysis was done with help of Open EPI and SPSS software. Results-It was concluded that patients having hypomagnesemia were at increased risk of electrolyte abnormalities, longer ventilatory support, longer hospital and ultimately poorer outcome stay as compared to patients with normal magnesium levels. Conclusion- Magnesium remains an important but often side-lined cation in critically ill patients. However, Hypomagnesemia is a repeated finding seen in critically ill patients and is significantly associated with a higher mortality rate and frequent need for mechanical ventilation.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To assess the ability of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ) and trauma-injury severity score (TRISS) in predicting mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) trauma patients.Methods:Databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI were retrieved from January 1980 to December 2020. The ability of the APACHE Ⅱ and the TRISS to predict mortality in the ICU trauma patients was compared in the retrieval literatures. The relevant literatures were screened by two researchers independently. The data of the included literatures were extracted, and the quality of the included literatures was evaluated. MetaDiSc 1.4 software was used to test the heterogeneity among studies. Meta-analysis was performed on diagnostic accuracy indicators and the summary receiver operator characteristics curve (SROC curve) was fitted. The area under SROC curve (AUC) of the two scores was compared. Deek test was used to analyze literature publication bias.Results:Six studies were selected with 4 054 patients involved with medium and high quality. Meta-analysis results showed that APACHE Ⅱ and TRISS had low sensitivity [the pooled sensitivity and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 0.48 (0.41-0.55) and 0.51 (0.41-0.62)], high specificity [the pooled specificity and 95% CI was 0.96 (0.93-0.97) and 0.98 (0.95-0.99)], the pooled diagnostic odds ratio ( DOR) and 95% CI was 20 (14-28) and 46 (18-120), and overall good performance in terms of AUC [the AUC and 95% CI was 0.79 (0.75-0.82) and 0.80 (0.76-0.83)] in predicting the prognosis of ICU trauma patients. There was no statistical difference in AUC between the two scores ( Z = 1.542, P > 0.05). Deek funnel plot showed little publication bias. Conclusion:Both APACHE Ⅱ and TRISS scores could accurately predict mortality in ICU trauma patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the predictive value of the serum C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin (ALB) ratio (CAR) for organ damage in tsutsugamushi disease.Methods:The clinical data of 166 patients with tsutsugamushi disease admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the organ damage group (72 cases) and non-organ damage group (94 cases) according to the organ damage criteria. The general data and laboratory test results of the two groups of patients were compared. The significant indicators of univariate analysis were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to analyze the predictive value of CAR for organ damage in patients with tsutsugamushi disease.Results:There were no significant differences in age, sex, days of fever, and admission body temperature between the organ damage group and non-organ damage group ( P>0.05). However, the body mass index, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), length of hospital stay, hospitalization expense, percentage of neutrophils (NEUT), lymphocyte count, procalcitonin, CRP, and CAR in the organ damage group were significantly higher than those in the non-organ damage group ( P<0.05), and ALB was significantly lower than that in the non-organ damage group ( P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that APACHEⅡ( P=0.039), NEUT ( P=0.003), and CAR ( P=0.011) were independent risk factors for tsutsugamushi disease complicated by organ damage. The ROC curve showed that the AUCs of APACHEⅡ, NEUT, and CAR were 0.655, 0.716, and 0.727, respectively. When the cut-off value of CAR was 2.86, the sensitivity was 55.6%, and the specificity was 79.8%. Conclusions:Elevated CAR is an independent risk factor for tsutsugamushi disease complicated with organ damage and can be used as an important indicator to evaluate the presence or absence of organ damage in patients with tsutsugamushi disease.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the relationship between hematocrit, early fluid therapy, and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock, and to provide evidence for fluid resuscitation therapy and prognosis assessment in these patients.Methods:The clinical information of patients with septic shock who were diagnosed and treated in the Emergency Intensive Care Unit (EICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020 were collected. Taking the survival or death of patients 28 days after admission as the end point of clinical research, the patients were divided into the survival and death groups. After analyzing the basic data of the two groups, the univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses were used to analyze the evaluation value of Δ Hematocrit (HCT) d2-d1 and ΔHCT d3-d1 on the prognosis of patients with septic shock. At the same time, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to analyze the overall survival rate of patients with septic shock, and the smooth curve fitting graph was used to verify its relationship with net fluid intake and death. Results:There were 241 cases in the survival group and 67 cases in the death group. Univariate COX analysis showed statistically significant differences between the survival and death groups in acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) ( P=0.0006), red cell volume distribution width (RDW) ( P=0.0043), age ( P=0.0184), ΔHCT d2-d1 ( P=0.0136), ΔHCT d3-d1 ( P=0.0204), and white blood cell (WBC) ( P=0.0444). Multivariate COX analysis showed that ΔHCT d2-d1 ( P=0.0115) and ΔHCT d3-d1 ( P=0.0029) were independent risk factors for death in EICU patients with septic shock. ΔHCT d2-d1 and ΔHCT d3-d1 were divided into three groups according to the three-digit method. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed no significant difference among the three groups in the overall survival rate related to ΔHCT d2-d1 ( P=0.16), but there was a statistically significant difference in the overall survival rate among the three groups related to ΔHCT d3-d1 ( P=0.025). The smooth fitting curve of ΔHCT d3-d1, net fluid intake, and prognosis showed that ΔHCT d3-d1 was negatively correlated with net fluid intake, and the middle ΔHCT d3-d1 group had the best prognosis. Conclusions:The value of ΔHCT d3-d1 is related to the net fluid intake of patients with septic shock. An appropriate decrease in HCT on the third day can improve the prognosis of patients with septic shock. The dynamic changes of hematocrit can provide a certain basis for fluid resuscitation and prognosis evaluation in patients with septic shock.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the clinical significance of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ (APACHEⅡ) combined with different systematic inflammation markers (SIMs) including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR)-in adult patients with venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).Methods:A total of 89 adult patients with VA-ECMO ( ≥ 3 d) in the Emergency Department of Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital from January 2017 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: survivors ( n=39) and non-survivors ( n=50). The baseline APACHE Ⅱscore and PLR, NLR, LMR before ECMO implantation and at 1, 2, 3 day after ECMO were recorded. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of 28-day mortality in patients with VA-ECMO. The utility of APACHEⅡ score and SIMs alone or combination for predicting clinical prognosis was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The patients were divided into the high risk group and the low risk group according to the best cut-off value, and the difference of ECMO-related complications between the two groups was compared. Results:When combined APACHEⅡ score with SIMs, APACHEⅡ + PLR 48 h + LMR 24 h + LMR 72 h demonstrated the greatest predictive ability with an AUC of 0.833. Compared with the high-risk group, the low-risk group has a lower incidence of acute renal injury, infection, bleeding complications, the use of continuous renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation, and a higher hospital survival rate.Conclusions:The combination of APACHEⅡ score and SIMs-PLR, LMR- is better than a single one for death prediction, and it is expected to be a new predictive model for early identification of the risk of death or poor prognosis in patients with VA-ECMO.
ABSTRACT
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a type of necrotizing and inflammatory liver disease caused by certain commonly-used drugs, Chinese herbal medicines or dietary supplements. In severe cases, it may lead to acute liver failure. Without liver transplantation, the fatality could reach up to 80%. It is of significance to master the indications of liver transplantation. Several prognostic scoring systems have been developed to help clinicians to decide which patients need urgent liver transplantation, such as King's College criteria (KCC) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring systems. However, these scoring methods have been developed for a long period of time and lack of modifications. Therefore, scholars have proposed several new scoring systems, such as acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoring systems, which provide novel ideas for the evaluation of liver transplantation. As an important treatment measure for drug-induced acute liver failure, urgent liver transplantation has greatly improved the survival rate of patients. In this article, the classification, clinical diagnosis, liver transplantation evaluation and prognosis of DILI were summarized, aiming to provide reference for the treatment of DILI by liver transplantation.
ABSTRACT
Resumo Este estudo narra a experiência de uma psicóloga em intervenção interdisciplinar realizada com uma criança hospitalizada com condições crônicas complexas de saúde, diagnosticada com amiotrofia muscular espinhal tipo I. A experiência foi vivenciada em conjunto com a terapia ocupacional e o relato foi estruturado a partir do material clínico registrado em diário de campo pela psicóloga da dupla, durante as sessões semanais ao longo de dois anos de acompanhamento. A experiência trouxe desafios e crescimento pessoal à psicóloga, autora deste estudo, bem como à paciente, por meio de atividades lúdicas adaptadas às suas necessidades, ampliando o cuidado para além da dimensão técnica e tecnológica, que são importantes para a garantia do funcionamento orgânico, embora não suficientes para uma qualidade de vida minimamente satisfatória.
Abstract This study narrates the experience of a psychologist in an interdisciplinary intervention carried out with a hospitalized child with Complex Chronic Conditions, diagnosed with Spinal Muscular Amyotrophy Type I. The intervention took place in conjunction with occupational therapy and the report was structured based on clinical material recorded on the psychologist's fieldnotes, during weekly sessions over two years of monitoring. The experience brought challenges and personal growth to the psychologist, author of this study, as well as to the patient, by means of playful activities adapted to her needs, expanding care beyond the technical and technological dimension-which are important to guarantee organic functioning, although insufficient for a minimally satisfactory quality of life.
Résumé Cette étude raconte l'expérience d'une psychologue dans une intervention interdisciplinaire menée auprès d'un enfant hospitalisé atteint de maladies chroniques complexes, diagnostiqué avec une amyotrophie musculaire spinale de type I. L'intervention a eu lieu en conjonction avec l'ergothérapie et le rapport a été structuré à partir du matériel clinique enregistré par le psychologue dans un journal de terrain, au cours de séances hebdomadaires pendant deux ans de suivi. L'expérience a apporté des défis et une croissance personnelle au psychologue, auteur de cette étude, ainsi qu'à la patiente, par le biais d'activités ludiques adaptées à ses besoins, élargissant les soins au-delà de la dimension technique et technologique-qui sont importantes pour assurer le fonctionnement organique, bien qu'insuffisantes pour une qualité de vie minimalement satisfaisante.
Resumen Este estudio presenta la experiencia de una psicóloga en una intervención interdisciplinaria, realizada con una niña hospitalizada con enfermedades complejas crónicas, específicamente con amiotrofia muscular espinal tipo I. La experiencia se dio junto con la terapia ocupacional, y el relato fue estructurado a partir de material clínico registrado por la psicóloga del dúo en un diario de campo, durante sesiones semanales por dos años de monitoreo. La experiencia trajo desafíos y crecimiento personal a la psicóloga, autora de este estudio, así como a la paciente por medio de actividades lúdicas adaptadas a sus necesidades, lo que amplió la atención más allá de la dimensión técnica y tecnológica, elementos importantes para garantizar el funcionamiento orgánico, pero no suficiente para brindarle una calidad de vida mínimamente satisfactoria.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Child, Preschool , Patient Care Team , Spinal Muscular Atrophies of Childhood/psychology , Spinal Muscular Atrophies of Childhood/therapy , Child, HospitalizedABSTRACT
Objective:To study the influence of time-dependent acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score on 14-day death risk in patients with severe stroke, and to provide reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment.Methods:Data of 3 229 patients with severe stroke were enrolled from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-Ⅲ (MIMIC-Ⅲ). According to the main types of stroke, the patients were divided into subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), ischemic stroke (IS) and other groups. According to age, patients were divided into > 60 years old and ≤ 60 years old subgroups. According to the baseline of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, they were divided into subgroups of > 3 and ≤ 3. The daily measured values of APACHE Ⅱ scores in each patient were recorded. And all-cause death within 14 days after admission to intensive care unit (ICU) was used as the outcome index to obtain the survival status and survival time of patients. Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data were established to evaluate the effect of APACHE Ⅱ score measured at multiple time points on the death risk of patients, and a subgroup analysis was performed.Results:Among the joint models, the one which include APACHE Ⅱ score, and the interaction items between APACHE Ⅱ and age showed the better fitting. Further analysis showed that APACHE Ⅱ score was affected by age, gender, hospital admission, baseline SOFA score and smoking history. After controlling for these confounding factors, APACHE Ⅱ score was significantly associated with 14-day all-cause death in patients with severe stroke [hazard ratio ( HR) = 1.48, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 1.31-1.66, P < 0.001], which indicated that the risk of death increased by 48% (95% CI was 31%-66%) for each 1-point increase in APACHE Ⅱ score. Subgroup analysis showed that for different types of severe stroke patients, APACHE Ⅱ score had a greater impact on the risk of 14-day death in SAH patients ( HR = 1.43, 95% CI was 1.10-1.85), but had a smaller impact on ICH and IS groups [HR (95% CI) was 1.37 (1.15-1.64) and 1.35 (1.06-1.71), respectively]. There was no significant difference in APACHE Ⅱ score on the risk of 14-day death between the patients aged > 60 years old and those aged ≤ 60 years old [ HR (95% CI): 1.37 (1.08-1.72) vs. 1.35 (1.07-1.70), respectively]. Compared with patients with SOFA score > 3, APACHE Ⅱ score had a greater impact on the risk of 14-day death in patients with SOFA score ≤ 3 [ HR (95% CI): 1.40 (1.16-1.70) vs. 1.34 (1.16-1.55)]. Conclusion:Time-dependent APACHE Ⅱ score is an important indicator to evaluate the risk of death in patients with severe stroke.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the risk factors of intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW) in patients with sepsis, and to evaluate the predictive value of each risk factor for ICUAW.Methods:A case control study was conducted, 60 septic patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Henan Provincial People's Hospital from October 20, 2020 to February 20, 2021 were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups: sepsis ICUAW group and sepsis non-ICUAW group. The data of gender, age, body mass index (BMI), acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ(APACHEⅡ) score, complications, mechanical ventilation, duration of ICUAW, length of stay in ICU, fasting blood glucose, blood lactic acid (Lac), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, outcome, antimicrobial agent, glucocorticoid, sedatives and analgesics drugs and vasoactive drugs were collected. Risk factors were screened by univariate Logistic regression analysis, and odds ratio ( OR) was adjusted by multivariate binary logistic regression, P < 0.05 was considered as independent risk factors. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn to analyze the predictive value of independent risk factors. Results:The APACHEⅡ score of the sepsis ICUAW group was significantly higher than that of the sepsis non-ICUAW group (23.05±8.17 vs. 15.33±4.89, P < 0.05), the total length of stay in the ICU was significantly longer than that of the sepsis non-ICUAW group (days: 15.1±9.2 vs. 8.5±3.4, P < 0.05), the improvement rate of patients was significantly lower than that of the sepsis non-ICUAW group [45.0% (9/20) vs. 95.0% (38/40), P < 0.05]. After univariate Logistic regression and multicollinearity test analysis, 7 factors including APACHEⅡ score, average SOFA score, blood lactic acid, proportion of mechanical ventilation, sedatives and analgesics drugs, type of antibiotics and type of vasoactive drugs were included in the binary Logistic regression model [ OR: 1.21, 2.05, 2.26, 0.21, 1.54, 2.07, 1.38, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.09-1.35, 1.42-2.94, 1.12-4.57, 0.05-0.66, 1.03-2.29, 1.27-3.37, 0.96-2.00, all P < 0.05]. Hosmer-Lemchaw test P = 0.901, and the correct percentage of prediction was 85%, indicating good model fit. Multivariate binary Logistic regression analysis showed that APACHEⅡ score and average SOFA score were independent risk factors for the occurrence of ICUAW in septic patients (APACHEⅡscore: OR = 1.17, 95% CI was 1.004-1.376, P = 0.044; average SOFA score: OR = 1.86, 95% CI was 1.157-2.981, P = 0.01). ROC curve analysis showed that the mean value of APACHEⅡ score, average SOFA score and their combined detection had a certain predictive value for the occurrence of ICUAW in sepsis patients, areas under ROC curve (AUC) were 0.787, 0.881, 0.905, 95% CI was 0.646-0.928, 0.791-0.972, 0.828-0.982, all P < 0.05. When the cut-off value was 19.500, 6.225, 0.375, the sensitivity was 75%, 90%, 90%, and the specificity were 80%, 80%, 85%, respectively. Conclusion:APACHEⅡ score and average SOFA score can be used as independent risk factors for the occurrence of ICUAW in sepsis, and their combined predictive value is better than that of individual index.
ABSTRACT
This cross-sectional research was carried out in the College of Medicine at the University of Taif, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.It included a random sample of medical students in 4th, 5th and 6th years (males and females). Data were collected using asemi-structured, self-administered questionnaire, including comprehensive, anonymous demographic and socioeconomicdata, lifestyle factors, health related quality of life, social support, student’s academic motivation, the past year grade pointaverage (GPA). The study included 261 students. The age ranged between 21 and 27 years (22.8±1.1 years). Malesrepresented 55.9% of the participants. Moreover, non-smokers, membership in charity association, having higher score ofpsychological domain of quality of life, and higher learning strategies score were significantly associated with grade pointaverage (GPA) score and they are responsible for 21.5% variability of the score. From the results it could be concluded thatAcademic performance of senior medical students in Taif University, manifested by GPA score is influenced by many factors(multi-factorial) that are responsible for only 21.5% of variability in grade point average (GPA).
ABSTRACT
Background: Acute pancreatitis is a common disease with wide clinical variation and its incidence is increasing. Acute pancreatitis may vary in severity, from mild self-limiting pancreatic inflammation to pancreatic necrosis with life-threatening sequelae. The severity of acute pancreatitis is linked to the presence of systemic organ dysfunctions and/or necrotizing pancreatitis. Aim of the study: To compare the efficacy of Ranson scoring with APACHE II scoring system in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. Materials and methods: The present study was a prospective study of 33 cases of Acute pancreatitis admitted in Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai, during the study period of July 2014 to September 2014. 33 cases for the purpose of the study were selected on the basis of the nonprobability (purposive) sampling method. multiple clinical and laboratory variables of both Ranson and APACHE II scoring system and the final score of the patient from both the scoring systems are assessed to know their efficacy in predicting the severity of the disease (higher the score more severe the disease). Results: Overall, 8(24.2%) patients suffered from severe pancreatitis and 25(75.7%) had mild acute pancreatitis of which all 8 had severe attack as per APACHE II score (>8) and only 3 of these were considered severe by Ranson score (>3). The systemic complications were a multiorgan failure in 2(6.06%), respiratory 1(3.03%) and renal 1(3.03%) all seen in patients with the severe score as per APACHE II. Umarani Subramaniam, Ahila Muthuselvi, Kesavan. A comparative study between APACHE II and Ranson scoring systems in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. IAIM, 2019; 6(4): 55-59. Page 56 Conclusion: The early diagnosis and precise scoring of disease severity are important goals in the initial evaluation and management of pancreatitis. Pancreatitis not only must be differentiated from a myriad of other potential diagnoses, but patients must also be stratified to identify those with severe disease and to guide appropriate therapy.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the value of a new community-acquired pneumonia severity index(CPSI) in predicting the severity and mortality of patients with community-acquired pneumonia(CAP).Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted.Patients with CAP in critical care medicine of the First People's Hospital of Chenzhou were enrolled in this study.According to whether the patients died within 28 days,patients were divided into the survival group and the death group.The difference of sex,age,vital signs,blood test,the lowest Glasgow coma score (GCS) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score,sepsis related organ failure assessment (SOFA)score,CURB-65 (confusion,uremia,respiratory rate,BP,age 65 years) score,pneumonia severity index (PSI) score and community-acquired pneumonia severity index (CPSI) score were compared between the two groups.Logistic regression analysis was performed for the scoring systems with statistical significance in univariate analysis.The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was drawn to analyze the prognostic value of each scoring system.Results Totally 283 patients were enrolled in this study (184 survivals and 99 deaths,mortality rate 35％).Univariate analysis showed that age,mechanical ventilation (MV) ratio,the fastest heart beat rate (HR),the lowest systolic blood pressure (SBP),the lowest mean blood pressure (MAP),pressure adjusted shock index (PASI),inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2),arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2),and oxygenation index (PO2/FiO2),blood urea nitrogen concentration (BUN),serum creatinine concentration (Scr),urine output,length of ICU stay,the lowest GCS,and APACHE Ⅱ score were significantly different between the two groups (P＜0.05).Multivariate regression analysis showed that CPSI score and SOFA score were independent risk factors for patients with CAP.The ROC curve of CAP patients was predicted in each scoring system,and the area under the ROC curve of CPSI score (0.728),SOFA and age score (0.708),PSI score (0.701),APACHE Ⅱ score (0.690),CURB-65 score (0.687) and SOFA score (0.683) gradually decreased.The sensitivity and specificity of the area under curve prediction showed that CPSI score was superior to the other scores.Conclusions The CPSI score can evaluate the severity of CAP patients,efficiently predict the outcome of patients with CAP,and can be widely used in clinical practice.