Promoting teaching quality by portfolio assessment in Cell Engineering classroom / 生物工程学报

We introduce the portfolio assessment into the classroom teaching reform in the curriculum of Cell Engineering, a specialty course in bioengineering & biotechnology. We established a complete classroom evaluation system that was divided the classroom assessment system of portfolio into four stages including the preparation stage, training stage, implementation stage and exhibition stage. We also discuss the feasibility and necessity of implementing the portfolio evaluation method in the course of cell engineering, the construction of evaluation system, and the key points and matters needing attention in the implementation process. The classroom reform is very productive, not only the classroom atmosphere has been activated, students' learning initiative and autonomy has been enhanced, but also the students' ability to analyze and solve professional problems related to cell engineering technology has been improved. The implementation of classroom teaching reform of this course can provide reference for other similar professional courses in colleges and universities.

Comparative study on classroom teaching quality evaluation standard of teachers and students / 中华医学教育探索杂志

Objective To study classroom teaching quality evaluation standards from two perspectives of teachers and students,and comparatively study difference of evaluation standards for teachers and students.Methods Questionnaire survey method is adopted.Classroom teaching quality evaluation entry questionnaire is distributed to 320 teachers and 560 students.SPSS 18.0 software is utilized for statistical analysis on the collected data.Expert consultation method is applied to determine membership degree on the analysis results.Finally,14 experts and 20 students are invited to sequence the importance of each dimension obtained after membership determination.Expert evaluation method is used for calculating the weight of each dimension thereof.Results Generally,the results show that all the teaching quality evaluation standards which have been selected by teachers and students can be assorted into 5 dimensionalities,namely teaching content,teaching method,teaching norm,teaching organization and students' learning condition.Particularly,teachers maintain that 23 indicators can be chosen to assess the classroom teaching quality while students think that 24 items are qualified for evaluating the room teaching quality,and they reach a consensus in 13 items.Besides,there is a big difference in their weight of the 5 dimensionalities.Conclusions By comparing and analyzing the choices and opinions about the classroom teaching quality evaluation standard between teachers and students,we learn that the two relative groups' assessments and comments are far different mainly attributing to their different evaluation perspectives on classroom teaching quality.Therefore,we advise different evaluation indicator systems should be adopted respectively for evaluation subjects in classroom teaching quality evaluation.