ABSTRACT
Objectives: This study evaluated the infl uence of mechanical and thermal cycling on the nanoleakageof Class V composite resin restorations with and without enamel beveling. Material and method:Using 60 Class V cavities prepared on the buccal surfaces of human molars, specimens were dividedinto two groups (n = 30) based on the confi gurations of the enamel cavosurface margins. (beveled andnon-beveled) After restoring the cavity preparations with a fl owable composite, half of the specimenswere mechanically load-cycled. The specimens were sealed leaving a 1 mm window around the cervicaland enamel margins. Specimens were placed in a 50% (W/V) silver nitrate solution then immersedin photodeveloping solution and exposed to fl uorescent light for 8h. The teeth were buccolinguallysectioned, gold sputter coated and examined with a SEM to evaluate the nanoleakage values. The datawere analyzed using two-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Results: Enamel margin confi guration had no significant effect on nanoleakage (p > 0.05). However, the nanoleakage value was signifi cantly higher inthe load-cycled group than in the group not load-cycled (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Since enamel margin confi guration does not affect nanoleakage, there is no need to bevel enamel margins of Class V cavitypreparations for composite restorations.
Objetivos: O presente estudo avaliou a infl uência dos ciclos de carga mecânico e térmico na nanoinfi ltração derestaurações Classe V em resinas compostas, com e sem biselamento do esmalte. Material e método: Os espécimes(60 cavidades Classe V preparadas na superfície vestibular de molares humanos) foram divididos em dois grupos(n = 30) baseados nas confi gurações das margens cavosuperfi ciais do esmalte (biseladas e não biseladas). Após restauraçãodos preparos cavitários com um compósito tipo fl ow, metade dos espécimes foi carregada mecanicamente.Os espécimes foram selados mantendo janela de 1 mm em torno das margens cervical e de esmalte. Os espécimesforam colocados em solução de nitrato de prata (50%), imersos na sequência em solução processadora fotográfi cae expostos à luz fl uorescente por oito horas. Os dentes foram cortados em sentido vestíbulo-lingual, revestidos emouro e observados em microscopia eletrônica para avaliar os valores de nanoinfi ltração. Os dados foram analisadospelo ANOVA (α = 0,05). Resultados: A confi guração das margens do esmalte não teve efeito signifi cante nananoinfi ltração (p > 0,05). Entretanto, os valores da nanoinfi ltração foram signifi cativamente mais altos no grupode carga que no grupo sem carga (p > 0,05). Conclusão: Uma vez que a confi guração da margem do esmalte nãoafeta a nanoinfi ltração, não há necessidade de biselar as margens do esmalte nos preparos de cavidades Classe V emrestaurações de compósitos.
Subject(s)
Humans , Composite Resins/chemistry , Dental Leakage , Dental Enamel/chemistry , In Vitro Techniques , Dental Cavity Preparation/methods , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surface Properties , Time FactorsABSTRACT
This study evaluated the marginal microleakage of five single step adhesives. Class V cavity preparations with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of extracted human molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into five groups and restored using one of the single step adhesives and composite resins: Prompt L-Pop/Filtek Z-250 (Group 1), AQ Bond/Metafil CX (Group 2), One-Up Bond F/Palfique Toughwell (Group 3), Futurabond/Admira (Group 4), Xeno III/Spectrum TPH (Group 5). The restored teeth were thermocycled. Microleakage was assessed by dye penetration using 2% methylene blue dye solution. The teeth were bisected buccolingually and evaluated for microleakage under steromicroscope. The data were statistically analysed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney tests. The results of this study were as follows; 1. Microleakage of enamel margins in group 3 was statistically higher than that in groups 1, 2, 4, 5 (p < 0.05). 2. Microleakage of dentin margins in group 1 was statistically higher than that in groups 2, 5, and that in group 3 was statistically higher than that in groups 2, 4, 5 (p < 0.05). 3. Dentin marginal microleakage was higher than enamel marginal microleakage in all experimental groups. In conclusion, Prompt L-Pop showed the least leakage at enamel margin, and AQ Bond showed at dentin margin in this study. Marginal miroleakage in dentin was higher than that in enamel.